Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical Considerations in Pharmacokinetic Study Design

  • Review Article
  • Clinical Pharmacokinetic Concepts
  • Published:
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Pharmacokinetic studies may generally be categorised into 3 types: (a) population-based investigations, (b) individual-based compartmental, or (c) individual-based noncompartmental research projects. Each type of study has advantages and limitations.

Population-based investigations pool drug concentrations across more than 1 individual subject. From these data, estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters are calculated. NONMEM is the only computer program available to evaluate this type of information. Recently a method has been proposed which derives individual estimates from the information available from NONMEM. By combining these 2 procedures it is possible for the clinician to review and adjust the dosage regimen if necessary.

Population-based studies require fewer design criteria than other methods and are adaptable to the clinical setting, i.e. subjects can be patients currently being treated with the drug under consideration. One distinct advantage to this type of study is the flexibility of sampling times and the capability of the clinician to use information from the critically ill, the geriatric patient or the very young child. These subjects would not be available for the individual-based type of study because of the relatively large number of samples needed.

Individual-based pharmacokinetic studies can be divided into 2 types with respect to their evaluation: (a) compartmental and (b) noncompartmental investigations. The latter type of study was originally thought to require fewer assumptions than the former but subsequently it has been shown that noncompartmental analyses are more restrictive and are basically compartmental in their approach. These studies estimate parameters which the compartmental investigation does not usually consider. These include area under the moment curve (AUMC) and mean residence time (MRT).

The individual-based compartmental approach to pharmacokinetics is best carried out in the laboratory setting. Estimates of the pharmacokinetic parameters are calculated for each individual in the study. This requires obtaining many samples from each subject and hence is not suitable for the critically ill patient.

Hypothesis testing and interval estimation are predicated on the underlying sampling distributions of the estimates. Without information regarding these distributions the investigator is advised to use the appropriate nonparametric statistical procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antel J, Grasela TH, Smith RB. The application of population pharmacokinetic analysis to large scale clinical efficacy trials. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 19: 37S–46S, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoszynski R, Powers J. Construction of best confidence intervals for half-lives. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 13: 1–6, 1990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beal SL, Sheiner LB. NONMEM users’ guide, University of California Press, San Francisco, California, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • DiStefano III JJ, Landaw EM. Multiexponential multicompartmental and noncompartmental modelling I: methodological limitations and physiological interpretations. American Journal of Physiology 246: R651–R664, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Endrenyi L. Design of experiments for estimating enzyme and pharmacokinetic parameters: kinetic data analysis, pp. 137–167, Plenum Press, New York, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey KR, Chapman MJ. The problem of model indistinguishability in pharmacokinetics. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 17: 229–267, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grasela TH, Sheiner LB. Pharmacostatistical modelling for observational data. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 19: 25S–37S, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieve AP. On the construction of shortest confidence intervals and Bayesian highest posterior density intervals. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 14: 395–399, 1991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto Y, Sheiner LB. Designs for population pharmacodynamics: value of pharmacokinetic data and population analysis. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 19: 333–353. 1991

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander M, Wolfe DA. Nonparametric statistical methods, pp. 48–51, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch GG. The use of nonparametric methods in the statistical analysis of the two-period change-over design. Biometrics 28: 577–584, 1972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey L, Dunne A. The design of pharmacokinetic experiments for model discrimination. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 16: 351–365, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam FC, Hung CT, Perrier DG. Estimation of variance for harmonic mean half-lives. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 74: 229–231, 1985

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landaw EM, Distefano III JJ. Multiexponential, multicompartmental and noncompartmental modelling II: data analysis and statistical considerations. American Journal of Physiology 246: R665–R677, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maitre PO, Buher M, Thomson D, Stanski DR. A three-step approach combining Bayesian regression and NONMEM population analysis: application to midazolam. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 19: 377–384, 1991

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mallet A, Mentri F, Steiner J, Lokeic F. Nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation for population pharmacokinetics, with application to cyclosporin. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 12: 311–327, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzler CM. Extended least squares (ELS) for pharmacokinetic models. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 76: 565–571, 1987

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metzler CM, Elfring GL, McEwen AJ. A user’s manual for NONLIN and associated programs, Upjohn, Kalamazoo, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck CC, Beal SL, Sheiner LB, Nichols AI. Extended least squares nonlinear regression: a possible solution to the ‘choice of weights’ problem in analysis of individual pharmacokinetic data. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 12: 545–558, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powers JJ. Statistical analysis of pharmacokinetic data. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 13: 113–120, 1990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambol NC, Clementi WA, Sheiner LB. Population dose-response relationships determined from efficacy trials: the anti-hypertensive effect of atenolol and betaxolol. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 19: 79S–91S, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuirmann DJ. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 15: 657–680, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner LB. Analysis of pharmacokinetic data using parametric models I: regression models. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 12: 93–117, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner LB. Analysis of pharmacokinetic data using parametric models II: point estimates of an individual’s parameters. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 13: 515–540, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner LB. Analysis of pharmacokinetic data using parametric models III: hypothesis tests and confidence intervals. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 14: 539–555, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner LB, Barr R, Marathe VV. Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 5: 445, 1977

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner LB, Beal SL. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates from several least squares procedures: superiority of extended least squares. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 13: 185–201, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner LB, Grasela TH. An introduction to mixed effect modelling: concepts, definitions and justification. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 19: 11S–23S, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake WJ. Use of confidence intervals in analysis of comparative bioavailability trials. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 61: 1340–1341, 1972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White DB, Walawander CY, Tung Y, Grasela TH. An evaluation of point and interval estimates in population pharmacokinetics using NONMEM analysis. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 19: 87–112, 1991

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaoka K, Nakagawa T, Uno T. Application of Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Bio-pharmaceutics 6: 165–175, 1978

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Powers, J.D. Statistical Considerations in Pharmacokinetic Study Design. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 24, 380–387 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199324050-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199324050-00003

Keywords

Navigation