Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Labour Analgesia

A Risk-Benefit Analysis

  • Review Articles
  • Risk-Benefit Assessment
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The pain associated with labour can be severe. The ideal labour analgesic does not exist and systemic opioids provide little relief. Nausea, vomiting and sedation are common adverse effects of systemic opioids. Paracervical block can relieve only the pain of the first stage of labour. The duration of analgesia obtained using paracervical block is limited and repeat blocks increase the risk of direct fetal injection.

Epidural analgesia effectively relieves labour pain. The insertion of an epidural catheter can provide continuous analgesia throughout labour. In addition, the catheter can be used to provide surgical anaesthesia, should operative delivery be required. Epidural local anaesthetics commonly produce maternal hypotension and motor blockade. However, opioids potentiate the effect of epidural local anaesthetics. Thus, concomitant epidural opioid injection allows the use of lower concentrations of local anaesthetics, decreasing the frequency and severity of hypotension and motor blockade. Epidural analgesia has other, potentially catastrophic, adverse effects but, with safe clinical practice, these problems are extremely rare.

Intrathecal injection of opioids or local anaesthetics also provides effective labour analgesia. However, no single intrathecal drug or drug combination reliably provides analgesia for the duration of labour. Many clinicians use both intrathecal and epidural analgesia as a combined spinal-epidural technique. This approach provides the rapid onset of intrathecal drugs and the flexibility of continuous epidural block.

Fetal heart rate decelerations occasionally follow the use of any of the above labour analgesic techniques. Most studies of the aetiology of fetal heart rate decelerations have focused on factors unique to each analgesic technique. However, the similar timing and appearance of fetal bradycardia suggests a common cause. Induction of maternal analgesia may transiently alter the balance between factors encouraging and inhibiting uterine contraction. A temporary increase in the uterotonic effects of endogenous or exogenous oxytocin may then produce a tetanic uterine contraction with subsequent decrease fetal oxygen delivery and resultant fetal bradycardia. Regardless of aetiology, these bradycardias are transient and should not produce maternal or fetal morbidity.

Much controversy surrounds the effects of analgesia, especially epidural block, on the course and outcome of labour. Various studies have reported that epidural analgesia slows labour, increases the incidence of malposition of the fetal head, increases the need for forceps delivery and increases the risk of caesarean delivery. Most of the studies reporting these effects are retrospective and nonrandomised. More careful studies suggest that specific anaesthetic techniques (i.e. local anaesthetic-opioid mixtures) or obstetrical management can limit or eliminate these ‘risks’ of epidural labour analgesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lederman RP, McCann DS, Work B, et al. Endogenous plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine in last-trimester pregnancy and labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 129: 5–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lederman RP, Lederman E, Work Jr B, et al. Anxiety and epinephrine in multiparous women in labor: relationship to duration of labor and fetal heart rate pattern. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 870–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Abboud TK, Artal R, Henriksen EH, et al. Effects of spinal anesthesia on maternal circulating catecholamines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 252–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hibbard BM, Anderson MM, Drife JO, et al. Deaths associated with anaesthesia. Report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom 1988–1990, London: HMSO, 1994d: 80–95

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mercer WH, Simons EG, Philpott RH. The use of lumbar epidural analgesia during the first stage of labour in high-risk pregnancies. S Afr Med J 1974; 48: 774–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thorp JA, Parisi VM, Boylan PC, et al. The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 670–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thorp JA, Eckert LO, Mathew SA, et al. Epidural analgesia and cesarean section for dystocia: risk factors in nulliparas. Am J Perinatol 1991; 8: 402–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Newton ER, Shroeder BC, Knape KG, et al. Epidural analgesia and uterine function. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 749–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jensen F, Ingelise Q, Brocks V, et al. Submucous paracervical blockade compared with intramuscular meperidine as analgesia during labor: a double-blinded study. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 724–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rayburn WF, Smith CV, Parriott JE, et al. Randomized comparison of meperidine and fentanyl during labor. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 604–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Garner EG, Smith CV, Rayburn WF. Maternal respiratory arrest associated with intravenous fentanyl use during labor. A case report. J Reprod Med 1994; 39: 818–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Petrie RH, Yeh S, Murata Y, et al. The effect of drugs on fetal heart rate variability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 130: 294–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanto F. Obstetric analgesia: clinical pharmacokinetic considerations. Clin Pharmacokinet 1986; 11: 283–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hibbard LT, Snyder EM, McVann RM. Subgluteal and retropsoal infection in obstetric practice. Obstet Gynecol 1972; 39: 137–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaylord TG, Pearson JW. Neuropathy following paracervical block in the obstetric patient. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 521–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grimes DA, Cates Jr W. Deaths from paracervical anesthesia used for first-trimester abortion. N Engl J Med 1973; 295: 1397–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cibils LA. Response of human uterine arteries to local anesthetics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126: 202–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Freeman RK, Gutierrez NA, Ray ML, et al. Fetal cardiac response to paracervical block anesthesia. Part I. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 113: 583–91

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shnider SM, Asling JH, Holl JW, et al. Paracervical block anesthesia in obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 107: 619–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rogers RE. Fetal bradycardia associated with paracervical block anesthesia in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 106: 913–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dodson WE, Hillman RE, Hillman LH. Brain tissue levels in a fatal case of neonatal mepivacaine (Carbocaine) poisoning. J Pediatr 1975; 86: 624–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Merkow AJ, McGuiness GA, Erenberg A, et al. The neonatal neurobehavioral effects of bupivacaine, mepivacaine, and 2-chloroprocaine used for pudendal block. Anesthesiology 1980; 52: 309–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Crawford JS. Lumbar epidural block in labour: a clinical analysis. Br J Anaesth 1972; 44: 66–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Crawford JS. The second thousand epidural blocks in an obstetric hospital practice. Br J Anaesth 1972; 44: 1277–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Eberle RL, Norris MC, Mallozzi Eberle A, et al. The effect of maternal position on fetal heart rate during epidural or intrathecal analgesia for labor [abstract]. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: A944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Paech MJ. The King Edward Memorial Hospital 1000 mother survey of methods of pain relief in labour. Anaesth Intensive Care 1991; 19: 393–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramin SM, Gambling DR, Lucas MJ, et al. Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labor. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86: 783–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Macdonald R. Dr Doughty’s technique for the location of the epidural space [letter]. Anaesthesia 1983; 38: 71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Norris MC, Grieco WM, Borkowski M, et al. Complications of labor analgesia: epidural versus combined spinal epidural techniques. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 529–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Norris MC, Leighton BL, DeSimone CA. Needle bevel direction and headache after inadvertent durai puncture. Anesthesiology 1989; 70: 729–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Östman PL. Complications associated with regional anesthsia in the obstetric patient. In: Norris MC, editor. Obstetric anesthesia. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1993: 763–99

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ravindran RS, Viegas OJ, Tasch JD, et al. Bearing down at the time of delivery and the incidence of spinal headache in parturients. Anesth Analg 1981; 60: 524–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lybecker H, Möller JT, May O, et al. Incidence and prediction of postdural puncture headache. A prospective study of 1021 spinal anesthetics. Anesth Analg 1990; 70: 389–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bart AJ, Wheeler AS. Comparison of epidural saline placement and epidural blood placement in the treatment of post-lumbar-puncture headache. Anesth 1978; 48: 221–3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Norris MC, Leighton BL. Continuous spinal anesthesia after unintentional durai puncture in parturients. Reg Anesth 1990; 15: 285–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Colonna-Romano P, Shapiro BE. Unintentional durai puncture and prophylactic epidural blood patch in obstetrics. Anesth Analg 1989; 69: 522–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Eerola M, Kaukinen L, Kaukinen S. Fatal brain lesion following spinal anaesthesia. Report of a case. Acta Anaesthiol Scand 1981; 25: 115–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Camann WR, Denney RA, Holby ED, et al. A comparison of intrathecal, epidural, and intravenous sufentanil for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 884–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Vertommen JD, Vandermeulen E, Van Aken H, et al. The effects of the addition of sufentanil to 0.125% bupivacaine on the quality of analgesia during labor and on the incidence of instrumental deliveries. Anesthesiology 1991; 74: 809–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chestnut DH, Vanderwalker GE, Owen CL, et al. The influence of continuous epidural bupivacaine analgesia on the second stage of labor and method of delivery in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology 1987; 66: 774–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Chestnut DH, Laszewski LJ, Pollack KL, et al. Continuous epidural infusion of 0.0625% bupivacaine-0.0002% fentanyl during the second stage of labor. Anesthesiology 1990; 72: 613–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Scott DB, Tunstall ME. Serious complications associated with epidural/ spinal blockade in obstetrics: a two-year prospective study. Int J Obstet Anesth 1995; 4: 133–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. VanZundert A. Is there a need for chloroprocaine 3% and bupivacaine 0.75%? Acta Anaesth Belg 1988; 39: 155

    Google Scholar 

  44. Leighton BL. Anesthetic complications: intraoperative. In: Norris MC, editor. Obstetric anesthesia. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1993: 615–44

    Google Scholar 

  45. Grove LH. Backache, headache and bladder dysfunction after delivery. Br J Anaesth 1973; 45: 1147–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Moir DD, Davidson S. Postpartum complications of forceps delivery performed under epidural and pudendal nerve block. Br J Anaesth 1972; 44: 1197–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Macarthur C, Lewis M, Knox EG, et al. Epidural anaesthesia and long term backache after childbirth. BMJ 1990; 301: 9–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Macarthur AJ, Macarthur C, Weeks S. Epidural anesthesia and postpartum back pain [abstract]. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: A973

    Google Scholar 

  49. Breen TW, Ransil BJ, Groves PA, et al. Factors associated with back pain after childbirth. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 29–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Abboud TK, Khoo SS, Miller F, et al. Maternal, fetal, and neonatal responses after epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine, 2-chloroprocaine, or lidocaine. Anesth Analg 1982; 61: 638–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Steiger RM, Nageotte MP. Effect of uterine contractility and maternal hypotension on prolonged decelerations after bupivacaine epidural anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 808–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Sepowski CM, Lester BM, Ostheimer GW, et al. The effects of maternal epidural anesthesia on neonatal behavior during the first month. Devel Med Child Neurol 1992; 34: 1072–80

    Google Scholar 

  53. Baraka A, Noueihid R, Hajj S. Intrathecal morphine for obstetric analgesia. Anesthesiology 1981; 54: 136–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Abboud TK, Shnider SM, Dailey PA, et al. Intrathecal administration of hyperbaric morphine for the relief of pain in labour. Br J Anaesth 1984; 56: 1351–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Gaiser RR, Adams HK, Cheek TG, et al. Comparison of three different doses of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil for labor analgesia. Abstracts of Scientific Papers, Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, 1995; 113

  56. Honet JE, Arkoosh VA, Norris MC, et al. Comparison among intrathecal fentanyl, meperidine, and sufentanil for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 1992; 75: 734–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Grieco WM, Norris MC, Leighton BL, et al. Intrathecal sufentanil labor analgesia: the effects of adding morphine or epinephrine. Anesth Analg 1993; 77: 1149–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Holmström B, Rawal N, Axelsson K, et al. Risk of catheter migration during combined spinal epidural block: percutaneous epiduroscopy study. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 747–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sprotte G, Schedel R, Pajunk H. An atraumatic needle for single-shot regional anethesia. Reg Anesth 1987; 10: 104–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Baker MN, Sarna MC. Respiratory arrest after second dose of intrathecal sufentanil. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 231–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Abouleish E. Apnoea associated with the intrathecal administration of morphine on obstetrics. Br J Anaesth 1988; 60: 592–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Hayes RL, Palmer CM. Respiratory depression after intrathecal sufentanil during labor. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 511–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Harding SA, Collis RE, Morgan BM. Meningitis after combined spinal-extradural anaesthesia in obstetrics. Br J Anaesth 1994; 73: 545–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Clarke VT, Smiley RM, Finster M. Uterine hyperactivity after intrathecal injection of fentanyl for analgesia during labor: a cause of fetal bradycardia? [letter]. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 1083

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Paul RH, Freeman RK. Fetal cardiac response to paracervical block anesthesia. Part II. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 113: 592–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Hunter CA. Uterine motility studies during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963; 85: 681–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Shnider SM, Abboud TK, Artal R, et al. Maternal catechola-mines decrease during labor after lumbar epidural anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 147: 13–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Studd JWW, Crawford JS, Duignan NM, et al. The effect of lumbar epidural analgesia on the rate of cervical dilatation and the outcome of labour of spontaneous onset. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980; 87: 1013–21

    Google Scholar 

  69. Chestnut DH, McGrath JM, Vincent Jr RD, et al. Does early administration of epidural analgesia affect obstetric outcome in nulliparous women who are in spontaneous labor? Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 1201–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Chestnut DH, Vincent Jr RD, McGrath JM, et al. Does early administration of epidural analgesia affect obstetric outcome in nulliparous women who are receiving intravenous oxytocin. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 1193–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Parker RK. Influence of labor epidural management on outcome in obstetrics [abstract]. Reg Anesth 1992; 17: 31

    Google Scholar 

  72. Floberg J, Belfrage P, Ohlsén H. Influence of pelvic outlet capacity on fetal head presentation at delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 127–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Naulty JS, March MG, Leavitt KL, et al. Effect of changes in labor analgesic practice on labor outcome [abstract]. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: A979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Hoult IJ, MacLennan AH, Carrie LES. Lumbar epidural analgesia in labour: relation to fetal malposition and instrumental delivery. BMJ 1977; 1: 14–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Hawkins JL, Hess KR, Kubicek MA, et al. A reevaluation of the association between instrument delivery and epidural analgesia. Reg Anesth 1995; 20: 50–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Thorburn J, Moir DD. Extradural analgesia: the influence of volume and concentration of bupivacaine on the mode of delivery, analgesic efficacy, and motor block. Br J Anaesth 1981; 53: 933–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Kaminski HM, Stafl A, Aimen J. The effect of epidural analgesia on the frequency of instrumental obstetric delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 770–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Chestnut DH, Vandewalker GE, Owen CL, et al. The influence of continuous epidural bupivacaine analgesia on the second stage of labor and method of delivery in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology 1987; 66: 774–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Maresh M, Choong K-H, Beard RW. Delayed pushing with lumbar epidural analgesia in labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 623–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Saunders NJ, Spiby H, Gilbert L, et al. Oxytocin infusion during second stage of labour in primiparous women using epidural analgesia: a randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. BMJ 1989; 299: 1423–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Diro M, Beydoun SN. Segmental epidural analgesia in labor: a matched control study. J Nat Med Assoc 1985; 78: 569–73

    Google Scholar 

  82. Lieberman E, Cohen A, Lang JM, et al. The association of epidural anesthesia with cesarean section in low risk women [abstract]. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172(Pt2): 176

    Google Scholar 

  83. Willdeck-Lund G, Lindmark G, Nilsson BA. Effect of segmentai epidural block on the course of labour and the condition of the infant during the neonatal period. Acta Anaesth Scand 1979; 23: 301–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Philipsen T, Jensen N-H. Epidural block or parenteral pethidine as analgesic in labour: a randomized study concerning progress in labour and instrumental deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989; 30: 27–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Thorp JA, Hu DH, Albin RM, et al. The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 160: 851–8

    Google Scholar 

  86. Gribble RK, Meier PR. Effect of epidural analgesia on the primary cesarean rate. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 231–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Neuhoff D, Burke MS, Porreco RP. Cesarean birth for failed progress in labor. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 915–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA

    Robert L. Eberle

  2. Department of Anaesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, USA

    Mark C. Norris

Authors
  1. Robert L. Eberle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark C. Norris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark C. Norris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eberle, R.L., Norris, M.C. Labour Analgesia. Drug-Safety 14, 239–251 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-199614040-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-199614040-00004

Keywords

Search

Navigation