Skip to main content
Log in

Flutamide

A Preliminary Review of its Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties, and Therapeutic Efficacy; in Advanced Prostatic Cancer

  • Drug Evaluation
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Synopsis

Flutamide is a non-steroidal antiandrogenic drug devoid of hormonal agonist activity. Flutamide appears to be a specific antiandrogen only at androgen-dependent accessory genital organs. Its pharmacological activity is due substantially to the principal metabolite, 2-hydroxyflutamide. In comparative trials involving small numbers of patients with previously untreated advanced prostatic cancer, flutamide 750mg daily is comparable with stilboestrol 1 or 3mg daily and with estramustine 560 or 840mg daily. Treatment of newly diagnosed advanced prostatic cancer with flutamide plus a luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist has produced very promising results, and appears to prolong survival relative to that achieved with leuprolide alone. However, these results require confirmation in suitably designed prospective studies. In previously treated patients refractory to castration, flutamide 750mg daily appears comparable in efficacy to estramustine phosphate 600 mg/m2 daily. Apart from a high incidence (34 to 100%) of gynaecomastia flutamide monotherapy is usually well tolerated, and has the advantage of preserving libido and sexual potency in at least 80% of patients. Gynaecomastia is infrequent, however, when flutamide is used in conjunction with surgical castration or an LHRH agonist. Thus, flutamide is a suitable alternative to other systemic treatment in patients with advanced prostatic cancer who wish to preserve sexual potency. In combination with an LHRH agonist flutamide may become a first-line agent for previously untreated patients with cancer of the prostate.

Pharmacodynamic Properties

Flutamide is a non-steroidal antiandrogenic drug devoid of hormone agonist activity. In animal studies flutamide has been shown to be a specific antagonist at the androgen-dependent seminal vesicles and ventral prostate. Androgen receptor binding studies using human benign prostatic tissue demonstrated that the hydroxylated metabolite was more active than flutamide itself in suppressing the nuclear uptake of 3H-testosterone, as was cyproterone acetate. Intraprostatic levels of androgen receptors and testosterone were depressed more following treatment with flutamide plus castration than with surgical castration alone. Administration of flutamide to patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy caused a significant increase in mean serum concentrations of testosterone, oestradiol and luteinising hormone (LH) due to simulation of an androgen deficit resulting in increased release of gonadotrophin, while cyproterone acetate, which possesses antigona-dotrophin activity, depressed mean plasma concentrations of testosterone, oestradiol, LH and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). Flutamide also increased serum concentrations of LH and FSH in surgically castrated patients. These increases are prevented by the concomitant administration of a luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist and such a combination forms the basis of ’complete androgen blockade’ therapy, advocated by some investigators as initial treatment in patients with newly diagnosed advanced prostatic cancer (see below). Administration of flutamide to postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer depressed levels of the main C-19 steroid precursor. Decreases in markers of C-19 steroid metabolism in castrated males suggested that flutamide increased the metabolism of adrenal C-19 steroids into inactive steroid glucuronides.

During administration of flutamide plus an LHRH agonist plasma concentrations of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL)-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B were significantly lower than previously recorded with castration or oestrogen therapy or in untreated patients. LDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B levels were higher with flutamide plus an LHRH agonist than with oestrogen, while the high density lipoprotein (HDL) apolipoprotein AII was lower during the combined regimen than during oestrogen therapy. Thus, the profile of changes in plasma lipoproteins with flutamide/LHRH agonist therapy relative to oestrogen treatment requires further clarification.

Mechanism of Action

The exact mechanism of action of flutamide has yet to be established conclusively. Flutamide appears to exert its antiandrogenic effects on male secondary sex structures by inhibition of androgen uptake and/or inhibition of nuclear binding of androgens in target tissues where it appears to form inactive complexes with nuclear androgen receptors. Flutamide did not appreciably influence conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone or other metabolic products. The lesser antiandrogenic effect in vitro than in vivo suggested involvement of an active metabolite. The hydroxylated metabolite is present in human plasma at much higher concentrations than unchanged flutamide and has antiandrogenic properties. Pure antiandrogens such as flutamide are more active in androgen-treated castrates than in intact animals; thus, the relative antiandrogenic activity of flutamide and cyproterone acetate depends upon the animal model. The antiandrogenic activity of flutamide is enhanced by the addition of an antigonadotrophic steroid.

Pharmacokinetic Properties

Maximum plasma concentrations of unchanged flutamide of 10 to 20 μg/L have been attained within 1 hour of oral administration of a single 250mg dose. In contrast, maximum concentrations of the active metabolite, 2-hydroxyflutamide, were 1290 to 1320 μg/L after the same dose, and mean steady-state concentrations of 940 μg/L were attained within 2 to 4 days. After repeated doses of flutamide 250mg, mean maximum plasma concentrations were 4- to 5-fold higher than after the first dose. In humans, flutamide is rapidly metabolised following oral administration to at least 10 plasma metabolites, although not all have been identified. The principal metabolite, 2-hydroxyflutamide, appears to be largely responsible for the antiandrogenic activity of flutamide. After single-dose oral administration of 3H-flutamide 200mg, 48.5% of the dose was recovered in the urine within 72 hours. Faecal recovery was 4.2% over the same period. Elimination half-life of the hydroxylated metabolite was 4 to 6.6 hours and 8 to 22 hours after 250 and 500mg, respectively.

Therapeutic Trials

Trials of flutamide alone and in conjunction with an LHRH agonist have been conducted in generally small groups of patients with advanced prostatic cancer. Because most studies used different objective assessment criteria, meaningful comparisons of results among studies are not possible. However, using fairly rigid criteria some promising results have been achieved using flutamide alone and in conjunction with an LHRH agonist in newly diagnosed patients with metastatic cancer of the prostate. Using the assessment criteria of the European Organisation for the Research of the Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), a complete or partial response has been noted in up to 82% of patients treated with flutamide 750mg daily alone. Similar results were reported in other studies using less rigorous criteria. With flutamide, as with other systemic treatments, the response rates in patients whose disease was refractory to hormonal manipulation were less satisfactory. Although up to 40% of patients with refractory cancer exhibited a positive response, the duration of response was generally short. One group of investigators has advocated treatment of previously untreated advanced prostatic cancer by ‘complete’ androgen blockade using flutamide plus an LHRH agonist or orchidectomy. These workers have reported that such a regimen produced a complete or partial response, according to rigid criteria of the United States National Prostatic Cancer Project (USNPCP), in 56% of patients, and stabilisation of the disease in a further 37%. A retrospective analysis of mortality in this study relative to that in studies of surgical castration or oestrogens alone, suggested improved survival in patents treated with flutamide plus an LHRH agonist. Confirmation of these results is needed and a suitably designed trial is in progress. Flutamide plus an LHRH agonist has also produced promising results in patients refractory to oestrogen therapy, with a positive response being achieved in about one-third of patients (USNPCP criteria).

Most of the few studies comparing flutamide with oestrogen therapy or estramustine phosphate have involved previously untreated patients. In generally small numbers of such patients, flutamide 750mg daily was similar in efficacy to stilboestrol 1 or 3mg daily. In comparisons with estramustine phosphate in newly diagnosed patients response to either drug was similar, but in one small study flutamide-treated patients relapsed significantly sooner than those treated with estramustine. In a larger group of patients who failed to respond to orchidectomy or whose disease progressed after an initial response, the initial response rate and 1-year survival were similar with flutamide 750mg and estramustine phosphate 600 mg/m2 daily.

Adverse Effects

Apart from a high incidence of gynaecomastia and some gastrointestinal discomfort flutamide has usually been well tolerated. Gynaecomastia, often mild to moderate, has occurred in 34 to 100% of non-castrated patients treated with flutamide alone, but was less pronounced and developed later than in patients treated with stilboestrol, and is infrequent when flutamide is used in conjunction with orchidectomy or an LHRH agonist. Elevation of plasma concentrations of alanine aminotransferase has been noted in many studies and in up to 32% of patients, but values have returned to normal without dosage modification in some patients. Some cases of severe toxic hepatitis have been reported, but in all patients liver function returned to normal after cessation of flutamide. Hot flushes have occurred in 50% of patients treated with flutamide plus an LHRH agonist. A favourable feature of flutamide therapy has been its lesser effect on libido and sexual potency; fewer than 20% of patients treated with flutamide alone reported such changes. In contrast, nearly all patients treated with oestrogens or estramustine phosphate reported loss of sexual potency.

Dosage

Flutamide is administered orally at a dosage of 250mg 3 times daily (with or without castration) in both newly diagnosed patients and those whose disease is refractory to hormonal manipulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Airhart RA, Barnett TF, Sullivan JW, Levine RL, Schlegel JU. Flutamide therapy for carcinoma of the prostate. Southern Medical Journal 71: 798–801, 1978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayub M, Levell MJ. Inhibition of rat testicular 17α-hydroxylase and 17,20-lyase activities by anti-androgens (flutamide, hydroxyilutamide, RU 23908, cyproterone acetate) in vitro. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry 28: 43–47, 1987

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger A, Labrie F, Dupont A, Brochu M, Gusan L. Endocrine effects of combined treatment with a LHRH agonist in association with flutamide in metastatic prostatic carcinoma. Clinical and Investigative Medicine 11: 321–326, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackard CF, Dol RP, Mellinger GT, Byar BP. Incidence of cardiovascular disease and death in patients receiving diethyl-stilboestrol for carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer 26: 249, 1970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brochu M, Bélanger A, Dupont A, Cusan L, Labrie F. Effects of flutamide and aminoglutethimide on plasma 5α-reduced steroid glucuronide concentrations in castrated patients with cancer of the prostate. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry 28: 619–622, 1987

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clos V, Esteve A, Jane F, Salva P. Microsomal effects of cyproterone acetate and flutamide in rat testis. General Pharmacology 19: 393–397, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford E, McLeod D, Dorr A, Spaulding J, Benson R, et al. Treatment of newly diagnosed stage D2 cancer with leuprolide and flutamide or leuprolide alone, phase III, intergroup study 0036. Abstract 460. Proceedings of ASCO 7: 119, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford ED, Eisenberger MA, McLeod DG, Spaulding JT, Benson R, et al. A comparison of leuprolide with and without flutamide in previously untreated patients with disseminated prostatic carcinoma: a placebo-controlled randomized trial. New England Journal of Medicine, in press, 1989

  • Daricello G, Serretta V, Pavone-Macaluso M. Flutamide in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer. Journal of Drug Development 1 (Suppl. 1): 17–22, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kernion JN, Murphy GP, Priore R. Comparison of flutamide and emcyt in hormone-refractory metastatic prostatic cancer. Urology 31: 312–317, 1988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar JD, Setty BS. Effect of flutamide, a nonsteroidal antiandrogen on testis and accessory genital organs of male rats: a reevaluation in prepubertal and adult rat. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 25: 81–85, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar JD, Srivastava SR, Setty BS. Effect of flutamide, a nonsteroidal antiandrogen on functional maturation of the epididymis of rat. Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology 82: 140–144, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Di Silverio F, Tenaglia R, Bizzarri M, Biggio A, Saragnano R. Experience with flutamide in advanced prostatic cancer patients refractory to previous endocrine therapy. Journal of Drug Development 1 (Suppl. 1): 10–16, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Eil C, Edelson SK. The use of human skin fibroblasts to obtain potency estimates of drug binding to androgen receptors. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 59: 51–53, 1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El Etreby MF, Habenicht U-F, Louton T, Nishino Y, Schröder HG. Effect of cyproterone acetate in comparison to flutamide and megestrol acetate on the ventral prostate, seminal vesicle, and adrenal glands of adult male rats. Prostate 11: 361–375, 1987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evenson M, Tenaglia R, Ferraro F, D’Eramo G, Pannunzio E, et al. Flutamide in advanced prostatic cancer. Abstract 42. Prostate 4: 666, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Flamm J, Fischer M. Komplette androgenblockade (orchiektomie + flutamide) versus androgenblockade mit zytostase (orchiektomie + testramustin) in der Behandlung des virginellen fortgeschrittenen prostatakarzinems. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 100: 589–592, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haefliger J-M. Expérience avec le flutamide dans le traitement du carcinome prostatique metastatique. Médecine et Hygiene 43: 3445–3451, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman L, Bradlow HL, Freed S, Levin J, Rosenfeld RS, et al. The effect of flutamide on testosterone metabolism and the plasma levels of androgens and gonadotrophins. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 45: 1224–1229, 1977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirte WE, Moors D, Maroun J. Combination therapy with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and flutamide in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate progressing on hormonal management. Abstract 256. Annals of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada 16: 370, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggins C, Hodges CV. Studies on prostatic cancer I. Cancer Research 1: 293–297, 1941

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobo E, Schmidt JD, Weinstein SH, Flocks RH. Comparison of flutamide (SCH13521) and diethylstilboestrol in untreated advanced prostatic cancer. Urology 8: 231–233, 1976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson J-E, Lingårdh G, Andersson S-O, Zador G, Beckman K-W. Clinical evaluation of flutamide and estramustine as initial treatment of metastatic carcinoma of prostate. Urology 29: 55–59, 1987

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kassem NY, Neri RO. Flutamide in advanced cancer of the prostate. Abstract El. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 31: 238,1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassem NY, Neri RO, Muntol JS. Effect of flutamide, an antiandrogen on stage D cancer of the prostate. Abstract B-27. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 29: 256, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Katchen B, Buxbaum S. Disposition of a new, nonsteroid, antiandrogen, α,α,α-trifluoro-2-methyl-4′-nitro-m-propionotoluidide (flutamide), in men following a single oral 200mg dose. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 41: 373–379, 1975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katchen B, Dancik S, Millington G. Percutaneous penetration and metabolism of topical [14C] flutamide in men. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 66: 379–382, 1976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keating MA, Griffin PP, Schiff SF. Flutamide in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Abstract 398. Journal of Urology 135: 203A, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth UA, Hano R, Nieschlag E. Effect of flutamide or cyproterone acetate on pituitary and testicular hormones in normal men. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 59: 963–969, 1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kontula KK, Seppänen PJ, Van Duyne P, Bardin CW, Jänne OA. Effect of a nonsteroidal antiandrogen, flutamide, on androgen receptor dynamics and ornithine decarboxylase gene expression in mouse kidney. Endocrinology 116: 226–233, 1985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kung TT, Mingo GG, Siegel MI, Watnick AS. Effect of adrena-lectomy, flutamide and leuprolide on the growth of the Dunning rat R-3327 prostatic carcinoma. Prostate 12: 357–363, 1988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Labrie F, Dupont A, Bélanger A. Complete androgen blockade for the treatment of prostate cancer. In De Vita VT et al. (Eds) Important advances in oncology, pp. 193–217, Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrie F, Dupont A, Bélanger A, Emond J, Monfette G, et al. Flutamide in combination with castration (surgical or medical) is the standard treatment in advanced prostate cancer. Journal of Drug Development 1 (Suppl. 1): 34–51, 1987b

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrie F, Dupont A, Cusan L, Giguére M, Bergeron N, et al. Combination therapy with flutamide and castration (LHRH agonist or orchiectomy) in previously untreated patients with clinical stage D2 prostate cancer: today’s therapy of choice. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry 30: 107–117, 1988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Labrie F, Dupont A, Giguére M, Borsanyi J-P, Bélanger A, et al. Combination therapy with flutamide offers a 33% positive objective response in relapsing prostate cancer patients. Abstract. Anticancer Research 6: 338, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrie F, Dupont A, Giguére M, Borsanyi JP, Lacourciere Y, et al. Combination therapy with flutamide and castration (orchiectomy or LHRH agonist): the minimal endocrine therapy in both untreated and previously treated patients. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry 27: 525–532, 1987a

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leuprolide Study Group. Leuprolide versus diethylstilbestrol for metastatic prostate cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 311: 1281–1286, 1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund F, Rasmussen F. Flutamide versus stilboestrol in the management of advanced prostatic cancer. British Journal of Urology 61: 140–142, 1988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren R. Flutamide as primary treatment for metastatic prostatic cancer. British Journal of Urology 59: 156–158, 1987

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane JR, Tolley DA. Flutamide therapy for advanced cancer: a phase II study. British Journal of Urology 57: 172–174, 1985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti B, Labrie F. Characteristics of flutamide action on prostatic and testicular functions in the rat. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry 29: 691–698, 1988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millard OH, Givner ML. Preliminary results in thirty patients with stage D2 prostatic cancer treated by total androgen blockade. Journal of Drug Development 1 (Suppl. 1): 26–33, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorjani S, Dupont A, Labrie F, Lupien P-J, Gagne C, et al. Changes in plasma lipoproteins during various androgen suppression therapies in men with prostatic carcinoma: effects of orchiectomy, estrogen and combination treatment with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist and flutamide. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 66: 314–322, 1988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy GP, Beckley S, Brady MF, Chu M, De Kernion JB, et al. Treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer patients with chemotherapy agents in combination with hormones versus hormones alone. Cancer 51: 1264–1272, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Narayana AS, Loening SA, Culp DA. Flutamide in the treatment of metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. British Journal of Urology 53: 152–153, 1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neri R. Studies on the biology and mechanism of action of non-steroidal antiandrogens. In Martini & Motta (Eds) Androgens and antiandrogens, pp. 179–189, Raven Press, New York, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Neri RO, Florence K, Koziol P, Vancleave S. A biological profile of a non-steroidal antiandrogen, Sch 13521. Endocrinology 91: 427–437, 1972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neri R, Kassem N. Biological and clinical properties of antiandrogens. In Bresciani et al. (Eds) Progess in cancer research and therapy, vol. 31, pp. 507–518, Raven Press, New York, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Neri RO, Mylecraine l. Effect of chronic administration of flutamide on the pituitary-gonadal axis in male rats. Archives of Andrology 9: 51–52, 1982

  • Neumann F, Graf K-J, Hasan SH, Schenck B, Steinbeck H. Central actions of antiandrogens. In Martini & Motta (Eds) Androgens and antiandrogens, pp. 163–177, Raven Press, New York, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus EM, Hirte WE, Moors DE, Stewart DJ, Irvine AH. Flutamide treatment in stage D2 (metastatic bone disease) prostatic carcinoma without prior endocrine therapy. Abstract S-1-3. Presented at the 14th ICC, Kyoto, Japan, 1985

  • Peets EA, Henson MF, Neri R. On the mechanism of the anti-androgenic action of flutamide (a-a-a-trifluoro-2-methyl-4-nitro-m-propionotoluidide) in the rat. Endocrinology 94: 532–541, 1974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poyet P, Labrie F. Comparison of the antiandrogenic/androgenic activities of flutamide, cyproterone acetate and megestrol acetate. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 42: 283–288, 1985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarfaty G, Alder S. Phase II study of flutamide in advanced prostate cancer. Abstract. British Journal of Urology 58: 94, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz M, Schmeldt A, Donn F, Becker H. The pharmacokinetics of flutamide and its major metabolites after a single oral dose and during chronic treatment. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 34: 633–636, 1988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Secreto G, Recchione C, Zambetti M, Fariselli G, Ballerini P. Hormonal changes induced by the pure antiandrogen flutamide in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 24: 867–872, 1988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simard J, Luthy I, Guay J, Bélanger A, Labrie F. Characteristics of interaction of the antiandrogen flutamide with the androgen receptor in various target tissues. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 44: 261–270, 1986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slack NH, Murphy GP. Criteria for evaluating patient responses to treatment modalities for prostatic cancer. Urologie Clinics of North America 11: 337–342, 1984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JA, Glede LM, Wettlaufer JN, Stein BS, Glass AG, et al. Clinical effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Urology 20: 106–114, 1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sogani PC, Ray B, Whitmore WF. Advanced prostatic carcinoma: flutamide therapy after conventional endocrine treatment. Urology 6: 164–166, 1975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sogani PC, Vagaiwala MR, Whitmore WF. Experience with flutamide in patients with advanced prostatic cancer without prior endocrine therapy. Cancer 54: 744–750, 1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soret JY, Verine JL, Daver A, Labrie F. Levels of intraprostatic androgen receptors and intraprostatic testosterone following orchiectomy with or without addition of an antiandrogen (flutamide) in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer. Journal of Drug Development 1 (Suppl. 1): 23–25, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • St-Arnaud R, Lachance R, Dupont A, Labrie F. Stimulation of the circulating levels of glycoprotein hormone alpha-subumit after combined administration of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist and flutamide in patients with cancer of the prostate. Clinical and Investigative Medicine 9: 215–221, 1986b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • St-Arnaud R, Lachance R, Kelly SJ, Bélanger A, Dupont A, et al. Loss of luteinizing hormone bioactivity in patients with prostatic cancer treated with an LHRH agonist and a pure antiandrogen. Clinical Endocrinology 24: 21–30, 1986a

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Symes EK, Milroy EJG, Mainwaring WIP. The nuclear uptake of androgen by human benign prostate in vitro: action of antiandrogens. Journal of Urology 120: 180–183, 1978

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viguier-Martinez MC, Hochereau de Reviers MT, Barenton B, Perreau C. Effect of a non-steroidal antiandrogen, flutamide, on the hypothalamus-pituitary axis, genital tract and testis in growing male rats: endocrinological and histological data. Acta Endocrinologica 102: 299–306, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by: E.D. Crawford, Division of Urology University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA; J.A. Critchley, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong-B. Cusack, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Boise, Idaho, USA; J. Geller, Department of Medicine, Mercy Hospital and Medical Center, San Diego, California USA; J.-E. Johansson, Department of Urology, Örebro Medical Center Hospital, Örebro, Sweden; G.P. Murphy, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; J. Phister, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Boise, Idaho, USA; F. Rasmussen, Department of Urology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; S. Whitehead, Department of Physiology, St George’s Hospital Medical School, University of London, London England

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brogden, R.N., Clissold, S.P. Flutamide. Drugs 38, 185–203 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198938020-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198938020-00003

Keywords

Navigation