Skip to main content
Log in

Amlodipine

A Review of its Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties, and Therapeutic Use in Cardiovascular Disease

  • Drug Evaluation
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 June 1991

Summary

Synopsis

Amlodipine, a basic dihydropyridine derivative, inhibits the calcium influx through ‘slow’ channels in peripheral vascular and coronary smooth muscle cells, thus producing marked vasodilation in peripheral and coronary vascular beds. Short to medium term clinical trials indicate that amlodipine is effective as both an antianginal agent in patients with stable angina pectoris and an antihypertensive agent in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. In small comparative studies amlodipine was at least as effective as ‘standard’ agents, including atenolol, verapamil, hydrochlorothiazide or captopril in hypertension, and diltiazem or nadolol in angina pectoris

Amlodipine is well tolerated, and does not appear to cause some of the undesirable effects often associated with other cardiovascular agents (e.g. adverse changes in serum lipid patterns, cardiac conduction disturbances, postural hypotension). The most common adverse effects associated with amlodipine therapy —oedema and flushing - are related to the vasodilatory action of the drug, and are generally mild to moderate in severity

Thus, amlodipine seems to provide a useful alternative to other agents currently available for the treatment of essential hypertension and chronic stable angina pectoris, with certain pharmacodynamic and tolerability properties thai should be advantageous in many patients

Pharmacodynamic Properties

Amlodipine, like other calcium entry blockers, inhibits the ‘slow’ channel influx of calcium into cardiac and vascular tissue. Its main site of action is the peripheral vasculature, although it also produces vasodilation in coronary vascular beds. Indeed, in patients with essential hypertension, intra-arterial infusions of amlodipine markedly increase forearm blood flow and reduce forearm vascular resistance, effects indicative of a peripheral arterial vasodilatory action. In vitro, amlodipine has been shown to inhibit potassium-induced contractions in human coronary artery preparations and, in several animal models, has dramatically increased coronary blood flow and reduced coronary vascular resistance. In humans, amlodipine has no significant effects on the sinoatrial or atrioventricular node

In patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension amlodipine has a sustained and gradual onset of antihypertensive effect. Medium term once-daily dosage regimens of 2.5 to 10mg produce reductions in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures of about 10 to 18% in most studies. Moreover, in these patients amlodipine increases renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate, and reduces renovascular resistance; plasma renin activity and aldosterone and cate-cholamine levels are not significantly affected. In addition, urine volume and urinary sodium excretion are unchanged, factors which suggest that amlodipine has no long term effect on sodium homeostasis

In animal models and in vitro studies using human cardiac tissue, high concentrations of amlodipine, which exceed clinically effective concentration ranges, have a weak negative inotropic effect. However, after short term administration to patients with coronary artery disease no significant cardiodepression occurs

As well as markedly reducing peripheral vascular resistance, and therefore afterload, amlodipine increases cardiac output and reduces stroke work. In addition to its ability to reduce afterload, amlodipine increases myocardial oxygen supply, reduces demand and improves exercise capacity in patients with symptomatic myocardial ischaemia

Animal studies have demonstrated a cardioprotective effect for amlodipine — in both in vivo and in vitro models of ischaemia-reperfusion; reductions in tissue calcium content and increases in shortening fraction have been noted after reperfusion

Amlodipine has demonstrated several other actions which warrant further study. These include antiatherosclerotic, antithrombotic and antihypertrophic actions. Indeed, amlodipine inhibits in vitro collagen synthesis in aortic strips from spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), which may indicate antiatherosclerotic potential. It also stimulates LDL receptor binding in human fibroblasts in vitro, an effect which, if produced in vivo, may retard atherogenesis through intracellular accumulation of LDL and a reduced accumulation of cholesterol in arterial walls. With reference to an antithrombotic action, amlodipine has been shown to reduce platelet aggregation in patients with essential hypertension and, in terms of antihypertrophic effects, regression of myocardial hypertrophy has been noted in SHRs

Pharmacokinetic Properties

After oral administration amlodipine is slowly and almost completely absorbed; peak plasma concentrations are attained within 6 to 12 hours. Amlodipine has a relatively high oral bioavailability of 60 to 65%, which is not influenced by food. Moreover, amlodipine appears to have a linear pharmacokinetic profile, with strong positive correlations between oral dosage, and Cmax and AUC0–72. In healthy volunteers, steady-state plasma concentrations are achieved after 7 once-daily oral doses, without evidence of accumulation. Amlodipine has a large volume of distribution of 21 L/kg, and is more than 95% bound to plasma proteins

Unlike verapamil, diltiazem and nifedipine, amlodipine does not undergo extensive and variable presystemic metabolism, although it is extensively and slowly metabolised by the liver. The initial biotransformation is oxidation of the dihydropyridine ring to produce the pyridine analogue, usually followed by oxidative deamination of the basic 2-aminoethoxymethyl side chain. In fact, this metabolic pathway leads to the production of more than 75% of the urinary metabolites of amlodipine, none of which are conjugated. None of the amlodipine metabolites have significant pharmacological activity

In comparison with other calcium entry blockers amlodipine has a relatively long elimination half-life of 35 to 45 hours, which permits once-daily administration. Less than 10% of an orally administered dose of amlodipine is excreted unchanged; 60% of a dose is recovered in the urine and 20 to 25% in the faeces after either oral or intravenous administration. The latter indicates that amlodipine and its metabolites are excreted in the bile and/or across the gut wall

In patients with hepatic cirrhosis, and in the elderly, amlodipine elimination is significantly reduced and some degree of accumulation is noted; elimination half-life is prolonged and AUC is increased. Although in the elderly this may simply be a reflection of large intersubject variability, relevant dosage adjustments should be made in both patient groups. The pharmacokinetic profile of amlodipine does not appear to be significantly altered in patients with renal impairment

Therapeutic Efficacy

In patients with chronic stable angina pectoris amlodipine improves both subjective symptoms [i.e. nitroglycerin (glyceryl trinitrate) consumption and angina attack frequency] and objective symptoms (ST segment deviation, exercise duration and time to angina onset). A few small well designed comparative trials have shown the antianginal efficacy of amlodipine to be similar to that of diltiazem and nadolol, but its relative efficacy needs confirmation in larger comparative studies. Amlodipine also improves subjective symptoms in patients with vasospastic angina

Several short to medium term trials have shown amlodipine, in oral regimens of 2.5, 5 and 10mg once daily, to significantly reduce supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressures in a dose-dependent manner in patients with essential hypertension. Amlodipine 5 to 10mg once daily also significantly reduces mean ambulatory blood pressure throughout a 24-hour dose interval in hypertensive patients. These antihypertensive effects are achieved without accompanying reflex tachycardia or postural hypotension. In a few small but well designed medium term comparative trials the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine was slightly better than that of verapamil and similar to that of hydrochlorothiazide, captopril and atenolol. However, as is the case in angina pectoris, amlodipine’s relative efficacy in hypertension needs to be further assessed in larger comparative studies

Tolerability

Amlodipine is generally well tolerated during short term therapy (i.e. ⩽ 6 months) in patients with essential hypertension or angina pectoris. Pooled results from 40 double-blind placebo-controlled trials show that 529/1775 (29.8%) amlodipine vs 268/1213 (22.1%) placebo recipients experienced adverse effects; 1.1 vs 0.7% of patients withdrew from treatment. The main amlodipine-induced side effects (oedema and flushing) occur as a result of vasodilation and are thought to be dose-dependent. However, amlodipine-induced oedema is usually mild or moderate in severity and is rarely troublesome to patients. Again on the basis of pooled data from 40 studies, 9.8% of amlodipine vs 2.3% of placebo recipients had oedema, which was considered definitely related to treatment in 4.3 vs 0.4% of patients

Other adverse effects reported occasionally and considered to be possibly related to amlodipine therapy include muscle cramps, frequency of micturition/nocturia, coughing, impotence, asthma, epistaxis, nervousness and conjunctivitis. However, these reactions are infrequent and few have been severe enough to warrant stopping treatment

Comparative trials suggest that amlodipine is at least as well tolerated as atenolol, nadolol, verapamil, diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide. However, pharmacodynamic data suggest that amlodipine may have a more favourable adverse effect profile than /5-blockers, thiazide diuretics and possibly some other calcium antagonists — for example, it does not appear to impair cardiac function or to cause postural hypotension, and reflex tachycardia occurs in only a small proportion of patients

Dosage and Administration

In patients with essential hypertension or angina pectoris, amlodipine should be initiated at a dosage of 5mg once daily orally and increased to 10mg once daily, if the desired therapeutic response has not been achieved after 2 weeks

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abemethy DR, Gutkowska J, Lambert MD. Amlodipine in elderly hypertensive patients: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): S67–S71, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Abernethy DR, Gutkowska J, Winterbottom LM. Effects of amlodipine, a long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonist in aging hypertension: pharmacodynamics in relation to disposition. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 48: 76–86, 1990

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abernethy DR. The pharmacokinetic profile of amlodipine. American Heart Journal 118: 1100, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antman EM, Stone PH, Muller JE, Braunwald E. Calcium channel blocking agents in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders. Part I: basic and clinical electrophysiologic effects. Annals of Internal Medicine 93: 875–885, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baez MA, Weidler DJ. Antihypertensive effect of amlodipine in hypertensive patients. Journal of Hypertension 4 (Suppl. 5): S458–S460, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman B and the investigators of study AML-NY-8 7-009. An open multicenter efficacy and safety evaluation of amlodipine in the treatment of symptomatic myocardial ischemia. Symposium: Topics in cardiovascular medicine. 24 Hour protection and control: a new era of calcium antagonists’; Nice, 14–15 Sep, 1989

  • Beresford AP, Humphrey MJ, Stopher DA. Amlodipine, a calcium channel blocker with pharmacokinetic properties novel to dihydropyridines. British Journal of Pharmacology 85 (Suppl.): 333, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford AP, Macrae PV, Alker D, Kobylecki RJ. Biotransformation of amlodipine. Identification and synthesis of metabolites found in rat, dog and human urine. Confirmation of structures by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Arzneimittel-Forschung/ Drug Research 39: 201–209, 1989

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beresford AP, Macrae PV, Stopher DA, Wood BA. Analysis of amlodipine in human plasma by gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography 420: 178–183, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beresford AP, McGibney D, Humphrey MJ, Macrae PV, Stopher DA. Metabolism and kinetics of amlodipine in man. Xenobiotica 18: 245–254, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernini F, Catapano AL, Corsini A, Fumagalli R, Paoletti R. Effects of calcium antagonists on lipids and atherosclerosis. American Journal of Cardiology 64: 1291–1341, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan J, Heptinstall S. How can we inhibit 5HT-induced platelet aggregation and why should we bother? Thrombosis and Haemostasis 58: 289, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumlein SL, Sievers R, Kidd P, Parmley W. Mechanism of protection from atherosclerosis by verapamil in the cholesterolfed rabbit. American Journal of Cardiology 54: 884–889, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braunwald E. Mechanism of action of calcium-channel blocking agents. New England Journal of Medicine 307: 1618–1627, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burges RA, Carter AJ, Gardiner DG, Higgins AJ. Amlodipine, a new dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker with slow onset and long duration of action. British Journal of Pharmacology 85 (Suppl.): 281, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Burges RA, Dodd MG. Amlodipine. Cardiovascular Drug Reviews 8: 25–44, 1990

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burges RA, Dodd MG, Gardiner DG. Pharmacologic profile of amlodipine. American Journal of Cardiology 64: 101–201, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Burges RA, Gardiner DG, Carter AJ, McKay FF. Amlodipine. Long-term natriuretic and antihypertensive activity in spontaneously hypertensive rats with developing and established hypertension. Annals New York Academy of Sciences 522: 516–518, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Burges RA, Gardiner DG, Gwilt M, Higgins AJ, Blackburn KJ, et al. Calcium channel blocking properties of amlodipine in vascular smooth muscle and cardiac muscle in vitro: evidence for voltage modulation of vascular dihydropyridine receptors. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 9: 110–119, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burns JF, Ames RP, Applegate WB, Ram CVS, Davidov ME, et al. Double-blind comparison of amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): S98–S102, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Caponnetto S. Open comparative study to assess the efficacy and safety of two calcium antagonists: amlodipine and diltiazem in the treatment of symptomatic myocardial ischemia. Symposium: ‘Topics in cardiovascular medicine. 24 Hour protection and control: a new era of calcium antagonists’; Nice, 14–15 Sep, 1989

  • Carter AJ, Gardiner DG, Burges RA. Natriuretic activity of amlodipine, diltiazem and nitrendipine in saline-loaded anesthetized dogs. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): S34–S38, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cauvin C, Loutzenhiser R, Van Breemen C. Mechanisms of calcium antagonist-induced vasodilation. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 23: 373–396, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chahine RA, Feldman RL, Giles TD, Raizner AE, Weiss RJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of amlodipine in vasospastic angina: an interim report of a multicenter, palcebo-controlled trial. American Heart Journal 118(5): 1128–1130, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung JY, Bonventre JV, Malis CD, Leaf A. Calcium and ischemic injury. New England Journal of Medicine 314: 1670–1676, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chichester CO, Rodgers RL. Effects of doxazosin on vascular collagen synthesis, arterial pressure and serum lipids in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 10 (Suppl. 9): S21–S26, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chrysant SG, Chrysant C, Trus J, Hitchcock A. Antihypertensive effectiveness of amlodipine in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. American Journal of Hypertension 2: 537–541, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies J, Jensen H, Garsdal P. A double-blind comparison of amlodipine and placebo added to open enalapril in patients with moderate-severe essential hypertension. Symposium: ‘Topics in cardiovascular medicine. 24 Hour protection and control: a new era of calcium antagonists’; Nice, 14–15 Sep, 1989

  • De Kock MB, D’Hondt AM, Detry JMR. Acute hemodynamic effects of intravenous amlodipine at rest and during exercise in mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Symposium: ‘Topics in cardiovascular medicine. 24 Hour protection and control: a new era of calcium antagonists’; Nice, 14–15 Sep, 1989

  • De Weerd P, ten Cate FJ, Bernink PJLM, Remme WJ, Barth J, et al. An 8-week evaluation of amlodipine and diltiazem in patients with stable exertional angina pectoris. Symposium: ‘Topics in cardiovascular medicine. 24 Hour protection and control: a new era of calcium antagonists’; Nice, 14–15 Sep, 1989

  • Dodd MG, Machin I. Anti-hypertensive effects of amlodipine, a novel dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker. British Journal of Pharmacology 85 (Suppl.): 335, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd MG, Machin I, Baird JRC. Antihypertensive effect of amlodipine, a novel long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonist. Pharmacologist 27(3): 290, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap ED, Matlib MA, Millard RW. Protection of regional mechanics and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation by amlodipine in transiently ischemic myocardium. American Journal of Cardiology 64: 841–931, 1989b

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap ED, Plowden JS, Lathrop DA, Millard RW. Hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of amlodipine, a new calcium channel blocker. American Journal of Cardiology 64(17): 71,1989a

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruijn B, Cocco G, Tyler HM. Multicenter placebo-controlled comparison of amlodipine and atenolol in mild to moderate hypertension. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): S107–S109, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott HL, Meredith PA, Reid JL, Faulkner JK. A comparison of the disposition of single oral doses of amlodipine in young and elderly subjects. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): S64–S66, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada JN, Saglietti H, Di Marco M, Cassabé H, Oliveri R. Antiischemic properties of amlodipine, a new calcium antagonist, in patients with severe coronary artery disease: a prospective trial. American Heart Journal 118(5): 1130, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Etingin OR, Hajjar DP. Nifedipine increases cholesteryl ester hydrolytic activity in lipid-laden rabbit arterial smooth muscle cells. Journal of Clinical Investigation 75: 1554–1558, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner JK, Hayden ML, Chasseaud LF, Taylor T. Absorption of amlodipine unaffected by food. Solid dose equivalent to solution dose. Arzneimittel-Forschung/Drug Research 39: 799–801, 1989

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner JK, McGibney D, Chasseaud LF, Perry JL, Taylor IW. The pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in healthy volunteers after single intravenous and oral doses and after 14 repeated oral doses given once daily. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 22: 21–25, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher CA, Josephson MI, Wachtfogel YT, Colman RW, Addonizio VP. Verapamil and diltiazem as antiplatelet agents: spectrum and mechanisms of activity. Circulation 68 (Suppl. III): 318,1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleckenstein A, Frey M, Zorn J, Fleckenstein-Grün G. Amlodipine, a new 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium antagonist with a particularly strong antihypertensive profile. American Journal of Cardiology 64: 211–341, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Frais MA, Silke B, Verma SP, Sharma SK, Reynolds G, et al. A haemodynamic dose finding study with a new slow-calcium channel blocker (amlodipine) in coronary artery disease. Herz 11: 351–358, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frick MH, McGibney D, Tyler HM. A dose-response study of amlodipine in mild to moderate hypertension. Journal of Internal Medicine 225: 101–105, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frishman WH. Amlodipine. In Messerli F (Ed.) Cardiovascular drug therapy, pp. 1017–1033, WB Saunders Company, New York, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Frishman WH, Brobyn R, Brown RD, Johnson BF, Reeves RL, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled comparison of amlodipine and atenolol in mild to moderate systemic hypertension. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): S103–S106, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg R, Davis K, Bristow MR, McKennett K, Kodsi SR, et al. Calcium antagonists suppress atherogenesis in aorta but not in the intramural coronary arteries of cholesterol-fed rabbits. Laboratory Investigation 49: 154–158, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glasser SP, Chrysant SG, Graves J, Rofman B, Koehn DK. Safety and efficacy of amlodipine added to hydrochlorothiazide therapy in essential hypertension. American Journal of Hypertension 2: 154–157, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glasser SP, West TW. Clinical safety and efficacy of once-a-day amlodipine for chronic stable angina pectoris. American Journal of Cardiology 62: 518–522, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godfraind T, Mennig D, Bravo G, Chalant C, Jaumin P. Inhibition by amlodipine of activity evoked in isolated human coronary arteries by endothelin, prostaglandin Fand depolarization. American Journal of Cardiology 64: 581–641, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross GJ, Färber NE, Pieper GM. Effects of amlodipine on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in dogs. American Journal of Cardiology 64: 941–1001, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Heber ME, Brigden G, Al-Khawaja I, Raftery EB. 24h blood pressure control with the once daily calcium antagonist, amlodipine. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 27: 359–365, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henry PD, Bentley Kl. Suppression of atherogenesis in cholesterol fed rabbits treated with nifedipine. Journal of Clinical Investigation 68: 1366–1369, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez R, Carvajal AR, Armas-de Hernandez MJ, Guerrero-Pajuelo J, Armas-Padilla MC, et al. The effects of once-daily amlodipine on platelet aggregation and blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension. Symposium: Topics in cardiovascular medicine. 24 Hour protection and control: a new era of calcium antagonists’; Nice, 14–15 Sep, 1989

  • Hoff PT, Tamura Y, Lucchesi BR. Cardioprotective effects of amlodipine in the ischemic-reperfused heart. American Journal of Cardiology 64: 101I-116I, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann F, Nastainczyk W, Röhrkasten A, Schneider T, Sieber M. Regulation of the L-type calcium channel. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 8: 393–398, 1987

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg KJ, Hornung RS, Hillis WS, Gupta S, Grant P, et al. Pharmacodynamics of amlodipine: hemodynamic effects and anti-anginal efficacy after atrial pacing. American Heart Journal 118: 1107–1113, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson NC, Lee PS, Reynolds G, Frais M, Taylor SH. Improvement of treadmill time to angina by amlodipine. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 20: 248, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns EJ. A study of the renal actions of amlodipine in the normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rat. British Journal of Pharmacology 94: 311–318, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kass RS, Arena JP, Chin S. Cellular electrophysiology of amlodipine: probing the cardiac L-type calcium channel. American Journal of Cardiology 64: 351–421, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass RS, Arena JP, DiManno D. Block of heart calcium channels by amlodipine: influence of drug charge on blocking activity. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): S45–S49, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katz AM, Reuter H. Cellular calcium and cardiac cell death. American Journal of Cardiology 44: 188–190, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnard DR, Harris M, Hossack KF. Endurance testing for evaluation of antianginal therapy with amlodipine, a calcium channel blocking agent. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 12: 791–796, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiowski W, Linder L, Bühler FR. Direct arterial vasodilator effects of amlodipine alone and in combination with verapamil in essential hypertension. Symposium: ‘Topics in cardiovascular medicine. 24 Hour protection and control: a new era of calcium antagonists’; Nice, 14–15 Sep, 1989

  • Laher MS, Kelly JG, Doyle GD, Carmody M, Donohoe JF, et al. Pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in renal impairment. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): S60–S63, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtlen PR, Rafflenbeul W, Amende R, Simon R, Reil G. The influence of Ca++-entry blockers on hemodynamics and coronary blood flow, and its importance for the treatment of angina pectoris. In Godfraind et al. (Eds) Calcium entry blockers in cardiovascular and cerebral dysfunction, pp. 161–179, Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer AR, Smedsrud T, Walker P, Tyler HM. Comparison of amlodipine and verapamil in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): 89–93, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer AR, Smedsrud T, Walker P, Tyler HM. A. comparison of amlodipine, verapamil and placebo in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Journal of Human Hypertension 3: 191–196, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loutzenhiser RD, Epstein M, Fischetti F, Horton C. Effects of amlodipine on renal hemodynamics. American Journal of Cardiology 64: 1221–1281, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclean D, Mitchell ET, Wilcox RG, Walker P, Tyler HM. Amlodipine and captopril in moderate-severe essential hypertension. Journal of Human Hypertension 2: 127–132, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis H, Lucas C, Henry PD. Effects of Ca++-antagonists on platelet aggregation and secretion. Circulation 62 (Pt. 2): 191, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason RP, Campbell SF, Wang S-D, Herbette LG. Comparison of location and binding for the positively charged 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist amlodipine with uncharged drugs of this class in cardiac membranes. Molecular Pharmacology 36: 634–640, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matlib MA, French JF, Grupp IL, Van Gorp C, Grupp G, et al. Vasodilatory action of amlodipine on rat aorta, pig coronary artery, human coronary artery, and on isolated Langendorff rat heart preparations. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): S50–S54, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matlib MA. Relaxation of potassium chloride-induced contractions by amlodipine and its interaction with the 1,4-dihydropyridine-binding site in pig coronary artery. American Journal of Cardiology 64: 511–571, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell LB, Schroeder JS, Mason JW. Comparative clinical electrophysiologic effects of diltiazem, verapamil and nifedipine: a review. American Journal of Cardiology 49: 629–635, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovic V, Neuss H, Cocco G, Prager G, Fitscha P, et al. A 6-week double-blind comparison of amlodipine and placebo in patients with stable exertional angina pectoris receiving concomitant β-blocker therapy. Symposium: ‘Topics in cardiovascular medicine. 24 Hour protection and control: a new era of calcium antagonists; Nice, 14–15 Sep, 1989

  • Mroczek WJ, Burris JF, Allenby KS. A double-blind evaluation of the effect of amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patietits. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): S79–S84, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakao J, Ito H, Ooyama T, Chang W-C, Murota S. Calcium dependency of aortic smooth muscle cell migration induced by 12-L-hydroxy-5,8,10,14-eicosatetraenoic acid. Atherosclerosis 46: 309–319, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nayler WG, Ferrari R, Williams A. Protective effect of pretreatment with verapamil, nifedipine and propranolol on mito-chondrial function in the ischemic and reperfused myocardium. American Journal of Cardiology 46: 242–248, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nayler WG. The effect of amlodipine on hypertension-induced cardiac hypertrophy and reperfusion-induced calcium overload. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): S41–S44, 1988

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh I. The safety of amlodipine. American Heart Journal 118; 1114–1120, 1989a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh I. The safety profile of amlodipine. Symposium: ‘Topics in cardiovascular medicine. 24 Hour protection and control: a new era of calcium antagonists’; Nice, 14–15 Sep, 1989b

  • Raftery EB, Heber ME, Brigden G, Al Khawaja I. 24-Hour control of blood pressure with the new once-daily calcium antagonist amlodipine. Symposium:’ Topics in cardiovascular medicine. 24 Hour protection and control: a new era of calcium antagonists’; Nice, 14–15 Sep, 1989

  • Reams GP, Lau A, Hamory A, Bauer JH. Amlodipine therapy corrects renal abnormalities encountered in the hypertensive state. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 10: 446–451, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reid JL, Meredith PA, Donnelly R, Elliott HL. Pharmacokinetics of calcium antagonists. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): S22–S26, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rofman BA. Long-term open evaluation of amlodipine versus hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential] hypertension. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): S94–S97, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rouleau J-L, Parmley WW, Stevens J, Wikman-Coffelt J, Sievers R, et al. Verapamil suppresses atherosclerosis in cholesterolfed rabbits. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1(6): 1453–1460, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rämö MP, Plowden JS, Gabel M, Millard RW, Lathrop DA. Amlodipine, a long-acting calcium antagonist drug reduces ischemia-induced ventricular conduction delay in pig hearts. American Journal of Cardiology 64: 781–831, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter M. Do calcium antagonists affect platelets? European Heart Journal 8 (Suppl. K): 75–82, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz A. Calcium antagonists: review and perspective on mechanism of action. American Journal of Cardiology 64: 31–91, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz JB. Effects of amlodipine on steady-state digoxin concentrations and renal digoxin clearance. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12: 1–5, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw VM, Heydon IJ, Maclntyre DP. PAF-induced human platelet aggregation is selectively inhibited by class II and class III, but not class I calcium ‘antagonists’. European Heart Journal 4 (Suppl. B):4, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen AC, Jennings RB. Myocardial calcium and magnesium in acute ischemic injury. American Journal of Pathology 67: 417–433, 1972

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silke B, Frais MA, Midtbo KA, Verma SP, Sharma S, et al. Comparative hemodynamic dose-response effects of five slow calcium channel-blocking agents in coronary artery disease. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 42: 381–387, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh BN, Ellrodt G, Nademanee K. Calcium antagonists: cardiocirculatory effects and therapeutic applications. In Hurst JW (Ed.) Clinical essays on the heart, Vol. 2, pp. 65–97, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh BN, Nademanee K, Baky SH. Calcium antagonists: clinical use in the treatment of arrhythmias. Drugs 25: 125–153, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Doherty J, Udhoji V, Smith K, Gorwit J, et al. Amlodipine versus nadolol in patients with stable angina pectoris. American Heart Journal 118: 1137–1138, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorkin EM, Clissold SP, Brogden RN. Nifedipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders. Drugs 30: 182–274, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stamler J, Prineas RJ, Neaton JD, Grimm RH, McDonald RH, et al. Background and design of the new US trial on diet and drug treatment of ‘mild’ hypertension (TOMHS). American Journal of Cardiology 59: 51G-60G, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein O, Leitersdorf E, Stein Y. Verapamil enhances receptor-mediated endocytosis of low density lipoproteins by aortic cells in culture. Arteriosclerosis 5: 35–44, 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stopher DA, Beresford AP, Macrae PV, Humphrey MJ. The metabolism and pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in humans and animals. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 12 (Suppl. 7): S55–S59, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SH, Lee P, Jackson N, Cocco G. A four-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel dose-response study of amlodipine in patients with stable exertional angina pectoris. American Heart Journal 118: 1133–1134, 1989b

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SH, Silke B, Verma SP, Sharma SK, Jackson N. A hemodynamic comparison of verapamil, diltiazem, and amlodipine in coronary artery disease. American Heart Journal 118: 1105–1106, 1989a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thadani U and the Amlodipine Study Group. Amlodipine: a once-daily calcium antagonist in the treatment of angina pectoris — a parallel dose-response, placebo-controlled study. American Heart Journal 118: 1135, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Théroux P, Taeymans Y, Waters DD. Calcium antagonists: clinical use in the treatment of angina. Drugs 25: 178–195, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandewoude M, Coche E, DeSmedt, Vryems R. Open evaluation of amlodipine in the monotherapeutic treatment of systolic hypertension in the elderly. Symposium: Topics in cardiovascular medicine. 24 Hour protection and control: a new era of calcium antagonists’; Nice, 14–15 Sep, 1989

  • Varrone J and the investigators of study AML-NY-86-002. Amlodipine use in the hypertensive patient in daily practice. Symposium: ‘Topics in cardiovascular medicine. 24 Hour protection and control: a new era of calcium antagonists’; Nice, 14–15 Sep, 1989

  • Velasco M, Hernandez R, Guevara J. A double-blind, parallel, comparative evaluation of amlodipine versus captopril in the monotherapeutic treatment of mild and moderate essential hypertension: interim results. Symposium: ‘Topics in cardiovascular medicine. 24 Hour protection and control: a new era of calcium antagonists’; Nice, 14–15 Sep, 1989

  • Vetrovec G, Dailey S, Kay GN, Epstein A, Plumb V. Hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of amlodipine, a new long-acting calcium antagonist: preliminary observations. American Heart Journal 118: 1104–1105, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Zwieten PA. Vascular effects of calcium antagonists: implications for hypertension and other risk factors for coronary heart disease. American Journal of Cardiology 64: 1171–1211, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster J, Robb OJ, Jeffers TA, Scott AK, Petrie JC, et al. Once daily amlodipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 24: 713–719, 1987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein DB, Heider JG. Antiatherogenic properties of calcium antagonists. American Journal of Cardiology 59: 163B-172B, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams DM, Cubeddu LX. Amlodipine pharmaeokinetics in healthy volunteers. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 28: 990–994, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wit AL, Cranefield P. Effect of verapamil on the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes of the rabbit and the mechanisms by which it arrests re-entrant atrioventricular nodal tachycardia. Circulation Research 35: 413–425, 1974

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yasue H, Omote S, Takizawa A, Nagao M, Miwa K, et al. Exertional angina pectoris caused by coronary arterial spasm: effects of various drugs. American Journal of Cardiology 43: 647–652, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zipes DP, Besch HP, Watanabe AM. Role of the slow current in cardiac electrophysiology. Circulation 51: 761–766, 1975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zipei DP, Fischer JC. Effects of agents which inhibit the slow channel on sinus node automaticity and atrioventricular conduction in the dog. Circulation Research 34: 184–192, 1974

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by: D.R. Abernethy, Division of Biology and Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA; F. Bernini, Instituto di Scienze Farmacologiche, Facoltà di Farmacia, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy; S.G. Chrysant, Oklahoma Cardiovascular and Hypertension Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; A.E. Doyle, Repatriation General Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg West, Victoria, Australia; H.L. Elliott, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Glasgow, Stobhill General Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland; M. Epstein, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA; W.H. Frishman, Montefiore Medical Center, The Jack D. Weiler Hospital of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine Division, Bronx, New York, USA; R. Hernandez, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, School of Medicine, Universidad Centro Occidental, ‘Lisandro Alvarado’, Barquisimeto, Venezuela; K. Ishii, Osaka Medical College, Department of Pharmacology, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan; E.J. Johns, Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, The Medical School, Edgbaston, Birmingham, England; W. Kiowski, Kantonsspital Basel, Department Innere Medizin, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Petersgraben, Switzerland; Y. Koiwaya, First Department of International Medicine, Miyazaki Medical College, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, Japan; W.J. Mroczek, Cardiovascular Center of Northern Virginia at Seven Corners, Falls Church, Virginia, USA; U. Thadani, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Cardiovascular Section, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03257483.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murdoch, D., Heel, R.C. Amlodipine. Drugs 41, 478–505 (1991). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199141030-00009

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199141030-00009

Keywords

Navigation