Skip to main content
Log in

Thromboprophylaxis with Low Molecular Weight Heparin after Major Orthopaedic Surgery is Cost Effective

  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the socioeconomic consequences of routine administration of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, on the basis of data from a number of clinical studies. Despite the higher direct costs associated with LMWH, this regimen was more cost effective per thromboembolic complication prevented than no prophylaxis, dextran 70, or low dose un-fractionated heparin. A sensitivity analysis was performed to address the outcome when the main factors in the economic analysis were changed; this had no significant effect on the conclusions of the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Planes A, Silsiguen M, Vochelle N. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. In Bergqvist D, Comerota AJ, Nicolaides AN, et al., editors. European Consensus Statement. London: Med Opin Publ Com, 1994: 271–80

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borris LC, Lassen MR, Jensen HP, et al. Perioperative thrombosis prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins in elective hip surgery: clinical and economic considerations. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994; 32: 262–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergqvist D, Jendteg S, Lindgren B, et al. The economics of general thromboembolic prophylaxis. World J Surg 1988; 12: 349–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Menzin J, Richter R, Huse D, et al. Prevention of deep-vein thrombosis following total hip replacement surgery with enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Ann Pharmacother 1994; 28: 271–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Brien BJ, Anderson DR, Goeree R. Cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin versus warfarin prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. Can Med Assoc J 1994; 150: 1083–90

    Google Scholar 

  6. Danish Enoxaparin Study Group. Low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) vs dextran 70. The prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 1621–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Trowbridge A, Boese CK, Woodruff B, et al. Incidence of posthospitalization proximal deep vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty. A pilot study. Clin Orthop 1994; 299: 203–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scurr JH, Coleridge-Smith PD, Hasty JH. Deep venous thrombosis: a continuing problem. BMJ 1988; 297: 28–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borris, L.C., Lassen, M.R. Thromboprophylaxis with Low Molecular Weight Heparin after Major Orthopaedic Surgery is Cost Effective. Drugs 52 (Suppl 7), 42–46 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199600527-00008

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199600527-00008

Keywords

Navigation