Skip to main content
Log in

In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Oral Cephalosporins

A Selective and Comparative Review

  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The in vitro activity of orally active first generation (cefalexin), second generation (cefaclor and cefuroxime) and third generation (cefdinir, cefixime, ceftibuten, cefpodoxime, cefprozil, and cefetamet) cephalosporins was reviewed. All of these cephalosporins inhibit community-acquired respiratory pathogens (i.e. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and S. pyogenes) and Neisseriaceae, but have little or no clinically relevant activity against oxacillin-/methicillin-resistant staphylococci, enterococci, Gramnegative rods (i.e. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Xanthomonas maltophilia), or anaerobic rods (i.e. Bacteroides fragilis and Clostridium species). Cefalexin, cefaclor and cefuroxime are less potent inhibitors and have a narrower spectrum of activity than the third generation cephalosporins reviewed. Among the third generation cephalosporins, cefixime inhibits the broadest spectrum of Enterobacteriaceae, but cefixime, ceftibuten, and cefetamet lack any clinically meaningful antistaphylococcal activity, and cefpodoxime and cefprozil are several dilution-folds less active against staphylococci than cefdinir. Cefdinir matches the potent inhibitory activity of cefixime against the most common community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens and the most common community-acquired Enterobacteriaceae (i.e. Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis and Klebsiella pneumoniae). In addition, of the third generation cephalosporins reviewed, cefdinir is the most potent inhibitor of the common community-acquired staphylococcal pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci and S. saprophyticus. Thus, the spectrum of activity of cefdinir encompasses most clinically significant community-acquired pathogens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Finch R. Skin and soft-tissue infections. Lancet 1988; 1: 164–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Friend JAR, Petrie JC. Respiratory Diseases. In: Speight TM, editor. Avery’s drug treatment. Chap. XX. Auckland: Adis Press Limited, 1987: 812–54

    Google Scholar 

  3. Greenwood D, Slack R. Urinary tract infection. Br J Pharmacol 1982; 13: 619–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. MacFarlane JT. Treatment of lower respiratory infections. Lancet 1987; 2: 1446–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. NCCLS. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Tentative standard M23-T: development of in vitro susceptibility testing criteria and quality control parameters. Villanova, PA: NCCLS, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  6. NCCLS. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Approved standard M7-A2: standard methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Villanova, PA: NCCLS, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  7. Briggs BM, Jones RN, Erwin ME, et al. In vitro activity evaluations of cefdinir (FK482, CI983, and PD134393). A novel orally administered cephalosporin. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1991; 14: 425–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerlach EH, Jones RN, Allen SD, et al. Cefdinir (FK 482), an orally administered cephalosporin in vitro activity comparison against recent clinical isolates from five medical centers and determination of MIC quality control guidelines. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 15: 537–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Scriver SR, Willey BM, Low DE, et al. Comparative in vitro activity of cefdinir (CI-983; FK-482) against staphylococci, Gram-negative bacilli and respiratory tract pathogens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 11: 646–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Qadri SM, Ueno Y, Saldin H, et al. In vitro activity of cefdinir (FK 482, PD 134393, CL-983): a new orally active cephalosporin. Chemotherapy (Basel) 1993; 39: 112–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bauernfeind A, Jungwirth R, Schweighart S, et al. Antibacterial activity and stability towards new beta-lactamases of eleven oral cephalosporins. Infection 1990; 18(Suppl. 3): 155–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Neu HC, Saha G, Chin N-X. Comparative in vitro activity and β-lactamase stability of FK482, a new oral cephalosporin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1989; 33: 1800–1975

    Google Scholar 

  13. Payne DJ, Amyes SGB. The sensitivity of clinical bacteria isolated in Scotland to the oral cephalosporin, cefdinir. Drugs Exp Clin Res 1992; 18: 225–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wise R, Andrews JM, Thornber D. The in-vitro activity of cefdinir (FK482), a new oral cephalosporin. J Antimicrob Chemother 1991; 28: 239–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Verbist L, Verhaegen J. Comparative in vitro activity of cefdinir (CI-983, FK-482) against aerobic microorganisms. Poster presented at the 17th ICC, Berlin, Germany, June 24, 1991

  16. Bauernfeind A, Przyklenk B, Jungwirth R, et al. Comparative activity of cefdinir (CI-983, FK-482) against staphylococci. Poster presented at the 17th ICC, Berlin, Germany, June 24, 1991

  17. Barrett MS, Jones RN. Susceptibility testing interpretive criteria and drug stability for cefdinir, cefetamet, and cefpodoxime against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 15: 685–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Frampton JE, Buckley MM, Brogden RN, et al. Cefpodoxime proxetil: a review of its antibacterial acativity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential. Drugs 1992; 44: 889–917

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones RN. Antimicrobial activity, spectrum and pharmacokinetics of old and new orally administered cephems. Antimicrobic Newsletter 1988; 5: 1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jones RN. New oral antimicrobial agents. Curr Opin Infect Dis 1989; 2: 367–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, R.N. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Oral Cephalosporins. Clin. Drug Invest. 9 (Suppl 3), 22–30 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199500093-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199500093-00005

Keywords

Navigation