Skip to main content
Log in

Dosage Regimens of Antibacterials

Implications of a Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model

  • Clinical Pharmacology
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A prominent trend in optimising anti-infective therapy is to prescribe time-dependent antibacterials (e.g. β-lactams, glycopeptides) using short dosing intervals, but to prescribe concentration-dependent antibacterials (e.g. aminoglycosides, quinolones) using widely spaced intervals — even once daily. However, the currently prevailing notion that the clinical efficacy of concentration-dependent antibacterials can be improved by lengthening the dosing interval has not been well established. We integrated the differential equations of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model describing the fate of a bacterial population in the presence of an antibacterial agent. We studied the variations of predicted efficacy, using a 1-compartment pharmacokinetic model with intravenous administration, according to the ratio between the dosing interval and the half-life of the drug, for a given daily dose. Simulations were performed using the published in vitro killing curve data of Pseudomonas aeruginosa obtained with tobramycin and ticarcillin. The results suggest that, independent of the time- or concentration-dependent nature of the antibacterial agent and the susceptibility of the pathogen, steady-state efficacy will decrease as the dosing interval increases, and therefore all antibacterials should ideally be administered at relatively short dosing intervals compared with their half-life, so that concentrations are below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as little as possible. Some arguments support the use of a large loading dose for concentration-dependent antibacterials, to rapidly reach steady-state at the infection site (this is also valid for time-dependent antibacterials), and to avoid the emergence of resistant mutants. Aminoglycosides are a special case within the class of concentration-dependent antibacterials, because of the possibility of adaptive resistance in terms of efficacy and of saturable target-organ uptake in terms of toxicity, both of which may support the concept of a long administration interval for these agents. Widely spaced administration of large doses of antibacterials with little dose-dependent toxicity may remain a valuable option, for reasons of cost and convenience, in the case of high susceptibility of the pathogen. However, in difficult situations (e.g. short drug half-life, high MIC of the pathogen, compromised host defences), optimising therapy using short dosing intervals should be most beneficial, especially when both the dose and the dose interval are adjusted for each patient (bodyweight, renal function, etc.) to achieve and maintain specific peak and trough concentrations selected according to the infecting organism and its susceptibility to the drug.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ebert SC, Craig WA. Pharmacodynamic properties of antibiotics: application to drug monitoring and dosage regimen design. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990; 6: 319–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Craig WA, Ebert SC. Killing and regrowth of bacteria in vitro: a review. Scand J Infect Dis 1991; Suppl. 74: 63–70

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergan T, Carlsen IB. Bacterial kill rates of amoxycillin and ampicillin at exponentially diminishing concentrations simulating in vivo conditions. Infection 1980; 8 Suppl. 1: 103S–8S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah PM, Ghahremani M, Gorres FJ, et al. Bactericidal activity of antimicrobials in the dynamic kill-curve model. J Drug Develop 1988; 1 Suppl. 3: 35–47

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garrett ER. Kinetics of antimicrobials action. Scand J Infect Dis 1978; 14: 54–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Navashin SM, Fomina IP, Firsov AA, et al. A dynamic model for in vitro evaluation of antimicrobial action by simulation of the pharmacokinetic profiles of antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother 1989; 23: 389–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Briceland LL, Pasko MT, Mylotte JM. Serum bacterial rate as a measure of antibiotic interactions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987; 31: 679–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tisdale JE, Pasko MT, Mylotte JM. Antipseudomonal activity of simulated infusions of gentamicin alone or with piperacillin assessed by serum bactericidal rate and area under the killing curve. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1989; 33: 1500–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Drusano GL. Human pharmacodynamics of beta-lactams, aminoglycosides and their combination. Scand J Infect Dis 1991; Suppl. 74: 235–48

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhi J, Nightingale CH, Quintiliani R. Microbial pharmacodynamics of piperacillin in neutropenic mice with systemic infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1988; 16: 355–75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mentré F. Analyse de la relation dose-effet par les modèles de population. In: Chastang C, Pons G, Regnier B, editors. Méthodes nouvelles en pharmacologie clinique pédiatrique. Paris: Springer-Verlag, 1992: 69–88

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blaser J, Stone BB, Zinner SH. Efficacy of intermittent versus continuous administration of netilmicin in a two-compartment in vitro model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1985; 27: 343–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Blaser J, Stone BB, Groner MC, et al. Comparative study with enoxacin and netilmicin in a pharmacodynamic model to determine importance of ratio of antibiotic peak concentration to MIC for bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987; 31: 1054–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gerber AU, Wiprächtiger P, Stettier-Spichiger U, et al. Constant infusions vs. intermittent doses of gentamicin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro. J Infect Dis 1982; 145: 554–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vogelman BS, Craig WA. Postantibiotic effects. J Antimicrob Chemother 1985; 15 Suppl. A: 37–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Leggett JE, Ebert S, Fantin B, et al. Comparative dose-effect relations at several dosing intervals for beta-lactams, aminoglycoside and quinolone antibiotics against Gram-negative bacilli in murine thigh-infection and pneumonitis models. Scand J Infect Dis 1991; Suppl. 74: 179–84

    Google Scholar 

  17. Giuliano RA, Verpooten GA, Verbist L, et al. In vivo uptake kinetics of aminoglycosides in the kidney cortex of rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1986; 236: 470–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Verpooten GA, Giuliano RA, Verbist L, et al. Once-daily dosing decreases renal accumulation of gentamicin and netilmicin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 45: 22–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mattie H, Craig WA, Péchère JC. Determinants of efficacy and toxicity of aminoglycosides. J Antimicrob Chemother 1989; 24: 281–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Barclay ML, Begg EJ, Hickling KG. What is the evidence for once-daily aminoglycoside therapy? Clin Pharmacokinet 1994; 27: 32–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhanel GG, Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic contributions to postantibiotic effects. Focus on aminoglycosides. Clin Pharmacokinet 1994; 27: 377–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Daikos GL, Jackson GG, Lolans VT, et al. Adaptive resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics from first exposure down-regulation. J Infect Dis 1990; 162: 414–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Daikos GL, Lolans VT, Jackson GG. First-exposure adaptive resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics in vivo with meaning for optimal clinical use. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35: 117–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouvier d’Yvoire, M.J.Y., Maire, P.H. Dosage Regimens of Antibacterials. Clin. Drug Invest. 11, 229–239 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199611040-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199611040-00006

Keywords

Navigation