Skip to main content
Log in

Risperidone, Haloperidol and Clozapine in the South Carolina Medicaid Program

A Comparative Analysis of Utilisation and Expenditure

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the increased acquisition costs associated with the atypical antipsychotic risperidone are offset by reductions in other mental health care utilisation and expenditure.

Design and setting: The study was population-based and used South Carolina Medicaid claims data to determine changes in mental healthcare utilisation and expenditures related to schizophrenia. Changes in mental health—related utilisation and expenditures over time were calculated; total mental health—related expenditures and utilisation were disaggregated into pharmaceuticals, inpatient hospitalisations, and ambulatory and inpatient physician services [Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) 1500 claims]. Groups of patients were compared for two 6-month periods preceding the initial prescription (pre1 and pre2), and two 6-month periods following the initial prescription (post1 and post2). Costs were discounted to the index date.

Perspective: Payor (South Carolina Medicaid).

Patients: Those patients with schizophrenia who received initial prescriptions for risperidone (n = 862), haloperidol (n = 325) or clozapine (n = 66) between February 1994 and June 1995 (index date).

Main outcome measures and results: The mean increase in level of expenditure per person for pharmaceuticals from the pre- to the post-treatment period was significantly greater in the risperidone [751 US dollars ($US)] and clozapine ($US1423) groups than in the haloperidol group ($US6). However, the change in mean level of total mental healthcare expenditure per person was not significantly different for the risperidone group ($US832) compared with the haloperidol group ($US540) over the same time period, but the increase in the clozapine group was significantly higher ($US2500.23; p < 0.0001 for clozapinevsrisperidone and clozapine vs haloperidol).

As the difference between the risperidone and haloperidol groups in pharmaceutical expenditures was not reflected in total mental healthcare expenditures, the remaining component costs were investigated to identify where the difference was offset. Compared with haloperidol, risperidone had a significantly smaller change in per person mean level of ambulatory and inpatient physician services claims for expenditure ($US692 vs $US269, p = 0.01) and utilisation (+1.70 vs −0.21, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Based on these findings, we conclude that, in this population of patients with schizophrenia increased costs associated with risperidone were offset by decreases in other mental healthcare utilization. Risperidone is a technical substitute for ambulatory healthcare services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Fig. 1
Table IV
Table V
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lieberman JA. Prediction of outcome in first-episode schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 1993; 54 Suppl. 3: 13–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marder SR. Management of schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 1996; 57 Suppl. 3: 9–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rupp A, Keith SJ. The costs of schizophrenia. Psych Clin North Am 1993; 16(2): 413–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carpenter WT, Buchanan RW. Schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 1994; 330(10): 681–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marken PA, Stanislav SW. Schizophrenia. In: Young LY, Koda-Kimble MA, editors. Applied therapeutics: the clinical use of drugs. 6th ed. Vancouver (BC): Applied Therapeutics, 1995: 75.1–75.26

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pary R, Tobias CR, Lippmann S. Chronic schizophrenia: options for pharmacologic management. Postgrad Med 1995; 98(5): 163–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lieberman JA. Atypical antipsychotic drugs as first-line treatment of schizophrenia: a rationale and hypothesis. J Clin Psychiatry 1996; 57 Suppl. 11: 68–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beasley Jr CM, Tollefson G, Tran P, et al. Olanzapine versus placebo and haloperidol: acute phase results of the North American double-blind olanzapine trial. Neuropsychopharmacology 1996; 14(2): 111–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Remington G, Kapur S. Neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms and the role of combined serotonin/dopamine antagonism. J Clin Psychiatry 1996; 14(1): 14–24

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chouinard G, Jones B, Remington G, et al. A Canadian multicenter placebo-controlled study of fixed dose of risperidone and haloperidol in the treatment of chronic schizophrenic patients. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1993; 13(1): 25–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kane J, Honigfeld G, Singer J, et al. Clozapine for the treatment resistant schizophrenic: a double blind comparison with chlorpromazine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45(9): 789–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Addington DE, Jones B, Bloom D, et al. Reduction of hospital days in chronic schizophrenic patients treated with risperidone: a retrospective study. Clin Ther 1993; 15(5): 917–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindstrom E, Eriksson B, Hellgren A, et al. Efficacy and safety of risperidone in the long-term treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Clin Ther 1995; 17(3): 402–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Albright PS, Livingstone S, Keegan Dl, et al. Reduction of healthcare resource utilisation and costs following the use of risperidone for patients with schizophrenia previously treated with standard antipsychotic therapy: a retrospective analysis using the Saskatchewan Health linkable databases. Clin Drug Invest 1996; 1: 289–99

    Google Scholar 

  15. Viale G, Mechling L, Maislin G, et al. Impact of risperidone on the use of mental health care resources. Psychiatr Serv 1997; 48(9): 1153–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nightengale BS, Crumley JM, Liao J, et al. Economic outcomes of antipsychotic agents in a Medicaid population: traditional agentsvsrisperidone. Psychopharmacol Bull 1998; 34(3): 373–82

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt KM, Hart AC, Aaron WS, editors. St. Anthony’s ICD-9-CM code book. Reston: St. Anthony Publishing, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-experimentation. Boston (MA): Houghton Mifflin Company, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  19. May PR, Tuma AH, Yale C, et al. Schizophrenia: a follow-up study of results of treatment: II: hospital stay over two to five years. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976; 33: 481–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Crow TJ, MacMillan JF, Johnson AL, et al. A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic neuroleptic treatment. Br J Psychiatry 1986; 148: 120–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Loebel AD, Lieberman JA, Alvir JMJ, et al. Duration of psychosis and outcome in first episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1992; 149: 1183–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wyatt RJ. Neuroleptics and the natural course of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1991; 17: 325–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. SAS Institute, Inc. SAS version 6.12. Cary (NC): SAS Institute, Inc., 1997

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shermock, K.M., Sadik, M.K., Kozma, C.M. et al. Risperidone, Haloperidol and Clozapine in the South Carolina Medicaid Program. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 9, 203–213 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200109040-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200109040-00003

Keywords

Navigation