This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (2689) Innovations and Technology for Healthy Eating Education (396) Innovations and Technology for Physical Activity Education (676) mHealth for Patient Education (210) Cardiac Self-Management (95) Instruments and Questionnaires for Physical Activity and Lifestyle (64) Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions (3029) Usability of Apps and User Perceptions of mHealth (868) Demographics of Users, Social & Digital Divide (670) Use and User Demographics of mHealth (306) Behavior Change (644)

Published on in Vol 9, No 11 (2021): November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/28024, first published .
Improvements in Diet and Physical Activity–Related Psychosocial Factors Among African Americans Using a Mobile Health Lifestyle Intervention to Promote Cardiovascular Health: The FAITH! (Fostering African American Improvement in Total Health) App Pilot Study

Improvements in Diet and Physical Activity–Related Psychosocial Factors Among African Americans Using a Mobile Health Lifestyle Intervention to Promote Cardiovascular Health: The FAITH! (Fostering African American Improvement in Total Health) App Pilot Study

Improvements in Diet and Physical Activity–Related Psychosocial Factors Among African Americans Using a Mobile Health Lifestyle Intervention to Promote Cardiovascular Health: The FAITH! (Fostering African American Improvement in Total Health) App Pilot Study

Authors of this article:

Jissy Cyriac1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sarah Jenkins2 Author Orcid Image ;   Christi A Patten3 Author Orcid Image ;   Sharonne N Hayes4 Author Orcid Image ;   Clarence Jones5 Author Orcid Image ;   Lisa A Cooper6 Author Orcid Image ;   LaPrincess C Brewer4, 7 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (11) Tweetations (12) Metrics

    Original Paper

    1Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Rochester, MN, United States

    2Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States

    3Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States

    4Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States

    5Hue-Man Partnership, Minneapolis, MN, United States

    6Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States

    7Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States

    *all authors contributed equally

    Corresponding Author:

    LaPrincess C Brewer, MD, MPH

    Department of Cardiovascular Medicine

    Mayo Clinic College of Medicine

    200 First St. SW

    Rochester, MN, 55905

    United States

    Phone: 1 507 266 1376

    Email: brewer.laprincess@mayo.edu


    Background: African Americans continue to have suboptimal cardiovascular health (CVH) related to diet and physical activity (PA) behaviors compared with White people. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions are innovative platforms to improve diet and PA and have the potential to mitigate these disparities. However, these are understudied among African Americans.

    Objective: This study aims to examine whether an mHealth lifestyle intervention is associated with improved diet and PA-related psychosocial factors in African Americans and whether these changes correlate with diet and PA behavioral change.

    Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis evaluating changes in diet and PA-related self-regulation, social support, perceived barriers, and CVH behaviors (daily fruit and vegetable intake and moderate-intensity PA [MPA] per week) in 45 African American adults (mean age 48.7 years, SD 12.9 years; 33/45, 73% women) enrolled in the FAITH! (Fostering African American Improvement in Total Health) app pilot study. The intervention is a 10-week, behavioral theory–informed, community-based mHealth lifestyle intervention delivered through a mobile app platform. Participants engaged with 3 core FAITH! app features: multimedia education modules focused on CVH with self-assessments of CVH knowledge, self-monitoring of daily fruit and vegetable intake and PA, and a sharing board for social networking. Changes in self-reported diet and PA-related self-regulation, social support, perceived barriers, and CVH behaviors were assessed by electronic surveys collected at baseline and 28 weeks postintervention. Changes in diet and PA-related psychosocial factors from pre- to postintervention were assessed using paired 2-tailed t tests. The association of changes in diet and PA-related psychosocial variables with daily fruit and vegetable intake and MPA per week was assessed using Spearman correlation. Associations between baseline and 28-week postintervention changes in diet and PA-related psychosocial measures and CVH behaviors with covariates were assessed by multivariable linear regression.

    Results: Participants reported improvements in 2 subscales of diet self-regulation (decrease fat and calorie intake, P=.01 and nutrition tracking, P<.001), one subscale of social support for healthy diet (friend discouragement, P=.001), perceived barriers to healthy diet (P<.001), and daily fruit and vegetable intake (P<.001). Improvements in diet self-regulation (increase fruit, vegetable, and grain intake, and nutrition tracking) and social support for healthy diet (friend encouragement) had moderate positive correlations with daily fruit and vegetable intake (r=0.46, r=0.34, and r=0.43, respectively). A moderate negative correlation was observed between perceived barriers to healthy diet and daily fruit and vegetable intake (r=−0.25). Participants reported increases in PA self-regulation (P<.001). Increase in social support subscales for PA (family and friend participation) had a moderate positive correlation with MPA per week (r=0.51 and r=0.61, respectively).

    Conclusions: Our findings highlight key diet and PA-related psychosocial factors to target in future mHealth lifestyle interventions aimed at promoting CVH in African Americans.

    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(11):e28024

    doi:10.2196/28024

    Keywords

    African Americans; cardiovascular health disparities; mHealth lifestyle intervention; diet; physical activity; mobile phone 


    Background

    African Americans have the highest rates of coronary heart disease and stroke-related deaths compared with White people and other racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States [1]. Cardiovascular risk factors such as suboptimal diet and physical activity (PA) have been identified as significant contributors to the disproportionate cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden among African Americans [1]. African Americans have an extremely low prevalence of individuals achieving ideal levels on 5 or more cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics, as outlined by the American Heart Association Life’s Simple 7 (LS7) [1-3].

    Suboptimal CVH in African Americans is rooted in structural racism, which has systematically limited their access to quality health care, employment opportunities, education, and safe neighborhood environments. The resulting scarcity of resources has led to elevated stress levels, food insecurity, and poor access to recreational spaces, all of which affect CVH in African Americans [4-7]. These structural inequities can further manifest as negative psychosocial factors that can influence health behaviors and CVH outcomes in African Americans [8-11]. In African Americans, increased self-reported stress and depressive symptoms have been associated with greater calorie consumption and lower levels of PA, respectively [10]. There is evidence to suggest that psychosocial factors affecting healthy diet and PA, such as cost and lack of time, are negatively associated with diet quality and regular PA, respectively [12-14]. Data on diet-related psychosocial factors indicate that self-regulatory behaviors, such as mindful food preparation, have been associated with healthier food acquisition and decreased purchase of preprepared foods among African American adults [15,16]. In addition, culturally tailored interventions integrating social support and addressing barriers have been identified as facilitators of PA in African American women [14,17]. African American women have also expressed a preference for interventions that promote self-regulatory behaviors (self-monitoring of PA) and incorporate strategies to overcome barriers to improve their PA patterns [17]. These findings provide compelling evidence that targeting diet and PA-related self-regulation, social support, and perceived barriers in mobile health (mHealth) lifestyle interventions for African Americans may facilitate improvements in diet and PA behaviors.

    Mobile app–based health interventions have the potential to improve diet and PA patterns among African Americans. Research from the Pew Research Center has shown that African Americans are less likely than White people to have traditional broadband access at home but are equally likely to own cell phones and smartphones. They are also more likely to use smartphones to access the internet, web-based social networking sites, and health information [18-20]. Thus, the use of smartphones for health promotion has the potential to mitigate health disparities, and makes progress toward achieving health equity through technology-based interventions [21].

    In addition, there is emerging evidence that interventions using mHealth apps may promote diet and PA behavior change [22-24] and may be effective interventional tools for underserved African American communities [21,25]. However, mHealth interventions have been significantly understudied in African American populations. James et al [26] found that <10% of identified mHealth studies within their systematic review included African American participants, and only 14% of those mHealth studies entirely comprised all African American participants. This is despite African Americans having high smartphone ownership, mobile technology use (including mobile apps), and eHealth literacy (EHL) [20,27-29]. EHL is defined as an individual’s ability to search for and understand health information on the internet using computers and mobile devices [30]. Given high EHL and smartphone ownership in African Americans, mHealth lifestyle interventions may be particularly effective in promoting healthy diet and PA behaviors.

    Current mHealth interventions to promote healthy diet and PA in African Americans suggest that they can be effective as stand-alone interventions [31-35] or adjuncts to in-person interventions [36-39]. Allicock et al [31] demonstrated that a stand-alone, mobile app–based intervention to encourage healthy diet and PA behaviors among African American survivors of breast cancer led to a significant reduction in sedentary time and fast food intake. Another culturally tailored, internet-based intervention for PA promotion as an adjunct to in-person PA sessions resulted in a significant reduction in sedentary behaviors among African American women [38]. Furthermore, mHealth interventions have demonstrated success in increasing diet and PA self-monitoring [39], promoting healthy diet and regular PA [33,35] and facilitating weight loss in African Americans [32,34,36,37]. Although mHealth lifestyle interventions have demonstrated improvements in diet and PA outcomes, few have discussed the interplay between psychosocial factors such as underlying diet and PA-related self-regulation, social support, perceived barriers, and their associations with health behaviors [33,34,38,40].

    Goal of This Study

    We seek to provide insight into this current gap in the literature by exploring changes in diet and PA-related self-regulation, social support, perceived barriers, and their associations with diet and PA patterns among African Americans using our culturally tailored, community-based mHealth lifestyle intervention. The FAITH! (Fostering African American Improvement in Total Health) app pilot study tested a novel mHealth intervention aiming to improve CVH in African Americans through local African American church congregations [41]. Through the use of the FAITH! app, participants had statistically significant improvements in diet, PA, blood pressure, and overall composite LS7 score [35].

    The primary aim of this study is to examine changes in diet and PA-related self-regulation, social support, and perceived barriers among participants in the FAITH! app pilot study. We also aim to assess whether any of the observed changes in these measures correlate with CVH behaviors (daily fruit and vegetable intake and moderate-intensity PA [MPA] per week). We hypothesize that participants would demonstrate improvements in diet and PA-related self-regulation, social support, perceived barriers, and CVH behaviors using the FAITH! app intervention.


    Study Design

    This study is a retrospective analysis examining changes in diet and PA-related psychosocial factors in the FAITH! app pilot study. Details of the intervention design, recruitment, implementation, and outcomes have been previously published [35,41,42]. Briefly, the pilot study was conducted using a single group, pretest-posttest intervention framework to assess CVH knowledge, behaviors, and biological factors among African Americans following the use of a mobile app–based intervention. The cohort was recruited from 5 African American churches within the Rochester and Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, metropolitan areas. The pilot study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03084822) and approved by the Mayo Clinic institutional review board. Participants provided written informed consent before enrollment in the study.

    Data Collection

    Baseline data were collected in July 2016, and follow-up data at 28 weeks were collected postintervention (April 2017). Electronic surveys were emailed directly to participants to assess their sociodemographic data, EHL, diet and PA-related self-regulation, social support, and perceived barriers, along with CVH behaviors (daily fruit and vegetable intake and MPA per week) at baseline and 28 weeks post intervention. Postintervention evaluation occurred at 28 weeks in an effort to align with the AHA LS7, the primary outcome of the parent study [35]. The LS7 comprises both biological and behavioral factors, and its evaluation was completed at the 28-week postintervention time point to assess for sustained changes in these variables. Thus, the present analysis examines changes from baseline to 28 weeks postintervention to concurrently assess for sustained changes in diet and PA-related self-regulation, social support, perceived barriers, and CVH behaviors. Outcome evaluation was designed based on psychosocial measures previously described in the literature, noted trends in a previous in-person iteration of the FAITH! program, and the theoretical foundation of the FAITH! app intervention [42-44]. Participants received up to US $150 in gift cards for their completion of survey assessments.

    Theoretical Framework: Intervention and Psychosocial Measures

    The 10-week intervention was delivered through a mobile app (FAITH! app; Figure 1) and consisted of 3 core features: (1) a multimedia education module series on CVH with pre- and postmodule self-assessments of CVH knowledge, (2) self-monitoring of daily fruit and vegetable intake and PA, and (3) a sharing board for networking with other participants. At study enrollment, participants were provided iPads with the FAITH! app installed and Fitbits (Charge 2, 2016 version, Fitbit Inc) for PA and step tracking. Within the FAITH! app, participants were expected to complete one educational module per week and complete the associated pre- and postmodule self-assessments, with completion of all educational modules by the end of the 10-week intervention. Participants entered daily entries for fruit and vegetable intake and PA during the course of 10 weeks. In addition, participants were encouraged to post on the sharing board for social networking with other study participants; no limits were imposed on the number of posts an individual participant could submit. Participants were expected to engage in all 3 core app features described above for the 10-week intervention delivery phase, and their engagement patterns with these features were closely monitored via Google Analytics [45]. Participants continued to have access to the app in the postintervention phase, but this was not monitored. Further details of the FAITH! app design and key features have been previously published [42].

    ‎
    Figure 1. FAITH! (Fostering African American Improvement in Total Health) app core features: (A) cardiovascular health education modules and self-assessments; (B) diet and physical activity self-monitoring; (C) sharing board.
    View this figure

    The FAITH! app was developed using a community-based participatory approach grounded in behavioral theories (social cognitive theory, health belief model, and community mobilization model) [42]. Social cognitive theory posits that individual health behavior is dependent on their reciprocal interaction with observational learning and reinforcements. We applied this theory within the FAITH! app via the sharing board, where participants could see others from their own communities modeling positive health behaviors (eg, diet and PA). This in turn could motivate their adoption of these behaviors [42]. In addition, the sharing board allowed individuals to receive positive reinforcement from others in the study to maintain healthy diet and PA behaviors. Correspondingly, social support was assessed to gauge the degree of positive reinforcement and observational role modeling experienced by participants through the use of the intervention. Central to the health belief model is that interventions are more effective in changing health behaviors if they influence an individual’s perception of susceptibility to illness or disease, severity of illness, potential positive benefits of healthy action, barriers to such action, and exposure to factors that prompt action (cues to action) [46]. Furthermore, a focus on perceived barriers and perceived benefits has been demonstrated to be the strongest predictor of behavior change [47]. On the basis of the principles of the health belief model, the CVH education modules were designed to convey the high CVD risk of African Americans and the severity of the consequences of CVD (heart attacks, heart failure, and strokes). In addition, the modules emphasized greater benefits than barriers to maintaining a healthy diet and regular PA and thus aimed to increase the likelihood that participants would take action to engage in these health behaviors. Participants’ prompts to action and self-directed behavior were further reinforced by encouraged use of the diet and PA self-monitoring app features. Accordingly, changes in diet and PA self-regulation and perceived barriers to healthy diet and PA were assessed to determine how effectively the intervention addressed these components of the health belief model [42]. Community mobilization was leveraged with the involvement of community partners from participating African American churches in all stages of app design using a community-based participatory research approach to ensure that the app incorporated African American religious and spiritual beliefs, the social connectedness aspects of the African American church, and cultural traditions of the African American community [42,48]. African American churches have been the cornerstone of academic-community partnerships seeking to enact social justice through research to improve health and access to quality care among African Americans [49].

    Measurement of Psychosocial Factors

    Diet-Related Measures

    Diet self-regulation was assessed using 14 items from the Health Beliefs Survey developed by Anderson et al [50], where each item was measured using a 5-point Likert scale (1=never to 5=always). Three subscales of diet self-regulation were assessed, including strategies to (1) increase fruit, vegetable, and grain intake (3 survey items; Cronbach α=.67), (2) decrease fat and calorie intake (6 survey items; Cronbach α=.78), and (3) plan and track nutrition (5 survey items; Cronbach α=.80). Responses for items in each category were averaged to calculate each score (range 1-5). Higher scores indicated greater dietary self-regulation. Social support for healthy diet was assessed using a survey instrument developed by Sallis et al [51], which consists of 20 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1=never to 5=very often) that assessed subscales of encouragement and discouragement from family and friends for healthy diet (4 subscales: family encouragement [5 items; Cronbach α=.81], friend encouragement [5 items; Cronbach α=.81], family discouragement [5 items; Cronbach α=.56], and friend discouragement [5 items; Cronbach α=.74]). Higher scores implied greater encouragement or discouragement, respectively. Perceived barriers to healthy diet were assessed using 15 items adapted from the Lose It Forever study questionnaire by Welsh et al [52]. The survey asked participants to evaluate the availability of healthy foods, the ability to control cravings for unhealthy foods, prepare healthy meals, and level of difficulty in the daily environment to choose healthy foods. Participants responded to items on a 5-point Likert scale (1=not at all true to me to 5=very true for me). Responses for each item were averaged to calculate a final score (range 1-5), with higher scores implying greater barriers (Cronbach α=.88).

    PA-Related Measures

    PA self-regulation was measured using the Self-Regulation Scale from the Health Beliefs Survey, which includes 10 items, using a 5-point Likert scale (1=never to 5=always) [33,50,53]. The scale assesses strategies to increase PA and the efforts used to track step counts over the past month. Scores across all items were averaged to calculate a final score (range 1-5), with higher scores indicating higher PA self-regulation (Cronbach α=.84). Social support for PA was measured using a survey instrument developed by Sallis et al [51] and comprised 23 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1=never to 5=very often) that assessed subscales of: family participation [10 items; Cronbach α=.92], family rewards or punishment [3 items; Cronbach α=.48], and friend participation [10 items; Cronbach α=.93]. Higher scores implied greater participation or reward or punishment, respectively. An adaptation of the Exercise Barriers Scale was used to assess barriers to exercise [54,55]. Participants rated a list of 20 items on a 4-point Likert scale (1=strongly agree to 4=strongly disagree) on how much they presented a barrier to exercise. Items included time for PA, convenience to complete PA, competing responsibilities, and concerns about hairstyle. The response to each item was reversed so that more agreement indicated more barriers. The items were averaged to calculate the final score (range 1-4), with higher scores implying greater barriers (Cronbach α=.91).

    CVH Behaviors

    Self-reported daily fruit and vegetable intake was assessed using 2 items adapted from previously developed instruments assessing fruit and vegetable intake [56-58]. Respondents reported daily servings of fruit and vegetables consumed. This instrument has been previously validated in a similar population of African Americans [59]. PA was assessed as self-reported total minutes of MPA per week using the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire) survey. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire has also been validated among African Americans [60,61]. MPA per week was used as it is a part of the standardized LS7 components and associated metrics [2,35].

    Covariates

    Key covariates for assessment of associations with psychosocial factors as well as diet and PA behaviors included sociodemographic data (age, sex, income, education level, marital status, and employment status), EHL, and level of app engagement. Participant EHL was measured using the eHealth Literacy Scale, which consists of 8 items on a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree; Cronbach α=.89) assessing self-reported skills in using eHealth information [30]. High versus low EHL was dichotomized at a score of 26, as previously used by Richtering et al [62]. The level of app engagement was categorized as high versus low. Participants with high app engagement met at least two of the following three criteria: (1) >70% completion of self-assessments within CVH education modules, (2) at least 7 entries into the diet and PA self-monitoring feature, and (3) at least one post on the sharing board. Participants who did not meet these criteria were categorized as having low app engagement. These parameters were determined by real-time monitoring of the participants’ use patterns of key features within the FAITH! app throughout the intervention phase (via Google Analytics). As a pilot study of the newly created FAITH! app among a fairly understudied population, a priori engagement patterns were not available.

    Statistical Analyses

    Participant data were summarized with frequencies and percentages, means and SDs, or medians and IQRs, as appropriate. Changes in the psychosocial measures from baseline to 28 weeks postintervention (∆) were assessed with paired 2-tailed t tests, with the exception of MPA per week, which was assessed with the signed-rank test. Effect sizes (Cohen d) were calculated as the average difference (28 weeks postintervention minus the baseline) divided by the SD of the difference, with the exception of MPA per week, for which the effect size was calculated as the difference in medians divided by the IQR. Effect sizes of <0.5 were categorized as small, 0.5 to <0.8 was categorized as medium, and ≥0.8 was categorized as high. Associations between baseline and 28-week postintervention changes in psychosocial measures and CVH behaviors with participant covariates (sex, employment status, EHL, and app engagement) were assessed using multivariable linear regression (or quantile regression at the median for MPA per week), including all covariates together. Given the small sample size, a focused set of covariates was included in the multivariable analysis. Associations between changes in diet and PA-related psychosocial measures with changes in daily fruit and vegetable intake and MPA per week were quantified using Spearman correlations (r). Correlations >0.2 were considered moderately associated, and correlations of >0.7 were considered highly associated. All analyses were performed using the SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Inc). All statistical tests were 2-tailed, and statistical significance was defined as P≤.01, and 99% CIs were reported along with the mean differences.


    Participant Demographics

    The analytic sample included 45 African American participants (mean age 48.7 years, SD 12.9 years; 33/45, 73% women) who completed the 10-week mHealth lifestyle intervention and surveys at baseline and 28-week postintervention (Table 1).

    Changes in Diet and PA-Related Psychosocial Measures and CVH Behaviors

    Overview

    Table 2 summarizes changes in the sample for all measured diet and PA-related psychosocial measures along with CVH behaviors from baseline to 28 weeks postintervention.

    Table 1. Baseline participant characteristics (N=45).
    CharacteristicsValues
    Age (years), mean (SD; range)48.7 (12.9; 26.0-72.0)
    Sex, n (%)

    		Women33 (73)

    		Men12 (27)
    Annual household income (n=40; US $), n (%)

    		<35,00014 (35)

    		≥35,00026 (65)
    Employment status, n (%)

    		Employed at least part time34 (76)

    		Unemployed11 (24)
    Marital status, n (%)

    		Unmarried22 (49)

    		Married23 (51)
    Education level, n (%)

    		No degree15 (33)

    		Technical, associate’s, college, or advanced degree30 (67)
    eHealth literacy score (n=40)

    		Value, mean (SD; range)30.5 (4.5; 21.0-40.0)

    		Low (<26), n (%)6 (15)

    		High (≥26), n (%)34 (85)
    App engagement, n (%)

    		Low20 (44)

    		High 25 (56)
    Table 2. Changes in diet and physical activity (PA)-related psychosocial measures and cardiovascular health behaviors, baseline to 28 weeks postintervention (N=45).
    CharacteristicsBaseline, mean (SD)a28 weeks postintervention, mean (SD)aDifference in scorea,b, mean (SD; 99% CI)Effect sizec (Cohen d)P value
    Diet-related psychosocial measures

    		Diet self-regulation


    		Increase fruit, vegetable, and grain intake3.3 (0.7)3.5 (0.7)0.2 (0.8; −0.1 to 0.6)0.32.04


    		Decrease fat and calorie intake3.0 (0.7)3.3 (0.7)0.3 (0.8; 0.0 to 0.6)0.41.01


    		Nutrition tracking2.1 (0.8)2.7 (0.8)0.6 (0.9; 0.2 to 1.0)0.61<.001

    		Social support for healthy diet


    		Family encouragement13.4 (4.8)12.9 (5.2)−0.5 (3.6; −2.0 to 1.0)−0.14.36


    		Family discouragement12.0 (3.8)11.5 (4.7)−0.5 (3.9; −2.1 to 1.1)−0.14.38


    		Friend encouragement11.8 (4.6)10.9 (4.7)−1.0 (5.0; −3.2 to 1.3)−0.19.25


    		Friend discouragement11.2 (4.6)9.0 (3.2)−2.1 (3.6; −3.7 to −0.5)−0.60.001

    		Perceived barriers to healthy diet2.5 (0.7)2.2 (0.6)−0.4 (0.5; −0.6 to −0.2)−0.76<.001
    Diet behavior

    		Daily fruit and vegetable intake (servings per day)3.4 (1.4)4.5 (1.8)1.2 (1.9; 0.4 to 1.9)0.62<.001
    PA-related psychosocial measures

    		PA self-regulation2.3 (0.6)2.7 (0.7)0.4 (0.7; 0.2 to 0.7)0.65<.001

    		Social support for PA


    		Family participation19.7 (8.9)20.1 (8.8)0.3 (8.6; −3.2 to 3.8)0.04.80


    		Family rewards or punishment3.7 (1.5)4.0 (1.6)0.4 (1.5; −0.2 to 1.0)0.25.10


    		Friend participation18.5 (10.2)21.9 (9.4)3.4 (8.4; −0.8 to 7.6)0.40.03

    		Perceived barriers to PA1.7 (0.4)1.7 (0.5)0.0 (0.5; −0.2 to 0.2)−0.01.93
    PA behavior

    		MPAd per week (minutes per week), median (IQR; 99% CI)e35.0 (0.0 to 110.0)75.0 (25.0 to 187.5) 30.0 (−12.5 to 122.5; −52.5 to 92.5)0.22.04

    aMean (SD) shown, unless otherwise specified.

    bDifference in score calculated before rounding as change in score from baseline to postintervention.

    cEffect size calculated before rounding as the mean difference divided by the SD of the difference, unless otherwise specified.

    dMPA: moderate-intensity physical activity.

    e99% CI for median difference estimated with quantile regression; effect size calculated as median difference divided by IQR; P value from signed-rank test.

    Diet-Related Psychosocial Measures and Daily Fruit and Vegetable Intake

    Participants reported statistically significant improvements in 2 subscales of diet self-regulation (decrease fat and calorie intake: ∆ +0.3; P=.01; Cohen d=0.41 and nutrition tracking: ∆ +0.6; P<.001; Cohen d=0.61), one subscale of social support (friend discouragement: ∆ −2.1; P=.001; Cohen d=−0.60), and perceived barriers to healthy diet (∆ −0.4; P<.001; Cohen d=−0.76) from baseline to 28 weeks postintervention. The sample also showed statistically significant improvements in reported daily fruit and vegetable intake (∆ +1.2; P<.001; Cohen d=0.62).

    PA-Related Psychosocial Measures and MPA Per Week

    Participants reported statistically significant improvements in PA self-regulation (∆ +0.4; P<.001; Cohen d=0.65) from baseline to 28 weeks postintervention. Participants reported a slight improvement in MPA per week (∆ +30 minutes; P=.04; Cohen d=0.22); however, this did not reach statistical significance.

    Correlation of Psychosocial Measures With CVH Behaviors

    Tables 3 and 4 summarize the correlation of the measured changes in diet and PA-related self-regulation, social support, and perceived barriers to CVH behaviors. Improvements in subscales of diet self-regulation (increase fruit, vegetable, and grain intake and nutrition tracking) had a moderate positive correlation (r=0.46 and r=0.34, respectively) with improvement in daily fruit and vegetable intake. Among social support for healthy diet subscales, increased friend encouragement for a healthy diet had a moderate positive correlation (r=0.43) with an increase in daily fruit and vegetable intake. A moderate negative correlation (r=−0.25) was seen between perceived barriers to healthy diet and daily fruit and vegetable intake (ie, greater barriers to healthy diet corresponded with less fruit and vegetable intake). For PA, 2 subscales of social support for PA (family and friend participation) had a moderate positive correlation (r=0.51 and r=0.61, respectively) with MPA per week.

    Table 3. Correlations of changes in diet-related psychosocial measures to changes in cardiovascular health behaviors (N=45).
    Diet-related psychosocial measuresCorrelation to change in daily fruit and vegetable intakea (servings per day)
    Diet self-regulation

    		Increase fruit, vegetable, and grain intake0.46

    		Decrease fat and calorie intake0.03

    		Nutrition tracking0.34
    Social support for healthy diet

    		Family encouragement0.004

    		Family discouragement0.19

    		Friend encouragement0.43

    		Friend discouragement0.05
    Perceived barriers to healthy diet−0.25

    aCorrelations >0.2 were considered moderately associated.

    Table 4. Correlations of changes in physical activity (PA)-related psychosocial measures to changes in cardiovascular health behaviors (N=45).
    PA-related psychosocial measuresCorrelation to change in MPAa per weekb (minutes per week)
    PA self-regulation0.17
    Social support for PA

    		Family rewards or punishment0.09

    		Family participation0.51

    		Friend participation0.61
    Perceived barriers to PA−0.08

    aMPA: moderate-intensity physical activity.

    bCorrelations >0.2 were considered moderately associated.

    Comparisons With Covariates

    In multivariable regression analyses, there were no statistically significant differences in pre- and postintervention score changes among any of the sociodemographics, EHL, or app engagement groups for diet and PA-related psychosocial measures and CVH behaviors.


    Principal Findings

    Our findings demonstrate that a culturally tailored, community-based mHealth lifestyle intervention can improve key diet and PA-related psychosocial factors and CVH behaviors in African Americans. In addition, several of the improvements in these diet and PA-related psychosocial measures were associated with improvements in diet and PA, which to our knowledge has not been previously described in the setting of a mobile app–based lifestyle intervention. The changes noted in our study were of small to medium effect sizes. This is consistent with the findings of other studies with similar sample sizes evaluating changes in diet and PA-related psychosocial measures [40]. A longer intervention timeframe may be needed to see greater changes in the diet and PA-related psychosocial measures evaluated in this study.

    Our findings illustrating the benefits of using an mHealth lifestyle intervention on diet and PA-related self-regulation in African Americans are consistent with those of other investigators. Participants in our study reported improvements in the subscales of diet self-regulation as well as PA self-regulation. Furthermore, improvements in diet self-regulation subscales were positively associated with increased daily fruit and vegetable intake. Ferrante et al [34] evaluated changes in diet and PA-related psychosocial variables and weight loss outcomes in a Fitbit plus mobile app lifestyle intervention versus a Fitbit only control group among African American survivors of breast cancer. Compared with the control group, participants in the intervention arm demonstrated sustained improvement across a larger number of self-regulatory behaviors for healthy diet and PA. In the Smart Walk study, an mHealth app–based intervention aimed at increasing PA in African American women, participants demonstrated improvements in self-regulation for PA [40]. Similar to these cohorts, our analytic sample was predominantly composed of African American women. Qualitative data on the interplay between health and spirituality in African American women show that health self-management in African American women is deeply intertwined with their spiritual and faith connections [63]. Thus, it is possible that faith-based interventions, such as this study, may provide greater self-regulatory benefits for African American women.

    Social support has been consistently identified as an important psychosocial variable for maintaining healthy diet [64] and PA, with family members and friends being identified as key sources of support [14,17]. Among the social support subscales for healthy diet, participants reported a decrease in friend discouragement in our study. In addition, improvements in friend encouragement were associated with increased daily fruit and vegetable intake. With respect to social support for PA, improving trends were noted for friend participation; however, this did not reach statistical significance. However, increases in family and friend participation were positively associated with increased MPA per week. Ferrante et al [34] reported improvements in social support for healthy diet but no significant changes in social support for PA, similar to our findings. In the Smart Walk study, there was no significant improvement in social support for PA; however, qualitative participant feedback suggested that increasing features for engagement on a sharing board with moderated discussion by the study team can facilitate participation and possibly increase social support [40]. In a recent qualitative analysis of the FAITH! app pilot study, participants demonstrated that they received encouragement and social support toward a healthy lifestyle from posts by other participants on the sharing board [48]. Thus, facilitating opportunities for discussion among study participants through a sharing board feature may foster meaningful engagement in mHealth interventions and increase social support in mHealth lifestyle interventions. Further investigation is necessary to better elucidate the most effective means of enhancing social support through greater opportunities for engagement within mHealth interventions.

    Prior studies have pointed to multiple barriers such as fatigue, time, cost, and lack of social support leading to poor diet and PA among African Americans [13,14,16]. In addition, there are links between socioeconomic and educational inequities experienced by African Americans that influence perceived barriers to healthy diet and PA. Analysis of survey data from a predominantly African American population by Sharpe et al [65] found that food-secure households reported better diet-related psychosocial factors than food insecure households; however, both groups had largely similar dietary intake patterns. Another study by Wilcox et al [66] found that in a predominantly African American population, less than a high school education was associated with lower diet quality, whereas income and food security were positively associated with higher diet quality. Employed African Americans have been found to have a lower cooking frequency than unemployed African Americans, which indicates that time constraints may be a limiting factor in healthy diet among employed African Americans [16]. Our evaluation of participants’ perceived barriers to healthy diet and PA encompassed similar factors as these studies but also included sociocultural considerations (hairstyle), ability to prepare healthy meals, environmental constraints (neighborhood), and support from family and friends. Overall, there was an improvement in perceived barriers to healthy diet, which further correlated with improvements in dietary intake. These findings suggest that our mHealth lifestyle intervention may offer support to African Americans in the navigation of perceived barriers stemming from longstanding structural inequities—or possibly, in spite of these existing inequities—by providing CVH education and highlighting practical strategies to incorporate healthy diet into daily life.

    Strengths and Limitations

    There are several strengths to this study. Our findings contribute further data on improvements in diet and PA-related psychosocial factors in African Americans participating in an mHealth lifestyle intervention. We further provide novel contributions by describing how changes in these underlying diet and PA-related psychosocial factors are associated with diet and PA behaviors. The intervention was co-designed with African American community members from participating churches who could give voice to the daily lived experiences of African Americans to ensure that the intervention emphasized African American faith, spirituality, and social connectedness. This study implemented an mHealth lifestyle intervention that was well-aligned with smartphone use patterns in African Americans and one that was well-received by participants [48].

    Our study has several limitations. This pilot study included a small convenience sample of African Americans residing in Minnesota; thus, our study was limited by selection bias and is not representative of all African Americans. Furthermore, the small sample size limited our statistical power. As such, we were unable to run formal mediation analyses to probe causal relationships between diet and PA-related psychosocial factors and their respective behaviors. With respect to covariate comparisons, our sample was not adequately sized to detect meaningful patterns based on sociodemographics, EHL, or level of app engagement. The psychosocial factors and CVH behavior measures were self-reported by the participants, which could reflect social desirability bias. Our pretest-posttest, quasi-experimental design lacked a control group, and the study was of a relatively short duration. A longer intervention duration may demonstrate a greater effect on diet and PA-related psychosocial measures. Research is currently underway to further evaluate the preliminary findings presented in this pilot study with a larger, more representative sample of African Americans within a randomized controlled trial (NCT03777709).

    Conclusions

    Our preliminary findings indicate that the use of a culturally tailored mHealth lifestyle intervention can improve diet and PA behaviors as well as several underlying diet and PA-related psychosocial factors. Diet and PA-related self-regulation, social support, and perceived barriers may be key psychosocial variables to target in future mHealth lifestyle interventions aiming to improve CVH behaviors among African Americans. In addition, we co-designed and implemented a mobile app–based intervention in partnership with an underserved African American community that was well-aligned with and complemented their mobile technology use patterns. It is important to understand the nuances of mobile technology use among African Americans compared with other populations in the United States and to design interventions that account for these differences to prevent the widening of the digital divide. Mobile app–based interventions may be powerful tools to address CVH disparities that disproportionately affect African Americans.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors thank all study participants and partnering church congregations for their unwavering support and commitment to the design and implementation of the intervention and their valuable contributions to this research.

    LCB was supported by the American Heart Association–Amos Medical Faculty Development Program (grant 19AMFDP35040005) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (Clinical and Translational Science Awards grant KL2 TR002379), the National Institutes of Health and National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (grant R21 MD013490-01), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (grant CDC-DP18-1817) during the implementation and analysis of this study. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Advancing Translational Science, National Institutes of Health, or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This publication was supported by Clinical and Translation Awards grant UL1 TR000135 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science to the Mayo Clinic and the Mayo Clinic Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement in Research. The funding bodies had no role in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021 Feb 23;143(8):254-743. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Djoussé L, Petrone AB, Blackshear C, Griswold M, Harman JL, Clark CR, et al. Prevalence and changes over time of ideal cardiovascular health metrics among African-Americans: The Jackson Heart Study. Prev Med 2015 May;74:111-116 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D, Mozaffarian D, Appel LJ, Van HL, American Heart Association Strategic Planning Task Force and Statistics Committee. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: The American Heart Association's strategic impact goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation 2010 Feb 2;121(4):586-613 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Cooper LA, Crews DC. COVID-19, racism, and the pursuit of health care and research worthy of trust. J Clin Invest 2020 Oct 01;130(10):5033-5035 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Williams DR, Lawrence JA, Davis BA, Vu C. Understanding how discrimination can affect health. Health Serv Res 2019 Dec;54 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1374-1388 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Carnethon MR, Pu J, Howard G, Albert MA, Anderson CA, Bertoni AG, American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology Prevention, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology, Stroke Council. Cardiovascular health in African Americans: a scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation 2017 Nov 21;136(21):393-423. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Churchwell K, Elkind MS, Benjamin RM, Carson AP, Chang EK, Lawrence W, American Heart Association. Call to action: structural racism as a fundamental driver of health disparities: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2020 Dec 15;142(24):454-468. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Sims M, Glover LS, Gebreab SY, Spruill TM. Cumulative psychosocial factors are associated with cardiovascular disease risk factors and management among African Americans in the Jackson Heart Study. BMC Public Health 2020 Apr 28;20(1):566 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Sims M, Diez-Roux AV, Gebreab SY, Brenner A, Dubbert P, Wyatt S, et al. Perceived discrimination is associated with health behaviours among African-Americans in the Jackson Heart Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016 Mar;70(2):187-194 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Sims M, Lipford KJ, Patel N, Ford CD, Min Y, Wyatt SB. Psychosocial factors and behaviors in african americans: The Jackson Heart Study. Am J Prev Med 2017 Jan;52(1S1):48-55. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Brewer LC, Redmond N, Slusser JP, Scott CG, Chamberlain AM, Djousse L, et al. Stress and achievement of cardiovascular health metrics: The American Heart Association life's simple 7 in blacks of the Jackson Heart Study. J Am Heart Assoc 2018 Jun 05;7(11):e008855 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Adams IK, Figueroa W, Hatsu I, Odei JB, Sotos-Prieto M, Leson S, et al. An examination of demographic and psychosocial factors, barriers to healthy eating, and diet quality among african american adults. Nutrients 2019 Feb 28;11(3):519 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Aycinena AC, Valdovinos C, Crew KD, Tsai WY, Mata JM, Sandoval R, et al. Barriers to recruitment and adherence in a randomized controlled diet and exercise weight loss intervention among minority breast cancer survivors. J Immigr Minor Health 2017 Feb;19(1):120-129. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Burse NR, Bhuiyan N, Mama SK, Schmitz KH. Physical activity barriers and resources among black women with a history of breast and endometrial cancer: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 2020 Aug;14(4):556-577. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Henry JL, Trude AC, Surkan PJ, Steeves EA, Hopkins LC, Gittelsohn J. Psychosocial determinants of food acquisition and preparation in low-income, urban african american households. Health Educ Behav 2018 Dec;45(6):898-907 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Farmer N, Wallen GR, Yang L, Middleton KR, Kazmi N, Powell-Wiley TM. Household cooking frequency of dinner among non-hispanic black adults is associated with income and employment, perceived diet quality and varied objective diet quality, HEI (healthy eating index): NHANES analysis 2007-2010. Nutrients 2019 Sep 02;11(9):2057 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Joseph RP, Ainsworth BE, Mathis L, Hooker SP, Keller C. Utility of social cognitive theory in intervention design for promoting physical activity among African-American women: a qualitative study. Am J Health Behav 2017 Sep 01;41(5):518-533 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Smith A. African Americans and technology use: a demographic portrait. Pew Research Center. 2014.   URL: https:/​/www.​pewresearch.org/​internet/​wp-content/​uploads/​sites/​9/​2014/​01/​African-Americans-and-Technology-Use.​pdf [accessed 2021-09-13]
    19. Anderson C, Cohn S. Mobile Technology and Home Broadband 2019. Pew Research Center. 2019 Jun 13.   URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/06/13/mobile-technology-and-home-broadband-2019/ [accessed 2021-09-13]
    20. James DC, Harville C. eHealth literacy, online help-seeking behavior, and willingness to participate in mhealth chronic disease research among African Americans, Florida, 2014-2015. Prev Chronic Dis 2016 Dec 17;13:E156 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Brewer LC, Fortuna KL, Jones C, Walker R, Hayes SN, Patten CA, et al. Back to the future: achieving health equity through health informatics and digital health. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020 Jan 14;8(1):e14512 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Wang Y, Xue H, Huang Y, Huang L, Zhang D. A systematic review of application and effectiveness of mHealth interventions for obesity and diabetes treatment and self-management. Adv Nutr 2017 May 15;8(3):449-462. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Rathbone AL, Prescott J. The use of mobile apps and SMS messaging as physical and mental health interventions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2017 Aug 24;19(8):e295 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Shaw R, Bosworth H. Short message service (SMS) text messaging as an intervention medium for weight loss: a literature review. Health Informatics J 2012 Dec;18(4):235-250 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Joseph RP, Royse KE, Benitez TJ. A systematic review of electronic and mobile health (e- and mhealth) physical activity interventions for african american and hispanic women. J Phys Act Health 2019 Mar 01;16(3):230-239. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. James DC, Harville C, Sears C, Efunbumi O, Bondoc I. Participation of African Americans in e-health and m-health studies: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2017 May;23(5):351-364. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. James DC, Harville C. Barriers and motivators to participating in mHealth research among African American men. Am J Mens Health 2017 Nov;11(6):1605-1613. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. James DC, Harville C, Whitehead N, Stellefson M, Dodani S, Sears C. Willingness of African American women to participate in e-health/m-health research. Telemed J E Health 2016 Mar;22(3):191-197 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. James DC, Harville C. Smartphone usage, social media engagement, and willingness to participate in mHealth weight management research among African American women. Health Educ Behav 2018 Jun;45(3):315-322. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale. J Med Internet Res 2006 Nov 14;8(4):e27 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Allicock M, Kendzor D, Sedory A, Gabriel KP, Swartz MD, Thomas P, et al. A pilot and feasibility mobile health intervention to support healthy behaviors in African American breast cancer survivors. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2021 Feb;8(1):157-165. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Cohen A, Perozich A, Rajan R, Persky S, Parisi J, Bowie J, et al. Framed, interactive theory-driven texting: effects of message framing on health behavior change for weight loss. Fam Community Health 2017;40(1):43-51 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Joseph RP, Keller C, Adams MA, Ainsworth BE. Print versus a culturally-relevant Facebook and text message delivered intervention to promote physical activity in African American women: a randomized pilot trial. BMC Womens Health 2015 Mar 27;15:30 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Ferrante JM, Devine KA, Bator A, Rodgers A, Ohman-Strickland PA, Bandera EV, et al. Feasibility and potential efficacy of commercial mHealth/eHealth tools for weight loss in African American breast cancer survivors: pilot randomized controlled trial. Transl Behav Med 2020 Oct 08;10(4):938-948. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Brewer LC, Hayes SN, Jenkins SM, Lackore KA, Breitkopf CR, Cooper LA, et al. Improving cardiovascular health among African-Americans through mobile health: The FAITH! app pilot study. J Gen Intern Med 2019 Aug;34(8):1376-1378 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Allen JK, Stephens J, Dennison HC, Stewart KJ, Hauck S. Randomized controlled pilot study testing use of smartphone technology for obesity treatment. J Obes 2013;2013:151597 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Lin M, Mahmooth Z, Dedhia N, Frutchey R, Mercado CE, Epstein DH, et al. Tailored, interactive text messages for enhancing weight loss among African American adults: The TRIMM randomized controlled trial. Am J Med 2015 Aug;128(8):896-904. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Joseph RP, Pekmezi D, Dutton GR, Cherrington AL, Kim Y, Allison JJ, et al. Results of a culturally adapted internet-enhanced physical activity pilot intervention for overweight and obese young adult African American women. J Transcult Nurs 2016 Mar;27(2):136-146 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Wang J, Cai C, Padhye N, Orlander P, Zare M. A behavioral lifestyle intervention enhanced with multiple-behavior self-monitoring using mobile and connected tools for underserved individuals with type 2 diabetes and comorbid overweight or obesity: pilot comparative effectiveness trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018 Apr 10;6(4):e92 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Joseph RP, Ainsworth BE, Hollingshead K, Todd M, Keller C. Results of a culturally tailored smartphone-delivered physical activity intervention among midlife African American women: feasibility trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021 Apr 22;9(4):e27383 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Brewer LC, Jenkins S, Lackore K, Johnson J, Jones C, Cooper LA, et al. mHealth intervention promoting cardiovascular health among African-Americans: recruitment and baseline characteristics of a pilot study. JMIR Res Protoc 2018 Jan 31;7(1):e31 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. Brewer LC, Hayes SN, Caron AR, Derby DA, Breutzman NS, Wicks A, et al. Promoting cardiovascular health and wellness among african-americans: community participatory approach to design an innovative mobile-health intervention. PLoS One 2019 Aug 20;14(8):e0218724 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Brewer LC, Balls-Berry JE, Dean P, Lackore K, Jenkins S, Hayes SN. Fostering African-American improvement in total health (FAITH!): an application of the american heart association's life's simple 7™ among midwestern African-Americans. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2017 Apr;4(2):269-281 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Brewer LC, Morrison EJ, Balls-Berry JE, Dean P, Lackore K, Jenkins S, et al. Preventing cardiovascular disease: participant perspectives of the FAITH! program. J Health Psychol 2017 Oct;24(12):1710-1723. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Google Analytics. Google. 2021.   URL: https://analytics.google.com/analytics/web/provision/#/provision [accessed 2021-09-14]
    46. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q 1984;11(1):1-47. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Carpenter CJ. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health Commun 2010 Dec;25(8):661-669. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Brewer LC, Kumbamu A, Smith C, Jenkins S, Jones C, Hayes SN, et al. A cardiovascular health and wellness mobile health intervention among church-going african americans: formative evaluation of the FAITH! app. JMIR Form Res 2020 Nov 17;4(11):e21450 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Brewer LC, Williams DR. We've come this far by faith: the role of the black church in public health. Am J Public Health 2019 Mar;109(3):385-386. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR, Williams DM. Social cognitive mediators of change in a group randomized nutrition and physical activity intervention: social support, self-efficacy, outcome expectations and self-regulation in the guide-to-health trial. J Health Psychol 2010 Jan;15(1):21-32. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Sallis JF, Grossman RM, Pinski RB, Patterson TL, Nader PR. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med 1987 Nov;16(6):825-836. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Welsh EM, Jeffery RW, Levy RL, Langer SL, Flood AP, Jaeb MA, et al. Measuring perceived barriers to healthful eating in obese, treatment-seeking adults. J Nutr Educ Behav 2012;44(6):507-512 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett RA, Williams DM. Social-cognitive determinants of physical activity: the influence of social support, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and self-regulation among participants in a church-based health promotion study. Health Psychol 2006 Jul;25(4):510-520. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    54. Sechrist KR, Walker SN, Pender NJ. Development and psychometric evaluation of the exercise benefits/barriers scale. Res Nurs Health 1987 Dec;10(6):357-365. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    55. Jackson H, Yates BC, Blanchard S, Zimmerman LM, Hudson D, Pozehl B. Behavior-specific influences for physical activity among African American women. West J Nurs Res 2016 Aug;38(8):992-1011. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    56. Luszczynska A, Tryburcy M, Schwarzer R. Improving fruit and vegetable consumption: a self-efficacy intervention compared with a combined self-efficacy and planning intervention. Health Educ Res 2007 Oct;22(5):630-638 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    57. Thompson FE, Subar AF, Smith AF, Midthune D, Radimer KL, Kahle LL, et al. Fruit and vegetable assessment. J Am Diet Assoc 2002 Dec;102(12):1764-1772. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    58. Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM, Carroll MD, Gannon J, Gardner L. A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am J Epidemiol 1986 Sep;124(3):453-469. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    59. Kreuter MW, Sugg-Skinner C, Holt CL, Clark EM, Haire-Joshu D, Fu Q, et al. Cultural tailoring for mammography and fruit and vegetable intake among low-income African-American women in urban public health centers. Prev Med 2005 Jul;41(1):53-62. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    60. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-1395. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    61. Wolin KY, Heil DP, Askew S, Matthews CE, Bennett GG. Validation of the international physical activity questionnaire-short among blacks. J Phys Act Health 2008 Sep;5(5):746-760 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    62. Richtering SS, Hyun K, Neubeck L, Coorey G, Chalmers J, Usherwood T, et al. eHealth literacy: predictors in a population with moderate-to-high cardiovascular risk. JMIR Hum Factors 2017 Jan 27;4(1):e4 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    63. Harvey IS, Johnson L, Heath CD. Womanism, spirituality, and self-health management behaviors of African American older women. Women Gender Fam Color 2013 Jun;1(1):59. [CrossRef]
    64. Watters JL, Satia JA, Galanko JA. Associations of psychosocial factors with fruit and vegetable intake among African-Americans. Public Health Nutr 2007 Jul;10(7):701-711. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    65. Sharpe PA, Whitaker K, Alia KA, Wilcox S, Hutto B. Dietary intake, behaviors and psychosocial factors among women from food-secure and food-insecure households in the United States. Ethn Dis 2016 Apr 21;26(2):139-146 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    66. Wilcox S, Sharpe PA, Liese AD, Dunn CG, Hutto B. Socioeconomic factors associated with diet quality and meeting dietary guidelines in disadvantaged neighborhoods in the southeast United States. Ethn Health 2020 Nov;25(8):1115-1131. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    CVD: cardiovascular disease
    CVH: cardiovascular health
    EHL: eHealth literacy
    FAITH!: Fostering African American Improvement in Total Health
    LS7: Life’s Simple 7
    mHealth: mobile health
    MPA: moderate-intensity physical activity
    PA: physical activity

    Edited by L Buis; submitted 16.03.21; peer-reviewed by C Carrion, A Lucas, K Devine; comments to author 12.05.21; revised version received 27.07.21; accepted 01.09.21; published 12.11.21

    Copyright

    ©Jissy Cyriac, Sarah Jenkins, Christi A Patten, Sharonne N Hayes, Clarence Jones, Lisa A Cooper, LaPrincess C Brewer. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 12.11.2021.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.