We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine
Research Article

Synergistic cytotoxicity of irinotecan and cisplatin in dual-drug targeted polymeric nanoparticles

    Pedro M Valencia

    Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

    ,
    Eric M Pridgen

    Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

    ,
    Brian Perea

    The School for Engineering of Matter, Transport & Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA

    ,
    Suresh Gadde

    Laboratory of Nanomedicine & Biomaterials & Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA

    ,
    Christopher Sweeney

    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA

    ,
    Philip W Kantoff

    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA

    ,
    Neil H Bander

    Weill Medical College of Cornell University, NY 10065, USA

    ,
    Stephen J Lippard

    Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

    MIT–Harvard Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

    ,
    Robert Langer

    Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

    Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

    ,
    Rohit Karnik

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

    Authors contributed equally

    Search for more papers by this author

    &
    Omid C Farokhzad

    * Author for correspondence

    Laboratory of Nanomedicine & Biomaterials & Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. .

    MIT–Harvard Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.12.134

    Aim: Two unexplored aspects for irinotecan and cisplatin (I&C) combination chemotherapy are: actively targeting both drugs to a specific diseased cell type, and delivering both drugs on the same vehicle to ensure their synchronized entry into the cell at a well-defined ratio. In this work, the authors report the use of targeted polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) to coencapsulate and deliver I&C to cancer cells expressing the prostate-specific membrane antigen. Materials & methods: Targeted NPs were prepared in a single step by mixing four different precursors inside microfluidic devices. Results: I&C were encapsulated in 55-nm NPs and showed an eightfold increase in internalization by prostate-specific membrane antigen-expressing LNCaP cells compared with nontargeted NPs. NPs coencapsulating both drugs exhibited strong synergism in LNCaP cells with a combination index of 0.2. Conclusion: The strategy of coencapsulating both I&C in a single NP targeted to a specific cell type could potentially be used to treat different types of cancer.

    Original submitted 24 February 2012; Revised submitted 21 June 2012; Published online 17 October 2012

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest ▪▪ of considerable interest

    References

    • Chabner BA, Roberts TG Jr. Timeline: chemotherapy and the war on cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer5(1),65–72 (2005).
    • Jia J, Zhu F, Ma X, Cao Z, Li Y, Chen YZ. Mechanisms of drug combinations: interaction and network perspectives. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.8(2),111–128 (2009).
    • Lehar J, Krueger AS, Avery W et al. Synergistic drug combinations tend to improve therapeutically relevant selectivity. Nat. Biotechnol.27(7),659–666 (2009).
    • Mayer LD, Harasym TO, Tardi PG et al. Ratiometric dosing of anticancer drug combinations: controlling drug ratios after systemic administration regulates therapeutic activity in tumor-bearing mice. Mol. Cancer Ther.5(7),1854–1863 (2006).
    • Kelland L. The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer7(8),573–584 (2007).
    • Wang D, Lippard SJ. Cellular processing of platinum anticancer drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.4(4),307–320 (2005).
    • Jung Y, Lippard SJ. Direct cellular responses to platinum-induced DNA damage. Chem. Rev.107(5),1387–1407 (2007).
    • Garcia-Carbonero R, Supko JG. Current perspectives on the clinical experience, pharmacology, and continued development of the camptothecins. Clin. Cancer Res.8(3),641–661 (2002).
    • Tardi PG, Dos Santos N, Harasym TO et al. Drug ratio-dependent antitumor activity of irinotecan and cisplatin combinations in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cancer Ther.8(8),2266–2275 (2009).▪ Demonstrates that a specific drug combination of irinotecan and cisplatin could be antagonistic, additive or synergistic depending on the administered drug ratio.
    • 10  Noda K, Nishiwaki Y, Kawahara M et al. Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.346(2),85–91 (2002).
    • 11  Hanna N, Bunn PA Jr, Langer C et al. Randomized Phase-III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin with etoposide/cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol.24(13),2038–2043 (2006).
    • 12  Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat. Nanotechnol.2(12),751–760 (2007).▪▪ Excellent review on nanotechnology, specifically nanoparticles for cancer therapy.
    • 13  Shi J, Xiao Z, Kamaly N, Farokhzad OC. Self-assembled targeted nanoparticles: evolution of technologies and bench to bedside translation. Acc. Chem. Res.44(10),1123–1134 (2011).
    • 14  Hrkach J, Von Hoff D, Ali M et al. Preclinical development and clinical translation of a PSMA-targeted docetaxel nanoparticle with a differentiated pharmacological profile. Sci. Transl. Med.4(128),128ra39 (2012).
    • 15  Kamaly N, Xiao Z, Valencia PM, Radovic-Moreno AF, Farokhzad OC. Targeted polymeric therapeutic nanoparticles: design, development and clinical translation. Chem. Soc. Rev.41(7),2971–3010 (2012).
    • 16  Hu C, Aryal S, Zhang L. Nanoparticle-assisted combination therapies for effective cancer treatment. Ther. Deliv.1(2),323–334 (2010).▪▪ Excellent review on the use of nanoparticles for combination chemotherapy. It discusses the advantages of using nanoparticles for combination chemotherapy and summarizes previous work carried out in the field.
    • 17  Kolishetti N, Dhar S, Valencia PM et al. Engineering of self-assembled nanoparticle platform for precisely controlled combination drug therapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107(42),17939–17944 (2010).▪▪ Shows coencapsulation and delivery of two drugs with different chemical and physical properties in the same nanoparticle.
    • 18  Maresca KP, Hillier SM, Femia FJ et al. A series of halogenated heterodimeric inhibitors of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) as radiolabeled probes for targeting prostate cancer. J. Med. Chem.52(2),347–357 (2009).
    • 19  Hillier SM, Maresca KP, Femia FJ et al. Preclinical evaluation of novel glutamate–urea–lysine analogues that target prostate-specific membrane antigen as molecular imaging pharmaceuticals for prostate cancer. Cancer Res.69(17),6932–6940 (2009).
    • 20  Cheng J, Teply BA, Sherifi I et al. Formulation of functionalized PLGA–PEG nanoparticles for in vivo targeted drug delivery. Biomaterials28(5),869–876 (2007).
    • 21  Karnik R, Gu F, Basto P et al. Microfluidic platform for controlled synthesis of polymeric nanoparticles. Nano Lett.8(9),2906–2912 (2008).▪ First publication where polymeric poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide)-co-poly(ethylene glycol) nanoparticles were prepared in microfluidic devices.
    • 22  Valencia PM, Basto PA, Zhang L et al. Single-step assembly of homogenous lipid-polymeric and lipid-quantum dot nanoparticles enabled by microfluidic rapid mixing. ACS Nano4(3),1671–1679 (2010).
    • 23  Chandran SS, Banerjee SR, Mease RC, Pomper MG, Denmeade SR. Characterization of a targeted nanoparticle functionalized with a urea-based inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). Cancer Biol. Ther.7(6),974–982 (2008).
    • 24  Thomas M, Kularatne SA, Qi L et al. Ligand-targeted delivery of small interfering RNAs to malignant cells and tissues. Ann. NY Acad. Sci.1175,32–39 (2009).
    • 25  Kularatne SA, Wang K, Santhapuram HK, Low PS. Prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted imaging and therapy of prostate cancer using a PSMA inhibitor as a homing ligand. Mol. Pharm.6(3),780–789 (2009).
    • 26  Zastre J, Anantha M, Ramsay E, Bally M. Irinotecan–cisplatin interactions assessed in cell-based screening assays: cytotoxicity, drug accumulation and DNA adduct formation in an NSCLC cell line. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.60(1),91–102 (2007).▪ Important publication where several references related to previous investigations on the synergism between irinotecan and cisplatin are provided together with an elucidation of the potential mechanism for their synergistic effect.
    • 27  Gu FX, Karnik R, Wang AZ et al. Targeted nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Nano Today2(3),14–21 (2007).
    • 28  Valencia PM, Hanewich-Hollatz MH, Gao W et al. Effects of ligands with different water solubilities on self-assembly and properties of targeted nanoparticles. Biomaterials32(26),6226–6233 (2011).
    • 29  Dhar S, Gu FX, Langer R, Farokhzad OC, Lippard SJ. Targeted delivery of cisplatin to prostate cancer cells by aptamer functionalized Pt(IV) prodrug–PLGA–PEG nanoparticles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105(45),17356–17361 (2008).
    • 30  Rhee M, Valencia PM, Rodriguez MI, Langer R, Farokhzad OC, Karnik R. Synthesis of size-tunable polymeric nanoparticles enabled by 3D hydrodynamic flow focusing in single-layer microchannels. Adv. Mater.23(12),H79–H83 (2011).
    • 31  Vauthier C, Schmidt C, Couvreur P. Measurement of the density of polymeric nanoparticulate drug carriers by isopycnic centrifugation. J. Nanoparticle Res.1,411–418 (1999).
    • 32  Johnson BK, Prud’homme RK. Mechanism for rapid self-assembly of block copolymer nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett.91(11),118302 (2003).
    • 33  Avgoustakis K. Pegylated poly(lactide) and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles: preparation, properties and possible applications in drug delivery. Curr. Drug Deliv.1(4),321–333 (2004).
    • 34  Chou TC. Theoretical basis, experimental design, and computerized simulation of synergism and antagonism in drug combination studies. Pharmacol. Rev.58(3),621–681 (2006).
    • 35  Reese DM, Tchekmedyian S, Chapman Y, Prager D, Rosen PJ. A Phase-II trial of irinotecan in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Invest. New Drugs16(4),353–359 (1998).