We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/phe.09.17

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) therapy is recognized as a standard treatment for primary antibody deficiency. SCIG is efficacious for the prevention of infections and is associated with a lower risk of systemic side effects, improved quality of life for patients and families and is preferred by children when compared with intravenous immunoglobulin replacement. For pediatric patients, SCIG is an ideal treatment modality that affords children and families more freedom and less disruption of important childhood activities. This article reviews the characteristics of SCIG to provide the pediatric practitioner with an understanding of the experiences their patients receiveing SCIG may encounter.

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest •• of considerable interest

Bibliography

  • Lindegren ML, Kobrynski L, Rasmussen SA et al.: Applying public health strategies to primary immunodeficiency diseases: a potential approach to genetic disorders. MMWR Recomm. Rep.53(RR-1),1–29 (2004).
  • Baumgart KW, Britton WJ, Kemp A, French M, Roberton D: The spectrum of primary immunodeficiency disorders in Australia. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.100(3),415–423 (1997).
  • Boyle JM, Buckley RH: Population prevalence of diagnosed primary immunodeficiency diseases in the United States. J. Clin. Immunol.27(5),497–502 (2007).
  • Berger M: A history of immune globulin therapy, from the Harvard crash program to monoclonal antibodies. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep.2(5),368–378 (2002).• Interesting discussion of the history of immune globulin development for treatment of immune deficiency.
  • Good RA, Lorenz E: Historic aspects of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Cancer68(6 Suppl.),1415–1421 (1991).
  • Bruton OC: Agammaglobulinemia. Pediatrics9(6),722–728 (1952).•• The first reported case of the use of immune globulin in primary immunodeficiency.
  • Gitlin D, Janeway CA: Agammaglobulinemia, congenital, acquired and transient forms. Prog. Hematol.1,318–329 (1956).
  • Stiehm ER: Standard and special human immune serum globulins as therapeutic agents. Pediatrics63(2),301–319 (1979).
  • Berger M, Cupps TR, Fauci AS: Immunoglobulin replacement therapy by slow subcutaneous infusion. Ann. Intern. Med.93(1),55–56 (1980).
  • 10  Ugazio AG, Duse M, Re R, Mangili G, Burgio GR: Subcutaneous infusion of gammaglobulins in management of agammaglobulinaemia. Lancet1(8265),226 (1982).
  • 11  Roord JJ, van der Meer JW, Kuis W et al.: Home treatment in patients with antibody deficiency by slow subcutaneous infusion of gammaglobulin. Lancet1(8273),689–690 (1982).
  • 12  Cunningham-Rundles C, Siegal FP, Smithwick EM et al.: Efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in primary humoral immunodeficiency disease. Ann. Intern. Med.101(4),435–439 (1984).
  • 13  Misbah SA, Chapel HM: Adverse effects of intravenous immunoglobulin. Drug Saf.9(4),254–262 (1993).
  • 14  Orange JS, Hossny EM, Weiler CR et al.: Use of intravenous immunoglobulin in human disease: a review of evidence by members of the Primary Immunodeficiency Committee of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.117(4 Suppl.),S525–553 (2006).• Evidence-based review of the use of immune globulin for different diseases.
  • 15  Gardulf A: Immunoglobulin treatment for primary antibody deficiencies: advantages of the subcutaneous route. BioDrugs21(2),105–116 (2007).
  • 16  Gregori L, Maring JA, MacAuley C et al.: Partitioning of TSE infectivity during ethanol fractionation of human plasma. Biologicals32(1),1–10 (2004).
  • 17  Poelsler G, Berting A, Kindermann J et al.: A new liquid intravenous immunoglobulin with three dedicated virus reduction steps: virus and prion reduction capacity. Vox Sang.94(3),184–192 (2008).
  • 18  Trejo SR, Hotta JA, Lebing W et al.: Evaluation of virus and prion reduction in a new intravenous immunoglobulin manufacturing process. Vox Sang.84(3),176–187 (2003).
  • 19  Ochs HD, Fischer SH, Wedgwood RJ: Modified immune globulin: its use in the prophylactic treatment of patients with immune deficiency. J. Clin. Immunol.2(2 Suppl),22S–30S (1982).
  • 20  Ochs HD, Fischer SH, Wedgwood RJ et al.: Comparison of high-dose and low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases. Am. J. Med.76(3A),78–82 (1984).
  • 21  Bonilla FA: Pharmacokinetics of immunoglobulin administered via intravenous or subcutaneous routes. Immunol. Allergy Clin. N. Am.28(4),803–819, ix (2008).
  • 22  Gardulf A, Nicolay U, Math D et al.: Children and adults with primary antibody deficiencies gain quality of life by subcutaneous IgG self-infusions at home. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.114(4),936–942 (2004).
  • 23  Smith GN, Griffiths B, Mollison D, Mollison PL: Uptake of IgG after intramuscular and subcutaneous injection. Lancet1(7762),1208–1212 (1972).
  • 24  Remvig L, Andersen V, Hansen NE, Karle H: Prophylactic effect of self-administered pump-driven subcutaneous IgG infusion in patients with antibody deficiency: a triple-blind cross-over study comparing P-IgG levels of 3 g l-1 versus 6 g l-1. J. Intern. Med.229(1),73–77 (1991).
  • 25  Vivaglobin®, package insert. ZLB Behring, Marburg, Germany, 2007.
  • 26  Gardulf A, Hammarstrom L, Smith CI: Home treatment of hypogammaglobulinaemia with subcutaneous gammaglobulin by rapid infusion. Lancet338(8760),162–166 (1991).
  • 27  Gardulf A, Nicolay U, Asensio O et al.: Rapid subcutaneous IgG replacement therapy is effective and safe in children and adults with primary immunodeficiencies – a prospective, multi-national study. J. Clin. Immunol.26(2),177–185 (2006).
  • 28  Radinsky S, Bonagura VR: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusion as an alternative to intravenous immunoglobulin. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.112(3),630–633 (2003).
  • 29  Chapel HM, Spickett GP, Ericson D, Engl W, Eibl MM, Bjorkander J: The comparison of the efficacy and safety of intravenous versus subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy. J. Clin. Immunol.20(2),94–100 (2000).
  • 30  Ochs HD, Gupta S, Kiessling P, Nicolay U, Berger M: Safety and efficacy of self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases. J. Clin. Immunol.26(3),265–273 (2006).
  • 31  Eijkhout HW, van Der Meer JW, Kallenberg CG et al.: The effect of two different dosages of intravenous immunoglobulin on the incidence of recurrent infections in patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter crossover trial. Ann. Intern. Med.135(3),165–174 (2001).
  • 32  Ochs HD, Pinciaro PJ: Octagam 5%, an intravenous IgG product, is efficacious and well tolerated in subjects with primary immunodeficiency diseases. J. Clin. Immunol.24(3),309–314 (2004).
  • 33  Pac M, Bernatowska E: Polish experience with immunoglobulin replacement treatment by subcutaneous infusion. Centr. Eur. J. Immunol.30(3–4),78–82 (2005).
  • 34  Fasth A, Nystrom J: Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous human immunoglobulin in children with primary immunodeficiency. Acta. Paediatr.96(10),1474–1478 (2007).
  • 35  Ballow M: Safety of IGIV therapy and infusion-related adverse events. Immunol. Res.38(1–3),122–132 (2007).
  • 36  Ballow M, Berger M, Bonilla FA et al.: Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a new intravenous immunoglobulin preparation, IGIV-C, 10% (Gamunex, 10%). Vox Sang84(3),202–210 (2003).
  • 37  Schiff RI, Williams LW, Nelson RP, Buckley RH, Burks W, Good RA: Multicenter crossover comparison of the safety and efficacy of Intraglobin-F with Gamimune-N, Sandoglobulin, and Gammagard in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases. J. Clin. Immunol.17(1),21–28 (1997).
  • 38  Gardulf A, Bjorvell H, Gustafson R, Hammarstrom L, Smith CI: Safety of rapid subcutaneous gammaglobulin infusions in patients with primary antibody deficiency. Immunodeficiency4(1–4),81–84 (1993).
  • 39  Gardulf A, Andersen V, Bjorkander J et al.: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement in patients with primary antibody deficiencies: safety and costs. Lancet345(8946),365–369 (1995).
  • 40  Hansen S, Gustafson R, Smith CI, Gardulf A: Express subcutaneous IgG infusions: decreased time of delivery with maintained safety. Clin. Immunol.104(3),237–241 (2002).
  • 41  Abrahamsen TG, Sandersen H, Bustnes A: Home therapy with subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusions in children with congenital immunodeficiencies. Pediatrics98(6 Pt 1),1127–1131 (1996).
  • 42  Thomas MJ, Brennan VM, Chapel HH: Rapid subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusions in children. Lancet342(8884),1432–1433 (1993).
  • 43  Gaspar J, Gerritsen B, Jones A: Immunoglobulin replacement treatment by rapid subcutaneous infusion. Arch. Dis. Child.79(1),48–51 (1998).
  • 44  Nicolay U, Kiessling P, Berger M et al.: Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in North American patients with primary immunedeficiency diseases receiving subcutaneous IgG self-infusions at home. J. Clin. Immunol.26(1),65–72 (2006).
  • 45  Hogy B, Keinecke HO, Borte M: Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of immunoglobulin treatment in patients with antibody deficiencies from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. Eur. J. Health Econ.6(1),24–29 (2005).
  • 46  Membe SK, Ho C, Cimon K, Morrison A, Kanani A, Roifman CM: Economic assessment of different modalities of immunoglobulin replacement therapy. Immunol. Allergy Clin. N. Am.28(4),861–874, x (2008).
  • 47  Berger M: Subcutaneous administration of IgG. Immunol. Allergy Clin. N. Am.28(4),779–802, viii (2008).• Excellent review of the use of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) for immune deficiency with a detailed discussion of the pharmacokinetic properties comparing SCIG and intravenous immunoglobulin.
  • 48  Fasth A, Nystrom J: Quality of life and health-care resource utilization among children with primary immunodeficiency receiving home treatment with subcutaneous human immunoglobulin. J. Clin. Immunol.28(4),370–378 (2008).• Recent article evaluating the impact SCIG has on the quality of life of children receiving home-based therapy and their families.
  • 49  Stiehm ER, Casillas AM, Finkelstein JZ et al.: Slow subcutaneous human intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of antibody immunodeficiency: use of an old method with a new product. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.101(6 Pt 1),848–849 (1998).
  • 50  MacLeish S, Hostoffer R: Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of DiGeorge syndrome related hypogammaglobulinemia. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.117(2),S174 (2006).
  • 51  Arora R, Newton TC, Nelson MR: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy in an 11-year-old patient with common variable immunodeficiency and von Willebrand disease. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol.99(4),367–370 (2007).
  • 52  Eijkhout HW, van den Broek PJ, van der Meer JW: Substitution therapy in immunodeficient patients with anti-IgA antibodies or severe adverse reactions to previous immunoglobulin therapy. Neth. J. Med.61(6),213–217 (2003).
  • 53  Sundin U, Nava S, Hammarstrom L: Induction of unresponsiveness against IgA in IgA-deficient patients on subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusion therapy. Clin. Exp. Immunol.112(2),341–346 (1998).
  • 54  Waniewski J, Gardulf A, Hammarstrom L: Bioavailability of gamma-globulin after subcutaneous infusions in patients with common variable immunodeficiency. J. Clin. Immunol.14(2),90–97 (1994).
  • 55  Bohle MV, Burton J, Chapel HM: Self-infusion programmes for immunoglobulin replacement at home: feasibility, safety and efficacy. Immunol. Allergy Clin. N. Am.28(4),821–832 (2008).
  • 101  European Society for Immunodeficiencies Database 2009. www.esid.org/statistics.php
  • 102  Research carried out by the Immune Deficiency Foundation. www.primaryimmune.org/publications/surveys/Treatment_Experiences_and_Preferences_(2003).pdf
  • 103  Research carried out by the Immune Deficiency Foundation. www.primaryimmune.org/pubs/IDF_survey_complete.pdf
  • 104  International Patient Organisation for Primary Immunodeficiencies: IPOPI global immunoglobulin list. www.ipopi.org/documents/global-immunoglobulin-list/Ig%20Global%20list%202008-1112.htm
  • 105  Berger M, Duff K: Subcutaneous IgG replacement therapy. www.uhhospitals.org/Portals/0/Docs/OurServices/Rainbow_Sub-Cu.pdf•• Provides excellent pictures demonstrating the mechanics of SCIG infusions and possible local reactions. Includes chart listing commonly used SCIG pumps and infusion needles.