Next Article in Journal
Annotation of Human Exome Gene Variants with Consensus Pathogenicity
Next Article in Special Issue
Transfer-RNA-Derived Fragments Are Potential Prognostic Factors in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
Previous Article in Journal
Identification and Characterization of Three Heat Shock Protein 90 (Hsp90) Homologs in the Brown Planthopper
Previous Article in Special Issue
Negative Regulation of Serine Threonine Kinase 11 (STK11) through miR-100 in Head and Neck Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/genes11091075
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

MicroRNAs Regulate Intestinal Immunity and Gut Microbiota for Gastrointestinal Health: A Comprehensive Review

by
Kefan Bi
,
Xujun Zhang
,
Wenbiao Chen
and
Hongyan Diao
*
State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2020, 11(9), 1075; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091075
Submission received: 26 July 2020 / Revised: 24 August 2020 / Accepted: 9 September 2020 / Published: 12 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Non-coding RNAs: Variety of Roles and Applications in Human Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNAs regulating gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. The regulation of microRNA expression in the gut intestine is gradually recognized as one of the crucial contributors of intestinal homeostasis and overall health. Recent studies indicated that both the microRNAs endogenous in the gut intestine and exogenous from diets could play influential roles in modulating microbial colonization and intestinal immunity. In this review, we discuss the biological functions of microRNAs in regulating intestinal homeostasis by modulating intestinal immune responses and gut microbiota. We particularly focus on addressing the microRNA-dependent communication and interactions among microRNA, gut microbiota, and intestinal immune system. Besides, we also summarize the roles of diet-derived microRNAs in host-microbiome homeostasis and their benefits on intestinal health. A better understanding of the relationships among intestinal disorders, microRNAs, and other factors influencing intestinal health can facilitate the application of microRNA-based therapeutics for gastrointestinal diseases.

1. Introduction

MicroRNAs are a class of small non-coding RNAs, 20–22 nucleotides in length, located at intragenic and intergenic regions of the genome, and they establish a diverse and complex regulatory network in regulating gene expressions and participating in various biological functions [1]. MicroRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II as long primary transcripts called primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs), which contain hairpin and flanking sequences. The hairpin structure of pri-miRNA is subsequently cleaved by RNA polymerase III. Drosha and essential cofactor DGCR8 liberate one or more 70–90 nucleotide hairpin in the pre-miRNA, which are transported to the cytoplasm for further cleavage by Dicer enzymes to form a mature miRNA. The mature miRNA is subsequently incorporated into the miRNA induced silencing complex (miRISC), and can bind to the specific UTR of mRNA molecules with complementary sites, which ensures that the miRNA can silence gene expression. It is suggested that microRNAs can silence a wide range of mRNA expression though translational repression or stimulation of the degradation of the mRNA. miRISC induces mRNA degradation and translational repression by attaching to the 3′ untranslated region of the target mRNAs in an incomplete or a complete complementary manner [2,3,4,5]. MicroRNA play a powerful and essential role in post-transcriptional gene regulation, which contributes to cell differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis, as well as being involved in the development of multiple gastrointestinal diseases [6].
The human gut intestine is colonized by complex symbiotic microflora, carrying approximately 1014 microbes, and these microbes reside in the digestive tract and play critical roles in digestion-absorption functions, as well as a wide range of other physiological processes [7]. These microbes are usually dynamic and sensitive to multiple host factors, including age, genetics, diet, antibiotic treatment, intestinal infection, and immune system. Alterations of the intestinal microbiota are thought to be an important factor in intestinal diseases or extra-intestinal disease1 [8]. Recently, a growing number of research studies have been carried out on investigating the mechanisms by which intestinal microbiota influence human diseases, and related studies have shown that microRNA could play an important regulatory role in human-microbiota interactions [9,10,11].
Intestinal epithelium builds the bridge among intestinal microbes, facilitating their symbiosis with the intestinal immune system for their functions on antigen presentation, type 2 immunity stimulation, differentiation and maturation of immune cells in lamina propria and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues, and triggering downstream immune responses [12].
A series of studies have revealed that intestinal microbiota and microRNAs may interact with each other for regulating host gene expression [10,13]. In fact, microRNAs have a wide range of effects on the intestinal immune system, and also play important roles in the pathogenesis of bowel diseases [14]. Recently, host microRNAs have also been suggested to participate in the invasion and infection of intestinal pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract [15]. Furthermore, a growing number of studies have demonstrated the functional roles of microRNAs in connecting the communication between intestinal microbes and the host intestinal epithelial cells [16,17].
It has been identified that most fecal microRNAs are derived from gut epithelial cells, especially Hopx-expressing cells, which can influence the composition and distribution of intestinal microbiota [11]. For instance, miR-101, miR-515-5p, miR-876-5p, miR-325, miR-1253, miR-1224-5p, miR-1226-5p, and miR-623 can all modulate and promote the growth of specific bacteria in the gut intestine [11]. In addition, recent studies suggested that fecal microRNAs are potential biomarkers for intestinal diseases, such as colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [18,19]. The triangle relationships among microRNAs, gut intestinal microbiota, and host immunity are decisive for the homeostasis or dysbiosis of the gastrointestinal environment [20].
In the following sections of the review, we summarize and discuss the studies about the bio-functions of microRNAs in the gut intestinal microenvironment, in which they serve as the link between the intestinal immune system and microbial community. The representative microRNAs active in influencing intestinal immunity and homeostasis are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 1, and their regulatory roles in the gastrointestinal tract are further addressed. Moreover, the modulatory effects of exogenous microRNAs on the gut intestinal microbiome are also described. Additionally, the potential of microRNAs in the gut intestine as biomarkers and candidate therapeutic targets for gastrointestinal diseases is briefly discussed as well.

2. MicroRNA in Regulating the Intestinal Immune System

2.1. MicroRNA and Innate Intestinal Immunity

The homeostasis of the intestinal environment depends on several factors, including host genetics, intestinal immune system, gut microbiota and metabolites, and intestinal barrier integrity and functions [30]. In terms of the host defense against intestinal pathogens, the mucosa-associated immune system protects the gut intestine at an early stage, through the dynamic functions and coordinated cellular interplays of epithelil cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages for recognizing foreign invaders [31,32]. Moreover, intestinal commensal bacteria are essential for the maturation of innate immune system. In fact, the interactions between dendritic cells and natural killer cells can initiate the intestinal immune responses by activating dendritic cells and macrophages via different pathogen-associated molecular patterns [33,34]. A number of recent studies have revealed that microRNA has a significant impact on immune cells and immune responses, defense against pathogenic microorganisms [30], intestinal mucosal barrier, and the development of intestinal epithelial cells [35], which largely influence intestinal homeostasis, and are extensively associated with autoimmune diseases. The innate immune system is considered as the first line of defense against foreign antigens and pathogens [36]. Growing evidence suggests that microRNA is indispensable for determining the fate of epithelial cells, such as proliferation, differentiation, or autophagy, through influencing targeted signaling pathways [35,37,38]. For example, the Wnt signaling pathway is closely associated with the mucosal immune homeostasis and intestinal epithelial differentiation [39]. Recently, miR156 was identified to possess essential functions in inhibiting intestinal cell proliferation through regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, in which miR156 could down-regulate the expression of Wnt10b and thus up-regulate β-catenin phosphorylation in the mouse model [24]. In another study, miR-31 was found to enhance the regeneration of epithelial cells through regulating the Wnt/Hippo signaling pathway, suppressing immune responses, and thus promoting the proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells for counteracting intestinal inflammatory diseases [23]. Moreover, the inflammatory-induced intestinal secretion of miR-31 could suppress the expression of several receptors such as GP130, IL17RA, and IL7R, which are involved in the activation of STAT3, and prevent the disruption or injury of intestinal epithelium [23]. The overexpression of miR-146a in the intestinal epithelial cells to response to the bacterial antigenslike lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or cytokines depends on the activation of the TLR4/MyD88/NF-kB, can induces immune tolerance and inhibits cytokine production in response to LPS and IL-1β in intestinal epithelial cells in the mouse model with colitis. [40]. Moreover, miR-375-3p is one of the microbiota-sensitive microRNAs that can regulate the proliferation of intestinal epithelial stem cells (IESCs). It has been found that miR-375-3p is highly expressed in IESCs and can act as a regulator for reducing IESC proliferation [41].
The defensive system of innate intestinal immunity against invading gut pathogens is initiated by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs); microRNAs are significantly connected with two general classes of PAMPs, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein (NOD) 2 and Toll-like receptor (TLR) [42,43].
NOD2 is a member of the NOD-like receptor family that encodes on human chromosome 16 and can recognize muramyl dipeptide, which functions as an intracellular sensor for pathogens [44]. NOD2 is considered as one of the genetic risk factors in the pathogenesis of IBD, and it is also recognized as the strongest single genetic susceptibility locus in Crohn’s disease [45]. The biogenesis of microRNAs and their functional roles in the adjustment and regulation of NOD2 are regarded as the critical factors for the initiation of innate immune responses [44]. The interaction between NOD2 and microRNAs, such as miR-20, miR-122, miR-192, miR-146a, and miR-320, is generally recognized to be prevalently connected with the pathogenesis of IBD [38,46,47,48,49]. MiRNAs regulate intestinal homeostasis by interacting with NOD2, targeting on intestinal epithelial cells and activating immune cells [44,50]. Pierdomenico et al. indicated that miR-320 can target NOD2, and that its expression was negatively correlated with NOD2 expression in IBD patients [51]. Further, the downregulation of miR-320 can also upregulate NF-κB activity and inflammatory cytokine production in the HT-29 cell lines. On the contrary, NOD2 can also regulate the expression of miR-21 in dendritic cells for the secretion of IL-23, the immunomodulatory mechanism of which is involved in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease [50].
TLR works as the sensor of innate immunity by identifying PAMPs and detecting invaded pathogens, which is highly related with the abnormal immune responses in the patients of IBD [52]. MicroRNAs are considered as the collaborators and regulators of the activation of TLRs. For instance, the up-regulation of miR-146a-5p expression was induced upon TLR4 stimulation by LPS for activating the downstream NF-κB signaling pathway, which plays an essential role in host intestinal defense against microbial infections [53]. Zhen et al. reported that let-7b/TLR4 signaling pathway could be activated by the infection of adherent invasive Escherichia coli. The down-regulation of let-7b resulted in the promotion of TLR4 and increased the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors, such as IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, for further stimulating intestinal epithelial cells and aggravating intestinal inflammation [54].

2.2. MicroRNA and Adaptive Intestinal Immunity

The maturation of the intestinal adaptive immune system is controlled by a complex network of signaling, and the differentiation and formation of nearly all the adaptive immune cells, for example, T cells and B cells, can be regulated by host microRNAs in the gut intestine [55]. The aberrant expression of these microRNAs leads to immunological abnormality and even autoimmune diseases [56]. Naive T cells within the intestines and lymph node can differentiate into different subtypes of T cells. Intestinal microbiota play important role in various processes of T cell development, both within and outside the intestines. Several specific bacterial species can induce the differentiation of T cells into particular subtypes [56,57]. Th17 and Treg cells are particularly important to regulate autoimmunity in the intestines. Th17 cells are significantly correlated with both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, and they induce the expression of transcription factor RORγt+ for producing cytokines associated with IBD, such as IL-17, IL-22, and IL-23 [58,59,60,61]. Regulatory T (Treg) cells are a group of CD4+ T cells that could regulate the activity of T cells and the entire immune system in gut intestine, and play an important role in the inhibition of the secretion of inflammatory cytokines and suppressing excessive immune responses.
CD4+ T cells can recognize and adapt to antigens or pathogens to be differentiated into different T cell subsets. T-bet, found in Th1 cells, is the key regulator of Th1 development and function, which enables them to produce type 1 cytokines, including IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-12 [62]. Continuous GATA3 expression is essential for CD4+ T cells to differentiate into Th2 cells, and induces the GATA3-mediated Th2 cytokine production (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13) [63].
According to previous studies, Crohn’s disease is highly related to Th1, while ulcerative colitis tends to be driven by Th2 [64,65]. Intestinal microRNAs can actually participate in these two intestinal diseases by regulating the differentiation of CD4+ T cells. Wu et al. indicate miR-17-92 can regulate the differentiation of the CD4+T cell to Th1 rather than Th2 though the overexpression of miR-17-92 can increase the production of IFN-γ to promote the CD4+T cell differentiation. Meanwhile, the over-expression of miR-17-92 can stimulate the secretion of IFN-γ, which further promotes CD4+ T-Th1 cell differentiation. Intestinal miR-146a, miR-29, miR-128, and miR-126 have been demonstrated to influence the induction of Th1 in gut intestine [66,67,68,69]. Moreover, the over-expression of intestinal miR-155 can promote CD4+ T-Th1 cell differentiation, the knockdown of miR-155 can inhibit CD4+ T cells from distributing to the effector sites in human colon, and miR-155 knockout can facilitate CD4+ T-Th2 cell differentiation [70,71,72]. Additionally, intestinal miR-21 has been observed to induce CD4+ T-Th2 cell differentiation, thus participating in the pathogenicity of IBD [46].
The differentiation of Th17 is an important regulator for intestinal homeostasis, which can be manipulated by responding to resident microflora or the microRNAs through different regulatory mechanisms [72]. For instance, intestinal miR-155 has been identified to promote cytokine secretion by dendritic cells for further regulating Th17 cell differentiation and immunologic functions, which were closely associated with the development of chronic intestinal inflammation and autoimmune diseases [73]. On the contrary, miR-155 knockdown reduces Th17 cell density and induces functional defects of inflammatory cytokine production, which further targets aryl hydrocarbon receptors for suppressing mucosal immune responses and ameliorates colitis [74]. Furthermore, miR-106a, miR-18b, and miR-363-3p can inhibit Th17 differentiation and reduce the secretion of cytokines, especially IL-17, in the gut intestine [75]. MiR-125a is highly expressed in intestinal T cells for regulating their functions, and a down-regulated miR-125a expression can influence Th1/Th17 cell differentiation in intestinal immune responses in mouse model [76]. This effect is reflected by the mice with miR-125 knockout, for which the induced Th1 and Th17 cell infiltrations severely damage the intestine barrier and stimulate colitis [76]. Moreover, miR-34a can protect the intestine from Citrobacter-induced colon cancer through targeting IL-6R and IL-23R for inhibiting the differentiation of Th17 cells and their infiltration, which suppresses the inflammation-induced proliferation of cancer stem cells [77].
It has been revealed that intestinal microRNAs also act as influencers for the differentiation and maturation of Treg cells. Based on the mice model, the antibiotic-induced alteration of intestinal microbiome influences the secretion of intestinal microRNAs, which may, in turn, affect immune-regulatory armament and energy metabolism in the gastrointestinal tract [78]. MiR-141 or miR-200a are demonstrated to be able to regulate Th17 cell differentiation and Treg cell formation in MS patients, thus suppressing autoimmune diseases in the intestines [79]. MiR-155 can regulate Th17/Treg cell balance by inhibiting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 expressions, and the overexpression of miR-155 reduces follicular Treg cells, while central Treg cells and miR-155-5p further target sirtuin-1 to maintain the balance of Th17/Treg cells [80]. Furthermore, miR-122a, miR-146a, miR-155, and miR-181a are highly expressed in T cells, with a close connection with Treg cells, which can target interferon regulatory factor 4 for suppressing IL-6 secretion and inducing IL-17A production, thus assisting in the mitigation of IBD [81,82,83,84]. In addition, the overexpression of miR-125a can inhibit the differentiation of CD4+ T cells into either Th1 or Th17 cells, which also contributes to immune-regulation [85].

3. MicroRNA in Modulating Gut Intestinal Microbiota

3.1. MicroRNA-Microbiota Interaction in Gut Intestinal Health and Disease

The intestinal immune system, gut microbiota, and mucosal barrier are all critical components in maintaining the dynamic balance of intestinal microenvironment, while gut microbial communities significantly contribute to the complex and tightly regulated system in dynamic intestinal equilibrium [86,87,88]. Probiotics are crucial parts of gut microflora, which can inhibit and exclude the colonization of pathogenic bacteria through various mechanisms [89,90,91]. For example, they possess unique roles in maintaining and activating intestinal immunity, especially mucosal immune responses [92]. Through activating innate or adaptive immunity in the gastrointestinal tract, probiotics can competitively inhibit pathogens attacking intestinal mucosa and enhance the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier [92,93]. They interact with the intestinal epithelial cells for promoting mucosal immunity by initiating pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory responses, which overall contributes to maintaining the homeostasis of gut intestine [86]. Recently, there have been several progresses in identifying the roles of endogenous intestinal microRNAs in manipulating gut microbiota, especially pathogenic bacteria and commensal flora, which are associated with the progression of intestinal diseases [94]. In Figure 2 and Table 2 we summarize the association between intestinal microbiota and the miRNA expression in the host intestine, and the prominent role in regulating intestinal homeostasis.
Previously, Guillaume et al. uncovered the potential mechanism under the intestinal microbiota regulation on host gene expression, which is possible via the connector microRNAs [11]. In another study, the differentially expressed microRNAs in germ-free and conventionally raised mice are connected with intestinal cell communication, signal transduction, inflammatory responses, and the influences on mucosal barrier-related gene expression, which further supports that the endogenous gut microbiota associates with microRNAs in modulating intestinal gene expression [95]. The alteration in the structure and abundance of gut microbiota will result in an altered intestinal miRNA profile, evidence indicates that gut microbiome can impact colon epithelial cells in several ways, like DNA damage, DNA methylation, change the chromatin structure, especially the relationship between the gut microbiome and non-coding RNAs [96].
Furthermore, microRNAs mediate the modulation of gut microbiome composition and their secretion of secondary metabolites; the aberrant microRNA expression and dysbiosis of gut intestinal microbiota are strongly correlated with a variety of intestinal diseases, particularly IBD and colorectal cancer [97,98,99]. Studies on miR-194-5p, miR-148-3p, and miR-27b-3p reveal that these microRNAs could be intermediates between Enterobacteriaceae and gut inflammation, and they have a strong correlation with Proteobacteria, which were previously reported to be abundant in IL-10 knockout mice and IBD patients, indicating their roles as mediators in the pathogenesis of Proteobacteria and intestinal inflammation [11,100]. Relying on fecal microbiota transplantation, the germ-free mice received intestinal microbes from wild-type donor, which exhibited a significant difference in their fecal microRNA profiles, and several other microRNAs, such as miR-144, miR-519, and miR-211, have been considered as important modulators of gut microbiota and biomarkers for Crohn’s disease, verified in the adult CD patients [101]. Moreover, in a study based on the DSS-induced colitis mice model, miR-21 was mentioned as a factor for the pathogenicity of intestinal inflammatory diseases and colitis-associated colorectal cancer, primarily through stimulating IL-10 and prostaglandin E2, which further inhibit anti-tumor adaptive immunity [102]. While Fusobacterium nucleatum can significantly up-regulate the expression of miR-21 through TLR4/MYD88/NF-κB pathway and facilitate the progression of colitis-associated colorectal cancer [102], in CRC patients on the other side, intestinal microbiota can also influence the host gene expression of intestinal microRNAs, which contributes to protecting intestinal homeostasis and attenuating gut inflammation [103,104]. For example, two probiotic strains, Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus salivarius, can restore the down-regulated expressions of miR-155 and miR-223, which ameliorate microbiota dysbiosis, preserve the function of the mucosal barrier, and relieve the DSS-induced colitis in mice model [105].

3.2. Diet-Derived MicroRNAs as Modulators for Gut Microbiome

Diet has been suggested to serve as the main modulator of host’s gut microbiota, since food is the major energy source, for not only the host, but also the intestinal microbes [113,114,115]. A large number of experimental evidence and clinical outcomes have indicated that diet is also one of the most important regulators, either directly or indirectly, for host microRNA expression in the intestine [116], which includes the microRNAs derived from dietary sources or food metabolites [117]. Interactive analysis of the relevance between intestinal microbiome and microRNAs obtained from diet revealed that miR-21, miR-146a, and miR-155 are potential factors coexistent in the host and foods, which play central roles in cellular senescence, DNA damage, and inflammatory reactions [118,119]. It is also suggested that dietary fibers in cruciferous vegetables could be utilized by intestinal microbes for the generation of trace elements and secondary metabolites, which further change the host intestinal microRNA profiles, regulate cancer-related microRNA expression, and eventually inhibit multiple cancer-related oncogenic signaling pathways [120,121]. Moreover, the microRNA profiles in peripheral blood could serve as biomarkers for evaluating individual nutritious status and diet habits [122]. Studies have also found that water intake can improve epithelial cells and mucosal barriers in the gastrointestinal tract by up-regulating the content of miR-1968-5p.MiR-1968-5p can target the MyD88 to inhibit the expression of the MyD88 in intestinal epithelial cells for reducing intestinal inflammation, which modulates the community of host intestinal microflora in mouse model [123].
Extracellular vesicles are present in most types of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells, which contribute to carrying and transporting proteins, RNAs (mRNA, microRNA, lncRNA, and other RNA species), and DNAs [124]. They facilitate the absorption of microRNAs from the digested external diet in the digestive tract of the host under various conditions [125]. The exosomes protect the integrity and stability of microRNAs from detrimental intestinal environments, such as digestive enzymes and low pH, by surrounding them with extracellular phospholipid bilayer vesicles [125]. Moreover, exosomes carrying microRNAs from milk are absorbed by intestinal epithelial crypt-like cells through the digestive system. The microRNA rich in the breast milk has been confirmed closely related with inflammation and immune response [126], which benefit the intestinal immunity and nutrients of infants, as well as the growth of preterm infants during early development [127].
It was indicated that plant-derived exosomal microRNAs could influence intestinal homeostasis and serve as potential therapeutic targets for IBD and colorectal cancer [128]. A recent study has shown that exosomal microRNAs generated after intestinal absorption of a plant-sourced diet can regulate and shape the composition and distribution of gut microbiota, which further suppresses gut inflammation and restore intestinal barrier for colitis inhibition in mice [112]. Furthermore, diet-derived microRNAs can crosstalk with gut intestinal microbiome for maintaining the overall healthy gastrointestinal environment. Analysis on the expression profiles of intestinal microRNAs indicates that diet with resistant starch can induce the down-regulation of colonic oncogenic miR-17-92, which significantly enriches Ruminococcus Bromii, Lactobacillus gasseri, and Parabecteroides distasonis, while it reduces the relative abundance of Bilophila and Sutterella, promoting the overall butyrate production by gut microbiota, and limiting the negative effects brought on by a high-meat diet in Rat model [129,130].

3.3. MicroRNAs Mediate the Crosstalk among Intestinal Epithelial Cells, Gut Microbes, and Intestinal Immune Responses

Previous studies have shown that microRNAs are considered as significant regulators in the maintenance of epithelial barrier function [131], cell apoptosis [132], cell proliferation and differentiation [133,134], and immune functions [135,136]. It was found that microRNAs can trigger apoptosis and differentiation of intestinal epithelial cells and immune cells, which modulate the overall intestinal immunity for maintaining a delicately balanced status of intestinal environment [137,138,139]. In addition, it has also been reported that the microRNAs secreted by host intestinal cells can regulate the growth of microbes and the abundance of intestinal microflora via DNA exchanging, impact the target bacteria at the DNA level. Liu et al. have found that microRNA secreted from intestinal epithelial cells can bind to single-stranded DNA target nucleotide sequences in the bacteria, to regulate the bacterial gene transcripts, bacterial growth and motility [11]. Meanwhile, gut microbiota can reversely modulate the host intestinal microRNAs and regulate intestinal epithelial tight junction proteins, which ultimately function in regulating innate and adaptive intestinal immunities, in the in mouse models with colitis and IEC cell lineages [140]. MiR-146a is expressed in ileum and distal colon, which has been demonstrated to be the key molecule for the crosstalk between intestinal immune responses and gut microbiota by restricting the expansion of Th17 and Treg cells and modulating intestinal microflora [40]. Moreover, miR-146a in intestinal epithelial cells can be potently induced by pro-inflammatory cytokines and LPS through TLR4/MyD88/NF-kB-Akt signaling, for inhibiting the activation of intestinal immunity and facilitating the immune tolerance of intestinal epithelial cells [40].
Intestinal microbiome can efficiently communicate with immune system and regulate host microRNA expression to modulate intestinal homeostasis [141]. Previous research has shown that intestinal microbiota can negatively regulate the expression of miR-10a in dendritic cells through interacting with the TLR signaling pathway [142], validated in IBD patients and human primary DC cells, eventually maintaining intestinal homeostasis and suppressing the development of chronic IBD by targeting IL-12/23p40 expression [143]. Johnston et al. previously reported that miR-21-deficient mice could reduce intestinal inflammation during acute colitis, which is attributed to the alterations of intestinal microflora composition [144]. In addition, the oral administration of miR-30d can target and regulate β-galactosidase AMUC_RS06985 expression in Akkermansia muciniphila for promoting the expansion of Akkermansia abundance in gut, which further stimulates Treg cells to suppress experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, indicating the potential of miR-30d for the treatment of multiple sclerosis [145]. Nutrients in milk have been proved to play a role in infant development by regulated gene expression. Milk rich in lactoferrin plays essential roles in infant development, cell proliferation and shape immune functions. Some studies have shown that lactoferrin can regulate the crypt cell transcriptome and is highly related to the secretion of Osteopontin, critically involved in NKT cell function, plays a role in the immune response [127,146]. In addition, intestinal microRNAs are also involved in gut intestinal microbial infections and subsequent immune responses. For example, Salmonella can modulate the intestinal miR-128 expression to reduce macrophage recruitment through regulating M-CSF, thus avoiding intestinal immunity for survival and infection [147]. Listeria can also inhibit the expression of several intestinal microRNAs, such as miR-192, miR-200b, and miR-215, while Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-3689 and Lactobacillus casei BL23 are able to rescue these microRNA levels during Listeria infection, for maintaining the effective intestinal immunity and overall intestinal homeostasis [148]. Besides, the up-regulation of miR-146 in macrophages can also be induced by Listeria monocytogenes infection, which then mediates intestinal innate immune responses, signal transduction, and autophagy [149].

4. Conclusions

Intestinal microRNAs have been suggested as key players in the maintenance of healthy gastrointestinal environment. On the one hand, these microRNAs regulate the intestinal immune system. For example, they influence innate intestinal immunity through regulating NOD2 and TLR, two of the crucial PAMPs; different microRNAs can also facilitate the differentiation of Th1, Th2, Th17, or Treg cells, thus participating in adaptive intestinal immunity. Intestinal microRNAs from intestinal epithelial cells or external diets interact with gut microbes, and modulate the composition and distribution of the intestinal microbial ecosystem. The complex but efficient crosstalk among gut microbiota, intestinal epithelial cells, and intestinal immunity, mediated by microRNAs, is critical for maintaining the overall gut intestinal health and preventing/ameliorating gastrointestinal diseases such as IBD and colorectal cancer (Figure 1). Therefore, the targeted intervention of microRNAs might be potential therapeutics for dysbiotic intestinal microbiome and chronic gut inflammation.

Author Contributions

K.B. wrote the manuscript and prepared figures, X.Z. and W.C. helped with conceptualization and participated in writing and revision of the paper, H.D. reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC2000500), the major national S&T projects for infectious diseases (2018ZX10301401), Key Research & Developement Plan of Zhejiang Province (2019C04005).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ambros, V. Micrornas: Tiny regulators with great potential. Cell 2001, 107, 823–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Bartel, D.P. Micrornas: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 2004, 116, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Ameres, S.L.; Zamore, P.D. Diversifying microrna sequence and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14, 475–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Huntzinger, E.; Izaurralde, E. Gene silencing by micrornas: Contributions of translational repression and mrna decay. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jonas, S.; Izaurralde, E. Towards a molecular understanding of microrna-mediated gene silencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015, 16, 421–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Friedman, R.C.; Farh, K.K.; Burge, C.B.; Bartel, D.P. Most mammalian mrnas are conserved targets of micrornas. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Rinninella, E.; Raoul, P.; Cintoni, M.; Franceschi, F.; Miggiano, G.A.D.; Gasbarrini, A.; Mele, M.C. What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Lin, L.; Zhang, J. Role of intestinal microbiota and metabolites on gut homeostasis and human diseases. BMC Immunol. 2017, 18, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Jostins, L.; Ripke, S.; Weersma, R.K.; Duerr, R.H.; McGovern, D.P.; Hui, K.Y.; Lee, J.C.; Schumm, L.P.; Sharma, Y.; Anderson, C.A.; et al. Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2012, 491, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Dalmasso, G.; Nguyen, H.T.; Yan, Y.; Laroui, H.; Charania, M.A.; Ayyadurai, S.; Sitaraman, S.V.; Merlin, D. Microbiota modulate host gene expression via micrornas. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, S.; da Cunha, A.P.; Rezende, R.M.; Cialic, R.; Wei, Z.; Bry, L.; Comstock, L.E.; Gandhi, R.; Weiner, H.L. The host shapes the gut microbiota via fecal microrna. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 19, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kaser, A.; Zeissig, S.; Blumberg, R.S. Inflammatory bowel disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 28, 573–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Moein, S.; Vaghari-Tabari, M.; Qujeq, D.; Majidinia, M.; Nabavi, S.M.; Yousefi, B. Mirnas and inflammatory bowel disease: An interesting new story. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 3277–3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kalla, R.; Ventham, N.T.; Kennedy, N.A.; Quintana, J.F.; Nimmo, E.R.; Buck, A.H.; Satsangi, J. Micrornas: New players in ibd. Gut 2015, 64, 504–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Aguilar, C.; Mano, M.; Eulalio, A. Micrornas at the host-bacteria interface: Host defense or bacterial offense. Trends Microbiol. 2019, 27, 206–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Belcheva, A. Micrornas at the epicenter of intestinal homeostasis. Bioessays 2017, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Takeda, N.; Jain, R.; LeBoeuf, M.R.; Wang, Q.; Lu, M.M.; Epstein, J.A. Interconversion between intestinal stem cell populations in distinct niches. Science 2011, 334, 1420–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Yuan, C.; Burns, M.B.; Subramanian, S.; Blekhman, R. Interaction between host micrornas and the gut microbiota in colorectal cancer. mSystems 2018, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ji, Y.; Li, X.; Zhu, Y.; Li, N.; Zhang, N.; Niu, M. Faecal microrna as a biomarker of the activity and prognosis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 503, 2443–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Viennois, E.; Chassaing, B.; Tahsin, A.; Pujada, A.; Wang, L.; Gewirtz, A.T.; Merlin, D. Host-derived fecal micrornas can indicate gut microbiota healthiness and ability to induce inflammation. Theranostics 2019, 9, 4542–4557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Z.; Li, C.; Chen, S.; Lin, H.; Zhao, H.; Liu, M.; Weng, J.; Liu, T.; Li, X.; Lei, C.; et al. Microrna-21 increases the expression level of occludin through regulating rock1 in prevention of intestinal barrier dysfunction. J. Cell Biochem. 2019, 120, 4545–4554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, L.; Shen, J.; Cheng, J.; Fan, X. Microrna-21 regulates intestinal epithelial tight junction permeability. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2015, 33, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tian, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, Y.; Zhao, R.; Du, S.; Lv, C.; Wu, W.; Liu, R.; Sheng, X.; Song, Y.; et al. Microrna-31 reduces inflammatory signaling and promotes regeneration in colon epithelium, and delivery of mimics in microspheres reduces colitis in mice. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 2281–2296.e2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, M.; Chen, T.; Wang, R.; Luo, J.Y.; He, J.J.; Ye, R.S.; Xie, M.Y.; Xi, Q.Y.; Jiang, Q.Y.; Sun, J.J.; et al. Plant mir156 regulates intestinal growth in mammals by targeting the wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2019, 317, C434–C448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shen, S.; Zhao, J.; Dai, Y.; Chen, F.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, J.; Wang, K. Methamphetamine-induced alterations in intestinal mucosal barrier function occur via the microrna-181c/ tnf-alpha/tight junction axis. Toxicol. Lett. 2020, 321, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, L.; Zhang, R.; Chen, J.; Wu, Q.; Kuang, Z. Baicalin protects against tnf-alpha-induced injury by down-regulating mir-191a that targets the tight junction protein zo-1 in iec-6 cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 40, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Shen, Y.; Zhou, M.; Yan, J.; Gong, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Du, P.; Chen, Y. Mir-200b inhibits tnf-alpha-induced il-8 secretion and tight junction disruption of intestinal epithelial cells in vitro. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2017, 312, G123–G132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Tang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Forsyth, C.B.; Shaikh, M.; Song, S.; Keshavarzian, A. The role of mir-212 and inos in alcohol-induced intestinal barrier dysfunction and steatohepatitis. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2015, 39, 1632–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. He, C.; Yu, T.; Shi, Y.; Ma, C.; Yang, W.; Fang, L.; Sun, M.; Wu, W.; Xiao, F.; Guo, F.; et al. Microrna 301a promotes intestinal inflammation and colitis-associated cancer development by inhibiting btg1. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 1434–1448.e1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zheng, D.; Liwinski, T.; Elinav, E. Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 492–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Allaire, J.M.; Crowley, S.M.; Law, H.T.; Chang, S.Y.; Ko, H.J.; Vallance, B.A. The intestinal epithelium: Central coordinator of mucosal immunity. Trends Immunol. 2018, 39, 677–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Geremia, A.; Biancheri, P.; Allan, P.; Corazza, G.R.; Di Sabatino, A. Innate and adaptive immunity in inflammatory bowel disease. Autoimmun. Rev. 2014, 13, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hugot, J.P.; Chamaillard, M.; Zouali, H.; Lesage, S.; Cezard, J.P.; Belaiche, J.; Almer, S.; Tysk, C.; O’Morain, C.A.; Gassull, M.; et al. Association of nod2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to crohn’s disease. Nature 2001, 411, 599–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Travassos, L.H.; Carneiro, L.A.; Ramjeet, M.; Hussey, S.; Kim, Y.G.; Magalhaes, J.G.; Yuan, L.; Soares, F.; Chea, E.; Le Bourhis, L.; et al. Nod1 and nod2 direct autophagy by recruiting atg16l1 to the plasma membrane at the site of bacterial entry. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. van der Flier, L.G.; Clevers, H. Stem cells, self-renewal, and differentiation in the intestinal epithelium. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2009, 71, 241–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Marshall, J.S.; Warrington, R.; Watson, W.; Kim, H.L. An introduction to immunology and immunopathology. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2018, 14, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ding, S.; Liu, G.; Jiang, H.; Fang, J. Microrna determines the fate of intestinal epithelial cell differentiation and regulates intestinal diseases. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2019, 20, 666–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, S.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, C.; Wu, H.; Zhao, J.; Wu, L.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, F.; Liu, H. The role of autophagy and related micrornas in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2018, 2018, 7565076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fevr, T.; Robine, S.; Louvard, D.; Huelsken, J. Wnt/beta-catenin is essential for intestinal homeostasis and maintenance of intestinal stem cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 27, 7551–7559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Anzola, A.; Gonzalez, R.; Gamez-Belmonte, R.; Ocon, B.; Aranda, C.J.; Martinez-Moya, P.; Lopez-Posadas, R.; Hernandez-Chirlaque, C.; Sanchez de Medina, F.; Martinez-Augustin, O. Mir-146a regulates the crosstalk between intestinal epithelial cells, microbial components and inflammatory stimuli. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Peck, B.C.; Mah, A.T.; Pitman, W.A.; Ding, S.; Lund, P.K.; Sethupathy, P. Functional transcriptomics in diverse intestinal epithelial cell types reveals robust microrna sensitivity in intestinal stem cells to microbial status. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 2586–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bayraktar, R.; Bertilaccio, M.T.S.; Calin, G.A. The interaction between two worlds: Micrornas and toll-like receptors. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Prakhar, P.; Holla, S.; Ghorpade, D.S.; Gilleron, M.; Puzo, G.; Udupa, V.; Balaji, K.N. Correction: Ac2pim-responsive mir-150 and mir-143 target receptor-interacting protein kinase 2 and transforming growth factor beta-activated kinase 1 to suppress nod2-induced immunomodulators. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 19446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Martinez-Torres, R.J.; Chamaillard, M. The ubiquitin code of nods signaling pathways in health and disease. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Cuthbert, A.P.; Fisher, S.A.; Mirza, M.M.; King, K.; Hampe, J.; Croucher, P.J.; Mascheretti, S.; Sanderson, J.; Forbes, A.; Mansfield, J.; et al. The contribution of nod2 gene mutations to the risk and site of disease in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2002, 122, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wu, F.; Dong, F.; Arendovich, N.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Y.; Kwon, J.H. Divergent influence of microrna-21 deletion on murine colitis phenotypes. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2014, 20, 1972–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Inoue, E.; Hata, K.; Kimura, H.; Yamaguchi, K.; Nojima, M.; Endo, I.; Shinozaki, M. Altered expression of micrornas in patients with pouchitis after restorative proctocolectomy. Surg. Today 2017, 47, 1484–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ghorpade, D.S.; Sinha, A.Y.; Holla, S.; Singh, V.; Balaji, K.N. Nod2-nitric oxide-responsive microrna-146a activates sonic hedgehog signaling to orchestrate inflammatory responses in murine model of inflammatory bowel disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 33037–33048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chen, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Tang, L.; Zheng, M.; Xu, C.; Song, J.; Meng, X. Mir-122 targets nod2 to decrease intestinal epithelial cell injury in crohn’s disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 438, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Brain, O.; Owens, B.M.; Pichulik, T.; Allan, P.; Khatamzas, E.; Leslie, A.; Steevels, T.; Sharma, S.; Mayer, A.; Catuneanu, A.M.; et al. The intracellular sensor nod2 induces microrna-29 expression in human dendritic cells to limit il-23 release. Immunity 2013, 39, 521–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Pierdomenico, M.; Cesi, V.; Cucchiara, S.; Vitali, R.; Prete, E.; Costanzo, M.; Aloi, M.; Oliva, S.; Stronati, L. Nod2 is regulated by mir-320 in physiological conditions but this control is altered in inflamed tissues of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2016, 22, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Xavier, R.J.; Podolsky, D.K. Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2007, 448, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chen, Y.; Zeng, Z.; Shen, X.; Wu, Z.; Dong, Y.; Cheng, J.C. Microrna-146a-5p negatively regulates pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion and cell activation in lipopolysaccharide stimulated human hepatic stellate cells through inhibition of toll-like receptor 4 signaling pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Guo, Z.; Cai, X.; Guo, X.; Xu, Y.; Gong, J.; Li, Y.; Zhu, W. Let-7b ameliorates crohn’s disease-associated adherent-invasive e coli induced intestinal inflammation via modulating toll-like receptor 4 expression in intestinal epithelial cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 156, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ghisi, M.; Corradin, A.; Basso, K.; Frasson, C.; Serafin, V.; Mukherjee, S.; Mussolin, L.; Ruggero, K.; Bonanno, L.; Guffanti, A.; et al. Modulation of microrna expression in human t-cell development: Targeting of notch3 by mir-150. Blood 2011, 117, 7053–7062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sonkoly, E.; Pivarcsi, A. Advances in micrornas: Implications for immunity and inflammatory diseases. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2009, 13, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ivanov, I.I.; Atarashi, K.; Manel, N.; Brodie, E.L.; Shima, T.; Karaoz, U.; Wei, D.; Goldfarb, K.C.; Santee, C.A.; Lynch, S.V.; et al. Induction of intestinal th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria. Cell 2009, 139, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Sakaguchi, S.; Yamaguchi, T.; Nomura, T.; Ono, M. Regulatory t cells and immune tolerance. Cell 2008, 133, 775–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Bhaumik, S.; Basu, R. Cellular and molecular dynamics of th17 differentiation and its developmental plasticity in the intestinal immune response. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Annunziato, F.; Romagnani, C.; Romagnani, S. The 3 major types of innate and adaptive cell-mediated effector immunity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 135, 626–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Omenetti, S.; Bussi, C.; Metidji, A.; Iseppon, A.; Lee, S.; Tolaini, M.; Li, Y.; Kelly, G.; Chakravarty, P.; Shoaie, S.; et al. The intestine harbors functionally distinct homeostatic tissue-resident and inflammatory th17 cells. Immunity 2019, 51, 77–89.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Kallies, A.; Good-Jacobson, K.L. Transcription factor t-bet orchestrates lineage development and function in the immune system. Trends Immunol. 2017, 38, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Nakayama, T.; Hirahara, K.; Onodera, A.; Endo, Y.; Hosokawa, H.; Shinoda, K.; Tumes, D.J.; Okamoto, Y. Th2 cells in health and disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 35, 53–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wallace, K.L.; Zheng, L.B.; Kanazawa, Y.; Shih, D.Q. Immunopathology of inflammatory bowel disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 6–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Randhawa, P.K.; Singh, K.; Singh, N.; Jaggi, A.S. A review on chemical-induced inflammatory bowel disease models in rodents. Korean J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2014, 18, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Chandiran, K.; Lawlor, R.; Pannuti, A.; Perez, G.G.; Srinivasan, J.; Golde, T.E.; Miele, L.; Osborne, B.A.; Minter, L.M. Notch1 primes cd4 t cells for t helper type i differentiation through its early effects on mir-29. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 99, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Specjalski, K.; Jassem, E. Micrornas: Potential biomarkers and targets of therapy in allergic diseases? Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. (Warsz) 2019, 67, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Baumjohann, D.; Heissmeyer, V. Posttranscriptional gene regulation of t follicular helper cells by rna-binding proteins and micrornas. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cui, P.; Hu, Y.; Tao, Y.; Chen, C.; Zhao, J.; Guo, M.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, L. Mir-126 knockdown enhances the activity of murine cd4+ t cells in vivo and promotes their differentiation into th1 cells. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi = Chin. J. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2016, 32, 347–351. [Google Scholar]
  70. Baumjohann, D.; Ansel, K.M. Microrna-mediated regulation of t helper cell differentiation and plasticity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 666–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rodriguez-Galan, A.; Fernandez-Messina, L.; Sanchez-Madrid, F. Control of immunoregulatory molecules by mirnas in t cell activation. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Sethi, A.; Kulkarni, N.; Sonar, S.; Lal, G. Role of mirnas in cd4 t cell plasticity during inflammation and tolerance. Front. Genet. 2013, 4, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Zhou, H.; Li, J.; Gao, P.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, J. Mir-155: A novel target in allergic asthma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Seddiki, N.; Brezar, V.; Ruffin, N.; Levy, Y.; Swaminathan, S. Role of mir-155 in the regulation of lymphocyte immune function and disease. Immunology 2014, 142, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Honardoost, M.A.; Naghavian, R.; Ahmadinejad, F.; Hosseini, A.; Ghaedi, K. Integrative computational mrna-mirna interaction analyses of the autoimmune-deregulated mirnas and well-known th17 differentiation regulators: An attempt to discover new potential mirnas involved in th17 differentiation. Gene 2015, 572, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ge, Y.; Sun, M.; Wu, W.; Ma, C.; Zhang, C.; He, C.; Li, J.; Cong, Y.; Zhang, D.; Liu, Z. Microrna-125a suppresses intestinal mucosal inflammation through targeting ets-1 in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. J. Autoimmun. 2019, 101, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, L.; Wang, E.; Wang, Y.; Mines, R.; Xiang, K.; Sun, Z.; Zhou, G.; Chen, K.Y.; Rakhilin, N.; Chao, S.; et al. Mir-34a is a microrna safeguard for citrobacter-induced inflammatory colon oncogenesis. eLife 2018, 7, e39479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Tanoue, T.; Atarashi, K.; Honda, K. Development and maintenance of intestinal regulatory t cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 295–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Naghavian, R.; Ghaedi, K.; Kiani-Esfahani, A.; Ganjalikhani-Hakemi, M.; Etemadifar, M.; Nasr-Esfahani, M.H. Mir-141 and mir-200a, revelation of new possible players in modulation of th17/treg differentiation and pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chao, G.; Li, X.; Ji, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Li, N.; Zhang, N.; Feng, Z.; Niu, M. Mir-155 controls follicular treg cell-mediated humoral autoimmune intestinal injury by inhibiting ctla-4 expression. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 71, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Robertson, S.A.; Zhang, B.; Chan, H.; Sharkey, D.J.; Barry, S.C.; Fullston, T.; Schjenken, J.E. Microrna regulation of immune events at conception. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2017, 84, 914–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Zeng, Q.; Liu, W.; Luo, R.; Lu, G. Microrna-181a and microrna-155 are involved in the regulation of the differentiation and function of regulatory t cells in allergic rhinitis children. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2019, 30, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Beres, N.J.; Szabo, D.; Kocsis, D.; Szucs, D.; Kiss, Z.; Muller, K.E.; Lendvai, G.; Kiss, A.; Arato, A.; Sziksz, E.; et al. Role of altered expression of mir-146a, mir-155, and mir-122 in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2016, 22, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Ghaebi, M.; Abdolmohammadi-Vahid, S.; Ahmadi, M.; Eghbal-Fard, S.; Dolati, S.; Nouri, M.; Talebi, M.; Hamdi, K.; Marofi, F.; Aghebati-Maleki, L.; et al. T cell subsets in peripheral blood of women with recurrent implantation failure. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2019, 131, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pan, W.; Zhu, S.; Dai, D.; Liu, Z.; Li, D.; Li, B.; Gagliani, N.; Zheng, Y.; Tang, Y.; Weirauch, M.T.; et al. Mir-125a targets effector programs to stabilize treg-mediated immune homeostasis. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Yousefi, B.; Eslami, M.; Ghasemian, A.; Kokhaei, P.; Salek Farrokhi, A.; Darabi, N. Probiotics importance and their immunomodulatory properties. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 8008–8018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Belkaid, Y.; Harrison, O.J. Homeostatic immunity and the microbiota. Immunity 2017, 46, 562–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Wang, G.; Huang, S.; Wang, Y.; Cai, S.; Yu, H.; Liu, H.; Zeng, X.; Zhang, G.; Qiao, S. Bridging intestinal immunity and gut microbiota by metabolites. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 3917–3937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Peng, M.; Tabashsum, Z.; Patel, P.; Bernhardt, C.; Carrion, M.; Biswas, D. Prevention of enteric bacterial infections and modulation of cecal microbiota with conjugated linoleic acids producing lactobacillus in mice. Gut Microbes 2019, 11, 433–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tokuhara, D.; Kurashima, Y.; Kamioka, M.; Nakayama, T.; Ernst, P.; Kiyono, H. A comprehensive understanding of the gut mucosal immune system in allergic inflammation. Allergol. Int. 2019, 68, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Peng, M.; Reichmann, G.; Biswas, D. Lactobacillus casei and its byproducts alter the virulence factors of foodborne bacterial pathogens. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 15, 418–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. van de Pavert, S.A.; Ferreira, M.; Domingues, R.G.; Ribeiro, H.; Molenaar, R.; Moreira-Santos, L.; Almeida, F.F.; Ibiza, S.; Barbosa, I.; Goverse, G.; et al. Maternal retinoids control type 3 innate lymphoid cells and set the offspring immunity. Nature 2014, 508, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Sommer, F.; Backhed, F. The gut microbiota--masters of host development and physiology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Goodrich, J.K.; Waters, J.L.; Poole, A.C.; Sutter, J.L.; Koren, O.; Blekhman, R.; Beaumont, M.; Van Treuren, W.; Knight, R.; Bell, J.T.; et al. Human genetics shape the gut microbiome. Cell 2014, 159, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Singh, N.; Shirdel, E.A.; Waldron, L.; Zhang, R.H.; Jurisica, I.; Comelli, E.M. The murine caecal microrna signature depends on the presence of the endogenous microbiota. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 8, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Zou, L.; Xiong, X.; Wang, K.; Yin, Y. Micrornas in the intestine: Role in renewal, homeostasis, and inflammation. Curr. Mol. Med. 2018, 18, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Dong, J.; Tai, J.W.; Lu, L.F. Mirna-microbiota interaction in gut homeostasis and colorectal cancer. Trends Cancer 2019, 5, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hu, S.; Dong, T.S.; Dalal, S.R.; Wu, F.; Bissonnette, M.; Kwon, J.H.; Chang, E.B. The microbe-derived short chain fatty acid butyrate targets mirna-dependent p21 gene expression in human colon cancer. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Thanikachalam, K.; Khan, G. Colorectal cancer and nutrition. Nutrients 2019, 11, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Sanctuary, M.R.; Huang, R.H.; Jones, A.A.; Luck, M.E.; Aherne, C.M.; Jedlicka, P.; de Zoeten, E.F.; Collins, C.B. Mir-106a deficiency attenuates inflammation in murine ibd models. Mucosal Immunol. 2019, 12, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Rojas-Feria, M.; Romero-Garcia, T.; Fernandez Caballero-Rico, J.A.; Pastor Ramirez, H.; Aviles-Recio, M.; Castro-Fernandez, M.; Chueca Porcuna, N.; Romero-Gomicronmez, M.; Garcia, F.; Grande, L.; et al. Modulation of faecal metagenome in crohn’s disease: Role of micrornas as biomarkers. World J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 24, 5223–5233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Nosho, K.; Sukawa, Y.; Adachi, Y.; Ito, M.; Mitsuhashi, K.; Kurihara, H.; Kanno, S.; Yamamoto, I.; Ishigami, K.; Igarashi, H.; et al. Association of fusobacterium nucleatum with immunity and molecular alterations in colorectal cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Tomkovich, S.; Gharaibeh, R.Z.; Dejea, C.M.; Pope, J.L.; Jiang, J.; Winglee, K.; Gauthier, J.; Newsome, R.C.; Yang, Y.; Fodor, A.A.; et al. Human colon mucosal biofilms and murine host communicate via altered mrna and microrna expression during cancer. mSystems 2020, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Tarallo, S.; Ferrero, G.; Gallo, G.; Francavilla, A.; Clerico, G.; Realis Luc, A.; Manghi, P.; Thomas, A.M.; Vineis, P.; Segata, N.; et al. Altered fecal small rna profiles in colorectal cancer reflect gut microbiome composition in stool samples. mSystems 2019, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Rodriguez-Nogales, A.; Algieri, F.; Garrido-Mesa, J.; Vezza, T.; Utrilla, M.P.; Chueca, N.; Garcia, F.; Olivares, M.; Rodriguez-Cabezas, M.E.; Galvez, J. Differential intestinal anti-inflammatory effects of lactobacillus fermentum and lactobacillus salivarius in dss mouse colitis: Impact on micrornas expression and microbiota composition. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Rodriguez-Nogales, A.; Algieri, F.; Garrido-Mesa, J.; Vezza, T.; Utrilla, M.P.; Chueca, N.; Fernandez-Caballero, J.A.; Garcia, F.; Rodriguez-Cabezas, M.E.; Galvez, J. The administration of escherichia coli nissle 1917 ameliorates development of dss-induced colitis in mice. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Rodriguez-Nogales, A.; Algieri, F.; Garrido-Mesa, J.; Vezza, T.; Utrilla, M.P.; Chueca, N.; Garcia, F.; Rodriguez-Cabezas, M.E.; Galvez, J. Intestinal anti-inflammatory effect of the probiotic saccharomyces boulardii in dss-induced colitis in mice: Impact on micrornas expression and gut microbiota composition. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 61, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Archambaud, C.; Sismeiro, O.; Toedling, J.; Soubigou, G.; Becavin, C.; Lechat, P.; Lebreton, A.; Ciaudo, C.; Cossart, P. The intestinal microbiota interferes with the microrna response upon oral listeria infection. mBio 2013, 4, e00707-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Yang, Y.; Weng, W.; Peng, J.; Hong, L.; Yang, L.; Toiyama, Y.; Gao, R.; Liu, M.; Yin, M.; Pan, C.; et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum increases proliferation of colorectal cancer cells and tumor development in mice by activating toll-like receptor 4 signaling to nuclear factor-kappab, and up-regulating expression of microrna-21. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 851–866.e824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Heydari, Z.; Rahaie, M.; Alizadeh, A.M.; Agah, S.; Khalighfard, S.; Bahmani, S. Effects of lactobacillus acidophilus and bifidobacterium bifidum probiotics on the expression of micrornas 135b, 26b, 18a and 155, and their involving genes in mice colon cancer. Probiot. Antimicrob. Proteins 2019, 11, 1155–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Fahmy, C.A.; Gamal-Eldeen, A.M.; El-Hussieny, E.A.; Raafat, B.M.; Mehanna, N.S.; Talaat, R.M.; Shaaban, M.T. Bifidobacterium longum suppresses murine colorectal cancer through the modulation of oncomirs and tumor suppressor mirnas. Nutr. Cancer 2019, 71, 688–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Teng, Y.; Ren, Y.; Sayed, M.; Hu, X.; Lei, C.; Kumar, A.; Hutchins, E.; Mu, J.; Deng, Z.; Luo, C.; et al. Plant-derived exosomal micrornas shape the gut microbiota. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 24, 637–652.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Peng, M.; Biswas, D. Short chain and polyunsaturated fatty acids in host gut health and foodborne bacterial pathogen inhibition. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 3987–4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Conlon, M.A.; Bird, A.R. The impact of diet and lifestyle on gut microbiota and human health. Nutrients 2014, 7, 17–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Peng, M.; Bitsko, E.; Biswas, D. Functional properties of peanut fractions on the growth of probiotics and foodborne bacterial pathogens. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, M635–M641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Riaz Rajoka, M.S.; Jin, M.; Haobin, Z.; Li, Q.; Shao, D.; Huang, Q.; Shi, J. Impact of dietary compounds on cancer-related gut microbiota and microrna. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 4291–4303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Philip, A.; Ferro, V.A.; Tate, R.J. Determination of the potential bioavailability of plant micrornas using a simulated human digestion process. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 1962–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Olivieri, F.; Rippo, M.R.; Procopio, A.D.; Fazioli, F. Circulating inflamma-mirs in aging and age-related diseases. Front. Genet. 2013, 4, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Teodori, L.; Petrignani, I.; Giuliani, A.; Prattichizzo, F.; Gurau, F.; Matacchione, G.; Olivieri, F.; Coppari, S.; Albertini, M.C. Inflamm-aging micrornas may integrate signals from food and gut microbiota by modulating common signalling pathways. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2019, 182, 111127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Pan, J.H.; Abernathy, B.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Shin, E.C.; Kim, J.K. Cruciferous vegetables and colorectal cancer prevention through microrna regulation: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 2026–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hu, S.; Liu, L.; Chang, E.B.; Wang, J.Y.; Raufman, J.P. Butyrate inhibits pro-proliferative mir-92a by diminishing c-myc-induced mir-17-92a cluster transcription in human colon cancer cells. Mol. Cancer 2015, 14, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Rome, S. Use of mirnas in biofluids as biomarkers in dietary and lifestyle intervention studies. Genes Nutr. 2015, 10, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Xiao, H.W.; Li, Y.; Luo, D.; Dong, J.L.; Zhou, L.X.; Zhao, S.Y.; Zheng, Q.S.; Wang, H.C.; Cui, M.; Fan, S.J. Hydrogen-water ameliorates radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity via myd88’s effects on the gut microbiota. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, e433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Li, C.; Yu, Y.; Yi, Y.; Wang, J.; Chen, D. Exosome-induced regulation in inflammatory bowel disease. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Munir, J.; Lee, M.; Ryu, S. Exosomes in food: Health benefits and clinical relevance in diseases. Adv. Nutr. 2020, 11, 687–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Victora, C.G.; Bahl, R.; Barros, A.J.; Franca, G.V.; Horton, S.; Krasevec, J.; Murch, S.; Sankar, M.J.; Walker, N.; Rollins, N.C.; et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet 2016, 387, 475–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Mirza, A.H.; Kaur, S.; Nielsen, L.B.; Storling, J.; Yarani, R.; Roursgaard, M.; Mathiesen, E.R.; Damm, P.; Svare, J.; Mortensen, H.B.; et al. Breast milk-derived extracellular vesicles enriched in exosomes from mothers with type 1 diabetes contain aberrant levels of micrornas. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhang, M.; Viennois, E.; Prasad, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Han, M.K.; Xiao, B.; Xu, C.; Srinivasan, S.; et al. Edible ginger-derived nanoparticles: A novel therapeutic approach for the prevention and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and colitis-associated cancer. Biomaterials 2016, 101, 321–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Nielsen, T.S.; Bendiks, Z.; Thomsen, B.; Wright, M.E.; Theil, P.K.; Scherer, B.L.; Marco, M.L. High-amylose maize, potato, and butyrylated starch modulate large intestinal fermentation, microbial composition, and oncogenic mirna expression in rats fed a high-protein meat diet. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Diosdado, B.; van de Wiel, M.A.; Terhaar Sive Droste, J.S.; Mongera, S.; Postma, C.; Meijerink, W.J.; Carvalho, B.; Meijer, G.A. Mir-17-92 cluster is associated with 13q gain and c-myc expression during colorectal adenoma to adenocarcinoma progression. Br. J. Cancer 2009, 101, 707–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Bian, Z.; Li, L.; Cui, J.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.Y.; Zen, K. Role of mir-150-targeting c-myb in colonic epithelial disruption during dextran sulphate sodium-induced murine experimental colitis and human ulcerative colitis. J. Pathol. 2011, 225, 544–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Tsukamoto, Y.; Nakada, C.; Noguchi, T.; Tanigawa, M.; Nguyen, L.T.; Uchida, T.; Hijiya, N.; Matsuura, K.; Fujioka, T.; Seto, M.; et al. Microrna-375 is downregulated in gastric carcinomas and regulates cell survival by targeting pdk1 and 14-3-3zeta. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 2339–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Johnnidis, J.B.; Harris, M.H.; Wheeler, R.T.; Stehling-Sun, S.; Lam, M.H.; Kirak, O.; Brummelkamp, T.R.; Fleming, M.D.; Camargo, F.D. Regulation of progenitor cell proliferation and granulocyte function by microrna-223. Nature 2008, 451, 1125–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Sun, W.; Shen, W.; Yang, S.; Hu, F.; Li, H.; Zhu, T.H. Mir-223 and mir-142 attenuate hematopoietic cell proliferation, and mir-223 positively regulates mir-142 through lmo2 isoforms and cebp-beta. Cell Res. 2010, 20, 1158–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Belz, G.T. Mir-142 keeps cd4+ dcs in balance. Blood 2013, 121, 871–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Mildner, A.; Chapnik, E.; Manor, O.; Yona, S.; Kim, K.W.; Aychek, T.; Varol, D.; Beck, G.; Itzhaki, Z.B.; Feldmesser, E.; et al. Mononuclear phagocyte mirnome analysis identifies mir-142 as critical regulator of murine dendritic cell homeostasis. Blood 2013, 121, 1016–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Garrido-Mesa, J.; Rodriguez-Nogales, A.; Algieri, F.; Vezza, T.; Hidalgo-Garcia, L.; Garrido-Barros, M.; Utrilla, M.P.; Garcia, F.; Chueca, N.; Rodriguez-Cabezas, M.E.; et al. Immunomodulatory tetracyclines shape the intestinal inflammatory response inducing mucosal healing and resolution. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 175, 4353–4370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Chivukula, R.R.; Shi, G.; Acharya, A.; Mills, E.W.; Zeitels, L.R.; Anandam, J.L.; Abdelnaby, A.A.; Balch, G.C.; Mansour, J.C.; Yopp, A.C.; et al. An essential mesenchymal function for mir-143/145 in intestinal epithelial regeneration. Cell 2014, 157, 1104–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Smith, P.M.; Howitt, M.R.; Panikov, N.; Michaud, M.; Gallini, C.A.; Bohlooly, Y.M.; Glickman, J.N.; Garrett, W.S. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic treg cell homeostasis. Science 2013, 341, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Chang, C.S.; Kao, C.Y. Current understanding of the gut microbiota shaping mechanisms. J. Biomed. Sci. 2019, 26, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Williams, M.R.; Stedtfeld, R.D.; Tiedje, J.M.; Hashsham, S.A. Micrornas-based inter-domain communication between the host and members of the gut microbiome. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Wu, W.; He, C.; Liu, C.; Cao, A.T.; Xue, X.; Evans-Marin, H.L.; Sun, M.; Fang, L.; Yao, S.; Pinchuk, I.V.; et al. Mir-10a inhibits dendritic cell activation and th1/th17 cell immune responses in ibd. Gut 2015, 64, 1755–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Xue, X.; Feng, T.; Yao, S.; Wolf, K.J.; Liu, C.G.; Liu, X.; Elson, C.O.; Cong, Y. Microbiota downregulates dendritic cell expression of mir-10a, which targets il-12/il-23p40. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 5879–5886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Johnston, D.G.W.; Williams, M.A.; Thaiss, C.A.; Cabrera-Rubio, R.; Raverdeau, M.; McEntee, C.; Cotter, P.D.; Elinav, E.; O’Neill, L.A.J.; Corr, S.C. Loss of microrna-21 influences the gut microbiota, causing reduced susceptibility in a murine model of colitis. J. Crohns Colitis 2018, 12, 835–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Liu, S.; Rezende, R.M.; Moreira, T.G.; Tankou, S.K.; Cox, L.M.; Wu, M.; Song, A.; Dhang, F.H.; Wei, Z.; Costamagna, G.; et al. Oral administration of mir-30d from feces of ms patients suppresses ms-like symptoms in mice by expanding akkermansia muciniphila. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 26, 779–794.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Diao, H.; Kon, S.; Iwabuchi, K.; Kimura, C.; Morimoto, J.; Ito, D.; Segawa, T.; Maeda, M.; Hamuro, J.; Nakayama, T.; et al. Osteopontin as a mediator of nkt cell function in t cell-mediated liver diseases. Immunity 2004, 21, 539–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Zhang, T.; Yu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, D.; Liu, F.; Zhang, C.Y.; Gu, H.; Zen, K. Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis modulates intestinal epithelial mir-128 levels to decrease macrophage recruitment via macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 209, 2000–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Archambaud, C.; Nahori, M.A.; Soubigou, G.; Becavin, C.; Laval, L.; Lechat, P.; Smokvina, T.; Langella, P.; Lecuit, M.; Cossart, P. Impact of lactobacilli on orally acquired listeriosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 16684–16689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Mannala, G.K.; Izar, B.; Rupp, O.; Schultze, T.; Goesmann, A.; Chakraborty, T.; Hain, T. Listeria monocytogenes induces a virulence-dependent microrna signature that regulates the immune response in galleria mellonella. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Genes 11 01075 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of microRNA on the regulation of immune cells in the intestine.
Figure 1. Effect of microRNA on the regulation of immune cells in the intestine.
Genes 11 01075 g001
Genes 11 01075 g002 550
Figure 2. Summary of microRNA-microbiota interaction in gut intestine, and the crucial role in regulating intestinal homeostasis through multiple mechanisms. The microRNAs secreted by intestinal epithelial cells are released into lumen, modulating the growth of gut microbes and the composition of intestinal microbiota. Gut microbiome in the host can be influenced by diet-derived microRNAs as well, while gut intestinal microbiota may in turn regulate the expression of intestinal microRNAs in the host.
Figure 2. Summary of microRNA-microbiota interaction in gut intestine, and the crucial role in regulating intestinal homeostasis through multiple mechanisms. The microRNAs secreted by intestinal epithelial cells are released into lumen, modulating the growth of gut microbes and the composition of intestinal microbiota. Gut microbiome in the host can be influenced by diet-derived microRNAs as well, while gut intestinal microbiota may in turn regulate the expression of intestinal microRNAs in the host.
Genes 11 01075 g002
Table
Table 1. Representative microRNAs and their functions in gut intestine.
Table 1. Representative microRNAs and their functions in gut intestine.
MicroRNATargetFunctionReference
miR-21Rho-associated protein kinase 1Regulates tight junction proteins; Protects intestinal barrier from dysfunction[21]
miR-21PTEN/PI3K/Akt signaling pathwayRegulates intestinal tight junction permeability; Preserves intestinal barrier[22]
miR-31Wnt/Hippo signaling pathway; GP130; IL7R; IL16RPromotes intestinal epithelial cell proliferation[23]
miR156Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathwayInhibits intestinal cell proliferation[24]
miR-181cTNF-αRegulates TNF-α; Reduces intestinal barrier injury[25]
miR-191aZonula occludens-1Regulates tight junction proteins; Reduces TNF-α-induced injury[26]
miR-200bMyosin light chain kinaseInhibits TNF-α-induced IL-8 secretion; Suppresses tight junction disruption[27]
miR-212Zonula occludens-1Regulates tight junction proteins; Reduces gut leakiness[28]
miR-301aBTG anti-proliferation factor 1Stimulates NF-κB activation; Promotes mucosal inflammation and tumorigenesis[29]
Table
Table 2. MicroRNA-microbiota interaction in the host intestines.
Table 2. MicroRNA-microbiota interaction in the host intestines.
Bacteria/miRNATargetEffectReference
E. coli Nissle 1917miR-223, miR-155
miR-150
miR-143, miR-375		Up-regulation
Down-regulation		[106]
Saccharomyces boulardiimiR-155, miR-223Down-regulation[107]
L. fermentummiR-150, miR-155, miR-223
miR-143		Down-regulation
Up-regulation		[105]
L. salivariusmiR-155, miR-223Down-regulation[105]
Listeria monocytogenesmiR-143, miR-148a
miR-200b, miR-200c		Down-regulation[108]
F. nucleatummicroRNA-21Up-regulation[109]
L. acidophilus
B. bifidum		miR-135b, miR-155
miR-26b, miR-18a		Down-regulation
Up-regulation		[110]
B. longummiR-145, miR-15a
miR-146a		Up-regulation
Down-regulation		[111]
miR-515-5pF. nucleatumPromoting bacterial growth[11]
miR-1226-5pE. coliPromoting bacterial growth[11]
gma-miR396eL. rhamnosusPromoting bacterial growth[112]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bi, K.; Zhang, X.; Chen, W.; Diao, H. MicroRNAs Regulate Intestinal Immunity and Gut Microbiota for Gastrointestinal Health: A Comprehensive Review. Genes 2020, 11, 1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091075

AMA Style

Bi K, Zhang X, Chen W, Diao H. MicroRNAs Regulate Intestinal Immunity and Gut Microbiota for Gastrointestinal Health: A Comprehensive Review. Genes. 2020; 11(9):1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091075

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bi, Kefan, Xujun Zhang, Wenbiao Chen, and Hongyan Diao. 2020. "MicroRNAs Regulate Intestinal Immunity and Gut Microbiota for Gastrointestinal Health: A Comprehensive Review" Genes 11, no. 9: 1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091075

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop