Next Article in Journal
Circulating tRNA-Derived Small RNAs as Novel Radiation Biomarkers of Heavy Ion, Proton and X-ray Exposure
Next Article in Special Issue
Heat Shock Protein 90 as Therapeutic Target for CVDs and Heart Ageing
Previous Article in Journal
The Progress of Intestinal Epithelial Models from Cell Lines to Gut-On-Chip
Previous Article in Special Issue
Calciprotein Particles Link Disturbed Mineral Homeostasis with Cardiovascular Disease by Causing Endothelial Dysfunction and Vascular Inflammation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 24
10.3390/ijms222413471
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Inflammation in Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction

by
Marios Sagris
1,*,†,
Panagiotis Theofilis
1,†,
Alexios S. Antonopoulos
1,
Evangelos Oikonomou
1,2,
Christina Paschaliori
1,
Nikolaos Galiatsatos
1,
Kostas Tsioufis
1 and
Dimitris Tousoulis
1
1
Cardiology Clinic, ‘Hippokration’ General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Cardiology, “Sotiria” Thoracic Diseases Hospital of Athens, University of Athens Medical School, 11527 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to the work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(24), 13471; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413471
Submission received: 8 November 2021 / Revised: 5 December 2021 / Accepted: 7 December 2021 / Published: 15 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Atherosclerosis: From Molecular Biology to Therapeutic Perspective 2.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chronic low-grade inflammation is involved in coronary atherosclerosis, presenting multiple clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic to stable angina, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Coronary microvasculature consists of vessels with a diameter less than 500 μm, whose potential structural and functional abnormalities can lead to inappropriate dilatation and an inability to meet the required myocardium oxygen demands. This review focuses on the pathogenesis of coronary microvascular dysfunction and the capability of non-invasive screening methods to detect the phenomenon. Anti-inflammatory agents, such as statins and immunomodulators, including anakinra, tocilizumab, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, have been assessed recently and may constitute additional or alternative treatment approaches to reduce cardiovascular events in atherosclerotic heart disease characterized by coronary microvascular dysfunction.

1. Introduction

Ischemic cardiac pain in the context of non-obstructed epicardial coronary arteries, a phenomenon frequently encountered in clinical cardiology practice, has been recognized as a clinical entity of increased cardiovascular risk when compared to control subjects [1,2], contrary to initial theories suggesting a nonthreatening disease progression [3]. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMVD) consists of the main etiologic factor of peripheral ischemia with “normal” epicardial coronary arteries. However, no definitive data exist on the pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of CMVD.
Coronary microvasculature consists of vessels with a diameter less than 500 μm, whose remodeling due to various stimuli could lead to structural and functional abnormalities and, consequently, result in inappropriate dilatation and the inability to meet the required oxygen demands. Known cardiovascular risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension, are implicated in this process due to their deleterious vascular effects. Ultimately, patients with CMVD could progress to a phenotype of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, with variable prognosis due to a lack of disease-specific treatment [4].
Chronic low-grade inflammation is undoubtedly involved in coronary atherosclerosis. Importantly, favorable cardiovascular outcomes have been reported in recent trials of patients with documented coronary artery disease (CAD) receiving either broad based or target anti-inflammatory treatment [5,6,7]. Contemporary evidence suggests that an inflammatory background is also responsible for the development of CMVD [8]. Therefore, we review the latest data regarding CMVD epidemiology and diagnostic approach while elaborating on the speculated effects of inflammation and the potential therapeutic implications of immunomodulatory agents.

2. Multimodality Assessment of CMVD

Evaluation of coronary blood flow velocity and coronary blood flow after the administration of vasodilating substances during cardiac catheterization are important determinants of coronary flow reserve (CFR), a measure of epicardial and microcirculatory blood flow. In the absence of epicardial artery obstruction, a reduced CFR value is indicative of CMVD. Corrections for age and systolic blood pressure in individuals should always be implemented. However, scientific research is currently focused on noninvasive methods of CMVD assessment.

2.1. Echocardiography

To begin with, echocardiography has been involved in CMVD assessment since 1998, when Wei et al. infused air-filled albumin microbubbles intravenously in an effort to quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) in an epicardial coronary artery. Next generation microbubbles, destructible by ultrasound, allowed the more accurate calculation of MBF by assessing their mean velocity (rate of reappearance after destruction in the setting of a constant intravenous infusion) and the microvascular cross-sectional area (microbubble concentration in the myocardium) [9]. Apart from contrast echocardiography, Doppler echocardiographic assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve (ratio of coronary flow velocity at stress and rest at proximal left anterior descending coronary artery) was found to satisfactorily correspond with invasive methods [10,11]. Moreover, its prognostic efficacy was determined in high risk individuals with known or suspected CAD [12]. Even though echocardiography is attractive due to the nature of the procedure (bedside, inexpensive, minimal patient-related risk), it is operator-dependent and has not been validated while patient-related factors such as obesity or pulmonary pathology could hinder the quality of measurements.

2.2. Cardiac CT Angiography

Cardiac CT angiography (CCTA) appears to be another appealing approach in the assessment of CMVD, since information about coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion can be acquired from one study [13]. By obtaining electrocardiographically-gated CT perfusion images at rest and after stress with vasodilators, MBF can be quantified [14]. Moreover, fractional flow reserve and MBF can also be calculated by mathematical models simulating maximal hyperemia [15]. However, the increased radiation exposure paired with a higher risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury especially in individuals with preexisting renal disease should always be taken into account [16].

2.3. Fat Attenuation Index

Interestingly, recent advancements in the detection of coronary inflammation via perivascular fat imaging in CT has garnered scientific attention and could be also applied in the context of CMVD [17]. The fat attenuation index (FAI), a recently developed imaging marker, was increased in areas of profound atherosclerosis as well as in regions characterized by fractional flow reserve (FFR) of 0.75 or less [18,19], highlighting the existing burden of inflammation, which is a distinct characteristic of vulnerable plaques. It has to be noted that FAI values appear to be correlated with the gold standard method of perivascular inflammation imaging, PET-CT with 18F-NaF uptake, FAI values seemed to be correlated with 18F-NaF uptake, as shown in a recent small cohort study of 41 stable patients with high risk plaques [20]. Evaluation of the pericoronary adipose tissue may be of additive discriminative importance in highly stenotic atherosclerotic plaques and improve their evaluation by CCTA, since a higher FAI value is indicative of a more hemodynamically significant stenosis.
FAI may also be of use in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction, with higher FAI values around the culprit lesions compared to FAI around non-culprit lesions. At the follow-up evaluation, the FAI around the culprit lesion was lower than baseline, with values comparable to those detected around stable atherosclerotic regions [17,21,22]. According to this observation, the capability of FAI to detect the acute changes in the inflammatory burden of pericoronary fat is evident, with a good discrimination ability (AUROC = 0.70) [21]. The fat radiomic profile (FRP) of stable pericoronary fat changes in comparison to follow-up CCTA imaging has also been described by Oikonomou et al. [23]. Several pharmacologic interventions could be implicated in the changes of pericoronary fat detected by FAI including drugs such as aspirin, statins, or biologic therapy with anti-inflammatory agents [24].
The incremental prognostic value of perivascular adipose tissue attenuation could become an important imaging option towards further characterization of the residual cardiovascular risk, which may not be adequately estimated by traditional scoring methods or inflammatory biomarkers. It is believed that the presence of residual inflammation in the coronary arterial bed and its detection might aid towards a more precise risk stratification and, consequently, the institution of an appropriate treatment approach, which might include anti-inflammatory agents. The use of statin and aspirin might modify this residual risk and, in such cases, FAI is no longer predictive of incident cardiovascular risk [24]. However, FRP and its properties constitute a non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factor, not influenced by drug therapy [23].
FAI, other than being an attractive alternative imaging option regarding the detection of vascular inflammation, may also be less expensive, with lower radiation exposure for the patient. However, its association with the existence of CMVD has not been explored and further research is required in this direction to better define FAI’s role in the evaluation of CMVD.

2.4. Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography

The most extensively studied noninvasive method of MBF estimation has undoubtedly been cardiac Positron Emission Tomography (PET) [25]. Even though limitations exist regarding its cost and availability of cyclotrons, myocardial perfusion reserve has been associated with adverse outcomes, namely heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, on top of its role in diagnosing CMVD [26,27].

2.5. Cardiac MRI

Last but not least, improvements in cardiac MRI protocols have made the imaging of microcirculation feasible by utilizing the diffusion of contrast medium from the microvasculature into the interstitium during the first pass. Integrated approaches, such as the Fermi model [28], have been formed to assess MBF which, together with microvascular perfusion resistance index, are good measures of CMVD [29,30]. Moreover, global CFR measurement is feasible via cardiac MRI, providing additional prognostic information [31]. Among cardiac MRI’s limitations, however, are the presence of imaging artifacts and the restricted use of gadolinium in chronic kidney disease patients.

2.6. Biomarkers

With regards to biomarkers, there have been several studies evaluating their role in CMVD (Table 1). Schroder et al. proceeded to an analysis of 92 biomarkers in women with CMVD and, even though they detected a component of six anti-inflammatory biomarkers that was associated with CMVD even after adjustment for known risk factors, it did not provide additional predictive value [32]. In this context, serum soluble CD40 ligand and high sensitivity C reactive protein (CRP) have been linked with CMVD, highlighting the inflammatory process mediating this entity [33,34,35]. Recently, Safdar et al. demonstrated the utility of renalase, a marker of endothelial function and inflammation, in patients with angina related to CMVD [36]. In the latest study of Suhrs et al., 17 inflammatory biomarkers were negatively correlated with coronary flow velocity reserve, further displayed the role of inflammation [37]. Despite their potential usefulness, validation in large-scale trials is warranted. Last but not least, microRNAs have been at the forefront in atherosclerosis research due to their potential as biomarkers as well as therapeutic approaches in ischemic diseases [38,39,40,41]. Several microRNAs (mir-125b, mir-181b, mir-200, mir-146) have been linked with the regulation of inflammatory processes and their use in the field of CMVD remains to be explored [42,43,44,45]. Last but not least, microRNAs have been at the forefront in atherosclerosis research due to their potential as biomarkers as well as therapeutic approaches in ischemic diseases [38,39,40,41]. Several microRNAs (mir-125b, mir-181b, mir-200, mir-146) have been linked with the regulation of inflammatory processes and their use in the field of CMVD remains to be explored [42,43,44,45].

3. The Role of Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of CMVD

3.1. Principal Pathophysiologic Mechanisms

Evidence from studies in autoimmune rheumatic diseases have stressed the decreased nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability together with the high assembly of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as the link between the pro-inflammatory state and endothelial dysfunction observed in CMVD [53]. CMVD can be maintained by a variety of physiological processes that result in either impaired dilatation or enhanced constriction of coronary microvessels [53]. Following endothelial dysfunction, the ensuing inflammation and immune system dysregulation are driving forces accelerating the atherosclerotic process, consequently affecting the microvasculature. Several chemokines and cytokines are involved, with interleukin IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α being crucial mediators of the inflammatory cascade [54]. Systemic inflammation is further exacerbated by pro-inflammatory circulating microparticles, which are believed to be responsible for NO modulation and cytokine release as well as monocyte recruitment [55]. These modifications eventually impede myocardial blood flow ability to adjust to variations in myocardial oxygen demand. Impaired vasodilation can be a result of either non-modified risk factors such as diabetes, obesity, and hypertension or either endothelium–independent mechanisms, referring to the development of nitrate resistance due to decreased cyclic GMP production [56]. The exacerbation of secreting oxygen species in contribution with reduced NO bioavailability drive a chain reaction of signaling events that promotes heart fibrosis and myocyte stiffness [57].
The normal coronary physiology is disrupted to varied degrees as a result of CMVD. Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and those with arterial hypertension have structural abnormalities that are responsible for the development of CMVD [58]. In patients with non-obstructive coronary disease, dysfunction of microvasculature can be a result of several factors, such as increased heart rate, reduced diastolic time, decreased driving blood pressure, and left ventricular inotropism, which need to be considered when assessing microvascular function. Finally, the coronary blood flow linearly affected by the pulsative pattern of the heart and the intramyocardial and intraventricular pressures. As such, abnormalities in the diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle altered the myocardial perfusion [56,59].

3.2. Hypertension

Chronic low-grade systemic inflammation seen in the cluster of comorbidities (i.e., diabetes mellitus, obesity, arterial hypertension) that are considered risk factors for CMVD merits specific attention [60,61] (Figure 1). Arterial hypertension increases the likelihood of death from ischemic heart disease over time. In developed countries, at least 30% of individuals have a history of hypertension, and it is independently related to poor cardiac prognosis following an acute myocardial infarction (MI) [62]. Severe microvascular damage inside the infarct zone presents promptly as microvascular blockage and affects approximately half of all STEMI patients. In patients with persistent microvascular obstruction, progressive irreversible capillary degradation occurs, leading to infarct zone hemorrhage, which is an independent predictor of death or heart failure long-term [63,64]. The underlying pathophysiology includes inflammatory stimuli paired with increased activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, resulting in endothelium-dependent CMVD by recruiting cell adhesion molecules [65]. Oxidative stress is also central as an orchestrator or collaborator of inflammation in hypertension-related vascular aging through mediators such as osteoprotegerin and the Sphingosine Kinase 1 gene [66,67]. The increased oxidative stress could further potentiate the pro-inflammatory effects of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), through the promotion of a secretory endothelial cell phenotype which aids vascular aging [68] and, consequently, CMVD. Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and arterial hypertension have structural abnormalities that are responsible for the development of CMVD [58]. The morphological alterations found in each of these disorders are defined by unfavorable remodeling of intramural coronary arterioles, resulting in medial wall thickening (mostly due to smooth muscle hypertrophy and increased collagen deposition) and varying degrees of intimal thickening [69].

3.3. Diabetes

In individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM), CMVD is often the prodrome of overt CAD and is a strong predictor of complications and mortality [70,71,72]. Inflammation in DM, induced by oxidative stress and the dysfunctional endothelium, plays a key role in the development of CMVD through the augmented expression of adhesion molecules and inflammatory cytokines as well as the mobilization of vascular smooth muscle cells [73,74]. Vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1), another molecule involved in the pathophysiology of DM, is also overexpressed by damaged endothelial cells, affecting leukocyte recruitment and advanced glycation end products (AGE) generation, thus promoting a pro-inflammatory state [75,76,77]. Chemokines such as CC-chemokine ligand 2–3 and CXC-chemokine ligand 8 have also been found to be involved in leukocyte mobilization and macrophage recruitment, resulting in an augmented inflammatory response in the setting of DM [78]. TNF-α values correlated with the levels of glucose and cystatin C, confirming that diabetes plays an orchestrating role in the progress of CMVD [79]. Coronary microvascular dysfunction has an independent relationship with cardiac or all-cause mortality in people with and without diabetes, allowing for incremental risk classification. Patients with diabetes and impaired CFR have by far more increased risk for cardiac events than those with normal CFR [15]. Importantly, studies have stressed the importance of strict glycemic control in maintaining vascular integrity [74,75], a finding that could be partly justified by attenuation of the above mentioned pro-inflammatory, DM-induced effects via optimal management [80,81].

3.4. Obesity

Weight status constitutes a significant role in the progression of atherosclerotic disease [82]. Obesity is characterized by excessive expansion of visceral white adipose tissue mass, also known as adiposopathy. Adiposopathy is comprised of adipocyte hypertrophy, decreased adipose tissue blood flow, altered oxygen levels within the tissue, a state of chronic low-grade inflammation and blunted lipid metabolism [83,84,85]. The latter includes impaired capacity for storing the surplus of dietary lipids, resulting in deposition of ectopic fat accumulating in body locations where it is not physiologically stored, such as the liver and muscle, and a shift to visceral adipose tissue (fat storage in the intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal spaces), contributing to increased circulating free fatty acids, oxidative stress, systemic inflammation, adipokine dysregulation and insulin resistance [83,84,85,86,87,88]. However, epicardial adipose tissue has several unique properties that distinguish it from other depots of visceral fat due to the common microcirculation of epicardial tissue and the underlying myocardium [89]. The accumulation of epicardial fat is closely associated with an impaired myocardial microcirculation, cardiac diastolic filling abnormalities, increased vascular stiffness, and left atrial dilatation in obese people [90,91]. More specifically, high levels of TNF-α induce the secretion of adhesion and chemoattractant molecules such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 while reducing nitric oxide availability. Resistin hormone stimulates the proliferation of smooth muscle cells and the over-secretion of endotelin-1, leading to endothelial dysfunction [92]. Obesity-related reductions in myocardial blood flow due to CMVD, combined with increased cardiac metabolic demand due to increases in ventricular mass, volume expansion, higher filling pressures, and greater cardiac output, may create a perfect background for the occurrence of myocardial oxygen supply–demand mismatch [15]. Finally, an unfavorable correlation was observed between CFR and increased LDL cholesterol where treatment with pioglitazone and lipid-lowering therapy seemed to improve CFR [93].

3.5. Gut Microbiota

This term describes the various commensal microbial species in the gastrointestinal tract [94]. During the last decade, several studies reported the potential association between gut microbiota and atherosclerosis [94,95]. Choline, betaine and L-carnitine are metabolized to trimethylamine (TMA) which is generated to trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), a gut microbe-dependent metabolite [94,95]. Studies showed that increased TMAO level induced the activation of NF-kappa B (NF-κB) pathway and increased the expression of pro-inflammatory genes including inflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules and chemokines [96]. Oxidative stress and NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation could also be triggered by TMAO and inflammatory cytokines such as IL-18 and IL-1β released. As such, diet has an important role in affecting the concentration of TMAO levels and the progression of atherosclerosis [97,98]. Latest studies showed that the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics for 3 to 4 weeks suppressed TMAO levels, ameliorating age-related oxidative stress and arterial dysfunction in mice [99]. The ability of CAD patients’ microbiota to generate ‘secondary’ bile acids enhanced the variety of the bile acid pool in both feces and serum. Under a high fat diet, this mechanism impeded hepatic bile acid synthesis and resulted in higher blood cholesterol levels. The CAD microbiota enhanced circulatory lipopolysaccharides levels as well as pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, while activating intestinal and systemic T help responses and decreasing Treg cell dispersion [100]. Finally, the use of probiotics, synbiotics, and probiotic functional products in a study of 90 obese patients with CAD proved beneficial, controlling plasma TMAO and HDL-C levels [101]. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of inhibiting various steps of TMAO production for the management atherosclerotic disease.

4. Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

Several anti-inflammatory drugs have been assessed over the years in either small or large randomized controlled trials (Table 2). Their aim was to reduce the inflammatory burden of coronary arteries, reducing the secretion of inflammatory cytokines while improving atherosclerotic plaque stabilization. Anti-inflammatory medications could constitute possible therapeutic options in the management of CMVD (Figure 2).

4.1. Statins-Aspirin

The effects of statins are well known for their pleiotropic actions and they have been the cornerstone of treatment for cardiovascular risk reduction and prevention [107]. Statins inhibit the critical step of cholesterol synthesis in which 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) is transformed to mevalonate by the enzyme HMG-CoA reductase [107]. Statins have been proven to reduce serum cholesterol along with a significant reduction in the morbidity and mortality of cardiovascular disease [107]. Statins act as anti-inflammatory agents, since the mevalonate pathway also influences endothelial function, inflammatory response, and coagulation [108]. The suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α) expression paired with the upregulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10) has been observed in animal models [109,110]. The largest to date JUPITER trial showed a significant reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) associated with lower high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels, in the group treated with rosuvastatin rather than placebo [111]. Moreover, statins seem to stabilize the atherosclerotic plaque with thickened fibrous caps and macrocalcification via a reduction in lipid content [108,112].
Luo et al. showed that statin treatment was associated with low morbidity and mortality in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction, during a follow up of 5 years. That was strengthened when the results were adjusted for various factors of the disease, such as smoking, sex, hyperhomocysteinemia, abnormal glucose tolerance, diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia [113]. Several studies have evaluated the use of statins with regard to CMVD. Rosuvastatin was efficacious in improving CFR in hypertensive patients after 12 months of treatment [114,115,116], while the use of statin after an acute myocardial infarction resulted in an increase of myocardial flow reserve at 2 weeks, imaged via cardiac PET [117]. Meta-analytic results provided further confirmation of the beneficial effect of statins on CMVD in patients without significant epicardial stenosis, by means of improved CFR [118]. Although there is currently no recommendation for the consistent introduction of statins in CMVD patients, these with high CV risk are candidates for early statin prescription.
In this aspect, aspirin increases cell apoptotic rate by decreasing the cell proliferation rate of vascular smooth muscle cells. It suppresses atherosclerosis progression by down-regulating the expression of NFκB1 and its targets, which might well provide us with more therapeutic strategies for treatment of the disease [119]. There is no convincing evidence that low-dose aspirin is beneficial in these people. Aspirin may reduce microvascular thrombotic events in individuals with atherosclerotic-related comorbidities [120].

4.2. Colchicine

(NOD)-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is a protein complex with an important role in inflammatory progression [6]. Cholesterol crystals are present through all stages of atherosclerosis and can activate the NLRP3 inflammasome within these inflammatory cells to produce IL-1β and IL-18, key mediators in the inflammatory cascade that drive plaque progression and instability [6]. Colchicine has been studied as an antagonist of NLRP3 inflammasome and, consequently, of IL-1β production. Firstly, a cohort study included 64 patients with stable CAD and abnormal hsCRP levels, notes a significant drop of hsCRP in the colchicine treatment group [121]. The COLchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT) strengthened the beneficial effects of early initiation of colchicine after myocardial infarction, decreasing the rates of cardiovascular death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, MI, stroke, or urgent hospitalization for angina requiring coronary revascularization [103,122].
There is only one study referring to CMVD which revealed that inhibition of inflammatory cytokines by colchicine or a receptor antagonist seems to improve CFR, myocardial contractility and relaxation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [107].

4.3. Anakinra–Canakinumab

Anakinra is an IL-1 receptor antagonist, which was first used for rheumatoid arthritis treatment. It binds to the IL-1 receptor to exert powerful IL-1α and IL-1β blocking activity [123]. It has been found to downregulate CRP and IL-6 in patients with myocardial infarction. Several studies have been found to improve the microvascular dysfunction with potential benefits in ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, diabetes and CAD [5,124]. A double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial of 23 patients with rheumatoid arthritis showed that administration of IL-1ra (Anakinra) caused a greater reduction of oxidative stress and IL-6. In addition, normalization of CRP levels as well as CFR and left ventricular function was observed after administration of Anakinra, in a mean follow up of 30 days [104]. Ikonomidis et al. performed a randomized trial and noted that anakinra resulted in a 29% improvement of CFR and an 18.7% improvement in global longitudinal strain after 3 months of treatment [125].
The CANTOS trial enrolled approximately 10,000 patients with a history of myocardial infarction and elevated hsCRP levels. Patients were stratified in canakinumab group and placebo, for a median follow up of 3.7 years. The CANTOS study showed that Canakinumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibitor of IL-1β, decreased the risk of cardiovascular events by lowering systemic inflammation in high cardiovascular risk patients [124,126]. More specifically, decrease of hsCRP and IL-6 was dose-dependent, while canakinumab at 150–300 mg every 3 months was found to reduce MACE by approximately 15% [5]. As such, further studies are needed for clarification of the utility of canakinumab in patients with CMVD, due to beneficial role in the whole progress of atherosclerosis.

4.4. Tocilizumab

Tocilizumab is a monoclonal antibody that competitively inhibits IL-6 receptor and has been shown to be useful in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, a chronic inflammatory disease [123]. Tocilizumab could improve endothelial function and decrease aortic stiffness in atherosclerotic patients [127,128,129]. In addition, CRP and fibrinogen were reduced in patients receiving tocilizumab [127,128,129]. On the other hand, the use of tocilizumab for atherosclerosis treatment is still debated since a recent study showed that patients receiving Tocilizumab had a mean increase in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) of 17 mg/dL, whereas another study found a 22% increase in LDL and total cholesterol and a 48% increase in fasting triglycerides in such patients [130].
Holte et al. showed that administration of Tocilizumab after MI did not affect CFR during hospitalization or after 6 months. Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) levels were increased, but this was not associated with reduced CFR in these patients [105]. On the contrary, the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients with tocilizumab resulted in the improvement of CFR by 13% [125]. In a recently reported randomized controlled trial, the administration of tocilizumab 280 mg in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction led to less extensive microvascular obstruction in cardiac MRI, highlighting a potential benefit in coronary microvasculature [131].

4.5. Etanercept-Adalinumab

Another target is TNF, whose inhibitors are available and well-evaluated drugs without severe adverse events. Agents from this drug category have been evaluated solely in patients with rheumatological conditions, additionally examining the incidence of MACE. In that subgroup a significant decrease in MACE was observed [132,133]. The ENTRACTE study showed that the TNF-α antagonists, Etanercept and Adalimumab, exert beneficial effects on atherosclerosis, blunting the progression of the subclinical disease via decreasing ICAM-1 and asymmetric dimethylarginine levels [134,135]. Furthermore, disruption of TNF-α signaling prevented angiotensin II-induced hypertension and aortic O2, while a reduction in resistance artery myogenic responsiveness was observed in mice [136,137].
With regards to CMVD, the treatment of psoriasis patients with etanercept for 4 months led to an 11% improvement in coronary flow reserve as reported in a randomized trial by Ikonomidis et al. [138], confirming the results of a previous prospective cohort study of 37 patients with psoriasis treated with TNF-α inhibitors by Piaserico et al. [139]. In the latter, the authors found that the improvement in CFR was correlated with the degree of reduction of inflammatory biomarkers [139]. In another study, twenty obese patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to etanercept treatment (25 mg subcutaneously twice weekly for 4 weeks). Plasma levels of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 decreased while microvascular vasodilatory responses remain unchanged. Due to the small sample studied, further evaluation of Etanercept is needed in larger cohorts [112,140].

5. Conclusions

Coronary microvascular dysfunction, a frequently encountered phenomenon in cardiology practice, is the result of endothelial dysfunction while systemic inflammation appears to be a significant contributing factor stemming from the cluster of comorbidities which are present. Recent pharmacological advances in the field of anti-inflammatory therapy may become essential for attenuating the residual cardiovascular risk in CAD with microvascular dysfunction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S., P.T., A.S.A.; methodology, M.S., E.O.; bioinformatics, M.S., P.T. and K.T.; analysis, M.S., C.P., N.G.; data curation, D.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S. and P.T. writing—review and editing, M.S., P.T., K.T. and D.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and ap-proved by the Institutional Review Board of the KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH IN-STITUTE and the NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE.

Informed Consent Statement

Participants were included in the study unless they chose the “optout” option as described in the Material and Methods section.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Johnson, B.D.; Shaw, L.J.; Buchthal, S.D.; Bairey Merz, C.N.; Kim, H.W.; Scott, K.N.; Doyle, M.; Olson, M.B.; Pepine, C.J.; den Hollander, J.; et al. Prognosis in women with myocardial ischemia in the absence of obstructive coronary disease: Results from the National Institutes of Health-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Circulation 2004, 109, 2993–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Lin, F.Y.; Shaw, L.J.; Dunning, A.M.; Labounty, T.M.; Choi, J.H.; Weinsaft, J.W.; Koduru, S.; Gomez, M.J.; Delago, A.J.; Callister, T.Q.; et al. Mortality risk in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: A prospective 2-center study of 2583 patients undergoing 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 58, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lichtlen, P.R.; Bargheer, K.; Wenzlaff, P. Long-term prognosis of patients with anginalike chest pain and normal coronary angiographic findings. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1995, 25, 1013–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Elgendy, I.Y.; Pepine, C.J. Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Is Ischemia Due to Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction a Mechanistic Factor? Am. J. Med. 2019, 132, 692–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ridker, P.M.; Everett, B.M.; Thuren, T.; MacFadyen, J.G.; Chang, W.H.; Ballantyne, C.; Fonseca, F.; Nicolau, J.; Koenig, W.; Anker, S.D.; et al. Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1119–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tardif, J.C.; Kouz, S.; Waters, D.D.; Bertrand, O.F.; Diaz, R.; Maggioni, A.P.; Pinto, F.J.; Ibrahim, R.; Gamra, H.; Kiwan, G.S.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Colchicine after Myocardial Infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 2497–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sagris, M.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Theofilis, P.; Oikonomou, E.; Siasos, G.; Tsalamandris, S.; Antoniades, C.; Brilakis, E.S.; Kaski, J.C.; Tousoulis, D. Risk factors profile of young and older patients with Myocardial Infarction. Cardiovasc. Res. 2021, cvab264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zanatta, E.; Colombo, C.; D’Amico, G.; d’Humieres, T.; Dal Lin, C.; Tona, F. Inflammation and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wei, K.; Jayaweera, A.R.; Firoozan, S.; Linka, A.; Skyba, D.M.; Kaul, S. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation 1998, 97, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Caiati, C.; Montaldo, C.; Zedda, N.; Montisci, R.; Ruscazio, M.; Lai, G.; Cadeddu, M.; Meloni, L.; Iliceto, S. Validation of a new noninvasive method (contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler) for the evaluation of coronary flow reserve: Comparison with intracoronary Doppler flow wire. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1999, 34, 1193–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lethen, H.; H, P.T.; Kersting, S.; Lambertz, H. Validation of noninvasive assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve in the right coronary artery. A comparison of transthoracic echocardiographic results with intracoronary Doppler flow wire measurements. Eur. Heart J. 2003, 24, 1567–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cortigiani, L.; Rigo, F.; Gherardi, S.; Bovenzi, F.; Picano, E.; Sicari, R. Implication of the continuous prognostic spectrum of Doppler echocardiographic derived coronary flow reserve on left anterior descending artery. Am. J. Cardiol. 2010, 105, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Danad, I.; Szymonifka, J.; Schulman-Marcus, J.; Min, J.K. Static and dynamic assessment of myocardial perfusion by computed tomography. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2016, 17, 836–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. George, R.T.; Jerosch-Herold, M.; Silva, C.; Kitagawa, K.; Bluemke, D.A.; Lima, J.A.; Lardo, A.C. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography. Investig. Radiol. 2007, 42, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Camici, P.G.; d’Amati, G.; Rimoldi, O. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: Mechanisms and functional assessment. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2015, 12, 48–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Blankstein, R.; Shturman, L.D.; Rogers, I.S.; Rocha-Filho, J.A.; Okada, D.R.; Sarwar, A.; Soni, A.V.; Bezerra, H.; Ghoshhajra, B.B.; Petranovic, M.; et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 54, 1072–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Antonopoulos, A.S.; Sanna, F.; Sabharwal, N.; Thomas, S.; Oikonomou, E.K.; Herdman, L.; Margaritis, M.; Shirodaria, C.; Kampoli, A.M.; Akoumianakis, I.; et al. Detecting human coronary inflammation by imaging perivascular fat. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Yu, M.; Dai, X.; Deng, J.; Lu, Z.; Shen, C.; Zhang, J. Diagnostic performance of perivascular fat attenuation index to predict hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis: A preliminary coronary computed tomography angiography study. Eur. Radiol. 2020, 30, 673–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hoshino, M.; Yang, S.; Sugiyama, T.; Zhang, J.; Kanaji, Y.; Yamaguchi, M.; Hada, M.; Sumino, Y.; Horie, T.; Nogami, K.; et al. Peri-coronary inflammation is associated with findings on coronary computed tomography angiography and fractional flow reserve. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2020, 14, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kwiecinski, J.; Dey, D.; Cadet, S.; Lee, S.E.; Otaki, Y.; Huynh, P.T.; Doris, M.K.; Eisenberg, E.; Yun, M.; Jansen, M.A.; et al. Peri-Coronary Adipose Tissue Density Is Associated With (18)F-Sodium Fluoride Coronary Uptake in Stable Patients With High-Risk Plaques. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 12, 2000–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Goeller, M.; Achenbach, S.; Cadet, S.; Kwan, A.C.; Commandeur, F.; Slomka, P.J.; Gransar, H.; Albrecht, M.H.; Tamarappoo, B.K.; Berman, D.S.; et al. Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Computed Tomography Attenuation and High-Risk Plaque Characteristics in Acute Coronary Syndrome Compared With Stable Coronary Artery Disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2018, 3, 858–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Sugiyama, T.; Kanaji, Y.; Hoshino, M.; Yamaguchi, M.; Hada, M.; Ohya, H.; Sumino, Y.; Hirano, H.; Kanno, Y.; Horie, T.; et al. Determinants of Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Attenuation on Computed Tomography Angiography in Coronary Artery Disease. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020, 9, e016202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Oikonomou, E.K.; Williams, M.C.; Kotanidis, C.P.; Desai, M.Y.; Marwan, M.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Thomas, K.E.; Thomas, S.; Akoumianakis, I.; Fan, L.M.; et al. A novel machine learning-derived radiotranscriptomic signature of perivascular fat improves cardiac risk prediction using coronary CT angiography. Eur. Heart J. 2019, 40, 3529–3543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Oikonomou, E.K.; Marwan, M.; Desai, M.Y.; Mancio, J.; Alashi, A.; Hutt Centeno, E.; Thomas, S.; Herdman, L.; Kotanidis, C.P.; Thomas, K.E.; et al. Non-invasive detection of coronary inflammation using computed tomography and prediction of residual cardiovascular risk (the CRISP CT study): A post-hoc analysis of prospective outcome data. Lancet 2018, 392, 929–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Slomka, P.; Berman, D.S.; Alexanderson, E.; Germano, G. The role of PET quantification in cardiovascular imaging. Clin. Transl. Imaging 2014, 2, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Taqueti, V.R.; Solomon, S.D.; Shah, A.M.; Desai, A.S.; Groarke, J.D.; Osborne, M.T.; Hainer, J.; Bibbo, C.F.; Dorbala, S.; Blankstein, R.; et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and future risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 840–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gould, K.L.; Johnson, N.P. Coronary Physiology beyond Coronary Flow Reserve in Microvascular Angina: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 72, 2642–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Biglands, J.D.; Magee, D.R.; Sourbron, S.P.; Plein, S.; Greenwood, J.P.; Radjenovic, A. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Four Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Estimation Methods Used in Cardiac MR Imaging: CE-MARC Substudy. Radiology 2015, 275, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Carrick, D.; Haig, C.; Ahmed, N.; Carberry, J.; Yue May, V.T.; McEntegart, M.; Petrie, M.C.; Eteiba, H.; Lindsay, M.; Hood, S.; et al. Comparative Prognostic Utility of Indexes of Microvascular Function Alone or in Combination in Patients With an Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2016, 134, 1833–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Thomson, L.E.; Wei, J.; Agarwal, M.; Haft-Baradaran, A.; Shufelt, C.; Mehta, P.K.; Gill, E.B.; Johnson, B.D.; Kenkre, T.; Handberg, E.M.; et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion reserve index is reduced in women with coronary microvascular dysfunction. A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored study from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2015, 8, e002481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Indorkar, R.; Kwong, R.Y.; Romano, S.; White, B.E.; Chia, R.C.; Trybula, M.; Evans, K.; Shenoy, C.; Farzaneh-Far, A. Global Coronary Flow Reserve Measured During Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is an Independent Predictor of Adverse Cardiovascular Events. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 12, 1686–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Schroder, J.; Mygind, N.D.; Frestad, D.; Michelsen, M.; Suhrs, H.E.; Bove, K.B.; Gustafsson, I.; Kastrup, J.; Prescott, E. Pro-inflammatory biomarkers in women with non-obstructive angina pectoris and coronary microvascular dysfunction. Int. J. Cardiol. Heart Vasc. 2019, 24, 100370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aslan, G.; Polat, V.; Bozcali, E.; Opan, S.; Cetin, N.; Ural, D. Evaluation of serum sST2 and sCD40L values in patients with microvascular angina. Microvasc. Res. 2019, 122, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dollard, J.; Kearney, P.; Clarke, G.; Moloney, G.; Cryan, J.F.; Dinan, T.G. A prospective study of C-reactive protein as a state marker in Cardiac Syndrome X. Brain Behav. Immun. 2015, 43, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Theofilis, P.; Sagris, M.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Oikonomou, E.; Tsioufis, C.; Tousoulis, D. Inflammatory Mediators of Platelet Activation: Focus on Atherosclerosis and COVID-19. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Safdar, B.; Guo, X.; Johnson, C.; D’Onofrio, G.; Dziura, J.; Sinusas, A.J.; Testani, J.; Rao, V.; Desir, G. Elevated renalase levels in patients with acute coronary microvascular dysfunction - A possible biomarker for ischemia. Int. J. Cardiol. 2019, 279, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Suhrs, H.E.; Schroder, J.; Bove, K.B.; Mygind, N.D.; Frestad, D.; Michelsen, M.M.; Lange, T.; Gustafsson, I.; Kastrup, J.; Prescott, E. Inflammation, non-endothelial dependent coronary microvascular function and diastolic function-Are they linked? PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Siasos, G.; Bletsa, E.; Stampouloglou, P.K.; Oikonomou, E.; Tsigkou, V.; Paschou, S.A.; Vlasis, K.; Marinos, G.; Vavuranakis, M.; Stefanadis, C.; et al. MicroRNAs in cardiovascular disease. Hell. J. Cardiol. HJC = Hell. Kardiol. Ep. 2020, 61, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Vogiatzi, G.; Oikonomou, E.; Deftereos, S.; Siasos, G.; Tousoulis, D. Peripheral artery disease: A micro-RNA-related condition? Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2018, 39, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Theofilis, P.; Oikonomou, E.; Vogiatzi, G.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Siasos, G.; Iliopoulos, D.C.; Perrea, D.; Tsioufis, C.; Tousoulis, D. The impact of proangiogenic microRNA modulation on blood flow recovery following hind limb ischemia. A systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2021, 106906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Theofilis, P.; Vogiatzi, G.; Oikonomou, E.; Gazouli, M.; Siasos, G.; Katifelis, H.; Perrea, D.; Vavuranakis, M.; Iliopoulos, D.C.; Tsioufis, C.; et al. The Effect of MicroRNA-126 Mimic Administration on Vascular Perfusion Recovery in an Animal Model of Hind Limb Ischemia. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 724465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Villeneuve, L.M.; Kato, M.; Reddy, M.A.; Wang, M.; Lanting, L.; Natarajan, R. Enhanced levels of microRNA-125b in vascular smooth muscle cells of diabetic db/db mice lead to increased inflammatory gene expression by targeting the histone methyltransferase Suv39h1. Diabetes 2010, 59, 2904–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Sun, X.; He, S.; Wara, A.K.M.; Icli, B.; Shvartz, E.; Tesmenitsky, Y.; Belkin, N.; Li, D.; Blackwell, T.S.; Sukhova, G.K.; et al. Systemic delivery of microRNA-181b inhibits nuclear factor-kappaB activation, vascular inflammation, and atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circ. Res. 2014, 114, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Reddy, M.A.; Jin, W.; Villeneuve, L.; Wang, M.; Lanting, L.; Todorov, I.; Kato, M.; Natarajan, R. Pro-inflammatory role of microrna-200 in vascular smooth muscle cells from diabetic mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2012, 32, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Cowan, C.; Muraleedharan, C.K.; O’Donnell, J.J., 3rd; Singh, P.K.; Lum, H.; Kumar, A.; Xu, S. MicroRNA-146 inhibits thrombin-induced NF-kappaB activation and subsequent inflammatory responses in human retinal endothelial cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 4944–4951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Liang, K.W.; Sheu, W.H.; Lee, W.J.; Lee, W.L.; Fu, C.P.; Wang, J.S. Differential expression of circulating vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in subjects with coronary artery disease and cardiac syndrome X without known diabetes mellitus. Biomark. Biochem. Indic. Expo. Response Susceptibility Chem. 2017, 22, 798–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Efe, S.C.; Demirci, K.; Ozturk, S.; Gurbuz, A.S.; Poci, N.; Kilicgedik, A.; Guler, A.; Yilmaz, M.F.; Izgi, I.A.; Kirma, C. Serum endocan levels in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Herz 2018, 43, 359–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Prasad, M.; Matteson, E.L.; Herrmann, J.; Gulati, R.; Rihal, C.S.; Lerman, L.O.; Lerman, A. Uric Acid Is Associated With Inflammation, Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction, and Adverse Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women. Hypertension 2017, 69, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Altiparmak, I.H.; Erkus, M.E.; Sezen, H.; Demirbag, R.; Kaya, Z.; Sezen, Y.; Gunebakmaz, O.; Asoglu, R.; Besli, F.; Neselioglu, S.; et al. Evaluation of thiol levels, thiol/disulfide homeostasis and their relation with inflammation in cardiac syndrome X. Coron. Artery Dis. 2016, 27, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mekonnen, G.; Corban, M.T.; Hung, O.Y.; Eshtehardi, P.; Eapen, D.J.; Al-Kassem, H.; Rasoul-Arzrumly, E.; Gogas, B.D.; McDaniel, M.C.; Pielak, T.; et al. Plasma soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor level is independently associated with coronary microvascular function in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 2015, 239, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bozcali, E.; Polat, V.; Aciksari, G.; Opan, S.; Bayrak, I.H.; Paker, N.; Karakaya, O. Serum concentrations of galectin-3 in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Atherosclerosis 2014, 237, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tenekecioglu, E.; Yilmaz, M.; Demir, S.; Bekler, A.; Ozluk, O.A.; Aydin, U.; Goncu, T.; Yontar, O.C. HDL-cholesterol is associated with systemic inflammation in cardiac syndrome X. Minerva Med. 2015, 106, 133–141. [Google Scholar]
  53. Faccini, A.; Kaski, J.C.; Camici, P.G. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in chronic inflammatory rheumatoid diseases. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 1799–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Oikonomou, E.; Leopoulou, M.; Theofilis, P.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Siasos, G.; Latsios, G.; Mystakidi, V.C.; Antoniades, C.; Tousoulis, D. A link between inflammation and thrombosis in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: Clinical and therapeutic implications. Atherosclerosis 2020, 309, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Puddu, P.; Puddu, G.M.; Cravero, E.; Muscari, S.; Muscari, A. The involvement of circulating microparticles in inflammation, coagulation and cardiovascular diseases. Can. J. Cardiol. 2010, 26, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Duncker, D.J.; Bache, R.J. Regulation of coronary blood flow during exercise. Physiol. Rev. 2008, 88, 1009–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Clarke, J.G.; Davies, G.J.; Kerwin, R.; Hackett, D.; Larkin, S.; Dawbarn, D.; Lee, Y.; Bloom, S.R.; Yacoub, M.; Maseri, A. Coronary artery infusion of neuropeptide Y in patients with angina pectoris. Lancet 1987, 1, 1057–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Crea, F.; Camici, P.G.; Bairey Merz, C.N. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: An update. Eur. Heart J. 2014, 35, 1101–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Choudhury, L.; Rosen, S.D.; Patel, D.; Nihoyannopoulos, P.; Camici, P.G. Coronary vasodilator reserve in primary and secondary left ventricular hypertrophy. A study with positron emission tomography. Eur. Heart J. 1997, 18, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sagris, M.; Theofilis, P.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Tsioufis, C.; Oikonomou, E.; Antoniades, C.; Crea, F.; Kaski, J.C.; Tousoulis, D. Inflammatory Mechanisms in COVID-19 and Atherosclerosis: Current Pharmaceutical Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Theofilis, P.; Sagris, M.; Oikonomou, E.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Siasos, G.; Tsioufis, C.; Tousoulis, D. Inflammatory Mechanisms Contributing to Endothelial Dysfunction. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Benjamin, E.J.; Blaha, M.J.; Chiuve, S.E.; Cushman, M.; Das, S.R.; Deo, R.; de Ferranti, S.D.; Floyd, J.; Fornage, M.; Gillespie, C.; et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017, 135, e146–e603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Carrick, D.; Haig, C.; Ahmed, N.; McEntegart, M.; Petrie, M.C.; Eteiba, H.; Hood, S.; Watkins, S.; Lindsay, M.M.; Davie, A.; et al. Myocardial Hemorrhage After Acute Reperfused ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Relation to Microvascular Obstruction and Prognostic Significance. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2016, 9, e004148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Eitel, I.; Kubusch, K.; Strohm, O.; Desch, S.; Mikami, Y.; de Waha, S.; Gutberlet, M.; Schuler, G.; Friedrich, M.G.; Thiele, H. Prognostic value and determinants of a hypointense infarct core in T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance in acute reperfused ST-elevation-myocardial infarction. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2011, 4, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Duprez, D.A. Role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in vascular remodeling and inflammation: A clinical review. J. Hypertens. 2006, 24, 983–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hao, Y.; Tsuruda, T.; Sekita-Hatakeyama, Y.; Kurogi, S.; Kubo, K.; Sakamoto, S.; Nakamura, M.; Udagawa, N.; Sekimoto, T.; Hatakeyama, K.; et al. Cardiac hypertrophy is exacerbated in aged mice lacking the osteoprotegerin gene. Cardiovasc. Res. 2016, 110, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Siedlinski, M.; Nosalski, R.; Szczepaniak, P.; Ludwig-Galezowska, A.H.; Mikolajczyk, T.; Filip, M.; Osmenda, G.; Wilk, G.; Nowak, M.; Wolkow, P.; et al. Vascular transcriptome profiling identifies Sphingosine kinase 1 as a modulator of angiotensin II-induced vascular dysfunction. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Wang, M.; Kim, S.H.; Monticone, R.E.; Lakatta, E.G. Matrix metalloproteinases promote arterial remodeling in aging, hypertension, and atherosclerosis. Hypertension 2015, 65, 698–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Camici, P.G.; Olivotto, I.; Rimoldi, O.E. The coronary circulation and blood flow in left ventricular hypertrophy. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2012, 52, 857–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Cortigiani, L.; Rigo, F.; Gherardi, S.; Galderisi, M.; Bovenzi, F.; Sicari, R. Prognostic meaning of coronary microvascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic study. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2014, 27, 742–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Murthy, V.L.; Naya, M.; Foster, C.R.; Gaber, M.; Hainer, J.; Klein, J.; Dorbala, S.; Blankstein, R.; Di Carli, M.F. Association between coronary vascular dysfunction and cardiac mortality in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2012, 126, 1858–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Sagris, M.; Giannopoulos, S.; Giannopoulos, S.; Tzoumas, A.; Texakalidis, P.; Charisis, N.; Kokkinidis, D.G.; Malgor, R.D.; Mouawad, N.J.; Bakoyiannis, C. Transcervical carotid artery revascularization: A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes. J. Vasc. Surg. 2021, 74, 657–665.e612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tabit, C.E.; Chung, W.B.; Hamburg, N.M.; Vita, J.A. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus: Molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2010, 11, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Suzuki, L.A.; Poot, M.; Gerrity, R.G.; Bornfeldt, K.E. Diabetes accelerates smooth muscle accumulation in lesions of atherosclerosis: Lack of direct growth-promoting effects of high glucose levels. Diabetes 2001, 50, 851–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Salmi, M.; Jalkanen, S. Vascular Adhesion Protein-1: A Cell Surface Amine Oxidase in Translation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2019, 30, 314–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Stolen, C.M.; Madanat, R.; Marti, L.; Kari, S.; Yegutkin, G.G.; Sariola, H.; Zorzano, A.; Jalkanen, S. Semicarbazide sensitive amine oxidase overexpression has dual consequences: Insulin mimicry and diabetes-like complications. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2004, 18, 702–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Diavati, S.; Sagris, M.; Terentes-Printzios, D.; Vlachopoulos, C. Anticoagulation Treatment in Venous Thromboembolism: Options and Optimal Duration. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Donath, M.Y.; Shoelson, S.E. Type 2 diabetes as an inflammatory disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sorop, O.; Heinonen, I.; van Kranenburg, M.; van de Wouw, J.; de Beer, V.J.; Nguyen, I.T.N.; Octavia, Y.; van Duin, R.W.B.; Stam, K.; van Geuns, R.J.; et al. Multiple common comorbidities produce left ventricular diastolic dysfunction associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction, oxidative stress, and myocardial stiffening. Cardiovasc. Res. 2018, 114, 954–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Costantino, S.; Paneni, F.; Battista, R.; Castello, L.; Capretti, G.; Chiandotto, S.; Tanese, L.; Russo, G.; Pitocco, D.; Lanza, G.A.; et al. Impact of Glycemic Variability on Chromatin Remodeling, Oxidative Stress, and Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and With Target HbA1c Levels. Diabetes 2017, 66, 2472–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Siasos, G.; Skotsimara, G.; Oikonomou, E.; Sagris, M.; Vasiliki-Chara, M.; Bletsa, E.; Stampouloglou, P.; Theofilis, P.; Charalampous, G.; Tousoulis, D. Antithrombotic Treatment in Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of the Literature about Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Strategies Used for Diabetic Patients in Primary and Secondary Prevention. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2020, 26, 2780–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Neeland, I.J.; Ross, R.; Despres, J.P.; Matsuzawa, Y.; Yamashita, S.; Shai, I.; Seidell, J.; Magni, P.; Santos, R.D.; Arsenault, B.; et al. Visceral and ectopic fat, atherosclerosis, and cardiometabolic disease: A position statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019, 7, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Shulman, G.I. Ectopic Fat in Insulin Resistance, Dyslipidemia, and Cardiometabolic Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 1131–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Goossens, G.H.; Blaak, E.E. Adipose Tissue Dysfunction and Impaired Metabolic Health in Human Obesity: A Matter of Oxygen? Front. Endocrinol. 2015, 6, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Frayn, K.N.; Karpe, F. Regulation of human subcutaneous adipose tissue blood flow. Int. J. Obes. 2014, 38, 1019–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lempesis, I.G.; van Meijel, R.L.J.; Manolopoulos, K.N.; Goossens, G.H. Oxygenation of adipose tissue: A human perspective. Acta Physiol. 2019, 228, e13298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bays, H.E. Adiposopathy is “sick fat” a cardiovascular disease? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 57, 2461–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Bays, H.E. Adiposopathy, diabetes mellitus, and primary prevention of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease: Treating “sick fat” through improving fat function with antidiabetes therapies. Am. J. Cardiol. 2012, 110, 4B–12B. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cao, H. Adipocytokines in obesity and metabolic disease. J. Endocrinol. 2014, 220, T47–T59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Karam, B.S.; Chavez-Moreno, A.; Koh, W.; Akar, J.G.; Akar, F.G. Oxidative stress and inflammation as central mediators of atrial fibrillation in obesity and diabetes. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2017, 16, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sagris, M.; Kokkinidis, D.G.; Lempesis, I.G.; Giannopoulos, S.; Rallidis, L.; Mena-Hurtado, C.; Bakoyiannis, C. Nutrition, dietary habits, and weight management to prevent and treat patients with peripheral artery disease. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 21, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Packer, M. Epicardial Adipose Tissue May Mediate Deleterious Effects of Obesity and Inflammation on the Myocardium. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 2360–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Naoumova, R.P.; Kindler, H.; Leccisotti, L.; Mongillo, M.; Khan, M.T.; Neuwirth, C.; Seed, M.; Holvoet, P.; Betteridge, J.; Camici, P.G. Pioglitazone improves myocardial blood flow and glucose utilization in nondiabetic patients with combined hyperlipidemia: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007, 50, 2051–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lang, D.H.; Yeung, C.K.; Peter, R.M.; Ibarra, C.; Gasser, R.; Itagaki, K.; Philpot, R.M.; Rettie, A.E. Isoform specificity of trimethylamine N-oxygenation by human flavin-containing monooxygenase (FMO) and P450 enzymes: Selective catalysis by FMO3. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1998, 56, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Libby, P.; Ridker, P.M.; Maseri, A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation 2002, 105, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ma, G.; Pan, B.; Chen, Y.; Guo, C.; Zhao, M.; Zheng, L.; Chen, B. Trimethylamine N-oxide in atherogenesis: Impairing endothelial self-repair capacity and enhancing monocyte adhesion. Biosci. Rep. 2017, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Ross, R. Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 340, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Seldin, M.M.; Meng, Y.; Qi, H.; Zhu, W.; Wang, Z.; Hazen, S.L.; Lusis, A.J.; Shih, D.M. Trimethylamine N-Oxide Promotes Vascular Inflammation Through Signaling of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and Nuclear Factor-kappaB. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2016, 5, e002767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Brunt, V.E.; Gioscia-Ryan, R.A.; Richey, J.J.; Zigler, M.C.; Cuevas, L.M.; Gonzalez, A.; Vazquez-Baeza, Y.; Battson, M.L.; Smithson, A.T.; Gilley, A.D.; et al. Suppression of the gut microbiome ameliorates age-related arterial dysfunction and oxidative stress in mice. J. Physiol. 2019, 597, 2361–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Liu, H.; Tian, R.; Wang, H.; Feng, S.; Li, H.; Xiao, Y.; Luan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, N.; Niu, H.; et al. Gut microbiota from coronary artery disease patients contributes to vascular dysfunction in mice by regulating bile acid metabolism and immune activation. J. Transl. Med. 2020, 18, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tenore, G.C.; Caruso, D.; Buonomo, G.; D’Avino, M.; Ciampaglia, R.; Maisto, M.; Schisano, C.; Bocchino, B.; Novellino, E. Lactofermented Annurca Apple Puree as a Functional Food Indicated for the Control of Plasma Lipid and Oxidative Amine Levels: Results from a Randomised Clinical Trial. Nutrients 2019, 11, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Ford, T.J.; Stanley, B.; Good, R.; Rocchiccioli, P.; McEntegart, M.; Watkins, S.; Eteiba, H.; Shaukat, A.; Lindsay, M.; Robertson, K.; et al. Stratified Medical Therapy Using Invasive Coronary Function Testing in Angina: The CorMicA Trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 72, 2841–2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bouabdallaoui, N.; Tardif, J.C.; Waters, D.D.; Pinto, F.J.; Maggioni, A.P.; Diaz, R.; Berry, C.; Koenig, W.; Lopez-Sendon, J.; Gamra, H.; et al. Time-to-treatment initiation of colchicine and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction in the Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT). Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 4092–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ikonomidis, I.; Lekakis, J.P.; Nikolaou, M.; Paraskevaidis, I.; Andreadou, I.; Kaplanoglou, T.; Katsimbri, P.; Skarantavos, G.; Soucacos, P.N.; Kremastinos, D.T. Inhibition of interleukin-1 by anakinra improves vascular and left ventricular function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Circulation 2008, 117, 2662–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Holte, E.; Kleveland, O.; Ueland, T.; Kunszt, G.; Bratlie, M.; Broch, K.; Michelsen, A.E.; Bendz, B.; Amundsen, B.H.; Aakhus, S.; et al. Effect of interleukin-6 inhibition on coronary microvascular and endothelial function in myocardial infarction. Heart 2017, 103, 1521–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Portman, M.A.; Olson, A.; Soriano, B.; Dahdah, N.; Williams, R.; Kirkpatrick, E. Etanercept as adjunctive treatment for acute Kawasaki disease: Study design and rationale. Am. Heart J. 2011, 161, 494–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Almeida, S.O.; Budoff, M. Effect of statins on atherosclerotic plaque. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2019, 29, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Sakellarios, A.I.; Fotiadis, D.I. Editorial commentary: The pleiotropic effect of statins on the atherosclerotic plaque and coronary heart disease. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2019, 29, 456–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Stumpf, C.; Petzi, S.; Seybold, K.; Wasmeier, G.; Arnold, M.; Raaz, D.; Yilmaz, A.; Daniel, W.G.; Garlichs, C.D. Atorvastatin enhances interleukin-10 levels and improves cardiac function in rats after acute myocardial infarction. Clin. Sci. 2009, 116, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Shen, Y.; Wu, H.; Wang, C.; Shao, H.; Huang, H.; Jing, H.; Li, D. Simvastatin attenuates cardiopulmonary bypass-induced myocardial inflammatory injury in rats by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 649, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Ridker, P.M.; Danielson, E.; Fonseca, F.A.; Genest, J.; Gotto, A.M., Jr.; Kastelein, J.J.; Koenig, W.; Libby, P.; Lorenzatti, A.J.; MacFadyen, J.G.; et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 2195–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Giles, J.T.; Sattar, N.; Gabriel, S.; Ridker, P.M.; Gay, S.; Warne, C.; Musselman, D.; Brockwell, L.; Shittu, E.; Klearman, M.; et al. Cardiovascular Safety of Tocilizumab Versus Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020, 72, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Luo, W.H.; Guo, Y.; Huang, J.W.; Zhang, P.D. Do Statins Have a Positive Impact on Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction on Long-Term Clinical Outcome? A Large Retrospective Cohort Study. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Hetzel, S.; DeMets, D.; Schneider, R.; Borzak, S.; Schneider, W.; Serebruany, V.; Schroder, H.; Hennekens, C.H. Aspirin increases nitric oxide formation in chronic stable coronary disease. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 18, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yang, Y.; Hwang, E.; Lee, S.A.; Lee, S.; Kim, D.H.; Song, J.M.; Kang, D.H. Effect of Rosuvastatin on Coronary Flow Reserve in Hypertensive Patients at Cardiovascular Risk. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 29, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sun, B.J.; Hwang, E.; Jang, J.Y.; Kim, D.H.; Song, J.M.; Kang, D.H. Effect of rosuvastatin on coronary flow reserve in patients with systemic hypertension. Am. J. Cardiol. 2014, 114, 1234–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ishida, K.; Geshi, T.; Nakano, A.; Uzui, H.; Mitsuke, Y.; Okazawa, H.; Ueda, T.; Lee, J.D. Beneficial effects of statin treatment on coronary microvascular dysfunction and left ventricular remodeling in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Int. J. Cardiol. 2012, 155, 442–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yong, J.; Tian, J.; Yang, X.; Xing, H.; He, Y.; Song, X. Effects of Oral Drugs on Coronary Microvascular Function in Patients Without Significant Stenosis of Epicardial Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Coronary Flow Reserve. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 7, 580419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kattoor, A.J.; Pothineni, N.V.K.; Palagiri, D.; Mehta, J.L. Oxidative Stress in Atherosclerosis. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2017, 19, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Naderi, S. Microvascular Coronary Dysfunction-an Overview. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2018, 20, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Nidorf, M.; Thompson, P.L. Effect of colchicine (0.5 mg twice daily) on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein independent of aspirin and atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 2007, 99, 805–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Nidorf, S.M.; Thompson, P.L. Why Colchicine Should Be Considered for Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerosis: An Overview. Clin. Ther. 2019, 41, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Castaneda, S.; Martinez-Quintanilla, D.; Martin-Varillas, J.L.; Garcia-Castaneda, N.; Atienza-Mateo, B.; Gonzalez-Gay, M.A. Tocilizumab for the treatment of adult-onset Still’s disease. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2019, 19, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Monteagudo, L.A.; Boothby, A.; Gertner, E. Continuous Intravenous Anakinra Infusion to Calm the Cytokine Storm in Macrophage Activation Syndrome. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020, 2, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Ikonomidis, I.; Pavlidis, G.; Katsimbri, P.; Andreadou, I.; Triantafyllidi, H.; Tsoumani, M.; Varoudi, M.; Vlastos, D.; Makavos, G.; Kostelli, G.; et al. Differential effects of inhibition of interleukin 1 and 6 on myocardial, coronary and vascular function. Clin. Res. Cardiol. Off. J. Ger. Card. Soc. 2019, 108, 1093–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhu, Y.; Xian, X.; Wang, Z.; Bi, Y.; Chen, Q.; Han, X.; Tang, D.; Chen, R. Research Progress on the Relationship between Atherosclerosis and Inflammation. Biomolecules 2018, 8, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Cacciapaglia, F.; Anelli, M.G.; Rinaldi, A.; Fornaro, M.; Lopalco, G.; Scioscia, C.; Lapadula, G.; Iannone, F. Lipids and Atherogenic Indices Fluctuation in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients on Long-Term Tocilizumab Treatment. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Toniati, P.; Piva, S.; Cattalini, M.; Garrafa, E.; Regola, F.; Castelli, F.; Franceschini, F.; Airo, P.; Bazzani, C.; Beindorf, E.A.; et al. Tocilizumab for the treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia with hyperinflammatory syndrome and acute respiratory failure: A single center study of 100 patients in Brescia, Italy. Autoimmun. Rev. 2020, 102568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Van Kraaij, T.D.; Mostard, R.L.; Ramiro, S.; Magro Checa, C.; van Dongen, C.M.; van Haren, E.H.; Buijs, J.; Landewe, R.B. Tocilizumab in Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia and Concomitant Cytokine Release Syndrome. Eur. J. Case Rep. Intern. Med. 2020, 7, 001675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Strang, A.C.; Bisoendial, R.J.; Kootte, R.S.; Schulte, D.M.; Dallinga-Thie, G.M.; Levels, J.H.; Kok, M.; Vos, K.; Tas, S.W.; Tietge, U.J.; et al. Pro-atherogenic lipid changes and decreased hepatic LDL receptor expression by tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis. Atherosclerosis 2013, 229, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Broch, K.; Anstensrud, A.K.; Woxholt, S.; Sharma, K.; Tollefsen, I.M.; Bendz, B.; Aakhus, S.; Ueland, T.; Amundsen, B.H.; Damas, J.K.; et al. Randomized Trial of Interleukin-6 Receptor Inhibition in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2021, 77, 1845–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ahlehoff, O.; Skov, L.; Gislason, G.; Gniadecki, R.; Iversen, L.; Bryld, L.E.; Lasthein, S.; Lindhardsen, J.; Kristensen, S.L.; Torp-Pedersen, C.; et al. Cardiovascular outcomes and systemic anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with severe psoriasis: 5-year follow-up of a Danish nationwide cohort. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. JEADV 2015, 29, 1128–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Jacobsson, L.T.; Turesson, C.; Gulfe, A.; Kapetanovic, M.C.; Petersson, I.F.; Saxne, T.; Geborek, P. Treatment with tumor necrosis factor blockers is associated with a lower incidence of first cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 2005, 32, 1213–1218. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  134. Bergstrom, U.; Jovinge, S.; Persson, J.; Jacobsson, L.T.H.; Turesson, C. Effects of Treatment with Adalimumab on Blood Lipid Levels and Atherosclerosis in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Curr. Ther. Res. Clin. Exp. 2018, 89, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Chen, X.Y.; Yan, B.X.; Man, X.Y. TNFalpha inhibitor may be effective for severe COVID-19: Learning from toxic epidermal necrolysis. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 2020, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Guzik, T.J.; Hoch, N.E.; Brown, K.A.; McCann, L.A.; Rahman, A.; Dikalov, S.; Goronzy, J.; Weyand, C.; Harrison, D.G. Role of the T cell in the genesis of angiotensin II induced hypertension and vascular dysfunction. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 2449–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Kroetsch, J.T.; Levy, A.S.; Zhang, H.; Aschar-Sobbi, R.; Lidington, D.; Offermanns, S.; Nedospasov, S.A.; Backx, P.H.; Heximer, S.P.; Bolz, S.S. Constitutive smooth muscle tumour necrosis factor regulates microvascular myogenic responsiveness and systemic blood pressure. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Ikonomidis, I.; Papadavid, E.; Makavos, G.; Andreadou, I.; Varoudi, M.; Gravanis, K.; Theodoropoulos, K.; Pavlidis, G.; Triantafyllidi, H.; Moutsatsou, P.; et al. Lowering Interleukin-12 Activity Improves Myocardial and Vascular Function Compared With Tumor Necrosis Factor-a Antagonism or Cyclosporine in Psoriasis. Circulation. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2017, 10, e006283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Piaserico, S.; Osto, E.; Famoso, G.; Zanetti, I.; Gregori, D.; Poretto, A.; Iliceto, S.; Peserico, A.; Tona, F. Treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors restores coronary microvascular function in young patients with severe psoriasis. Atherosclerosis 2016, 251, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Dominguez, H.; Storgaard, H.; Rask-Madsen, C.; Steffen Hermann, T.; Ihlemann, N.; Baunbjerg Nielsen, D.; Spohr, C.; Kober, L.; Vaag, A.; Torp-Pedersen, C. Metabolic and vascular effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha blockade with etanercept in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. J. Vasc. Res. 2005, 42, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 22 13471 g001 550
Figure 1. Inflammatory mechanisms of cardiovascular risk factors implicated in coronary microvascular dysfunction. TMAO: trimethylamine N-oxide; NO: nitric oxide.
Figure 1. Inflammatory mechanisms of cardiovascular risk factors implicated in coronary microvascular dysfunction. TMAO: trimethylamine N-oxide; NO: nitric oxide.
Ijms 22 13471 g001
Ijms 22 13471 g002 550
Figure 2. Anti-inflammatory approaches in cardiovascular diseases. IL: interleukin; NLRP3: NOD-like receptor protein 3; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; CRP: C reactive protein; PAI: plasminogen activator inhibitor; VSMC: Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell; HMG-CoA: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA.
Figure 2. Anti-inflammatory approaches in cardiovascular diseases. IL: interleukin; NLRP3: NOD-like receptor protein 3; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; CRP: C reactive protein; PAI: plasminogen activator inhibitor; VSMC: Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell; HMG-CoA: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA.
Ijms 22 13471 g002
Table
Table 1. Examined biomarkers in the field of coronary microvascular dysfunction.
Table 1. Examined biomarkers in the field of coronary microvascular dysfunction.
StudyBiomarkerOutcome
Aslan et al. [33]sCD40-LsCD40-L was related to MVD in regression analysis
Dollard et al. [34]hsCRPhsCRP levels are proportional to disease severity
Safdar et al. [36]RenalaseIndependent predictor of coronary MVD even after adjustment for risk factors
Liang et al. [46]VCAM-1VCAM-1 is a significant factor differentiating obstructive CAD with CSX
Efe et al. [47]EndocanEndocan levels ≥2072 ng/L had a 72% sensitivity and 54% specificity for accurate prediction of CSX
Prasad et al. [48]Uric acidUric acid was associated with markers of inflammation and coronary endothelial dysfunction in postmenopausal women
Altiparmak et al. [49]ThiolSpecificity 84% and sensitivity 86% of CSX prediction with total thiol values ≤338.4 µmol/L
Schroder et al. [32]Component of:
CCL16
CXCL16
PGLYRP1
TNFR1
GDF15
TNFRSF10C		The 9-biomarker component was associated with MVD but did not provide further diagnostic utility
Mekonnen et al. [50]suPARAssociation of suPAR with CFR
Bozcali et al. [51]Galectin 3↑ Galectin-3 in patients with CSX even after adjustment for risk factors
Tenekecioglou et al. [52]HDL-C↓ HDL-C is associated with systemic inflammation in CSX
sCD40-L: soluble CD40 ligand, MVD: microvascular dysfunction, hsCRP: high sensitivity C reactive protein, VCAM-1: vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, CAD: coronary artery disease, CSX: coronary syndrome X, CCL16: Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 16, CXCL16: Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 16, PGLYRP1: Peptidoglycan Recognition Protein 1, TNFR1: tumor necrosis factor receptor 1, GDF15: growth/differentiation factor 15, TNFRSF10C: TNF Receptor Superfamily Member 10c, suPAR: soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, CFR: coronary flow reserve, HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol. ↑ indicates increased expression, ↓ indicates decreased expression.
Table
Table 2. Therapeutic anti-Inflammatory agents.
Table 2. Therapeutic anti-Inflammatory agents.
DRUGACTIONTRIAL
AspirinInhibitor of COXCoronary Microvascular Angina Trial (CorMicA) [102]
ColchicineInhibition of NLRP3 inflammasomeCOLCOT Trial [103]
AnakinraMonoclonal antibody against IL-1 ReceptorIkonomidis et al. [104]
Canakinumabmonoclonal antibody against IL-1-betaCANTOS Trial [5]
TocilizumabIL-6 Receptor InhibitorHolte et al. [105]
EtanerceptTNF-α antagonistsENTRACTE Trial [106]
AdalimumabTNF-α antagonistsENTRACTE Trial [106]
IL: interleukin; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; NLRP3: NOD-like receptor protein 3; COX: cyclooxygenase.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sagris, M.; Theofilis, P.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Oikonomou, E.; Paschaliori, C.; Galiatsatos, N.; Tsioufis, K.; Tousoulis, D. Inflammation in Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413471

AMA Style

Sagris M, Theofilis P, Antonopoulos AS, Oikonomou E, Paschaliori C, Galiatsatos N, Tsioufis K, Tousoulis D. Inflammation in Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(24):13471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413471

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sagris, Marios, Panagiotis Theofilis, Alexios S. Antonopoulos, Evangelos Oikonomou, Christina Paschaliori, Nikolaos Galiatsatos, Kostas Tsioufis, and Dimitris Tousoulis. 2021. "Inflammation in Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 24: 13471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413471

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop