Next Article in Journal
Tryptophan-Tyrosine Dipeptide, the Core Sequence of β-Lactolin, Improves Memory by Modulating the Dopamine System
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of SchisandraChinensis Bee Pollen on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Gut Microbiota in HighFat Diet Induced Obese Mice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/nu11020347
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Dietary Fiber Intake (Supplemental or Dietary Pattern Rich in Fiber) and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

by
Cláudia Mesquita de Carvalho
*,
Luiza Azevedo Gross
,
Mirela Jobim de Azevedo
† and
Luciana Verçoza Viana
Endocrine Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Prédio 12, 4º andar, Porto Alegre-RS 90035-003, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
In Memoriam: Professor of Medicine, Endocrine Division, who deceased before publication of this work. Her expertise was crucial for the design and conduct of this study.
Nutrients 2019, 11(2), 347; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11020347
Submission received: 3 January 2019 / Revised: 22 January 2019 / Accepted: 30 January 2019 / Published: 6 February 2019
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fiber intake is associated with better glycemic control being an important non-pharmacological treatment for diabetes (DM). We hypothesize that a dietary fiber intake can bring benefits to diabetic kidney disease (DKD), improving renal outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of dietary fiber (supplemental or dietary pattern rich in fiber) on DKD. We searched six databases to identify clinical trials that reported fiber intake and renal outcomes (albuminuria, proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) dialysis) in patients with DM. From 1814 studies, 48 papers were fully evaluated. In the end, seven trials (161 patients, aged 58.3 years, 49% females) were included. The studies were organized into three categories (vegetarian, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and fiber supplement), two evaluated supplements and five dietary patterns. Vegetarian diet reduced albuminuria in three trials, two in patients with type 1 DM and one in patients with type 2 DM; and one study demonstrated a change in the eGFR in type 1 DM. The individual quality of the studies was low/uncertain. A vegetarian dietary pattern may have a beneficial effect on these renal outcomes. However, the individual effect of the intake of fiber on DKD not was possible to be evaluated.

1. Introduction

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a growing worldwide epidemic. Approximately, 425 million adults are affected by this chronic disease [1]. Most of the financial burden of DM is related to management of its complications, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is the most expensive and debilitating [2]. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a frequent cause of mortality in patients with type 2 DM [3], and it is well established that CKD is a risk factor for CVD [4]. Among patients with type 2 DM and coronary artery disease, mortality rates were progressively higher in patients with mild and moderate CKD compared with patients with preserved estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) [5].
Nutritional gaps in the knowledge of dietary management of DKD include amount and quality of carbohydrates, protein, and fat intake [6]. It is known that fiber intake is associated with better glycemic control [7] and cardiovascular risk reduction [8]. Table 1 shows an overview of dietary fiber recommendations. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) [9] recommends that patients with DM should consume at least 14 grams of fiber for each 1000 kcals daily and it suggests that carbohydrate intake from vegetables, fruits, legumes, and whole grains, with an emphasis on foods higher in fiber and lower in glycemic load, is preferred over other sources of sugar [10]. The American Heart Association (AHA) also endorses healthy dietary patterns rich in fiber to prevent CVD, such as Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) and Mediterranean diets [11]. In its latest edition, Dietary Guidelines for Americans [12] reinforced the idea of fiber consumption through specific foods and patterns.
There is no precise recommendation about fiber intake or dietary patterns rich in fiber for patients with CKD [6,13,14]. Since the effect of dietary fiber on renal outcomes is not well established, and dietary fiber appears to be an important non-pharmacological treatment for DM and CVD, it is necessary to better understand and further investigate its effects on diabetic kidney disease (DKD). We hypothesize that a dietary fiber intake can bring benefits to DKD, through improve renal outcomes. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of dietary fiber (supplemental or dietary pattern rich in fiber) on DKD.

2. Materials and Methods

This systematic review was carried out using a protocol constructed according to the Cochrane Handbook recommendations [15], and it was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [16] (PROSPERO CRD42017072535).

2.1. Data Sources and Searches

We searched databases from Medline, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov register, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify interventional clinical trials that reported dietary fiber intake (supplemental or dietary pattern rich in fiber) and renal outcomes (albuminuria, proteinuria, eGFR, and dialysis) in patients with DM, up to January 2018.
The initial search comprised the terms diabetes, dietary fiber, diabetic nephropathy, albuminuria, proteinuria, diabetic kidney disease, eGFR, renal replacement therapy, kidney failure chronic, and related entry terms. The complete Medline search strategy is presented in Appendix A, available in the Supporting Material for this article online. All potentially eligible studies were reviewed, regardless of the primary outcome or language.

2.2. Study Selection

Only interventional clinical trials conducted on patients with diabetes (type 1 or type 2 DM) with at least one high fiber group were included in the present review. Dietary fiber intake (supplemental or dietary pattern rich in fiber) was compared with conventional or low-fiber diets. Dietary intervention must have lasted at least four weeks. We excluded studies with non-clinical trials design (cohort, cross-sectional, case-control, and review studies), with the same dietary intervention in all studied groups, without dietary information, or without data about renal outcomes.

2.3. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

All citations retrieved from electronic databases were imported into the EndNote Program. Two reviewers (CMC, LAG) independently analyzed the titles and abstracts of every paper retrieved from the literature search to identify potentially eligible studies. The full text of the remaining papers was obtained for further examination. Disagreements were solved by a third reviewer (LVV).
Data of included studies were independently extracted by the same two reviewers using a standardized form. Extracted data included: first author’s name, year of publication, sample size, study design, trial duration, general characteristics of participants (the type of DM, age, gender, body mass index, HbA1c, hypertension or blood pressure), intervention characteristics and outcomes of interest. A detailed description of the type of diet (actual intake or prescribed diet), total energy, macronutrients, and fiber content was documented for interventions and comparators.
In this review, we used renal outcomes definitions provided by authors of the included studies. In general, DKD is diagnosed based on the persistence of albuminuria and/or reduced eGFR in the absence of signs or symptoms of other primary causes of kidney damage [17]. End-of-study and baseline means or statistical dispersion for outcomes were extracted.
Methodological quality of studies was measured according to the Cochrane Collaboration’s Handbook [15]. Biases were classified into six domains: selection, performance, detection, attrition, reporting, and other [15,18]. The "other" chosen domain was the assessment of dietary compliance. The risk of bias was independently analyzed by two reviewers (CMC, LAG) for each domain, and was classified as high, low, or unclear. Regarding dietary compliance, the risk was classified as "low" if the study described the method of a dietary adherence. The performance domain (blinding of participants and personnel) was not possible to evaluate in studies that have dietary intervention (dietary pattern).

3. Results

3.1. Literature Search

We identified 1814 studies in database searches. Of them, 1766 were excluded based on title and abstract, leaving 48 articles for further full-text evaluation. We excluded 41 studies (Appendix B), mainly due to lack of dietary or renal outcomes information, non-clinical trials design or only abstract available. As a result, seven interventional clinical trials were included in the current systematic review (Figure 1).

3.2. Study Characteristics

The seven interventional clinical trials comprised 161 patients with DM, age from 20 to 74 years (mean 58.3 years) and 49% females. HbA1c was reported in six studies (range 6.9–8.7%). Good glycemic control, defined as HbA1c below 7% was achieved in two trials. Three trials had renal outcomes as a primary outcome [19,20,21], and only one study included patients with established renal disease (macroalbuminuria) [19]. All trials included few patients (range 8–49), had a small duration of the intervention (four to twelve weeks), and most studies were conducted in Brazil [19,22,23]. Four trials had a parallel design [22,23,24,25], and three showed a crossover design [19,20,21]. Two studies included patients with type 1 DM [20,21]. Dialysis and proteinuria were not reported in any included studies. Two studies [23,24] did not describe eGFR, one study did not report albuminuria [25], and one study reported fractional albumin clearance [21]. Table 2 shows the complete description of the included trials.
Didactically, the studies were organized into three sections by type of dietary intervention: “vegetarian diet” (n = 4) [19,20,21,24], “fiber supplement” (n = 2) [22,25], and “DASH diet” (n = 1) [23]. Most interventions were compared to usual diet. Mean fiber intake in the intervention was 24 g/day (range: 20–27 g/day) and 16 g/day (range: 14–20 g/day) in the control group. Given the wide heterogeneity among studies regarding the type and form of dietary interventions, as well as the assessed outcomes, and the small number of studies identified in the literature, we could not perform a meta-analysis of the extracted data. The following sections provide additional detail on the included studies, grouped by type of intervention.

3.3. Vegetarian diet

3.3.1. Type 1 DM

Two interventional clinical trials, including 17 adult patients (age 32 to 46 years), 59% females, assessed the vegetarian diets compared to a usual diet in patients with type 1 DM [20,21]. The studies were conducted in Greece [20] and the United Kingdom [21]. The intervention period ranged from four to eight weeks, and both had crossover clinical trials. Total fiber intake was 0.2 to 0.4 g/kg/day in the intervention versus 0.1 to 0.3 g/kg/day in the control group.
In the study conducted by Kontessis et al. [20], diets were isocaloric and with the same quantity of protein, but the intervention group contained exclusively vegetable protein and a mean fiber intake of 0.2 g/kg/day versus 0.1 g/kg/day in the control group. eGRF and albuminuria were significantly lower for the intervention group.
In the study of Jibani et al. [21], the intervention consisted of a predominantly vegetarian diet, with animal protein fraction limited to approximately 30% of the total protein intake. Median actual fiber consumption was 0.4 g/kg/day in the intervention versus 0.3 g/kg/day in the control. There was no change in eGFR, but the fractional albumin clearance was significantly lower in the vegetarian group compared with the conventional diet.

3.3.2. Type 2 DM

We found two randomized clinical trials that assessed the effect of a vegetarian diet on patients with type 2 DM [19,24]. The studies were conducted in the United States [24] and Brazil [19], the sample size ranged from 11 to 17 patients, with a mean age of 57 years, 36% were females, and the study duration ranged from four to twelve weeks. In the interventions, patients ingested 26.5 g of total fiber versus 20g in the control groups (conventional diets).
In the pilot trial of Nicholson et al. [24], the intervention consisted of a low-fat vegan diet compared to a conventional diet, and there was no difference in the albuminuria between groups. The study performed by Mello et al. [19] was a crossover trial that evaluated the effects of a lactovegetarian compared with a chicken based or usual diet. No difference was observed in the eGFR between the vegetarian and usual or chicken diet. However, lactovegetarian and chicken-based diets reduced albuminuria by the same amount compared with usual diet. The quantity of fiber was greater in the lactovegetarian group, but the protein intake was smaller in the lactovegetarian group compared with chicken and usual diets.

3.4. Fiber Supplement

Two randomized clinical trials conducted in patients with type 2 DM used 10g of a soluble fiber supplement (guar gum or inulin) [22,25]. The studies were conducted in Brazil [22] and Iran [25] and the sample size ranged from 40 to 49 patients with a mean age of 54.5 years, 71% females, and mostly obese patients (BMI: 30.3 kg/m2). The intervention period ranged from six weeks to two months.
In the study of Dall’Alba et al. [22], total fiber intake was 24 g/day (10 g/day of guar gum supplement) compared with 16 g/day in the control taken for six weeks. There was no difference in the eGFR and albuminuria between groups.
The study of Farhangi et al. [25] included only women, and the intervention group received a 10 g/day chicory inulin as supplemental fiber, and the control group received 10 g/day maltodextrin for two months. No information was available about total fiber intake. No changes in eGFR values had been observed.

3.5. DASH Diet

Only one study evaluated the benefit of DASH diet and physical activity for four weeks compared with a diet based on ADA recommendations in patients with type 2 DM [23]. The study was conducted in Brazil and included 40 patients with DM and hypertension, mean age 62 years old, 55% females. The total fiber consumed in the intervention group was 20 versus 14 g/day in the control group. There were no differences in albuminuria between groups at the end-of-the study.

3.6. Methodological Quality Assessment of Studies

None of the included studies satisfied all areas established by the Cochrane Handbook [15]. In general, the quality of the studies was low or uncertain. The selection bias domain was not possible to be evaluated in one study, because it was a non-randomized clinical trial [21]. Three studies provided a detailed description about random sequence generation [22,23,25], while only one study described the method used for allocation concealment [25]. The blinding of participants was described in two studies (dietary fiber supplement) [22,25]. The intervention providers were blinded to the group assignment in only one study [25]. One study had a loss of follow-up greater than 20% in the run-in period (~57%). On reporting bias, one study presented the outcome eGFR without having previously described it in the registry [19]. All studies properly presented the item “diet or supplement adherence". Table 3 shows the complete assessment of the methodological quality of the included studies.

4. Discussion

Diet is the cornerstone treatment for patients with DM and as far as we know this is the first systematic review that attempts to shows benefits of a consumption of dietary fiber on renal outcomes in patients with DM. Among the seven included studies, only the vegetarian dietary pattern was associated with beneficial kidney outcomes: three studies showed a reduction of albuminuria (two conducted in patients with type 1 DM and one in patients with type 2 DM) and one study demonstrated a change in the eGFR in patients with type 1 DM.
As we already know, the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy has complex mechanisms including the effect of high glucose, endothelial dysfunction inflammation, renin-angiotensin system activation, reactive oxygen species, increase of advanced glycation end-product, and glomerular hyperfiltration [26]. Dietary fiber plays an important role in glycemic control [7,27] and regardless of the source (food or supplements) fiber exhibits hypoglycemic actions in patients with type 2 DM [28,29]. Some studies have shown that good glycemic control reduces albuminuria [30,31,32] in patients with DM and dietary fiber intake was found to be associated with a reduced risk of albuminuria in a cross-sectional study [33]. Recently, a Japanese randomized clinical trial showed that a diet higher in fiber was able to improve endothelial function, possibly by a reduction of glucose excursions, in patients with type 2 DM [34].
In the general population, consumption of fiber-rich foods can reduce serum creatinine levels [35,36] and may increase eGFR in CKD patients without DM [36]. A prospective study showed that high fiber intake, mainly from legumes and vegetables, was related to lower incidence of CKD after six years of follow-up. For every additional 5 g/day of fiber intake, there was an 11% reduction in risk of CKD [37]. In fact, the precise effects of dietary fiber consumption on renal function are not well known, but healthy dietary patterns with high fiber are associated with lower mortality in people with kidney disease [38].
In our systematic review, a dietary pattern rich in fiber: Vegetarian diet was the only category associated with a reduction in albuminuria in both type 1 and type 2 DM patients and reduction in eGFR in a group of patients with type 1 DM and possible hyperfiltration. It is worth noting that protein intake was lower in two out of three of these studies. It has been suggested that plant-based proteins may exert beneficial effects on blood pressure, protein loss in urine, and GFR, and reduce renal tissue damage preventing the progression of CKD when compared to animal proteins [39]. It is difficult to isolate the effect of a single nutrient, in this case, dietary fiber from protein. A vegetarian dietary pattern is usually richer in fibers, but it is lower in animal protein, which may be more suitable for these patients and exert beneficial glomerular effects [40]. Higher eGFR has been demonstrated in patients with a normal renal function on an animal protein diet in comparison with a person on a vegetable-based diet [41,42].
Bioavailability of dietary proteins in plant-based diets is diverse. The content of phosphorus, amino acids types, and advanced glycation end products (AGEs) is distinguished in animal and plant diets. Plant-based sources of protein tend to have the less bioavailable form of phosphorus as phytate compared to organic phosphorus found in processed foods as well as in animal sources of protein. The mechanisms by which plant-based diets may reduce DKD progression may be related to the form of phosphorus, AGEs, a reduction in blood pressure by decreasing sodium, an increase in fiber leading to improved glycemic control, or from bioactive compounds in soy protein-based diets, such as isoflavones [43]. Additionally, dietary protein also delivers an increased acid load per nephron providing a non-hemodynamic mechanism promoting renal injury through the induction of endothelin and aldosterone in response to increased nephron ammonia generation. In the presence of proteinuria, increased dietary protein alters glomerular permselectivity, increasing urinary albumin loss [44].
In our review, no other dietary pattern had favorable effects on renal outcomes. DASH diet was not able to reduce eGFR or albuminuria in patients with type 2 DM similar to the results of Jacobs et al. in patients without DM [45]. However, in two large, prospective, long-term studies, adherence to DASH diet was associated with protection against eGFR decline [46,47]. No clinical trial specifically designed to evaluate the effects of a Mediterranean diet in patients with DM was identified in our database search. In a recent cohort study, a Mediterranean dietary pattern was associated with a decreased risk of CKD in patients with and without DM [48]. A Mediterranean diet was too evaluated in a randomized clinical trial, PREDIMED (PREvencion con DIeta MEDiterranea) study. However, two subgroup analyses that evaluated only patients with type 2 DM, showed no difference in nephropathy between Mediterranean groups compared to a low-fat diet [49,50]. These studies were not included in this systematic review due to them not presenting the dietary fiber intake.
Limitations of our systematic review are the small number of studies, with a small sample size, few ethnic groups represented among the participants, and short follow-up time (no more than twelve weeks). This may limit the effect of any dietary intervention in renal outcomes, particularly because CKD is a slowly progressive disease. Many years may be necessary for the development of kidney damage. In fact, DKD was present in only one study in our systematic review [19]. Regarding the quality of the included studies, lack of description of trial characteristics made the quality analysis unclear in several domains. Fiber dietary intake in included studies was lower than recommended by most dietary guidelines (38 g/day for men and 25 g/day women) [9,51,52]. In addition, we could not establish an independent fiber effect on renal outcomes since most included studies evaluated eating patterns. On the other hand, dietary patterns seem to be more important than a single nutrient and offer a more practical application in public health promotion since it is easier for people to adopt dietary patterns instead of specific nutrients from their diets [53].
Evidence of benefits of dietary fiber on renal outcomes in patients with DM is still limited, and more precise indications of the amount, duration, and the type of fiber intake to achieve these goals are needed. Regrettably, we could not evaluate the individual effect of different fiber sources (legumes, vegetables, or fruits) on the outcomes. We know that all fibers are not the same and sources of fibers carry other nutrients (i.e., vitamins and minerals) that on their own already have positive effects on health. Available data extrapolated from the general population, show that fiber intake is likely protective against CKD progression and mortality [27,37,54], and every effort should be made to encourage higher fiber intake in the CKD population. Unfortunately, we could not reach a definitive conclusion regarding the beneficial effect of fiber in DKD in our systematic review. Still, larger, longer, better design trials are needed to evaluate the effect of fiber on DKD.
A vegetarian dietary pattern may have a beneficial effect on these renal outcomes. However, the individual effect of the intake of fiber on DKD was not possible to be evaluated on our systematic review. New randomized trials are needed to reach a definitive conclusion.

Author Contributions

C.M.C. and L.A.G. collected the data. C.M.C. wrote the first draft with contributions from L.V.V. L.V.V. participated in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the version to be submitted and any revised version. M.J.A. made substantial contributions to conception and design. C.M.C., L.A.G. and L.V.V. reviewed and commented on subsequent drafts of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Sources of Support: This study was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa (FIPE)-Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. C.M.C. was the recipient of a scholarship from CAPES.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. MEDLINE Search Strategy for the Systematic Review

((((“Diabetes Mellitus” [Mesh] OR (Diabetes Mellitus) OR “Diet, Diabetic” [Mesh] OR (Diet, Diabetic) OR (Diabetic Diets) OR (Diets, Diabetic) OR (Diabetic Diet) OR "Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2” [Mesh] OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2) OR (Noninsulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus) OR (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Type II) OR (Stable Diabetes Mellitus) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Stable) OR (Slow-Onset Diabetes Mellitus) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Slow Onset) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Slow-Onset) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Noninsulin Dependent) OR (Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Non Insulin Dependent) OR (Maturity-Onset Diabetes) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Adult-Onset) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Noninsulin-Dependent) OR (Adult-Onset Diabetes Mellitus) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Adult Onset) OR (NIDDM) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Maturity Onset) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Maturity-Onset) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Ketosis-Resistant) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Ketosis Resistant) OR (Ketosis-Resistant Diabetes Mellitus) OR (Type II DM) OR (Type 2 DM) OR "Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1" [Mesh] OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Brittle) OR (Brittle Diabetes Mellitus) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin Dependent) OR (Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Juvenile-Onset) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Juvenile Onset) OR (Juvenile-Onset Diabetes Mellitus) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Ketosis-Prone) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Ketosis Prone) OR (Ketosis-Prone Diabetes Mellitus) OR (Juvenile-Onset Diabetes) OR (Diabetes, Juvenile-Onset) OR (Juvenile Onset Diabetes) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Type I) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Sudden-Onset) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Sudden Onset) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Sudden Onset) OR (Sudden-Onset Diabetes Mellitus) OR (Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus) OR (Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent, 1) OR (Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus 1) OR (Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus 1) OR (Type 1 Diabetes) OR (Diabetes, Type 1) OR (IDDM) OR (Diabetes, Autoimmune) OR (Autoimmune Diabetes)))) AND ("Dietary Fiber" [Mesh] OR (Dietary Fiber) OR (Fiber, Dietary) OR (Dietary Fibers) OR (Fibers, Dietary) OR (Roughage) OR (Roughages) OR (Wheat Bran) OR (Bran, Wheat) OR (Brans, Wheat) OR (Wheat Brans) OR "Whole Grains" [Mesh] OR (Whole Grains) OR (Grain, Whole) OR (Grains, Whole) OR (Whole Grain) OR (Whole Grain Cereals) OR (Cereal, Whole Grain) OR (Cereals, Whole Grain) OR (Grain Cereal, Whole) OR (Grain Cereals, Whole) OR (Whole Grain Cereal) OR (Cereal fiber) OR “Plants, Edible” [Mesh] OR (Plants, Edible) OR (Edible Plant) OR (Edible Plants) OR (Plant, Edible) OR (Food Plants) OR (Food Plant) OR (Plant, Food) OR (Plants, Food) OR “Vegetables” [Mesh] OR (Vegetables) OR (Vegetable) OR “Fruit” [Mesh] OR (Fruit) OR (Fruits) OR (Plant Aril) OR (Arils, Plant) OR (Aril, Plant) OR (Plant Arils) OR (Fiber) OR (Soluble fiber) OR (Total fiber) OR (Insoluble fiber) OR “Diet, Vegetarian”[Mesh] OR (Diet, Vegetarian) OR (Diets, Vegetarian) OR (Vegetarian Diets) OR (Vegetarian Diet) OR (Vegetarianism) OR “Diet, Vegan” [Mesh] OR (Diet, Vegan) OR (Diets, Vegan) OR (Vegan Diets) OR (Vegan Diet) OR (Veganism) OR (Diet, Dash) OR (Diets, Dash) OR (Dash Diet) OR (Dash Diets) OR (Dash) OR (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) OR “Diet, Mediterranean”[Mesh] OR (Diet, Mediterranean) OR (Mediterranean Diet) OR (Diets, Mediterranean) OR “Inulin”[Mesh] OR (Inulin) OR “Psyllium”[Mesh] OR (Psyllium) OR (Gum, Ispaghule) OR (Ispaghula) OR (Guar gum) OR (Gum guar)))) AND ((“Diabetic Nephropathies” [Mesh] OR (Diabetic Nephropathies) OR (Nephropathies, Diabetic) OR (Nephropathy, Diabetic) OR (Diabetic Nephropathy) OR (Diabetic Kidney Disease) OR (Diabetic Kidney Diseases) OR (Kidney Disease, Diabetic) OR (Kidney Diseases, Diabetic) OR (Diabetic Glomerulosclerosis) OR (Kimmelstiel-Wilson Syndrome) OR (Kimmelstiel Wilson Syndrome) OR (Syndrome, Kimmelstiel-Wilson) OR (Kimmelstiel-Wilson Disease) OR (Kimmelstiel Wilson Disease) OR (Nodular Glomerulosclerosis) OR (Glomerulosclerosis, Nodular) OR (Glomerulosclerosis, Diabetic) OR “Albuminuria”[Mesh] OR (Albuminuria) OR (Albuminurias) OR “Proteinuria”[Mesh] OR (Proteinuria) OR (Proteinurias) OR (Microalbuminuria) OR (Macroalbuminuria) OR (Diabetic Renal Disease) OR (Increased urinary albumin excretion) OR “Glomerular Filtration Rate”[Mesh] OR (Glomerular Filtration Rate) OR (Filtration Rate, Glomerular) OR (Filtration Rates, Glomerular) OR (Glomerular Filtration Rates) OR (Rate, Glomerular Filtration) OR (Rates, Glomerular Filtration) OR (Chronic Kidney Disease) OR (Renal Replacement Therapy[Mesh]) OR (Renal Replacement Therapy) OR “Dialysis”[Mesh] OR (Dialysis) OR (Dialyses) OR “Renal Dialysis”[Mesh] OR (Renal Dialysis) OR (Hemodialysis) OR (Hemodialyses) OR “Kidney Failure, Chronic”[Mesh] OR (Kidney Failure, Chronic) OR (End-Stage Kidney Disease) OR (Disease, End-Stage Kidney) OR (End Stage Kidney Disease) OR (Kidney Disease, End-Stage) OR (Chronic Kidney Failure) OR (End-Stage Renal Disease) OR (Disease, End-Stage Renal) OR (End Stage Renal Disease) OR (Renal Disease, End-Stage) OR (Renal Disease, End Stage) OR (Renal Failure, End-Stage) OR (End-Stage Renal Failure) OR (Renal Failure, End Stage) OR (Renal Failure, Chronic) OR (Chronic Renal Failure) OR (ESRD) OR (ESKD) OR “Renal Insufficiency, Chronic”[Mesh] OR (Renal Insufficiency, Chronic) OR (Chronic Renal Insufficiencies) OR (Chronic Renal Insufficiencies) OR (Renal Insufficiencies, Chronic) OR (Chronic Renal Insufficiency) OR (Kidney Insufficiency, Chronic) OR (Chronic Kidney Insufficiency) OR (Chronic Kidney Insufficiencies) OR (Kidney Insufficiencies, Chronic) OR (Chronic Kidney Diseases) OR (Chronic Kidney Disease) OR (Disease, Chronic Kidney) OR (Diseases, Chronic Kidney) OR (Kidney Disease, Chronic) OR (Kidney Diseases, Chronic) OR (Chronic Renal Diseases) OR (Chronic Renal Disease) OR (Disease, Chronic Renal) OR (Diseases, Chronic Renal) OR (Renal Disease, Chronic) OR (Renal Diseases, Chronic))).

Appendix B. Excluded Studies of the Systematic Review (n = 41)

AuthorYearPeriodicReasons to exclusion
Paisey1984Diabetes CareNon-clinical trials
Parillo1984Minerva EndocrinologicaDuration <4-weeks
Barsotti1987Infusionstherapie und Klinische ErnährungOnly abstract
Parillo1988American Journal of Clinical NutritionDuration <4-weeks
Barsotti1988Contributions of NephrologyOnly abstract
Naumova 1990Vŭtreshni Bolesti Only abstract
Barsotti1991American Journal of Nephrology Non-diabetic population
Metcalf 1993Clinical ChemistryOutcomes of interest not reported
Hadfield1993Practical DiabetesNon-clinical trials
Oldrizzi1994Journal of the American Society of NeprhologyDietary information not provided
Citro1998Minerva EndocrinologicaOutcomes of interest not reported
GSEDNu 2006Journal of Diabetes and ComplicationsNon-clinical trials
Brunori2007American Journal of Kidney DiseasesNon-diabetic population
Cámara2008Revista Espanhola de Salud Publica Outcomes of interest not reported
Glover2009Food HydrocolloidsOutcomes of interest not reported
Teixeira2010DiabetesOutcomes of interest not reported
Gong 2011DiabetologiaDietary information not provided
Lin2011American Journal of Kidney Diseases Dietary information not provided
Sun2011Journal of Chinese Clinical MedicineOnly abstract
Reddy2012Kidney Research Clinical PracticeNon-clinical trials
Dunkler2013JAMA Internal MedicineNon-clinical trials
Chang2013American Journal of Kidney DiseasesNon-clinical trials
Tirosh 2013Diabetes CareOnly abstract
Dans2013Phillipine Journal of Internal medOnly abstract
Khatri2014Clinical Journal of the American Society of NephrologyNon-clinical trials
Hsu2014Clinical NutritionNon-clinical trials
Xu2014Clinical Journal of the American Society of NephrologyNon-clinical trials
Díaz-López2015Diabetes CareDietary information not provided
Villarini2015Annali di IgieneNon-diabetic population
Lee2015Nephrology Dialysis TransplantationNon-clinical trials
Nazha2015Nephrology Dialysis TransplantationOnly abstract
Rebholz2016American Journal of Kidney DiseasesDuplicated
Dunkler2016American Journal of Kidney DiseasesNon-clinical trials
Piccoli2016BMC NephrologyDietary information not provided
Ashgari2016Hypertension ResearchNon-clinical trials
Hirahatake2016CirculationDietary information not provided
Rebhold2016American Journal of NephrologyNon-clinical trials
Mejia2016The FASEB JournalOnly abstract
Ashgari2017Nephrology, Dialysis, TransplantationNon-clinical trials
Horikawa2017NutrientsNon-clinical trials
Duncan2017Diabetology and Metabolic SyndromeDietary information not provided

References

  1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 8th ed.; International Diabetes Federation: Brussels, Belgium, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Slabaugh, S.L.; Curtis, B.H.; Clore, G.; Fu, H.; Schuster, D.P. Factors associated with increased healthcare costs in Medicare Advantage patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled in a large representative health insurance plan in the US. J. Med. Econ. 2015, 18, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lupsa, B.C.; Inzucchi, S.E. Diabetes medications and cardiovascular disease: At long last progress. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2018, 25, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sarnak, M.J.; Levey, A.S.; Schoolwerth, A.C.; Coresh, J.; Culleton, B.; Hamm, L.L.; McCullough, P.A.; Kasiske, B.L.; Kelepouris, E.; Klag, M.J.; et al. Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: A statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 2003, 108, 2154–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lima, E.G.; Hueb, W.; Gersh, B.J.; Rezende, P.C.; Garzillo, C.L.; Favarato, D.; Hueb, A.C.; Rahmi Garcia, R.M.; Franchini Ramires, J.A.; Filho, R.K. Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Long-Term Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Coronary Artery Disease on Surgical, Angioplasty, or Medical Treatment. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2016, 101, 1735–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ko, G.J.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Goldstein-Fuchs, J.; Rhee, C.M. Dietary Approaches in the Management of Diabetic Patients with Kidney Disease. Nutrients 2017, 9, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Silva, F.M.; Kramer, C.K.; de Almeida, J.C.; Steemburgo, T.; Gross, J.L.; Azevedo, M.J. Fiber intake and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr. Rev. 2013, 71, 790–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. McRae, M.P. Dietary Fiber Is Beneficial for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses. J. Chiropr. Med. 2017, 16, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Evert, A.B.; Boucher, J.L.; Cypress, M.; Dunbar, S.A.; Franz, M.J.; Mayer-Davis, E.J.; Neumiller, J.J.; Nwankwo, R.; Verdi, C.L.; Urbanski, P.; et al. Nutrition therapy recommendations for the management of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2014, 37 (Suppl. 1), S120–S143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. American Diabetes Association. 4. Lifestyle Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care 2018, 41 (Suppl. 1), S38–S50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Eckel, R.H.; Jakicic, J.M.; Ard, J.D.; de Jesus, J.M.; Houston Miller, N.; Hubbard, V.S.; Lee, I.M.; Lichtenstein, A.H.; Loria, C.M.; Millen, B.E.; et al. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014, 129 (Suppl. 2), S76–S99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 8th ed.; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 2015.
  13. Molitch, M.E.; Adler, A.I.; Flyvbjerg, A.; Nelson, R.G.; So, W.Y.; Wanner, C.; Kasiske, B.L.; Wheeler, D.C.; de Zeeuw, D.; Mogensen, C.E. Diabetic kidney disease: A clinical update from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes. Kidney Int. 2015, 87, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence Analysis Library, 2015. Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline. 2010. USA. Available online: https://www.andeal.org/topic.cfm?cat=3927 (accessed on 1 February 2019).
  15. Higgins JPT GSe. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [Updated March 2011]; The Cochrane Collaboration: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  16. Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gotzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2009, 62, e1–e34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. American Diabetes Association. 10. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care 2018, 41 (Suppl. 1), S105–S118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Higgins, J.P.; Altman, D.G.; Gotzsche, P.C.; Juni, P.; Moher, D.; Oxman, A.D.; Savovic, J.; Schulz, K.F.; Weeks, L.; Sterne, J.A.; et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011, 343, d5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. De Mello, V.D.; Zelmanovitz, T.; Perassolo, M.S.; Azevedo, M.J.; Gross, J.L. Withdrawal of red meat from the usual diet reduces albuminuria and improves serum fatty acid profile in type 2 diabetes patients with macroalbuminuria. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 83, 1032–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kontessis, P.A.; Bossinakou, I.; Sarika, L.; Iliopoulou, E.; Papantoniou, A.; Trevisan, R.; Roussi, D.; Stipsanelli, K.; Grigorakis, S.; Souvatzoglou, A. Renal, metabolic, and hormonal responses to proteins of different origin in normotensive, nonproteinuric type I diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1995, 18, 1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Jibani, M.M.; Bloodworth, L.L.; Foden, E.; Griffiths, K.D.; Galpin, O.P. Predominantly vegetarian diet in patients with incipient and early clinical diabetic nephropathy: Effects on albumin excretion rate and nutritional status. Diabet. Med. 1991, 8, 949–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dall’Alba, V.; Silva, F.M.; Antonio, J.P.; Steemburgo, T.; Royer, C.P.; Almeida, J.C.; Gross, J.L.; Azevedo, M.J. Improvement of the metabolic syndrome profile by soluble fibre—Guar gum—In patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomised clinical trial. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 110, 1601–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Paula, T.P.; Viana, L.V.; Neto, A.T.; Leitao, C.B.; Gross, J.L.; Azevedo, M.J. Effects of the DASH Diet and Walking on Blood Pressure in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Hypertens. (Greenwich) 2015, 17, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nicholson, A.S.; Sklar, M.; Barnard, N.D.; Gore, S.; Sullivan, R.; Browning, S. Toward improved management of NIDDM: A randomized, controlled, pilot intervention using a lowfat, vegetarian diet. Prev. Med. 1999, 29, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Farhangi, M.A.; Javid, A.Z.; Dehghan, P. The effect of enriched chicory inulin on liver enzymes, calcium homeostasis and hematological parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Prim. Care Diabetes 2016, 10, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maezawa, Y.; Takemoto, M.; Yokote, K. Cell biology of diabetic nephropathy: Roles of endothelial cells, tubulointerstitial cells and podocytes. J. Diabetes Investig. 2015, 6, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fujii, H.; Iwase, M.; Ohkuma, T.; Ogata-Kaizu, S.; Ide, H.; Kikuchi, Y.; Idewaki, Y.; Joudai, T.; Hirakawa, Y.; Uchida, K.; et al. Impact of dietary fiber intake on glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors and chronic kidney disease in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Fukuoka Diabetes Registry. Nutr. J. 2013, 12, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Post, R.E.; Mainous, A.G., 3rd; King, D.E.; Simpson, K.N. Dietary fiber for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2012, 25, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. De Carvalho, C.M.; de Paula, T.P.; Viana, L.V.; Machado, V.M.; de Almeida, J.C.; Azevedo, M.J. Plasma glucose and insulin responses after consumption of breakfasts with different sources of soluble fiber in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomized crossover clinical trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 106, 1238–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Showail, A.A.; Ghoraba, M. The association between glycemic control and microalbuminuria in Type 2 diabetes. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transplant. 2016, 27, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on albuminuria in type 1 diabetes: Long-term follow-up of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014, 2, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, W.Z.; Hung, C.C.; Wen, Y.W.; Ning, H.C.; Gau, B.R.; Huang, Y.Y. Effect of glycemic control on microalbuminuria development among type 2 diabetes with high-normal albuminuria. Ren. Fail. 2014, 36, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Metcalf, P.A.; Baker, J.R.; Scragg, R.K.; Dryson, E.; Scott, A.J.; Wild, C.J. Dietary nutrient intakes and slight albuminuria in people at least 40 years old. Clin. Chem. 1993, 39, 2191–2198. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kondo, K.; Morino, K.; Nishio, Y.; Ishikado, A.; Arima, H.; Nakao, K.; Nakagawa, F.; Nikami, F.; Sekine, O.; Nemoto, K.I.; et al. Fiber-rich diet with brown rice improves endothelial function in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chiavaroli, L.; Mirrahimi, A.; Sievenpiper, J.L.; Jenkins, D.J.; Darling, P.B. Dietary fiber effects in chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 69, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Salmean, Y.A.; Segal, M.S.; Langkamp-Henken, B.; Canales, M.T.; Zello, G.A.; Dahl, W.J. Foods with added fiber lower serum creatinine levels in patients with chronic kidney disease. J. Ren. Nutr. 2013, 23, e29–e32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Mirmiran, P.; Yuzbashian, E.; Asghari, G.; Sarverzadeh, S.; Azizi, F. Dietary fibre intake in relation to the risk of incident chronic kidney disease. Br. J. Nutr. 2018, 119, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kelly, J.T.; Palmer, S.C.; Wai, S.N.; Ruospo, M.; Carrero, J.J.; Campbell, K.L.; Strippoli, G.F. Healthy Dietary Patterns and Risk of Mortality and ESRD in CKD: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017, 12, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gluba-Brzozka, A.; Franczyk, B.; Rysz, J. Vegetarian Diet in Chronic Kidney Disease-A Friend or Foe. Nutrients 2017, 9, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Melina, V.; Craig, W.; Levin, S. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2016, 116, 1970–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lohsiriwat, S. Protein Diet and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate. Open J. Nephrol. 2013, 3, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Barai, S.; Gambhir, S.; Prasad, N.; Sharma, R.K.; Ora, M.; Kumar, A.; Gupta, A.; Parasar, D.S.; Suneetha, B. Levels of GFR and protein-induced hyperfiltration in kidney donors: A single-center experience in India. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2008, 51, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Moorthi, R.N.; Vorland, C.J.; Hill Gallant, K.M. Diet and Diabetic Kidney Disease: Plant Versus Animal Protein. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2017, 17, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kaysen, G.A.; Odabaei, G. Dietary protein restriction and preservation of kidney function in chronic kidney disease. Blood Purif. 2013, 35, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jacobs, D.R., Jr.; Gross, M.D.; Steffen, L.; Steffes, M.W.; Yu, X.; Svetkey, L.P.; Appel, L.J.; Vollmer, W.M.; Bray, G.A.; Moore, T.; et al. The effects of dietary patterns on urinary albumin excretion: Results of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Trial. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2009, 53, 638–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lin, J.; Fung, T.T.; Hu, F.B.; Curhan, G.C. Association of dietary patterns with albuminuria and kidney function decline in older white women: A subgroup analysis from the Nurses’ Health Study. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2011, 57, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rebholz, C.M.; Crews, D.C.; Grams, M.E.; Steffen, L.M.; Levey, A.S.; Miller, E.R., 3rd; Appel, L.J.; Coresh, J. DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) Diet and Risk of Subsequent Kidney Disease. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2016, 68, 853–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Asghari, G.; Farhadnejad, H.; Mirmiran, P.; Dizavi, A.; Yuzbashian, E.; Azizi, F. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with reduced risk of incident chronic kidney diseases among Tehranian adults. Hypertens. Res. 2017, 40, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Diaz-Lopez, A.; Babio, N.; Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A.; Corella, D.; Amor, A.J.; Fito, M.; Estruch, R.; Aros, F.; Gomez-Gracia, E.; Fiol, M.; et al. Mediterranean Diet, Retinopathy, Nephropathy, and Microvascular Diabetes Complications: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care 2015, 38, 2134–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Diaz-Lopez, A.; Bullo, M.; Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A.; Guasch-Ferre, M.; Ros, E.; Basora, J.; Covas, M.I.; del Carmen Lopez-Sabater, M.; Salas-Salvado, J.; Investigators, P.R.S. Effects of Mediterranean diets on kidney function: A report from the PREDIMED trial. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2012, 60, 380–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Dahl, W.J.; Stewart, M.L. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Health Implications of Dietary Fiber. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2015, 115, 1861–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and Allergies (NDA). Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for carbohydrates and dietary fibre. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1462. [Google Scholar]
  53. Medina-Remon, A.; Kirwan, R.; Lamuela-Raventos, R.M.; Estruch, R. Dietary patterns and the risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, asthma, and neurodegenerative diseases. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 262–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Krishnamurthy, V.M.; Wei, G.; Baird, B.C.; Murtaugh, M.; Chonchol, M.B.; Raphael, K.L.; Greene, T.; Beddhu, S. High dietary fiber intake is associated with decreased inflammation and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2012, 81, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 11 00347 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the literature search to identify clinical trials evaluating the effect of dietary fiber on renal outcomes (albuminuria, eGFR) of patients with diabetes.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the literature search to identify clinical trials evaluating the effect of dietary fiber on renal outcomes (albuminuria, eGFR) of patients with diabetes.
Nutrients 11 00347 g001
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of dietary patterns and fiber recommendations.
Table 1. Characteristics of dietary patterns and fiber recommendations.
Dietary Patterns/
Guidelines Recommendations		Main FoodsNutrients Characteristics
DASH diet 1,2,4Includes vegetables, fruits, whole grains, fat-free or low-fat dairy products, fish, poultry, beans, nuts, and vegetable oils; <25% dietary intake from fat; low in sweets, sugar-sweetened beverages, and tropical oils. Low in saturated fats and cholesterol
Rich in fiber
Rich in protein
Vegetarian diet 2,3, 4Includes whole grains, vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, seeds, soy and, if desired, dairy products, and eggs.
Does not include meat, fowl or seafood, or products containing those foods.		Rich in fiber
Rich in n-6 fatty acids
Rich in vegetable protein
Mediterranean diet 1,2,4Includes fruits, vegetables, whole grains, beans, nuts, seeds, seafood, olive oil; low to moderate amounts of poultry, and dairy products, with little red meat; low to moderate wine consumption (optional).Rich in fiber
Rich in monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fat
Guidelines recommendations1 AHA: Rich in fiber
2 American Guideline: 14 g/1000kcal
5 European Guideline: 25 g/day
4 ADA: 14g/1000 kcal or 25 g/day women, 38 g/day men
6 KDOQI/7KDIGO: no specific recommendation
ADA = American Diabetes Association; AHA = American Heart Association; KDOQI = Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative; KDIGO = Kidney Disease Outcomes; Quality Initiative. 1 American Heart Association—Guideline on Lifestyle Management to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk, 2013; 2 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2015; 3 Position of the American Dietetic Association: Vegetarian Diets, 2015; 4 American Diabetes Association, 2014/2018; 5 Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for carbohydrates and dietary fiber, 2010; 6 KDOQI—Chronic Kidney Disease Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline, 2010; 7 Diabetic Kidney Disease—A clinical update from Kidney Disease: KDIGO.
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of the studies evaluating the effect of fiber intake on renal outcomes (albuminuria and eGFR) in patients with diabetes.
Table 2. Characteristics of the studies evaluating the effect of fiber intake on renal outcomes (albuminuria and eGFR) in patients with diabetes.
Author Year CountrySample CharacteristicsStudy DesignDiet CharacteristicsRenal Outcomes
Type 1 diabetes
Vegetarian diet
Jibani
1991
n = 8
 
United Kingdom 		Females: 37.5%
Hypertension: 25%
Age: 46 (22–70) years
HbA1c: NA
BMI: NA
Withdrawals: 20%
 
Duration: 8-weeks 		Crossover clinical trial
 
Washout:
8-weeks		Intervention (n = 10): vegetarian diet *
Energy: 32 (23–34) kcal/kg/day
CHO: 3.4 (2.3–4.2) g/kg/day; Prot: 1.0 g/kg/day; Lip: 1.2 g/kg/day
Total fiber: 0.4 g/kg/day
Soluble fiber: NA
Insoluble fiber: NA
 
Control (n = 10): conventional diet *
Energy: 29 (15–35) kcal/kg /day
CHO: 3.7 (2.6–4.6) g/kg/day; Prot: 1.4 g/kg/day; Lip: 1.4 g/kg/day
Total fiber: 0.3 g/kg/day
Soluble fiber: NA
Insoluble fiber: NA 		Intervention
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) §
Final: 109 (48–163)
Fractional albumin clearance (x10−4) **
Final: 87 (23–829)
 
Control
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Final: 109 (45–134) Fractional albumin clearance (x10−4)
Final: 188 (58–810)
Kontessis
1995
n = 9
 
Greece		Females: 77.8%
Hypertension: 0%
Age: 32 (20–48) years
HbA1c: 6.7 (5.1–8.4)%
BMI: 23.8 (20.6–27.8) kg/m2
Withdrawals: 0%
 
Duration: 4-weeks 		Randomized crossover clinical trial
 
Washout:
≥1-week		Intervention (n = 9): vegetal protein diet *
Energy: 22.8 ± 3.8 kcal/kg/day
CHO: 2.8 ± 0.7 g/kg/day; Prot: 0.95 ± 0.3 g/kg/day; Lip: 0.9 ± 0.1 g/kg/day
Total fiber: 0.2 ± 0.03 g/kg/day
Soluble fiber: NA
Insoluble fiber: NA
 
Control (n = 9): animal protein diet *
Energy: 23.3 ± 3.7 kcal/kg /day
CHO: 2.4 ± 0.65 g/kg/day; Prot: 1.1 ± 0.3 g/kg/day; Lip: 0.95 ± 0.1 g/kg/day
Total fiber: 0.1 ± 0.1 g/kg/day
Soluble fiber: NA
Insoluble fiber: NA		Intervention
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) **
Basal: 110 (88–129)
Final: 89.9 ± 4.1
Albuminuria (mg/24 h) **
Final: 10.4 (1.3–22.5)
 
Control
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Basal: 110 (88–129)
Final: 105.6 ± 5.1
Albuminuria (mg/24 h)
Final: 17.1 (4.1–44.5)
Type 2 diabetes
Vegetarian diet
Nicholson
1999
n = 11
 
USA		Females: 45.5%
Hypertension: 81.8%
Age: 54.3 (34–74) years
HbA1c: 8.2 ± 1.5%
BMI: NA
Withdrawals: 15.4%
 
Duration: 12-weeks 		Randomized clinical trialIntervention (n = 7): low fat vegan diet *
Energy: 1409 ± 549 kcal/day
CHO: 75 ± 4.4%; Prot: 14 ± 1.6%; Lip: 11 ± 4.7%
Total fiber: 26 ± 8.2 g/day
Soluble fiber: NA
Insoluble fiber: NA
 
Control (n = 4): conventional diet *
Energy: 1526 ± 314 kcal/day
CHO: 51 ± 3.5%; Prot: 18 ± 1.4%; Lip: 31 ± 2.4%
Total fiber: 20 ± 2.7 g/day
Soluble fiber: NA
Insoluble fiber: NA		Intervention
Albuminuria (mg/24 h) §
Basal: 434.8 ± 565.5
Final: 155.2 ± 182.6
 
Control
Albuminuria (mg/24 h)
Basal: 82.9 ± 114.6
Final: 169.2 ± 298
Mello
2006
n = 17
 
Brazil 		Females: 17.6%
Hypertension: 47%
Age: 59 ± 11 years
HbA1c: 7.6 ± 2.6%
BMI: 26.2 ± 2.6 kg/m2
Withdrawals: 57.5%
 
Duration: 4-weeks 		Randomized crossover clinical trial
 
Washout:
4-weeks		Intervention (n = 17): lactovegetarian diet *
Energy: 1634 ± 451 kcal/day
CHO: 58.7 ± 6.8%; Prot: 11.6 ± 1.5%; Lip: 29.5 ± 6.8%
Total fiber: 27 ± 8.1 g/day
Soluble fiber: NA
Insoluble fiber: NA
 
Control (n = 17): usual diet *
Energy: 1901 ± 480 kcal/day
CHO: 46.9 ± 6.7%; Prot: 21.9 ± 3.4%; Lip: 30.8 ± 6.3%
Total fiber: 20±7.5 g/day
Soluble fiber: NA
Insoluble fiber: NA		Intervention
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) §
Final: 81.9 ± 25.3
Albuminuria (mg/24 h) **
Final: 332.5 (111.1–1449)
 
Control
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Final: 81.8 ± 22.2
Albuminuria (mg/24 h)
Final: 453.6 (324.4–1774.4)
Fiber supplement
Dall’Alba
2013
n = 44
 
Brazil 		Females: 38.6%
Hypertension: 93.2%
Age: 62 ± 9.7 years
HbA1c: 6.9 ± 0.8%
BMI: 29.8 ± 3.7 kg/m2
Withdrawals: 4.3%
 
Duration: 6-weeks 		Randomized clinical trialIntervention (n = 23): 10 g guar gum supplement *
Energy: 1700 ± 439 kcal/day
CHO: 184.2 ± 28.1 g/day; Prot: 81.5 ± 15.4 g/day; Lip: 61.5 ± 10.2 g/day
Total fiber: 24.3 ± 5.4 g/day
Soluble fiber: 14.8 ± 1.9 g/day
Insoluble fiber: 9.5 ± 3.6 g/day
 
Control (n = 21): control group *
Energy: 1553 ± 371 kcal/day
CHO: 191.9 ± 27.3 g/day; Prot: 86.3 ± 12 g/day; Lip: 58.3 ± 12.8 g/day
Total fiber: 15.7 ± 6.3 g/day
Soluble fiber: 5.2 ± 1.9 g/day
Insoluble fiber: 10.5 ± 4.7 g/day 		Intervention
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) §
Basal: 84.8 ± 16.6
Final: 85 ± 16.2
Albuminuria (mg/24 h) ‡
Basal: 6.8 (3–17.5)
Final: 6.2 (3–9.5)
 
Control
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) §
Basal: 89.2 ± 16.7
Final: 89 ± 17.4
Albuminuria (mg/24 h) §
Basal: 6.7 (3–19.3)
Final: 7.6 (3–15.8)
Farhangi
2016
n = 49
 
Iran		Females: 100%
Hypertension: NA
Age: 48.3 ± 8.8 years
HbA1c: 8.3 ± 0.9%
BMI: 30.8 ± 3.9 kg/m2
Withdrawals: 9.3%
 
Duration: 2-months 		Randomized clinical trialIntervention (n = 27): 10g chicory inulin supplement
Energy: NA
CHO: NA; Prot: NA; Lip: NA
Total fiber: NA
Soluble fiber: 10 g/day
Insoluble fiber: NA
 
Control (n = 22): placebo
Energy: NA
CHO: NA; Prot: NA; Lip: NA
Total fiber: NA
Soluble fiber: NA
Insoluble fiber: NA		Intervention
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) §
Basal: 86.3 ± 14
Final: 84.3 ± 13.6
 
Control
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Basal: 85.3 ± 13.5
Final: 82.1 ± 16.1
DASH diet
Paula
2015
n = 40
 
Brazil		Females: 55%
Hypertension: 100%
Age: 62.2 ± 8.4 years
HbA1c: 8.7 ± 1.8%
BMI: 29.4 ± 3.4 kg/m2
Withdrawals: 0%
 
Duration: 4-weeks 		Randomized clinical trialIntervention (n = 20): DASH diet *
Energy: 1585 ± 321 kcal/day
CHO: 47.1 ± 7.3%; Prot: 23.5 ± 6.7%; Lip: 29.4 ± 5.8%
Total fiber: 20.1 ± 4.3 g/day
Soluble fiber: 6.1 ± 2.1 g/day
Insoluble fiber: 12.9 ± 2.9 g/day
 
Control (n = 20): ADA recommendations *
Energy: 1752 ± 299 kcal/day
CHO: 39.3 ± 9.9%; Prot: 23 ± 3.8%; Lip: 36.8 ± 8%
Total fiber: 14.1 ± 4.8 g/day
Soluble fiber: 4.7 ± 2.1 g/day
Insoluble fiber: 11 ± 5.3 g/day		Intervention
Albuminuria (mg/24 h) §
Basal: 41.6 (22.1–185.8)
Final: 31.8 (10.2–132.7) ‡
 
Control
Albuminuria (mg/24 h)
Basal: 43.5 (18.5–194.4)
Final: 33.4 (11.2–119.6)
Abbreviators: ADA = American Diabetic Association; BMI = body mass index; kcal = kilocalories; CHO = carbohydrates; DASH = Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension; Egfr = estimated glomerular filtration rate; Lip = Lipids; NA = Not available; NS = Not significant; Prot = Protein. * actual intake ** p < 0.05 for the effect of diet between groups; ‡ p < 0.05 for the effect of diet within group; § Not significant.
Table
Table 3. Assessment of methodological quality or risk of bias item for each included study.
Table 3. Assessment of methodological quality or risk of bias item for each included study.
Selection BiasPerformance BiasDetection BiasAttrition BiasReporting BiasOther Bias
Random sequence generationAllocation ConcealmentBlinding of participant and personnelBlinding of outcome assessmentIncomplete outcome dataSelective reportingDiet/supplement adherence
Jibani, 1991NA *NA *NA *UncertainLowUncertainLow
Kontessis, 1995UncertainUncertainNA *UncertainUncertainUncertainLow
Nicholson, 1999UncertainUncertainNA *UncertainLowUncertainLow
Mello, 2006UncertainUncertainNA *UncertainHighUncertainLow
Dall’Alba, 2013LowUncertainHigh UncertainLowLowLow
Paula, 2015LowUncertainNA *UncertainLowLowLow
Farhangi, 2016LowLowLowLowLowHighLow
Abbreviators: * NA = not applicable for this type of study. Adapted from Cochrane Collaboration’s tool.4.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mesquita de Carvalho, C.; Azevedo Gross, L.; Jobim de Azevedo, M.; Verçoza Viana, L. Dietary Fiber Intake (Supplemental or Dietary Pattern Rich in Fiber) and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. Nutrients 2019, 11, 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11020347

AMA Style

Mesquita de Carvalho C, Azevedo Gross L, Jobim de Azevedo M, Verçoza Viana L. Dietary Fiber Intake (Supplemental or Dietary Pattern Rich in Fiber) and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. Nutrients. 2019; 11(2):347. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11020347

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mesquita de Carvalho, Cláudia, Luiza Azevedo Gross, Mirela Jobim de Azevedo, and Luciana Verçoza Viana. 2019. "Dietary Fiber Intake (Supplemental or Dietary Pattern Rich in Fiber) and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials" Nutrients 11, no. 2: 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11020347

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop