Next Article in Journal
Re. Consent to External-Beam Radiotherapy
Previous Article in Journal
What Are the Factors that Predict Outcome at Relapse after Previous Esophagectomy and Adjuvant Therapy in High-Risk Esophageal Cancer?
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Treatment for Glioblastoma Multiforme: Current Guidelines and Canadian Practice

Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Division of Radiation Oncology, 1331 29th Street NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2010, 17(6), 52-58; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v17i6.574
Submission received: 6 August 2010 / Revised: 8 September 2010 / Accepted: 9 October 2010 / Published: 1 November 2010

Abstract

Purpose: Our survey aimed to document variability in the practice patterns of Canadian radiation oncologists treating high-grade brain tumours. Materials and Methods: A 20-question survey was developed to address various aspects of treatment: (1) Guidelines used; (2) Types of fusion protocols used; (3) Number of treatment phases; (4) Margins for volume delineation; (5) Dose constraints. The survey was sent to Canadian radiation oncologists currently treating the central nervous system (CNS) as one of their primary sites. Results: We attained a 56% response rate from radiation oncologists across Canada treating CNS sites. In their practice, 14% of respondents reported following guidelines from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; 32%, from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; and 56%, centre-specific guidelines. Single-phase treatment was reported by 60% of clinicians, and two-phase or multi-phase treatments, by 37%. For clinicians treating in single phase, margins from the gross treatment volume (GTV) to the planning treatment volume (PTV) included 0.5 cm (6%), 1 cm (6%), 1.5 cm (25%), 2.0 cm (56%), 2.5 cm (25%), and 3 cm (12.5%), with some respondents selecting more than one standard margin. For clinicians treating in multiple phases, margins from gtv to ptv in phase 2 included 1 cm (10%), 2.0 cm (40%), 2.5 cm (30%), and 3.0 cm (20%). Variability was also observed in dose constraints to critical structures. All respondents trimmed their margins to bony structures.
Keywords: glioblastoma multiforme; margins; Canadian; survey; treatment; radiation; volumes glioblastoma multiforme; margins; Canadian; survey; treatment; radiation; volumes

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghose, A.; Lim, G.; Husain, S. Treatment for Glioblastoma Multiforme: Current Guidelines and Canadian Practice. Curr. Oncol. 2010, 17, 52-58. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v17i6.574

AMA Style

Ghose A, Lim G, Husain S. Treatment for Glioblastoma Multiforme: Current Guidelines and Canadian Practice. Current Oncology. 2010; 17(6):52-58. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v17i6.574

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghose, A., G. Lim, and S. Husain. 2010. "Treatment for Glioblastoma Multiforme: Current Guidelines and Canadian Practice" Current Oncology 17, no. 6: 52-58. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v17i6.574

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop