Next Article in Journal
Clinical Information Available to Oncologists in Surgically Treated Rectal Cancer: Room to Improve
Previous Article in Journal
The Potential Role for Acupuncture in Treating Symptoms in Patients with Lung Cancer: An Observational Longitudinal Study
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Responses by Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients to Out-Of-Pocket Costs in Newfoundland and Labrador

1
Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information, St. John’s, NL, Canada
2
Division of Community Health and Humanities, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL, Canada
3
School of Pharmacy, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2013, 20(3), 158-165; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1197
Submission received: 7 May 2013 / Revised: 9 May 2013 / Accepted: 14 May 2013 / Published: 1 June 2013

Abstract

Purpose: Cancer patients face substantial care-related out-of-pocket (oop) costs that may influence treatment decisions, attitudes, and use of drug- or appointment-related cost-saving strategies. We examined the relationship between oop costs and care-related responses by patients. Methods: We surveyed 170 prostate and 131 breast cancer patients presenting at clinics or support groups, or listed on the cancer registry in Newfoundland and Labrador. Results: In the 3-month period before the survey, 18.8% of prostate and 25.2% of breast cancer patients had oop costs greater than $500. Those oop costs consumed more than 7.5% of quarterly household income for 15.9% of prostate and 19.1% of breast cancer patients. Few patients (8.8% prostate, 15.3% breast) ever adopted any drug- or appointment-related cost-saving strategy. Few patients (7.2% prostate, 9.6% breast) said oop costs influenced treatment decisions, told their physicians about their oop costs (27.0% prostate, 21.1% breast), or were aware of available financial assistance programs (27.3% prostate, 36.9% breast). Compared with patients having low or moderate oop costs (22.9% prostate, 16.7% breast, and 25.7% prostate, 58.3% breast respectively), a larger proportion of prostate (56.0%) and breast (58.3%) cancer patients with high oop costs said that those costs created stress. Among prostate cancer patients, a larger proportion of those having high oop costs (compared with low or moderate costs) used drug-related (22.2% vs. 3.3% and 9.6% respectively) and appointment-related (11.1% vs. 1.1% and 3.8% respectively) cost-saving strategies, said oop costs created an unusual amount of stress (48.0% vs. 18.4% and 10.4%), and had difficulty paying those costs (29.2% vs. 6.2% and 10.4%). Conclusions: For a small group of breast and prostate cancer patients, oop costs are high, but rarely lead to the use of care-related cost-saving strategies or influence care decisions.
Keywords: out-of-pocket costs; financial barriers; patient responses out-of-pocket costs; financial barriers; patient responses

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Housser, E.; Mathews, M.; LeMessurier, J.; Young, S.; Hawboldt, J.; West, R. Responses by Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients to Out-Of-Pocket Costs in Newfoundland and Labrador. Curr. Oncol. 2013, 20, 158-165. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1197

AMA Style

Housser E, Mathews M, LeMessurier J, Young S, Hawboldt J, West R. Responses by Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients to Out-Of-Pocket Costs in Newfoundland and Labrador. Current Oncology. 2013; 20(3):158-165. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1197

Chicago/Turabian Style

Housser, E., M. Mathews, J. LeMessurier, S. Young, J. Hawboldt, and R. West. 2013. "Responses by Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients to Out-Of-Pocket Costs in Newfoundland and Labrador" Current Oncology 20, no. 3: 158-165. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1197

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop