Next Article in Journal
Synthesis Maps: Visual Knowledge Translation for the Canimpact Clinical System and Patient Cancer Journeys
Previous Article in Journal
Challenges and Insights in Implementing Coordinated Care between Oncology and Primary Care Providers: A Canadian Perspective
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

How Different Is Cancer Control across Canada? Comparing Performance Indicators for Prevention, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment

by
R. Rahal
1,*,
J. Chadder
1,
K. DeCaria
1,
G. Lockwood
1 and
H. Bryant
1,2 in collaboration with the System Performance Steering Committee and the Technical Working Group
1
Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada
2
Departments of Community Health Sciences and of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2017, 24(2), 124-128; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3578
Submission received: 6 January 2017 / Revised: 2 February 2017 / Accepted: 5 March 2017 / Published: 1 April 2017

Abstract

Meaningful performance measures are an important part of the toolkit for health system improvement. The Canadian Partnership Against Cancer has been reporting on pan-Canadian cancer system performance indicators since 2009—work that has led to the availability of standardized measures that can help to shed light on the extent of variation and opportunities for quality improvement across the country. Those measures include a core set of system indicators ranging from prevention and screening, through diagnosis and treatment, to survivorship and end-of-life care. Key indicators were calculated and graphed, showing the range from worst to best result for the provinces and territories included in the data. There were often significant differences in cancer system performance between provinces and territories. For example, smoking prevalence rates ranged from 14% to 62%. The 90th percentile wait times from an abnormal breast screen to resolution (without biopsy) ranged from 4 weeks to 8 weeks. The percentage of breast cancer resections that used breast-conserving surgery rather than mastectomy ranged from 38% to 75%. Clinical trial participation rates for adults ranged from 0.2% to 6.6%. Variations in performance indicators between Canadian jurisdictions suggest potential differences in the planning and delivery of cancer control services and in clinical practice patterns and patient outcomes. Understanding sources of variation can help to identify opportunities for improvements in the quality and outcomes of cancer control service delivery in each province and territory.
Keywords: performance indicators performance indicators

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rahal, R.; Chadder, J.; DeCaria, K.; Lockwood, G.; Bryant, H., in collaboration with the System Performance Steering Committee and the Technical Working Group. How Different Is Cancer Control across Canada? Comparing Performance Indicators for Prevention, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Curr. Oncol. 2017, 24, 124-128. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3578

AMA Style

Rahal R, Chadder J, DeCaria K, Lockwood G, Bryant H in collaboration with the System Performance Steering Committee and the Technical Working Group. How Different Is Cancer Control across Canada? Comparing Performance Indicators for Prevention, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Current Oncology. 2017; 24(2):124-128. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3578

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rahal, R., J. Chadder, K. DeCaria, G. Lockwood, and H. Bryant in collaboration with the System Performance Steering Committee and the Technical Working Group. 2017. "How Different Is Cancer Control across Canada? Comparing Performance Indicators for Prevention, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment" Current Oncology 24, no. 2: 124-128. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3578

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop