Next Article in Journal
Overcoming Resistance in a BRAF V600e–Mutant Adenocarcinoma of the Lung
Previous Article in Journal
Glove and Instrument Changing to Prevent Tumour Seeding in Cancer Surgery: A Survey of Surgeons’ Beliefs and Practices
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Harmonization of PD-L1 Testing in Oncology: A Canadian Pathology Perspective

by
Diana N. Ionescu
1,*,
M. R. Downes
2,3,
A. Christofides
4 and
M. S. Tsao
3,5
1
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
2
Anatomic Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
3
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; §impact Medicom Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
4
Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2018, 25(3), 209-216; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.4031
Submission received: 3 March 2018 / Revised: 7 April 2018 / Accepted: 5 May 2018 / Published: 1 June 2018

Abstract

Checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are demonstrating promising efficacy and appear to be well tolerated in a number of tumour types. In non-small-cell lung cancer, head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma, outcomes appear particularly favourable in patients with high PD-L1 expression. However, assays for PD-L1 have been developed for individual agents, and they use different antibody clones, immunohistochemistry staining protocols, scoring algorithms, and cut-offs. Given that laboratories are unlikely to use multiple testing platforms, use of one PD-L1 assay in conjunction with a specific therapy will become impractical and could compromise treatment options. Methods to harmonize testing methods are therefore crucial to ensuring appropriate treatment selection. This paper focuses on lung, bladder, and head-and-neck cancer. It reviews and compares available PD-L1 testing methodologies, summarizes the literature about comparability studies to date, discusses future directions in personalized diagnostics, and provides a pathologist’s perspective on PD-L1 testing in the Canadian laboratory setting.
Keywords: immunotherapy; lung cancer; bladder cancer; PD-L1 assays; immunohistochemistry immunotherapy; lung cancer; bladder cancer; PD-L1 assays; immunohistochemistry

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ionescu, D.N.; Downes, M.R.; Christofides, A.; Tsao, M.S. Harmonization of PD-L1 Testing in Oncology: A Canadian Pathology Perspective. Curr. Oncol. 2018, 25, 209-216. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.4031

AMA Style

Ionescu DN, Downes MR, Christofides A, Tsao MS. Harmonization of PD-L1 Testing in Oncology: A Canadian Pathology Perspective. Current Oncology. 2018; 25(3):209-216. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.4031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ionescu, Diana N., M. R. Downes, A. Christofides, and M. S. Tsao. 2018. "Harmonization of PD-L1 Testing in Oncology: A Canadian Pathology Perspective" Current Oncology 25, no. 3: 209-216. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.4031

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop