Next Article in Journal
Prophylaxis and Management of Acute Radiation-Induced Skin Reactions: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating the Impact on Quality of Life of Chemoradiation in Gastric Cancer
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Cancer Treatment Decision-Making by Patients: A Descriptive Study

1
School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
2
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
3
Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
4
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, and The Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2010, 17(4), 85-93; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v17i4.527
Submission received: 9 May 2010 / Revised: 5 June 2010 / Accepted: 6 July 2010 / Published: 1 August 2010

Abstract

Objective: Using an interview-guided survey, our descriptive study aimed to document the extent to which cancer patients perceive they are involved in making treatment decisions and the factors that influence patient involvement. Patients and methods: Our study enrolled patients from a Canadian ambulatory oncology program who were undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy, or both, for cancer. The adapted Control Preferences Scale was used to survey perceived and preferred roles in decision-making. The study survey also included items from the Decisional Conflict Scale and the Preparation for Decision-Making Scale. Results: Of 192 participants, 98 (51%) perceived that they were offered treatment choices. Of those 98, 47 (48%) thought that the options were presented equally. Compared with the patients not offered choices, those who were given choices were less passive (4% vs. 29%, p < 0.001) and more satisfied (100% vs. 95%, p < 0.03) in decision-making. Participants whose preferred and perceived roles were different would have preferred more involvement in decision-making. To attain the preferred involvement, patients wanted to receive more information on treatment options, to be given a choice, to have more discussion with the health care team, and to have providers better listen to their needs. Conclusions: Only half of surveyed patients thought that they were offered choices for their cancer treatment. When offered choices, patients were more active in decision-making. Further initiatives are required to determine approaches for supporting patients with cancer so that they can be more involved in decision-making.
Keywords: cancer; shared decision-making; preferences; decision quality; role in decision-making cancer; shared decision-making; preferences; decision quality; role in decision-making

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stacey, D.; Paquet, L.; Samant, R. Exploring Cancer Treatment Decision-Making by Patients: A Descriptive Study. Curr. Oncol. 2010, 17, 85-93. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v17i4.527

AMA Style

Stacey D, Paquet L, Samant R. Exploring Cancer Treatment Decision-Making by Patients: A Descriptive Study. Current Oncology. 2010; 17(4):85-93. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v17i4.527

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stacey, D., L. Paquet, and R. Samant. 2010. "Exploring Cancer Treatment Decision-Making by Patients: A Descriptive Study" Current Oncology 17, no. 4: 85-93. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v17i4.527

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop