Abstract
Perceptual load theory (Lavie, 1995) states that participants cannot engage in focused attention when shown displays containing a low perceptual load, because attentional resources are not exhausted, whereas in high-load displays attention is always focused, because attentional resources are exhausted. An alternative “salience” hypothesis holds that the salience of distractors and not perceptual load per se determines selective attention. Three experiments were conducted to investigate the influence that target and distractor onsets and offsets have on selective processing in a standard interference task. Perceptual load theory predicts that, regardless of target or distractor presentation (onset or offset), interference from ignored distractors should occur in low-load displays only. In contrast, the salience hypothesis predicts that interference should occur when the distractor appears as an onset and would occur for distractor offsets only when the target was also an offset. Interference may even occur in highload displays if the distractor is more salient. The results supported the salience hypothesis.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atchley, P., Kramer, A. F., &Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: Attentional set for perceptual transients.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 594–606.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon.
Deutsch, J. A., &Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations.Psychological Review,70, 80–90.
Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli.Psychological Review,87, 272–300.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 201–204.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 155–160.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R.W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Johnson, D. N., McGrath, A., &McNeil, C. (2002). Cuing interacts with perceptual load in visual search.Psychological Science,13, 284–287.
Kramer, A. F., &Hahn, S. (1995). Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field.Psychological Science,6, 381–386.
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 451–468.
Lavie, N. (2000). Selective attention and cognitive control: Dissociating attentional functions through different types of load. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 175–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lavie, N., &Cox, S. (1997). On the efficiency of visual selectivity attention: Efficient visual search leads to inefficient distractor rejection.Psychological Science,8, 395–398.
Lavie, N., &Fox, E. (2000). The role of perceptual load in negative priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1038–1052.
Lavie, N., &Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of locus of selection in visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 183–197.
Müller, H.J., &Rabbitt, P.M.A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 315–330.
Navon, D., &Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the humanprocessing system.Psychological Review,86, 214–255.
Paquet, L. (2001). Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flankers task: Evidence for early selection.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 301–306.
Paquet, L., &Craig, G. L. (1997). Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task.Memory & Cognition,25, 182–189.
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 206–217.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,2, 643–662.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 83–90.
Treisman, A., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eltiti, S., Wallace, D. & Fox, E. Selective target processing: Perceptual load or distractor salience?. Perception & Psychophysics 67, 876–885 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193540
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193540