Abstract
Ambulatory accelerometry is a technique that allows objective measurement of aspects of everyday human behavior. The aim of our research has been to develop, validate, and apply this technique, which recently resulted in an upper limb activity monitor (ULAM). The ULAM consists of body-mounted acceleration sensors connected to a waist-worn data recorder and allows valid and objective assessment of activity of both upper limbsduring performance of also automatically detected mobility-related activities: lying, sitting, standing, walking, cycling, and general movement. The ULAM can be used to determine (limitations of) upper limb activity and mobility in freely moving subjects with upper limb disorders. This article provides a detailed description of its characteristics, summarizes the results of a feasibility study and four application studies in subjects having upper limb complex regional pain syndrome, discusses the most important practical, technical, and methodological issues that were encountered, and describes current and future research projects related to measuring (limitations of) upper limb activity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernmark, E., &Wiktorin, C. (2002). A triaxial accelerometer for measuring arm movements.Applied Ergonomics,33, 541–547.
Bussmann, H. B., Reuvekamp, P. J., Veltink, P. H., Martens, W. L., &Stam, H. J. (1998). Validity and reliability of measurements obtained with an “activity monitor” in people with and without a transtibial amputation.Physical Therapy,78, 989–998.
Bussmann, J. B. J. (1998).Ambulatory monitoring of mobility-related activities in rehabilitation medicine. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Bussmann, J. B. J., Martens, W. L. J., Tulen, J. H. M., Schasfoort, F. C., van den Berg-Emons, H. J. G., &Stam, H. J. (2001). Measuring daily behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: The Activity Monitor.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,33, 349–356.
Bussmann, J. B. [J.],Tulen, J. H., van Herel, E. C., &Stam, H. J. (1998). Quantification of physical activities by means of ambulatory accelerometry: A validation study.Psychophysiology,35, 488–496.
Bussmann, J. B. [J.],van de Laar, Y. M., Neeleman, M. P., &Stam, H. J. (1998). Ambulatory accelerometry to quantify motor behaviour in patients after failed back surgery: a validation study.Pain,74, 153–161.
Bussmann, J. B. J., Veltink, P. H., Koelma, F., van Lummel, R. C., &Stam, H. J. (1995). Ambulatory monitoring of mobility-related activities: The initial phase of the development of an Activity Monitor.European Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation,5, 2–7.
Estill, C. F., MacDonald, L. A., Wenzl, T. B., &Petersen, M. R. (2000). Use of accelerometers as an ergonomic assessment method for arm acceleration: A large-scale field trial.Ergonomics,43, 1430–1445.
Jain, A., Martens, W. L. J., Mutz, G., Weiss, R. K., &Stephan, E. (1996). Towards a comprehensive technology for recording and analysis of multiple physiological parameters within their behavioral and environmental context. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.),Ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 215–236). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
Keil, A., Elbert, T., &Taub, E. (1999). Relation of accelerometer and EMG recordings for the measurement of upper extremity movement.Journal of Psychophysiology,13, 77–82.
Mathie, M. J., Coster, A. C., Lovell, N. H., &Celler, B. G. (2004). Accelerometry: Providing an integrated, practical method for longterm, ambulatory monitoring of human movement.Physiological Measurement,25, R1–20.
Patterson, S. M., Krantz, D. S., Montgomery, L. C., Deuster, P. A., Hedges, S. M., &Nebel, L. E. (1993). Automated physical activity monitoring: Validation and comparison with physiological and self-report measures.Psychophysiology,30, 296–305.
Postma, K., van den Berg-Emons, H. J., Bussmann, J. B., Sluis, T. A., Bergen, M. P., &Stam, H. J. (2005). Validity of the detection of wheelchair propulsion as measured with an activity monitor in patients with spinal cord injury.Spinal Cord,43, 550–557.
Renfrew, J. W., Moore, A. M., Grady, C., Robertson-Tchabo, E. A., Cutler, N. R., Rapoport, S. I., et al. (1984). A method for measuring arm movements in man under ambulatory conditions.Ergonomics,27, 651–661.
Renfrew, J. W., Pettigrew, K. D., &Rapoport, S. I. (1987). Motor activity and sleep duration as a function of age in healthy men.Physiology & Behavior,41, 627–634.
Schasfoort, F. C., Bussmann, J. B. J., Krijnen, H. J., &Stam, H. J. (2006). Upper limb activity over time in complex regional pain syndrome type 1 as objectively measured with an upper limb-activity monitor: An explorative multiple case study.European Journal of Pain,10, 31–39.
Schasfoort, F. C., Bussmann, J. B. J., &Stam, H. J. (2000). Outcome measures for complex regional pain syndrome type I: An overview in the context of the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps.Disability & Rehabilitation,22, 387–398.
Schasfoort, F. C., Bussmann, J. B. J., &Stam, H. J. (2002). Ambulatory measurement of upper limb usage and mobility-related activities during normal daily life with an upper limb-activity monitor: A feasibility study.Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 40, 173–182.
Schasfoort, F. C., Bussmann, J. B. J., &Stam, H. J. (2004). Impairments and activity limitations in subjects with chronic upper-limb complex regional pain syndrome type I.Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation,85, 557–566.
Schasfoort, F. C., Bussmann, J. B. J., &Stam, H. J. (2005). Correlation between a novel upper limb activity monitor and four other instruments to determine functioning in upper limb complex regional pain syndrome type I.Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine,37, 108–114.
Schasfoort, F. C., Bussmann, J. B. J., Zandbergen, A. M. A. J., &Stam, H. J. (2003). Impact of upper limb complex regional pain syndrome type I on everyday life measured with a novel upper limb-activity monitor.Pain,101, 79–88.
Taub, E., Uswatte, G., &Pidikiti, R. (1999). Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation—a clinical review.Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development,36, 237–251.
Uswatte, G., Foo, W. L., Olmstead, H., Lopez, K., Holand, A., &Simms, L. B. (2005). Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: An objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke.Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation,86, 1498–1501.
Uswatte, G., Miltner, W. H., Foo, B., Varma, M., Moran, S., &Taub, E. (2000). Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter.Stroke,31, 662–667.
van den Berg-Emons, H. J. G., Bussmann, J. B. J., Balk, A. H. M. M., &Stam, H. J. (2000). Validity of ambulatory accelerometry to quantify physical activity in heart failure.Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine,32, 187–192.
van Hilten, B., Hoff, J. I., Middelkoop, H. A., van der Velde, E. A., Kerkhof, G. A., Wauquier, A., et al. (1994). Sleep disruption in Parkinson’s disease: Assessment by continuous activity monitoring.Archives of Neurology,51, 922–928.
van Vugt, J. P., van Hilten, B. J., &Roos, R. A. (1996). Hypokinesia in Huntington’s disease.Movement Disorder,11, 384–388.
Vega-Gonzalez, A., &Granat, M. H. (2005). Continuous monitoring of upper-limb activity in a free-living environment.Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation,86, 541–548.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schasfort, F.C., Busmann, J.B.J.(., Martens, W.L.J. et al. Objective measurement of upper limb activity and mobility during everyday behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: The upper limb activity monitor. Behavior Research Methods 38, 439–446 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192798
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192798