Abstract
In four experiments, we examined selection processes in visual search using a probe detection task to measure the allocation of attention. Under preview search conditions, probes were harder to detect on old relative to new distractors (Experiment 1). This cannot be attributed solely to low-level sensory factors (Experiment 2). In addition, probe detection was sensitive to color-based grouping of old distractors and to color similarity between old distractors (Experiments 3 and 4). These effects were dissociated when the color of the old distractors changed but probe detection effects remained. Collectively, the data indicate both group-based suppression of distractors and the separate inhibition of distractor features in search.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1997). Goal-directed guidance of attention: Evidence from conjunctive visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 948–961.
Braithwaite, J. J. (2002).Visual search in space and time: Where attention and inattention collide? Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Birmingham, U.K.
Braithwaite, J. J., &Humphreys, G.W. (2003). Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 213–237.
Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., &Hodsoll, J. (2003). Color grouping in space and time: Evidence from negative color-based carryover effects in preview search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 758–778.
Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G.W., &Hodsoll, J. (2004). Effects of colour on preview search: Anticipatory and inhibitory biases for colour.Spatial Vision,17, 389–425.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. Oxford: Pergamon.
Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention.Psychological Review,97, 523–547.
Cave, K. R. (1999). The FeatureGate model of visual selection.Psychological Research,62, 182–194.
Cave, K. R. (2001). Selection can be performed effectively without temporal binding, but could be even more effective with it.Visual Cognition,8, 467–487.
Clark-Carter, D. (1997).Doing quantitative psychological research: From design to report. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Donk, M., &Theeuwes, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 891–900.
Duncan, J. (1995). Target and nontarget grouping in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 117–120.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 578–588.
Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., &Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 32–39.
Folk, C. L., &Remington, R. W. (1996). When knowledge does not help: Limitations on the flexibility of attentional control. In A. F. Kramer (Ed.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 271–297). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R.W., &Johnston, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 682–685.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R.W., &Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 317–329.
Humphreys, G.W., Kyllingsbaek, S., Watson, D. G., Olivers, C. N. L., Law, I., &Paulson, O. B. (2004). Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in search: A time course analysis of visual marking using behavioural and functional imaging procedures.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,57A, 610–635.
Jiang, Y., Marks, L. E., & Chun, M. M. (2002a). Visual marking: Dissociating effects of new and old set size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 293–302.
Jiang, Y., Marks, L. E., &Chun, M. M. (2002b). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 717–730.
Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J., &van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995). Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1053–1069.
Kim, M. S., &Cave, K. R. (1995). Spatial attention in visual search for features and feature conjunctions.Psychological Science,6, 376–380.
Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.Nature,334, 430–431.
Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 138–147.
Koshino, H. (2001). Activation and inhibition of stimulus features in conjunction search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 294–300.
Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., Smith, K. J., &Hulleman, J. (2003). What is “marked” in visual marking? Evidence for effects of configuration in preview search.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 982–996.
LaBerge, D. (1995).Attentional processing: The brain’s art of mindfulness. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
LaBerge, D. (1997). Attention, awareness, and the triangular circuit.Consciousness & Cognition,6, 149–181.
Moore, C. M., &Egeth, H. (1998). How does feature-based attention affect visual processing?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1296–1310.
Murphy, T. D., &Eriksen, C.W. (1987). Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 576–586.
Neill, W. T., &Valdes, L. A. (1996). Facilitatory and inhibitory aspects of attention. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 77–107). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Neisser, U. (1976).Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
Olivers, C. N. L., Braithwaite, J. J., & Humphreys, G.W. (in press). Why are responses to new targets delayed when new is prioritized? Response suppression effects in the preview paradigm.Perception & Psychophysics.
Olivers, C. N. L., &Humphreys, G.W. (2002). When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited capacity inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 22–42.
Olivers, C. N. L., &Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Visual marking inhibits singleton capture.Cognitive Psychology,47, 1–42.
Olivers, C. N. L., Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G.W. (1999). Visual marking of locations and feature maps: Evidence from within-dimension defined conjunctions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52A, 679–715.
Poisson, M. E., &Wilkinson, F. (1992). Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual search.Perception,21, 21–38.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., &Dehaene, S. (1994). Attentional networks.Trends in Neurosciences,17, 75–79.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Shih, S.-I, &Sperling, G. (1996). Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 758–779.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., &Atchley, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 130–134.
Tipper, S. T. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 571–590.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
Watson, D. G. (2002). Visual marking in moving displays: Feature-based inhibition is not necessary.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 74–84.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.Psychological Review,104, 90–122.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G.W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1–17.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 471–481.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Visual marking and visual change.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 379–395.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45–77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by an ESRC postdoctoral fellowship and a British Academy postdoctoral fellowship awarded to J.J.B. and an MRC program grant held by G.W.H.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baithwaite, J.J., Humphreys, G.W. & Hulleman, J. Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search. Perception & Psychophysics 67, 81–101 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195014
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195014