Abstract
Naming an object entails a number of processing stages, including retrieval of a target lexical concept and encoding of its phonological word form. We investigated these stages using the picture-word interference task in an fMRI experiment. Participants named target pictures in the presence of auditorily presented semantically related, phonologically related, or unrelated distractor words or in isolation. We observed BOLD signal changes in left-hemisphere regions associated with lexical-conceptual and phonological processing, including the midto-posterior lateral temporal cortex. However, these BOLD responses manifested as signal reductions for all distractor conditions relative to naming alone. Compared with unrelated words, phonologically related distractors showed further signal reductions, whereas only the pars orbitalis of the left inferior frontal cortex showed a selective reduction in response in the semantic condition. We interpret these findings as indicating that the word forms of lexical competitors are phonologically encoded and that competition during lexical selection is reduced by phonologically related distractors. Since the extended nature of auditory presentation requires a large portion of a word to be presented before its meaning is accessed, we attribute the BOLD signal reductions observed for semantically related and unrelated words to lateral inhibition mechanisms engaged after target name selection has occurred, as has been proposed in some production models.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2009). Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language & Cognitive Processes, 24, 713–734. doi:10.1080/01690960802597250
Abel, S., Dressel, K., Bitzer, R., Kümmerer, D., Mader, I., Weiller, C., & Huber, W. (2009). The separation of processing stages in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm. NeuroImage, 44, 1113–1124.
Amaro, E., Jr., Williams, S. C., Shergill, S. S., Fu, C. H., Mac-Sweeney, M., Picchioni, M., et al. (2002). Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: Current strategies and future prospects. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 16, 497–510.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Baier, B., Kleinschmidt, A., & Müller, N. G. (2006). Cross-modal processing in early visual and auditory cortices depends on expected statistical relationship of multisensory information. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 12260–12265. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1457-06.2006
Berg, T., & Schade, U. (1992). The role of inhibition in a spreading activation model of language production, Part 1: The psycholinguistic perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 405–434.
Bles, M., & Jansma, B. M. (2008). Phonological processing of ignored distractor pictures: An fMRI investigation. BMC Neuroscience, 9, 20.
Botvinick, M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539–546.
Damian, M. F., & Als, L. C. (2005). Long-lasting semantic context effects in the spoken production of object names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1372–1384.
Damian, M. F., & Bowers, J. S. (2009). Assessing the role of orthography in speech perception and production: Evidence from picture-word interference tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 581–598. doi:10.1080/09541440801896007
Damian, M. F., & Martin, R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological Modelcodes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 345–361.
Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 65–70.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.
Dell, G. S., & O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1991). Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: A comment on Levelt et al. (1991). Psychological Review, 98, 604–614.
Dell, G. S., & O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1994). Inhibition in interactive activation models of linguistic selection and sequencing. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, & language (pp. 409–451). San Diego: Academic Press.
Dell’Acqua, R., Job, R., Peressotti, F., & Pascali, A. (2007). The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 717–722.
de Zubicaray, G. I. (2006). Cognitive neuroimaging: Cognitive science out of the armchair. Brain & Cognition, 60, 272–281.
de Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K. L., Eastburn, M. M., & Pringle, A. (2006). Top-down influences on lexical selection during spoken word production: A 4T fMRI investigation of refractory effects in picture naming. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 864–873.
de Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K. L., Eastburn, M. M., & Wilson, S. J. (2002). Orthographic/phonological facilitation of naming responses in the picture-word task: An event-related fMRI study using overt vocal responding. NeuroImage, 16, 1084–1093.
de Zubicaray, G. I., Wilson, S. J., McMahon, K. L., & Muthiah, S. (2001). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word paradigm: An event-related fMRI study employing overt responses. Human Brain Mapping, 14, 218–227.
Duffau, H., Gatignol, P., Mandonnet, E., Peruzzi, P., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., & Capelle, L. (2005). New insights into the anatomofunctional connectivity of the semantic system: A study using corticosubcortical electrostimulations. Brain, 128, 797–810.
Eden, G. F., Joseph, J. E., Brown, H. E., Brown, C. P., & Zeffiro, T. A. (1999). Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: The behavioral interleaved gradients technique. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 41, 13–20.
Elliott, M. R., Bowtell, R. W., & Morris, P. G. (1999). The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor, and auditory functional MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 41, 1230–1235.
Freire, L., Roche, A., & Mangin, J. F. (2002). What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series? IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21, 470–484.
Friston, K. J., Glaser, D. E., Henson, R. N. A., Kiebel, S., Phillips, C., & Ashburner, J. (2002). Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: Applications. NeuroImage, 16, 484–512.
Ganushchak, L. Y., & Schiller, N. O. (2008). Brain error-monitoring activity is affected by semantic relatedness: An event-related brain potentials study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 927–940.
Genovese, C. R., Lazar, N. A., & Nichols, T. (2002). Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. NeuroImage, 15, 870–878.
Goldrick, M. (2006). Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence. Language & Cognitive Processes, 21, 817–855.
Goldrick, M. (2007). Connectionist principles in theories of speech production. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 515–530). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hantsch, A., Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. J. (2005). Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning. Memory & Cognition, 33, 984–1000.
Harley, T. A. (1993). Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production. Language & Cognitive Processes, 8, 291–309.
Harley, T. A., & MacAndrew, S. B. G. (2001). Constraints upon word substitution speech errors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 395–418.
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662–720.
Heim, S., Friederici, A. D., Schiller, N. O., Rüschemeyer, S. A., & Amunts, K. (2009). The determiner congruency effect in language production investigated with functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 928–940. doi:10.1002/hbm.20556
Hirschfeld, G. H. F., Jansma, B., Boelte, J., & Zwitserlood, P. (2008). Interference and facilitation in overt speech production investigated with ERPs. NeuroReport, 19, 1227–1230.
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101–144.
Jescheniak, J. D., Hantsch, A., & Schriefers, H. J. (2005). Context effects on lexical choice and lexical activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 905–920.
Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. J. (1998). Serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in language production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1256–1274.
Kan, I. P., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2004). Effect of name agreement on prefrontal activity during overt and covert picture naming. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 43–57.
Kuipers, J.-R., La Heij, W., & Costa, A. (2006). A further look at semantic context effects in language production: The role of response congruency. Language & Cognitive Processes, 21, 892–919.
Laird, A. R., McMillan, K. M., Lancaster, J. L., Kochunov, P., Turkeltaub, P. E., Pardo, J. V., & Fox, P. T. (2005). A comparison of label-based review and ALE meta-analysis in the Stroop task. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 6–21.
Laurienti, P. J., Burdette, J. H., Wallace, M. T., Yen, Y. F., Field, A. S., & Stein, B. E. (2002). Deactivation of sensory-specific cortex by cross-modal stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 420–429.
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.
Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 503–535.
McMahon, K., Pringle, A., Eastburn, M., & Maillet, D. (2004). Improving EPI imaging quality and sound levels with bandwidth selection [Abstract]. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Kyoto, 1033. http://cds.ismrm.org/ismrm-2004.
Mechelli, A., Josephs, O., Lambon Ralph, M. A., McClelland, J. L., & Price, C. J. (2007). Dissociating stimulus-driven semantic and phonological effects during reading and naming. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 205–217.
Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2007). Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 35, 494–503.
Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 1146–1160.
Navarrete, E., & Costa, A. (2005). Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 359–377.
Ojemann, J. G., Akbudak, E., Snyder, A. Z., McKinstry, R. C., Raichle, M. E., & Conturo, T. E. (1997). Anatomic localization and quantitative analysis of gradient refocused echo-planar fMRI susceptibility artifacts. NeuroImage, 6, 156–167.
Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 539–557.
Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460–499.
Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107–142.
Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Model ing attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88–125.
Roelofs, A. (2008a). Attention to spoken word planning: Chronometric and neuroimaging evidence. Language & Linguistics Compass, 2/3, 389–405. doi:10.111/j.1749-818x.2008.00060.x
Roelofs, A. (2008b). Tracing attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 353–368.
Rosinksi, R. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Kukish, K. S. (1975). Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task. Child Development, 46, 247–253.
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 86–102.
Shattuck, D. W., Mirza, M., Adisetiyo, V., Hojatkashani, C., Salamon, G., Narr, K. L., et al. (2008). Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures. NeuroImage, 39, 1064–1080.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174–215.
Spalek, K., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2008). Task-dependent semantic interference in language production: An fMRI study. Brain & Language, 107, 220–228.
Starreveld, P. A. (2000). On the interpretation of onsets of auditory context effects in word production. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 497–525.
Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 686–698.
Vaughan, J. T., Adriany, G., Garwood, M., Yacoub, E., Duong, T., DelaBarre, L., et al. (2002). Detunable transverse electromagnetic (TEM) volume coil for high-field NMR. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 47, 990–1000.
Vitkovitch, M., Rutter, M., & Read, A. (2001). Inhibitory effects during object name retrieval: The effect of interval between prime and target on picture naming responses. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 483–506.
Weissman, D. H., Warner, L. M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2004). The neural mechanisms for minimizing cross-modal distraction. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 10941–10949.
Zaitsev, M., Hennig, J., & Speck, O. (2003). Automated online EPI distortion correction for fMRI applications [Abstract]. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1042. http://cds.ismrm.org/ismrm-2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Zubicaray, G.I., McMahon, K.L. Auditory context effects in picture naming investigated with event-related fMRI. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 9, 260–269 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.3.260
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.3.260