Abstract
When walking effort is increased due to manipulations such as wearing heavy backpacks, people perceive hills to be steeper and distances to be farther (Bhalla & Proffitt, 1999; Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, & Epstein, 2003). On the basis of these findings, we expected people to overestimate distances on steep hills relative to the same distances on flat ground, because of the increased effort required to ascend or descend them. This hypothesis is in contrast to the belief that distances are specified solely by optical and oculomotor information related to the geometry of the environment. To test the hypothesis, we investigated distance estimation on hills and flat terrains in natural and virtual environments. We found that participants judged steep uphill and downhill distances to be farther than the same distances on flat terrain. These results are inconsistent with the idea that spatial layout is perceived solely in terms of geometry, lending partial support to an effort hypothesis.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amorim, M.-A., Loomis, J. M., &Fukusima, S. S. (1998). Reproduction of object shape is more accurate without the continued availability of visual information.Perception,27, 69–86.
Bhalla, M., &Proffitt, D. R. (1999). Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1076–1096.
Creem, S. H., &Proffitt, D. R. (1998). Two memories for geographical slant: Separation and interdependence of action and awareness.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 22–36.
Epstein, W. (1977).Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes. New York: Wiley.
Epstein, W., Park, J., &Casey, A. (1961). The current status of the size-distance hypotheses.Psychological Bulletin,58, 491–514.
Epstein, W., &Rogers, S. (2003). Percept-percept couplings revisited. In U. Savardi & A. Mazzocco (Eds.),Figura e sfondo (pp. 93–106). Padua: CLEUP.
Gillam, B. (1967). Changes in the direction of induced aniseikonic slant as a function of distance.Vision Research,7, 777–783.
Gillam, B. (1995). The perception of spatial layout from static optical information. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.),Perception of space and motion (pp. 23–67). San Diego: Academic Press.
Gogel, W. C. (1990). A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 105–123.
Gogel, W. C., &Mertz, D. L. (1989). The contribution of heuristic process to the moon illusion. In M. Hershenson (Ed.),The moon illusion (pp. 235–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hershenson, M. (1999).Visual space perception: A primer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Liang, J., Shaw, C., &Green, M. (1991). On temporal-spatial realism in the virtual reality environment.Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery: Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology,4, 19–25.
Loomis, J. M., Da Silva, J. A., Fujita, N., &Fukusima, S. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 906–921.
Minetti, A. E., Ardigò, L. P., &Saibene, F. (1993). Mechanical determinants of gradient walking energetics in man.Journal of Physiology,472, 725–735.
Minetti, A. E., Ardigò, L. P., &Saibene, F. (1994). The transition between walking and running in humans: Metabolic and mechanical aspects at different gradients.Acta Physiologica Scandinavica,150, 315–323.
Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., &Tittle, J. S. (1996). The visual perception of three-dimensional length.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 173–186.
Okabe, A., Aoki, K., &Hamamoto, W. (1986). Distance and direction judgment in a large-scale natural environment: Effects of a slope and winding trail.Environment & Behavior,18, 755–772.
Peebles, J. J. (1964). Rugged waters: Trails and campsites of Lewis and Clark in the Salmon River country.Idaho Yesterdays,8, 2–17.
Philbeck, J. W., &Loomis, J. M. (1997). Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 72–85.
Proffitt, D. R., Bhalla, M., Gossweiler, R., &Midgett, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 409–428.
Proffitt, D. R., Creem, S. H., &Zosh, W. D. (2001). Seeing mountains in mole hills: Geographical-slant perceptions.Psychological Science,12, 418–423.
Proffitt, D. R., Stefanucci, J., Banton, T., &Epstein, W. (2003). The role of effort in perceiving distance.Psychological Science,14, 106–112.
Sedgwick, H. A. (1986). Space perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 1. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 21.1 to 21.57). New York: Wiley.
Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D. R., &Epstein, W. (2004). Perceiving distance: A role of effort and intent.Perception,33, 577–590.
Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D. R., &Epstein, W. (2005). The role of effort and intention in distance perception [Abstract].Journal of Vision,3, 15a.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF ITR/Carnegie Mellon Grant 0121629 and ONR Grant N000140110060 to D.R.P.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stefanucci, J.K., Proffitt, D.R., Banton, T. et al. Distances appear different on hills. Perception & Psychophysics 67, 1052–1060 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193631
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193631