Abstract
We report the results of a large-scale picture naming experiment in which we evaluated the potential contribution of nine theoretically relevant factors to naming latencies. The experiment included a large number of items and a large sample of participants. In order to make this experiment as similar as possile to classic picture naming experiments, participants were familiarizedwith the materials during a training session. Speeded naming latencies were determined by a software key on the basis of the digital recording of the responses. The effects of various variables on these latencies were assessed with multiple regression techniques, using a repeated measures design. The interpretation of the observed effects is discussed in relation to previous studies and current views on lexical access during speech production.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alario, F.-X., &Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 531–552.
Attneave, F. (1957). Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes.Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 221–227.
Bachoud-Lévi, A.-C., Dupoux, E., Cohen, L., &Mehler, J. (1998). Where is the length effect? A cross-linguistic study of speech production.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 331–346.
Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J.I. (1985). The locus of word frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production?Journal of Memory & Language,24, 89–106.
Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., &Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 560–585.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review,94, 115–147.
Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Méot, A., &,Fayol, M. (2002). The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies.British Journal of Psychology,93, 89–114.
Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A., &,Chalard, M. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers35, 158–167.
Carroll, J. B., &White, M. N. (1973). Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 563–576.
Content, A., Mousty, P., &Radeau, M. (1990). BRULEX: Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé [Brulex: A computerized lexical database for the French language].L’Année Psychologique,90, 551–566.
Cuetos, F., Ellis, A. W., &Alvarez, B. (1999). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 650–658.
Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M., &Snodgrass, J. G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,65, 171–237.
Dell’Acqua, R., Lotto, L., &Job, R. (2000). Naming times and standardized norms for the Italian PD/DPSS set of 266 pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,32, 588–615.
Ellis, A. W., &Morrison, C. M. (1998). Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 515–523.
Ferrand, L. (2000). Reading aloud polysyllabic words and nonwords: The syllabic length effect reexamined.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 142–148.
Feyereisen, P., Van der Borght, F., &,Seron, X. (1988). The operativity effect in naming: A re-analysis.Neuropsychologia,26, 401–415.
Forster, K. I., &Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 627–635.
Forster, K. I., &Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,35, 116–124.
Francis, W. N., &Kučera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Fromkin, V. A. (1971). Thenon-anomalousnature of anomalous utterances.Language,47, 27–52.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Gilhooly, M. L. (1979). Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory tasks.Memory & Cognition,7, 214–223.
Glaser, W. R. (1992). Picture naming.Cognition,42, 61–105.
Hirsh, K. W., &Funnell, E. (1995). Those old, familiar things: Age of acquisition, familiarity and lexical access in progressive aphasia.Journal of Neurolinguistics,9, 23–32.
Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., &Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification.Cognitive Neuropsychology,5, 67–103.
Johnson, C. J., Paivio, A., &Clark, J. M. (1996). Cognitive components of picture naming.Psychological Bulletin,120, 113–139.
Klapp, S. T., Anderson, W. G., &Berrian, R. W. (1973). Implicit speech in reading reconsidered.Journal of Experimental Psychology,100, 368–374.
Lachman, R. (1973). Uncertainty effects on time to access the internal lexicon.Journal of Experimental Psychology,99, 199–208.
Lachman, R., Shaffer, J. P., &Hennrikus, D. (1974). Language and cognition: Effects of stimulus codability, name-word frequency, and age of acquisition on lexical reaction time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 613–625.
Lenvelt, W., Roelofs, A., &,Meyer, A. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 1–75.
Lorch, R. F., &Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 149–157.
Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A., &Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 131–147.
Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., &Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 42–71.
Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., &Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 528–559.
Morrison, C. M., &Ellis, A. W. (1995). The roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 116–133.
Morrison, C. M., Ellis, A. W., &Quinlan, P. T. (1992). Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition.Memory & Cognition,20, 705–714.
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., &Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur Internet: LEXIQUE [A lexical database of contemporary French on Internet: LEXIQUE].L’Année Psychologique,101, 447–462. Available at http://www.lexique.org.
Oldfield, R. C., &Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,17, 273–281.
Paivio, A., Clark, J. M., Digdon, N., &Bons, T. (1989). Referential processing: Reciprocity and correlates of naming and imaging.Memory & Cognition,17, 163–174.
Plaut, D. C., &Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology.Cognitive Neuropsychology,10, 377–500.
Santiago, J., MacKay, D. G., Palma, A., &Rho, C. (2000). Sequential activation processes in producing words and syllables: Evidence from picture naming.Language & Cognitive Processes,15, 1–44.
Savage, G. R., Bradley, D. C., &Forster, K. I. (1990). Word frequency and the pronunciation task: The contribution of articulatory fluency.Language & Cognitive Processes,5, 203–326.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1979). Speech errors as evidence for a serial-ordering mechanism in sentence production. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 295–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Yuditsky, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 516–536.
Vitkovitch, M., &Tyrrell, L. (1995). Sources of disagreement in object naming.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 822–848.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alario, F.X., Ferrand, L., Laganaro, M. et al. Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36, 140–155 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195559
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195559