Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Management of distal femoral periprosthetic fractures by distal femoral locking plate: A retrospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Management of periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures is difficult. Osteoporosis, comminution and bone loss, compromise stability with delayed mobility and poor functional outcomes. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with anatomic distal femoral (DF) locking plate permits early mobilization. However, this usually necessitates bone grafting (BG). Biological fixation using minimally invasive techniques minimizes periosteal stripping and morbidity.

Materials and Methods: 31 patients with comminuted periprosthetic DF fractures were reviewed retrospectively from October 2006 to September 2012. All patients underwent fixation using a DF locking compression plate (Synthes). 17 patients underwent ORIF with primary BG, whereas 14 were treated by closed reduction (CR)and internal fixation using biological minimally invasive techniques. Clinical and radiological followup were recorded for an average 36 months.

Results: Mean time to union for the entire group was 5.6 months (range 3–9 months). Patients of ORIF group took longer (Mean 6.4 months, range 4.5–9 months) than the CR group (mean 4.6 months, range 3–7 months). Three patients of ORIF and one in CR group had poor results. Mean knee society scores were higher for CR group at 6 months, but nearly identical at 12 months, with similar eventual range of motion.

Discussion: Locked plating of comminuted periprosthetic DF fractures permits stable rigid fixation and early mobilization. Fixation using minimally invasive biological techniques minimizes morbidity and may obviate the need for primary BG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berry DJ. Epidemiology: Hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30:183–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30:265–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Parvizi J, Jain N, Schmidt AH. Periprosthetic knee fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:663–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hernigou P, Mathieu G, Filippini P, Demoura A. Intra and postoperative fractures of the femur in total knee arthroplasty: Risk factors in 32 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2006;92:140–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Horwitz DS, Kubiak EN. Surgical treatment of osteoporotic fractures about the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:2970–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Younger AS, Dunwoody J, Duncan CP. Periprosthetic hip and knee fractures: The scope of the problem. Instr Course Lect 1998;47:251–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM. Anterior femoral notching and ipsilateral supracondylar femur fracture in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1988;3:185–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Su ET, DeWal H, Di Cesare PE. Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004;12:12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Backstein D, Safir O, Gross A. Periprosthetic fractures of the knee. J Arthroplasty 2007;22 4 Suppl 1:45–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chmell MJ, Moran MC, Scott RD. Periarticular fractures after total knee arthroplasty: Principles of management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1996;4:109–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Althausen PL, Lee MA, Finkemeier CG, Meehan JP, Rodrigo JJ. Operative stabilization of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of four treatment methods. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18:834–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindahl H, Malchau H, Oden A, Garellick G. Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:26–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Delport PH, Van Audekercke R, Martens M, Mulier JC. Conservative treatment of ipsilateral supracondylar femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Trauma 1984;24:846–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Giannoudis PV, Kanakaris NK, Tsiridis E. Principles of internal fixation and selection of implants for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury 2007;38:669–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zdero R, Walker R, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:1068–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Herrera DA, Kregor PJ, Cole PA, Levy BA, Jönsson A, Zlowodzki M. Treatment of acute distal femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty: Systematic review of 415 cases (1981–2006). Acta Orthop 2008;79:22–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fitzek JG, Wessinghage D. Intramedullary nailing of peri-prosthetic fractures following total knee joint replacement. Aktuelle Traumatol 1990;20:248–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Murrell GA, Nunley JA. Interlocked supracondylar intramedullary nails for supracondylar fractures after total knee arthroplasty. A new treatment method. J Arthroplasty 1995;10:37–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weber D, Pomeroy DL, Schaper LA, Badenhausen WE Jr, Curry JI, Smith MW, et al. Supracondylar nailing of distal periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop 2000;24:33–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bong MR, Egol KA, Koval KJ, Kummer FJ, Su ET, Iesaka K, et al. Comparison of the LISS and a retrograde-inserted supracondylar intramedullary nail for fixation of a periprosthetic distal femur fracture proximal to a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:876–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Strauss EJ, Schwarzkopf R, Kummer F, Egol KA. The current status of locked plating: The good, the bad, and the ugly. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:479–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fulkerson E, Tejwani N, Stuchin S, Egol K. Management of periprosthetic femur fractures with a first generation locking plate. Injury 2007;38:965–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ricci WM, Loftus T, Cox C, Borrelli J. Locked plates combined with minimally invasive insertion technique for the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20:190–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ricci WM, Borrelli J Jr. Operative management of periprosthetic femur fractures in the elderly using biological fracture reduction and fixation techniques. Injury 2007;38 Suppl 3:S53–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kolb W, Guhlmann H, Friedel R, Nestmann H. Fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with the less invasive stabilization system (LISS): A new minimally invasive treatment with locked fixed-angle screws. Zentralbl Chir 2003;128:53–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wick M, Muller EJ, Kutscha-Lissberg F, Hopf F, Muhr G. Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures: LISS or retrograde intramedullary nailing? Problems with the use of minimally invasive technique. Unfallchirurg 2004;107:181–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim KI, Egol KA, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;446:167–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith WJ, Martin SL, Mabrey JD. Use of a supracondylar nail for treatment of a supracondylar fracture of the femur following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996;11:210–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ochsner PE, Pfister A. Use of the fork plate for internal fixation of periprosthetic fractures and osteotomies in connection with total knee replacement. Orthopedics 1999;22:517–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Shawi AK, Smith SP, Anderson GH. The use of a carbon fiber plate for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:320–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Barth J, Bertl O. Para-articular, periprosthetic fracture in a case with total knee endoprosthesis using the Ilizarov hybrid fixator. Unfallchirurg 2003;106:856–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kassab M, Zalzal P, Azores GM, Pressman A, Liberman B, Gross AE. Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty using a distal femoral allograft. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:361–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Corten K, Vanrykel F, Bellemans J, Frederix PR, Simon JP, Broos PL. An algorithm for the surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur around a wellfixed femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:1424–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Erhardt JB, Grob K, Roderer G, Hoffmann A, Forster TN, Kuster MS. Treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures with the noncontact bridging plate: A new angular stable implant. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008;128:409–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Jamali AA, Lee MA, Donthineni R, Meehan JP. Minimally invasive management of a floating prosthesis injury with locking plates. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:928–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vallier HA, Hennessey TA, Sontich JK, Patterson BM. Failure of LCP condylar plate fixation in the distal part of the femur. A report of six cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:846–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wong P, Gross AE. The use of structural allografts for treating periprosthetic fractures about the hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30:259–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max Institute of Orthopedics and Joint Replacement, Max Super Specialty Hospital, 1, Press Enclave Road, Saket, New Delhi, 110 017, India

    Rajiv Thukral, S. K. S. Marya & Chandeep Singh

Authors
  1. Rajiv Thukral
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. K. S. Marya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chandeep Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajiv Thukral.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thukral, R., Marya, S.K.S. & Singh, C. Management of distal femoral periprosthetic fractures by distal femoral locking plate: A retrospective study. IJOO 49, 199–207 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.152480

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.152480

Key words

MeSH terms

Search

Navigation