Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Outcome in primary cemented total knee arthroplasty with or without drain

A prospective comparative study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Suction drain insertion is a common practice in orthopedic surgery, especially after joint arthroplasty to prevent the formation of a hematoma. Theoretically the use of a drain should diminish the volume of hematoma; however the literature has conflicting data. Some authors state that drainage evacuates fluid from a limited area only and can be a cause of infection due to retrograde migration of bacteria. It can also impair the early postoperative rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome (especially postoperative pain) and intake of analgesics in patients who had undergone primary cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with or without a postoperative drain.

Materials and Methods

A prospective comparative study of 108 consecutive patients (121 knees) was conducted. They were divided into two groups: A study group, with no drainage and a control group with drain inserted at the end of surgery. A total of 121 patients were recruited into two groups. A study group consisted of 59 knees, in which we did not use drainage after TKA and a control group with 62 knees, in which drain was inserted post surgery. Both groups were comparable in terms of preoperative characteristics. The indication for TKA was osteoarthritis (n = 105) and rheumatoid arthritis (n = 16).

Results

In patients without drainage we observed lower need for opioids, higher blood loss on the 1st postoperative day and a lower need for change of dressings. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of total blood loss, hidden blood loss, transfusion rate, range of motion, length of hospital stay or incidence of complications between the two groups. In 1 year observation there were no differences in clinical outcome between the two groups.

Conclusions

The present study conclude that there is no rationale for the use of drain after primary TKA. There are benefits in terms of lower opioid intake, lower blood loss on the first postoperative day and lower need for dressing reinforcement during hospitalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Esler CN, Blakeway C, Fiddian NJ. The use of a closed suction drain in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85:215 7.

  2. Minnema B, Vearncombe M, Augustin A, Gollish J, Simor AE. Risk factors for surgical site infection following primary total knee arthroplasty. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:477–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Parker MJ, Roberts CP, Hay D. Closed suction drainage for hip and knee arthroplasty. A meta analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86 A: 1146–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tucci G, Amorese V, Romanini E. Closed suction drainage after orthopaedic surgery: evidence versus practice. J Orthop Traumatol 2006;7:29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gross JB. Estimating allowable blood loss: Corrected for dilution. Anesthesiology 1983;58:277–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tetro AM, Rudan JF. The effects of a pneumatic tourniquet on blood loss in total knee arthroplasty. Can J Surg 2001;44:33 8.

  7. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;2489–12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Waugh TR, Stinchfield FE. Suction drainage of orthopaedic wounds. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1961;43 A: 939–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cobb JP. Why use drains? J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:993–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Closed wound drainage in total hip or total knee replacement. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:35–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Adalberth G, Byström S, Kolstad K, Mallmin H, Milbrink J. Postoperative drainage of knee arthroplasty is not necessary: A randomized study of 90 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1998;69:475–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Niskanen RO, Korkala OL, Haapala J, Kuokkanen HO, Kaukonen JP, Salo SA. Drainage is of no use in primary uncomplicated cemented hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:567–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dora C, von Campe A, Mengiardi B, Koch P, Vienne P. Simplified wound care and earlier wound recovery without closed suction drainage in elective total hip arthroplasty. A prospective randomized trial in 100 operations. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007;127:919–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li C, Nijat A, Askar M. No clear advantage to use of wound drains after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized, controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:519–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chandratreya A, Giannikas K, Livesley P. To drain or not drain: Literature versus practice. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1998;43:404–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ovadia D, Luger E, Bickels J, Menachem A, Dekel S. Efficacy of closed wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:317 21.

  17. Holt BT, Parks NL, Engh GA, Lawrence JM. Comparison of closed suction drainage and no drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1997;20:1121–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jenny JY, Boeri C, Lafare S. No drainage does not increase complication risk after total knee prosthesis implantation: A prospective, comparative, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001;9:299 301.

  19. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C. Is closed suction drain necessary in unicompartmental knee replacement? A prospective randomised study. Knee 2004;11:399–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Busch CA, Shore BJ, Bhandari R, Ganapathy S, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, et al. Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:959–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stein C. The control of pain in peripheral tissue by opioids. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1685–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bonnet F, Marret E. Postoperative pain management and outcome after surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2007;21:99 107.

  23. Yiannakopoulos CK, Kanellopoulos AD. Innoxious removal of suction drains. Orthopedics 2004;27:412–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Audet AM, Goodnough LT, Parvin CA. Evaluating the appropriateness of red blood cell transfusions: The limitations of retrospective medical record reviews. Int J Qual Health Care 1996;8:41–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Arthroscopy of the Knee Joint, Medical University of Łódź, 91 002, Łódź, Drewnowska 75, Poland

    Rafał Kęska, T. Przemysław Paradowski & Dariusz Witoński

  2. Department of Orthopedics, Sunderby Central Hospital of Norrbotten, SE-971 80, Luleå, Sweden

    T. Przemysław Paradowski

Authors
  1. Rafał Kęska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Przemysław Paradowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dariusz Witoński
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafał Kęska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kęska, R., Paradowski, T.P. & Witoński, D. Outcome in primary cemented total knee arthroplasty with or without drain. IJOO 48, 404–409 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.136285

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.136285

Key words

MeSH terms

Search

Navigation