Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhanced recovery program in total hip arthroplasty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Background

Enhanced recovery program (ERP) was implemented to optimize the hospital stay in total hip arthroplasty. This study assessed the effects of optimizing preoperative and perioperative care using enhanced recovery (ER) on patients undergoing Total hip arthroplasty.

Materials and Methods

We compared a prospective group of 64 patients on the ER program with a historic cohort of 63 patients that received conventional care (non ER).

Results

ER patients were discharged earliest from hospital [mean length of stay (LOS) 5.3 days, median 4; P < 0.001] as compared to a mean of 8.3 days among non ER patients. Comparison based on American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades, preoperative hemoglobin, and body mass index (BMI) revealed that patients with ASA grade 3, preoperative hemoglobin of <14 g/dl, and BMI >30 on ER program spent shorter time in hospital as compared to the non ER’s conventionally treated patients with more favorable physiological parameters of ASA grade 1 and 2, preoperative hemoglobin of >14 g/dl, and BMI <30.

Conclusion

The ER protocol is universally beneficial and confers an advantage regardless of the patients’ preoperative condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P, Franks PJ, Longman RJ, Kendrick AH, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery program. Br J Surg 2006;93:300–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology abd rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 1997;78:606–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 2002;183:630–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anesthesia, surgery and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet 2003;362:1187–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Basse L, Raskov HH, Hjort Jakobsen D, Sonne E, Billesbølle P, Hendel HW, et al. Accelerated postoperative recovery program after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg 2002;89:446–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:851–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Basse L, Thorbøl JE, Løssl K, Kehlet H. Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:271–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fearon KC, Luff R. The nutritional management of surgical patients: enhanced recovery after surgery. Proc Nutr Soc 2003;62:807–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ljungqvist O, Søreide E. Preoperative fasting. Br J Surg 2003;90:400–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thorell A, Efendic S, Gutniak M, Häggmark T, Ljungqvist O. Insulin resistance after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 1994;81:59–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hausel J, Nygren J, Thorell A, Lagerkranser M, Ljungqvist O. Randomized clinical trial of the effects of oral preoperative carbohydrates on postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2005;92:415–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Soop M, Carlson GL, Hopkinson J, Clarke S, Thorell A, Nygren J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effects of immediate enteral nutrition on metabolic responses to major colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery protocol. Br J Surg 2004;91:1138–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pearse EO, Caldwell BF, Lockwood RJ, Hollard J. Early mobilisation after conventional knee replacement may reduce the risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:316–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shepperd S, McClaran J, Phillips CO, Lannin NA, Clemson LM, McCluskey A, et al. Discharge planning from hospital to home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;1:CD000313.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cullen DJ, Apolone G, Greenfield S, Guadagnoli E, Cleary P. ASA physical status and age predict morbidity after three surgical procedures. Ann Surg 1994;220:3–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Conlon NP, Bale EP, Herbison GP, McCarroll M. Postoperative anemia and quality of life after primary hip arthroplasty in patients over 65 years old. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1056–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cullen DJ, Nemeskal AR, Cooper JB, Zaslavsky A, Dwyer MJ. The effect of pulse oximetry, age and ASA physical status on the frequency of patients admitted unexpectedly to a post operative intensive care unit and the severity of their anesthesia related complications. Anesth Analg 1992;74:181–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Djokovic JL, Hedley-Whyte J. Prediction of outcome of surgery and anesthesia in patients over 80. JAMA 1979;242:2301–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Owens WD, Dykes MH, Gilbert JP, McPeek B, Ettling MB. Development of two indices of postoperative morbidity. Surgery 1975;77:586–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tiret L, Desmonts JM, Hatton F, Vourc’h G. Complications associated with anesthesia-a prospective study in France. Can Anaesth Soc J 1986;33:336–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vacanti CJ, VanHouten RJ, Hill RC. A statistical analysis of the relationship of physical status to postoperative mortality in 68,388 cases. Anesth Analg 1970;49:564–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bray GA. Overweight is risking fate: Definition, classification, prevalence and risks. Ann NY Acad Sci 1987;499:14–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Spicer DD, Pomeroy DL, Badenhausen WE, Schaper LA Jr, Curry JI, Suthers KE, et al. Body Mass Index as a predictor of outcome in total knee replacement. Int Orthop 2001;25:246–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sadr Azodi O, Bellocco R, Eriksson K, Adami J. The impact of tobacco use and body mass index on the length of stay in the hospital and risk of postoperative complications among patients undergoing total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:1316–20.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dall GF, Ohly NE, Ballantyne JA, Brenkel IJ. The influence of preoperative factors on the length of in-patient stay following primary total hip replacement for osteoarthritis. A multivariate analysis of 2302 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:434–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amitabh J. Dwyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dwyer, A.J., Tarassoli, P., Thomas, W. et al. Enhanced recovery program in total hip arthroplasty. IJOO 46, 407–412 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.98829

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.98829

Key words

Navigation