Published online Dec 18, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2009.50.12.1208
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy without Renal Arterial Clamping
Abstract
Purpose
Renal vascular clamping during a laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a time-consuming procedure with a risk of renal ischemia. To study the feasibility of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without renal arterial clamping, we compared the procedure with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with vascular clamping.
Materials and Methods
Seventeen patients underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without renal arterial clamping (group 1) from February 2004 to June 2008. The operative results were reviewed retrospectively and compared with those of 16 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with arterial clamping (group 2). Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. However, exophytic tumors were detected in 13 patients in group 1 and 3 patients in group 2 (p=0.001). Scores on the preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification were 6.9 in group 1 and 7.7 in group 2 (p=0.037). All surgeries by the transperitoneal approach were performed by a single surgeon.
Results
The mean operative times were 103 and 130 minutes in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.312). The mean renal arterial clamping time of group 2 was 27.6 minutes (range, 20-42 minutes). The mean estimated blood loss was 327 ml in group 1 and 315 ml in group 2 (p=0.971). The mean postoperative change in the glomerular filtration rate was 20.11 ml/min/1.73 m2 in group 1 and 18.95 ml/min/1.73 m2 in group 2 (p=0.748). The mean times to postoperative initiation of ambulation and of oral intake were 1.6 and 1.7 days (p=0.486) and 1.3 and 1.6 days (p=0.811) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 7.4 and 7.9 days in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.9). The mean tumor size was 2.1 cm (range, 1-7 cm) in group 1 and 3.3 cm (range, 1.5-9 cm) in group 2.
Conclusions
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without renal arterial clamping is feasible for a localized renal tumor. However, patients should be selected carefully, such as those with an exophytic tumor.
Table 1
Patient characteristics
Table 2
Operative results
Table 3
Pathologic results of renal tumors
Table 4
Difference in the glomerular filtration rate in patients who underwent partial nephrectomy
References
-
Hong SH, Ryu KY, Yoo JS, Seo SI, Kim JC, Hwang TK. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for the 4cm or less renal tumors. Korean J Urol 2006;47:1256–1262.
-
-
Seo IY, Bae BJ, Rim JS. Early experience of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor. Korean J Urol 2007;48:1–5.
-
-
Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, Macchi V, Porzionato A, De Caro R, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumors in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2009Epub ahead of print.
-
-
Fogarty JD, Hafron JM, Hoenig DM, Ghavamian R. Laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for the small exophytic renal mass. JSLS 2005;9:199–204.
-