Platinum open access journal
pISSN 2466-0493 eISSN 2466-054X
Indexed in MEDLINE, SCIE, Scopus, DOAJ and more
    Korean J Urol. 2012 Feb;53(2):104-108. English.
    Published online Feb 20, 2012.
    https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2012.53.2.104
    © The Korean Urological Association, 2012
    Original Article

    Serial Changes in Sexual Function Following Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Short-term Follow-up Study

    Min Su Jeong, Seung Beom Ha, Chang Ju Lee, Min Chul Cho,1 Soo Woong Kim and Jae-Seung Paick
      • Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
      • 1Department of Urology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.
    • Corresponding Author: Jae-Seung Paick. Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea. TEL: +82-2-2072-2422, FAX: +82-2-742-4665, Email: jspaick@snu.ac.kr
    Received September 14, 2011; Accepted October 24, 2011.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Abstract

    Purpose

    To evaluate the serial changes in sexual function in the short-term period after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to investigate whether a change in each domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is associated with improvement of micturition.

    Materials and Methods

    Thirty-eight potent men who underwent HoLEP and in whom complete 12-month follow-up data on the IIEF were available were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent a baseline evaluation for BPH. The surgical outcome was evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively by use of the International Prostate Symptom Score, IIEF, and uroflowmetry.

    Results

    The mean age and body mass index of the patients was 64.5±6.2 years and 24.2±2.6 kg/m2, respectively. Mean total prostate volume and transitional zone volume were 48.8±18.8 ml and 24.2±16.1 ml, respectively. Most IIEF domain scores showed a slight decrease at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery but recovered to the baseline or showed a marginal but nonsignificant increase at 12 months postoperatively compared with baseline. Orgasmic function and the overall sexual satisfaction domain score remained slightly reduced up to 12 months postoperatively. There was no significant correlation between improvement of micturition and change in sexual function throughout the follow-up period after surgery.

    Conclusions

    Although HoLEP achieves significant improvements in micturition, overall sexual function decreases slightly in the early postoperative period, but recovers to the baseline at 12 months postoperatively. Our data suggest that changes in sexual function after HoLEP are not associated with improvement of micturition.

    Keywords
    Erectile dysfunction; Holmium; Lasers; Prostatic hyperplasia

    INTRODUCTION

    With the increase in life expectancy, there has been a growing interest in age-related conditions such as lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) and sexual dysfunction in the past few years. Because LUTS/BPH and sexual dysfunction are highly prevalent conditions that have substantially adverse impacts on quality of life (QoL) in elderly men, many studies have evaluated a causal relationship between LUTS/BPH and sexual function, although such a relationship remains controversial [1-6].

    Because of the possible association between LUTS/BPH and sexual function, several studies have evaluated the influence of various treatments for LUTS/BPH on sexual function [6-12]. The previous studies on transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), the reference standard of surgical treatment for LUTS/BPH, have shown mixed results in terms of postoperative sexual function [6-9, 12]. Recent studies that specifically evaluated sexual function following photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) reported improvements or maintenance of sexual function after surgery [10, 13, 14]. Also, recent studies on holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), an attractive alternative to TURP, have shown no significant changes in overall sexual function at one or two time points of follow-up after surgery [11, 15].

    To date, however, data are sparse on the serial changes in sexual function in the short-term period following HoLEP as assessed by use of validated tools. We therefore aimed to evaluate the serial changes in sexual function in the short-term period after HoLEP for LUTS/BPH by use of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and to investigate whether a change in each domain of the IIEF was associated with improvement of micturition.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    1. Study design

    Approval for this study was provided by the Internal Review Board of our Hospital. Of 95 potent men who underwent HoLEP for LUTS/BPH refractory to medical therapy with an alpha-blocker between July 2008 and April 2009 by a single surgeon, complete 12-month follow-up data on the IIEF were available for 53 patients. After excluding patients 1) who had a history of previous prostatic surgery, 2) with urethral stricture or neurogenic bladder or prostatic malignancy, or 3) who did not have sexual intercourse within 4 weeks before surgery or each follow-up visit, a total of 38 patients were eligible for analysis.

    All patients underwent a baseline evaluation with the IIEF, transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), and multichannel video urodynamic study (MMS UD-2000; Medical Measurement System, Ennschede, The Netherlands) in addition to a general standard evaluation for LUTS/BPH including history, physical examination including digital rectal examination, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). After HoLEP, surgical outcomes of the treatment for LUTS/BPH were assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively by use of the IIEF, IPSS, uroflowmetry, and post-void residual urine volume (PVR). Retrograde ejaculation was documented by an urologist on the basis of the medical history at the follow-up visit.

    2. Intervention

    All surgical procedures were performed in a routine manner as previously described in detail [16]. Briefly, the first step was the exposure of the surgical capsule by incisions at the 5 and 7 o'clock positions just above the verumontanum. These incisions were connected to each other in the shape of an inverted "U" by an incision at the 6 o'clock position. The median lobe was then enucleated along the surgical capsule in a retrograde fashion. The surgical capsule in the 12 o'clock position of the apex was exposed through a midline incision, which was extended from the bladder neck to the apex. The incision was then connected from the lateral edge to the 12 o'clock position and retrograde enucleation of the lateral lobes was performed. Morcellation of three enucleated lobes was performed in a routine manner. At the end of surgery, a 20 Fr three-way urethral Foley catheter was placed, and the balloon was inflated with 30 ml of saline.

    3. Statistical analysis

    Change in serial sexual function was evaluated by comparing the total IIEF score as well as each individual domain score between baseline and each follow-up after surgery by use of the paired t-test. To systemically monitor changes in erectile function over time after surgery, the severity of erectile dysfunction (ED) in the patients was stratified into the following five categories according to the erectile function (EF) domain score of the IIEF: no ED (EF domain score 26 to 30), mild ED (EF score, 22 to 25), mild to moderate ED (EF score, 17 to 21), moderate ED (EF score, 11 to 16), and severe ED (EF score, 6 to 10) [17]. The proportional changes in each category were analyzed throughout the follow-up period after HoLEP. We used the Pearson correlation test to assess the significance of correlations between change in each IIEF domain score and that in each variable of IPSS or uroflowmetry. A 5% level of significance was used for all statistical testing, and all statistical tests were two-sided. SPSS ver. 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the data analysis.

    RESULTS

    1. Baseline characteristics and perioperative variables

    The baseline characteristics and perioperative variables are shown in Table 1. Mean age and body mass index of all eligible patients were 64.5±6.2 years and 24.2±2.6 kg/m2, respectively. Mean serum PSA, total prostate volume, and transitional zone volume were 3.1±3.2 ng/ml, 48.8±18.8 ml, and 24.2±16.1 ml, respectively. Seven (18.4%) patients received medication with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors before surgery. There were no major intraoperative complications such as severe bleeding requiring blood transfusion, but capsular perforation, bladder mucosal injury, de novo stress urinary incontinence, and de novo urgency urinary incontinence were observed in 1, 4, 1, and 6 cases, respectively. Twenty (52%) patients complained of retrograde ejaculation after the surgery.

    TABLE 1
    Baseline characteristics and perioperative variables for the 38 eligible patients

    2. Serial changes in micturition parameters and sexual function after HoLEP

    Table 2 summarizes the subjective and objective outcomes after HoLEP. As expected, both subtotal voiding symptom scores and total IPSS scores were significantly reduced compared with baseline starting from 1 month after the HoLEP procedure, which was associated with a significant improvement in the QoL index. In contrast, the subtotal storage symptom scores were significantly reduced compared with baseline starting from 3 months after surgery. All IIEF domain scores showed a slight decrease at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery compared with baseline, although these changes were not statistically significant except for the orgasmic function and overall sexual satisfaction domain scores at 6 months after HoLEP. Also, at 12 months after HoLEP, all IIEF domain scores except for orgasmic function and overall sexual satisfaction recovered to the baseline or showed a marginal but nonsignificant increase compared with baseline. In contrast, both orgasmic function and overall sexual satisfaction domain scores were still slightly decreased at the 12-month follow-up compared with baseline, but this was not statistically significant. Of the two items that compose the orgasmic function domain, the score of "ejaculation frequency" at 1, 3, and 6 months after HoLEP was significantly decreased compared with baseline (p<0.05). Even at 12 months after surgery, the score of "ejaculation frequency" was still slightly reduced compared with baseline, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.070).

    TABLE 2
    Baseline values and HoLEP outcome according to the IIEF, IPSS, and uroflowmetry with PVR (Mean±SD)

    3. Prevalence and severity of ED according to the follow-up period after HoLEP

    Fig. 1 shows the prevalence and severity of ED according to the follow-up period after HoLEP. The percentages of patients with erectile dysfunction before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after HoLEP were 73.7%, 78.9%, 81.6%, 78.9%, and 71.1%, respectively. The percentages of patients with normal EF or mild ED at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery were slightly decreased compared with baseline, whereas the percentages of patients with mild-to-moderate or moderate ED were slightly increased, but not significantly so. In contrast, the percentage of patients with normal EF or mild ED at 12 months after surgery was slightly increased compared with baseline, whereas the percentage of patients with moderate or severe ED was slightly decreased, which was not statistically significant.

    FIG. 1
    Prevalence and severity of erectile dysfunction according to the follow-up period after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. ED, erectile dysfunction.

    4. Correlation between changes in micturition and sexual function

    We performed the Pearson correlation test to assess whether change in sexual function after HoLEP was associated with improvement in micturition symptoms. There was no significant correlation between improvement in each variable of the IPSS or uroflowmetry and change in each IIEF domain score during the entire period of follow-up after the HoLEP procedure.

    DISCUSSION

    There are several data in the published literature evaluating the effect of HoLEP for LUTS/BPH on sexual function [11, 15, 18-21]. However, some studies used nonvalidated tools for evaluation of postoperative sexual function, and even other studies that used validated questionnaires did not analyze serial changes in the individual items or each domain score of the questionnaires in the early postoperative period after HoLEP. To our knowledge, our study is the first to evaluate serial changes in sexual function by use of a validated questionnaire in the short-term, early postoperative period after HoLEP. Thus, our data can extend the current state of knowledge in the area of sexual function after BPH surgery by further exploring the serial changes in sexual function in the early postoperative period after HoLEP. The important findings of our study can be summarized as follows: 1) overall sexual function was slightly deteriorated in the early postoperative period after HoLEP, but recovered to the baseline at 1 year postoperatively; 2) different from other IIEF domain scores, the orgasmic function or overall sexual satisfaction domain score was slightly decreased and this decrease lasted up to 12 months following HoLEP, probably due to ejaculatory problems; 3) there was no significant correlation between improvement of micturition and change in sexual function throughout the follow-up period after HoLEP.

    As suggested by our results, sexual function appears to be transiently decreased in the early postoperative period after HoLEP. Uygur et al. [22] showed that ED developed in 5% and 6% of potent patients at 3 months after open prostatectomy or TURP, respectively, but that EF recovered in about half of them at 6 months postoperatively. Also, a previous study by Tscholl et al. [23] using the snap-gauge test at 4 days and 3 months after TURP showed a high rate of ED in the immediate postoperative period, which significantly improved at retesting. A recent study by Choi et al. [24] showed that the EF domain score was decreased at 1 and 3 months after TURP but recovered to the baseline at 6 months after surgery. Thus, the ED seen immediately after BPH surgery may be temporary and due to the neurapraxia induced by thermal injury or emotional stress [15]. This is supported by the result of a study by Zohar et al. [25] showing that patients with LUTS/BPH reportedly tend to be anxious and less satisfied with their sexual life and that the level of anxiety exhibited by the patient is a predictor of potency after prostatectomy. Furthermore, Meng et al. [11] suggested that injury to the urethra could affect patients as pain during erection after HoLEP.

    Another interesting finding was that the orgasmic function or overall sexual satisfaction domain score remained slightly decreased throughout the follow-up period after the HoLEP procedure. In the present study, the scores of "ejaculation frequency," one of two items that compose the orgasmic function domain, were decreased throughout the follow-up period after HoLEP compared with baseline, although not significantly so at 12 months after surgery. Therefore, ejaculatory problems may have an adverse effect on orgasmic function or overall sexual satisfaction after HoLEP. This finding is in accordance with the study by Briganti et al. [15] showing a significant deterioration in the mean IIEF orgasmic function domain score after HoLEP and a recent study by Muntener et al. [12] suggesting that the loss of ejaculatory function after TURP is significant and is associated with considerable bother.

    The present study did not demonstrate a significant correlation between improvement of micturition and change in sexual function after HoLEP. Although some studies have shown a correlation between LUTS/BPH and sexual dysfunction [2-5, 26], the epidemiologic data do not support a causal relationship based on Hill's criteria for causality between the two. Thus, it remains unclear whether sexual dysfunction in older men is causally related to BPH or is merely a consequence of aging [27]. Moreover, the evaluation of sexual function in patients treated with TURP or PVP has been associated with mixed results [6-10, 12-14]. Thus, the effect of BPH surgery on sexual function is still controversial. In accordance with our results, most recent studies have demonstrated no significant effect of HoLEP on sexual function after surgery in patients with LUTS/BPH [18-21].

    Some limitations of our study warrant consideration. First, the present study is limited by both its retrospective nature and the fact that it was conducted at a single institution and therefore carries with it all the inherent potential issues associated with such studies. Second, the follow-up period was only in the short-term. However, alterations of sexual function more than 1 year after surgery may be significantly attributed to aging and comorbidities rather than the HoLEP procedure. Third, although retrograde ejaculation was queried at every follow-up visit, the IIEF cannot assess this condition completely. Fourth, our population was not large enough to perform an analysis in subgroups such as patients with no or mild ED or to allow for multivariate analysis. However, our data can be used to counsel patients regarding realistic expectations of sexual function after the HoLEP procedure.

    CONCLUSIONS

    Although HoLEP achieves significant improvements in micturition both subjectively and objectively, overall sexual function decreases slightly in the early postoperative period after but recovers to baseline at 12 months postoperatively. In addition, our data suggest that changes in sexual function after HoLEP are not associated with improvement of micturition symptoms. However, studies with larger cohorts including prospective, multicenter studies are necessary to fully validate these findings.

    Notes

    The authors have nothing to disclose.

    References

      1. Boyle P, Robertson C, Mazzetta C, Keech M, Hobbs R, Fourcade R, et al. The association between lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction in four centres: the UrEpik study. BJU Int 2003;92:719–725.
      1. Rosen R, Altwein J, Boyle P, Kirby RS, Lukacs B, Meuleman E, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms and male sexual dysfunction: the multinational survey of the aging male (MSAM-7). Eur Urol 2003;44:637–649.
      1. Hoesl CE, Woll EM, Burkart M, Altwein JE. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is prevalent, bothersome and underdiagnosed in patients consulting urologists for benign prostatic syndrome (BPS). Eur Urol 2005;47:511–517.
      1. Braun MH, Sommer F, Haupt G, Mathers MJ, Reifenrath B, Engelmann UH. Lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction: co-morbidity or typical "Aging male" symptoms? Results of the "Cologne Male Survey". Eur Urol 2003;44:588–594.
      1. Elliott SP, Gulati M, Pasta DJ, Spitalny GM, Kane CJ, Yee R, et al. Obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms correlate with erectile dysfunction. Urology 2004;63:1148–1152.
      1. Leliefeld HH, Stoevelaar HJ, McDonnell J. Sexual function before and after various treatment for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 2002;89:208–213.
      1. Wasson JH, Reda DJ, Bruskewitz RC, Elinson J, Keller AM, Henderson WG. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 1995;332:75–79.
      1. Parsons CI. Impotence following transurethral resection of the prostate. In: Rajfer J, editor. Common problems in infertility and impotence. 1st ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical; 1990. pp. 352-355.
      1. Poulakis V, Ferakis N, Witzsch U, de Vries R, Becht E. Erectile dysfunction after transurethral prostatectomy for lower urinary tract symptoms: Results from a center with over 500 patients. Asian J Androl 2006;8:69–74.
      1. Paick JS, Um JM, Kim SW, Ku JH. Influence of high-power potassium-titanyl-phosphate photoselective vaporization of the prostate on erectile function: a short-term follow-up study. J Sex Med 2007;4:1701–1707.
      1. Meng F, Gao B, Fu Q, Chen J, Liu Y, Shi B, et al. Change of sexual function in patients before and after Ho:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate. J Androl 2007;28:259–261.
      1. Muntener M, Aellig S, Kuettel R, Gehrlach C, Sulser T, Strebel RT. Sexual function after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): results of an independent prospective multicentre assessment of outcome. Eur Urol 2007;52:510–515.
      1. Bruyère F, Puichaud A, Pereira H, Faivre d'Arcier B, Rouanet A, Floc'h AP, et al. Influence of photoselective vaporization of the prostate on sexual function: results of a prospective analysis of 149 patients with long-term follow-up. Eur Urol 2010;58:207–211.
      1. Kavoussi PK, Hermans MR. Maintenance of erectile function after photoselective vaporization of the prostate for obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Sex Med 2008;5:2669–2671.
      1. Briganti A, Naspro R, Gallina A, Salonia A, Vavassori I, Hurle R, et al. Impact on sexual function of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a prospective, 2-center, randomized trial. J Urol 2006;175:1817–1821.
      1. Cho MC, Park JH, Jeong MS, Yi JS, Ku JH, Oh SJ, et al. Predictor of de novo urinary incontinence following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Neurourol Urodyn 2011;30:1343–1349.
      1. Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, Mishra A, Osterloh IH. Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology 1999;54:346–351.
      1. Naspro R, Suardi N, Salonia A, Scattoni V, Guazzoni G, Colombo R, et al. Holmium laser enucleation the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70 g: 24-month follow-up. Eur Urol 2006;50:563–568.
      1. Kuntz RM, Ahyai S, Lehrich K, Fayad A. Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients. J Urol 2004;172:1012–1016.
      1. Tan AH, Gilling PJ, Kennett KM, Frampton C, Westenberg AM, Fraundorfer MR. A randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in large glands (40 to 200 grams). J Urol 2003;170:1270–1274.
      1. Aho TF, Gilling PJ, Kennett KM, Westenberg AM, Fraundorfer MR, Frampton CM. Holmium laser bladder neck incision versus holmium enucleation of the prostate as outpatient procedures for prostates less than 40 grams: a randomized trial. J Urol 2005;174:210–214.
      1. Uygur MC, Gür E, Arik AI, Altuğ U, Erol D. Erectile dysfunction following treatments of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective study. Andrologia 1998;30:5–10.
      1. Tscholl R, Largo M, Poppinghaus E, Recker F, Subotic B. Incidence of erectile impotence secondary to transurethral resection of benign prostatic hyperplasia, assessed by preoperative and postoperative Snap Gauge tests. J Urol 1995;153:1491–1493.
      1. Choi SB, Zhao C, Park JK. The effect of transurethral resection of the prostate on erectile function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 2010;51:557–560.
      1. Zohar J, Meiraz D, Maoz B, Durst N. Factors influencing sexual activity after prostatectomy: a prospective study. J Urol 1976;116:332–334.
      1. Laumann EO, West S, Glasser D, Carson C, Rosen R, Kang JH. Prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction by race and ethnicity among men aged 40 or older in the United States: From the male attitudes regarding sexual health survey. J Sex Med 2007;4:57–65.
      1. Costabile RA, Steers WD. How can we best characterize the relationship between erectile dysfunction and benign prostatic hyperplasia? J Sex Med 2006;3:676–681.
    Cited by
    Crossref 20
    Google Scholar 
    PubMed Central 10
    Scopus 23
    MeSH Terms
    Body Mass Index
    Erectile Dysfunction
    Follow-Up Studies
    Holmium
    Humans
    Lasers, Solid-State
    Male
    Orgasm
    Postoperative Period
    Prostate
    Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Retrospective Studies
    Urination
    Metrics
    Share
    Links to
    Figures
    slide

    1 / 1

    Tables
    slide
    slide

    1 / 2

    PERMALINK