Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.58(4) > 1006860

Kang, Oh, Seo, Joen, Seo, Shin, Choi, and Kim: Clinical Factors Predicting for Neoplastic Transformation of Gastric Hyperplastic Polyps

Abstract

Background/Aims

Hyperplastic polyps (HPs) are the most common cause of all benign epithelial gastric polyps, constituting 30 to 93%. Although gastric HPs are usually considered as benign lesions compared with adenoma, neoplastic transformation has been known to occur rarely. We aimed to identify the clinical factors of gastric HPs predicting for neoplastic transformation.

Methods

Between January 2002 to August 2010, a total of 274 gastric HPs, which had been removed by endoscopic polypectomy or surgical resection from 210 patients, were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Neoplastic transformation was found in 15 cases (5.5%) of 274 HPs including 10 cases of low grade dysplasia (3.7%), 2 cases of high grade dysplasia (0.7%) and 3 cases of adenocarcinoma (1.1%). Neoplastic transformations were significantly associated with >1 cm in size (n=10 [66.7%] vs. n=91 [35.1%], p=0.024), with pedunculated shape (n=9 [60.0%] vs. n=62 [23.9%], p=0.002), with previous history of gastrectomy (n=3 [20.0%] vs. n=3 [1.2%], p=0.002) and with synchronous neoplastic lesions occurring elsewhere in the gastric mucosa (n=5 [33.3%] vs. n=31 [12.0%], p=0.021). However, no significant difference was found between HPs with and without neoplastic transformation in terms of age, sex, number of polyps detected per patient, location, macroscopic appearance such as erosion, hyperemia.

Conclusions

Neoplastic transformation of gastric HPs had significant relationships with >1 cm in size, pedunculated shape, postgastectomy state, and synchronous neoplastic lesion. Therefore, endoscopic polypectomy should be considered in these HPs to avoid the risk of missing HPs with neoplastic potential.

References

1. Ming SC, Goldman H. Pathology of the gastrointestinal tract. 1st ed.Philadelphia: WB Saunders;1992.
2. Deyhle P. Results of endoscopic polypectomy in the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy. 1980; (Suppl):35–46.
3. Carmack SW, Genta RM, Schuler CM, Saboorian MH. The current spectrum of gastric polyps: a 1-year national study of over 120,000 patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104:1524–1532.
crossref
4. Jain R, Chetty R. Gastric hyperplastic polyps: a review. Dig Dis Sci. 2009; 54:1839–146.
crossref
5. Hattori T. Morphological range of hyperplastic polyps and carcinomas arising in hyperplastic polyps of the stomach. J Clin Pathol. 1985; 38:622–630.
crossref
6. Goddard AF, Badreldin R, Pritchard DM, Walker MM, Warren B. British Society of Gastroenterology. The management of gastric polyps. Gut. 2010; 59:1270–1276.
crossref
7. Deppisch LM, Rona VT. Gastric epithelial polyps. A 10-year study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1989; 11:110–115.
8. Muehldorfer SM, Stolte M, Martus P, Hahn EG, Ell C. Multicenter Study Group "Gastric Polyps". Diagnostic accuracy of forceps biopsy versus polypectomy for gastric polyps: a prospective multicentre study. Gut. 2002; 50:465–470.
crossref
9. Han AR, Sung CO, Kim KM, et al. The clinicopathological features of gastric hyperplastic polyps with neoplastic transformations: a suggestion of indication for endoscopic polypectomy. Gut Liver. 2009; 3:271–275.
crossref
10. Abraham SC, Singh VK, Yardley JH, Wu TT. Hyperplastic polyps of the stomach: associations with histologic patterns of gastritis and gastric atrophy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001; 25:500–507.
crossref
11. Krejs GJ. Gastric cancer: epidemiology and risk factors. Dig Dis. 2010; 28:600–603.
crossref
12. Dirschmid K, Platz-Baudin C, Stolte M. Why is the hyperplastic polyp a marker for the precancerous condition of the gastric mucosa? Virchows Arch. 2006; 448:80–84.
crossref
13. Orlowska J, Jarosz D, Pachlewski J, Butruk E. Malignant transformation of benign epithelial gastric polyps. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995; 90:2152–2159.
14. Nakamura T. Malignant change of gastric polyp, with special reference to histopathological classification. Stomach Intestine. 1968; 3:737–747.
15. Daibo M, Itabashi M, Hirota T. Malignant transformation of gastric hyperplastic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol. 1987; 82:1016–1025.
16. Hizawa K, Fuchigami T, Iida M, et al. Possible neoplastic transformation within gastric hyperplastic polyp. Application of endoscopic polypectomy. Surg Endosc. 1995; 9:714–718.
crossref
17. Rosen S, Hoak D. Intramucosal carcinoma developing in a hyperplastic gastric polyp. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993; 39:830–833.
crossref
18. Orlowska J, Pietrow D. Multifocal gastric carcinoma arising from hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990; 85:1629–1634.
19. Zea-Iriarte WL, Sekine I, Itsuno M, et al. Carcinoma in gastric hyperplastic polyps. A phenotypic study. Dig Dis Sci. 1996; 41:377–386.

Fig. 1.
Relationship between shape and size of total hyperplastic polyps.
kjg-58-184f1.tif
Fig. 2.
(A) Endoscopic finding of the case of hyperplastic polyp with neoplastic transformation. A 4.0×1.2 cm sized pedunculated lesion with spontaneous bleeding is noted on the greater curvature side of the mid body in a patient with melena. Endoscopic snare polypectomy was immediately performed for the hemostasis. (B) Microscopic finding showed focal adenocarcinomatous transformation (cir-cle) and dysplastic foci (square) in the background of the hyperplastic polyp (H&E stain, ×40).
kjg-58-184f2.tif
Table 1.
Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of Enrolled Gastric Hyperplastic Polyps (n=274)
  Number (%)
Number of patients 210
Age (mean±SD, yr) 62.1±11.1
Sex  
   Male 93 (33.9)
   Female 181 (66.1)
Previous of gastrectomy  
   Ulcer perforation 1 (0.4)
   Gastric cancer 5 (1.8)
Presence of synchronous neoplastic lesion  
   Dysplasia 19 (6.9)
   Adenocarcinoma 17 (6.2)
Number of polyps per patient 1.7
Location  
   Upper third 26 (9.5)
   Middle third 118 (43.1)
   Lower third 130 (47.4)
Pathology  
   Neoplastic transformation 15 (5.5)
    Low grade dysplasia 10 (3.7)
    High grade dysplasia 2 (0.7)
    Adenocarcinoma 3 (1.1)
   Non-neoplastic transformation 259 (94.5)
Endoscopic appearance  
   Shape  
    Sessile 117 (42.7)
    Semipedunculated 86 (31.4)
    Pedunculated 71 (25.9)
   Size (cm, mean±SD) 1.1±0.8
    ≤1 173 (63.1)
    >1 101 (36.9)
Table 2.
Summary of Data on Gastric Hyperplastic Polyps with Neoplastic Transformations
Enrolled No. Age (yr) Sex Site Size (cm) Shape Hyperemia Erosion Biopsy finding Final diagnosis Previous gastrectomy H. pylori Background gastrits Synchronous neoplastic lesion
1 62 F Upper 1.1 P HGD LGD/HP CSG
2 59 F Middle 1.2 P HGD Adenoca./HP Ulcer OP (B-II) RG
3 67 M Lower 0.8 P LGD LGD/HP HpG Adenocarcinoma
4 59 M Lower 0.8 S LGD LGD/HP NA
5 53 F Lower 1.3 S LGD LGD/HP HpG Dysplasia
6 78 F Middle 4.0 P Adenoca./HP NA
7 78 F Lower 1.4 P LGD/HP   NA
8 71 M Middle 0.4 S LGD LGD/HP Cancer OP (B-II) NA Dysplasia
9 71 M Middle 0.4 S LGD LGD/HP Cancer OP (B-II) NA Dysplasia
10 51 F Upper 1.7 SP LGD/HP HpG
11 62 F Upper 2.0 P HP Adenoca./HP NA
12 70 F Lower 2.5 P HP HGD/HP HpG
13 75 F Middle 2.2 P LGD/HP NA
14 61 F Lower 0.7 S HP LGD/HP HpG Dysplasia
15 70 M Middle 3 P HGD HGD/HP NA

M, male; F, female; HP, hyperplastic polyp; S, sessile; SP, semipedunculated; P, pedunculated; LGD, low grade dysplasia; HGD, high grade dysplasia; Adenoca., adenocarcinoma; OP, operation; B-II, Billoth II; RG, reactive gastritis; CSG, chronic superficial gastritis; HpG, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) gastritis; NA, not available.

Table 3.
Characteristics of Hyperplastic Polyp with or without Neoplastic Transformation
  Neoplastic transformation (n=15) Non-neoplastic transformation (n=259) p-value
Sex
    Male 5 (33.3) 88 (34.0) NS
    Female 10 (66.7) 171 (66.0)  
Mean age (yr) 65.8 61.9 NS
No. of hyperplastic 1.5 1.7 NS
   polyps depending      
   on location      
    Upper third 3 (20.0) 23 (8.9) NS
    Middle third 6 (40.0) 112 (43.2)  
    Lower third 6 (40.0) 124 (47.9)  
Macroscopictype hyperemia
    Present 14 (93.3) 201 (77.6) NS
    Absent 1 (6.7) 58 (22.4)  
Erosion
    Present 2 (13.3) 104 (40.2) NS
    Absent 13 (86.7) 155 (59.8)  
Shape
    Sessile 5 (33.3) 112 (42.3) 0.002
    Semipedunculated 1 (6.7) 85 (32.8)  
    Pedunculated 9 (60.0) 62 (23.9)  
Size (cm)
    Median (range) 1.3 (0.4–4.0) 0.8 (0.2–5.0) 0.010
    ≤1 5 (33.3) 168 (64.9) 0.024
    >1 10 (66.7) 91 (35.1)  
Previous gastrectomy
    Yes 3 (20.0) 3 (1.2) 0.002
    No 12 (80.0) 256 (98.8)  
Presence of synchronous neoplastic lesion
    Yes 5 (33.3) 31 (12.0) 0.021
    No 10 (66.7) 228 (88.0)  

Values are number (%).

TOOLS
Similar articles