Investigating the effect of cochlear synaptopathy on envelope following responses using a model of the auditory nerve
Creators
- 1. Technical
- 2. Interacoustics Research Unit
- 3. Tech
- 4. Boston University
Description
Dataset containing the recorded and simulated data reported in the manuscript "Investigating the effect of cochlear synaptopathy on envelope following responses using a model of the auditory nerve" published in the Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, JARO (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-019-00721-7):
- RECORDED Envelope Following Responses (EFR) in normal-hearing (NH) threshold and hearing-impaired (HI) human listeners using deeply (m = 85%) and shallowly (m = 25%) modulated sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) tones.
- SIMULATED EFRs using the auditory nerve (AN) model by Zilany et al. (2009, 2014).
Files content and structure:
Recorded EFRs:
- 01_data__efr.csv:
EFR recordings as a function of stimulus level (EFR magnitude-level functions) for the NH and HI listeners using two modulation depths.
The file containing the recorded EFR data have the following columns:
- lvl: Stimulation level
- m85_ok: EFR magnitude (dB re to 1 µV) using m = 85%. Significant responses (F-test = 1)
- m85_ko: EFR magnitude (dB re to 1 µV) using m = 85%. Non-significant responses (F-test = 0)
- m85_bkg: Estimated background noise magnitude (dB re to 1 µV) for the recordings when m = 85%
- m25_ok: EFR magnitude (dB re to 1 µV) using m = 25%. Significant responses (F-test = 1)
- m25_ko: EFR magnitude (dB re to 1 µV) using m = 25%. Non-significant responses (F-test = 0)
- m25_bkg: Estimated background noise magnitude (dB re to 1 µV) for the recordings when m = 25%
- subj: Listener id
- hearing: Hearing group (nh | hi) of the listener
Simulated EFRs:
Files with the simulation results summing across frequency and SR fiber type
Fig. 4:
- fig4a__simul_efr__nh_23ohc_13ihc__no_cs.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function for the NH threshold listeners (average) assuming 2/3 of OHC loss and 1/3 of IHC loss (Fig. 4a). - fig4b__simul_efr__nh_slp_thres_all_ohc__no_cs.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function for the NH threshold listeners (average) assuming sloping threshold at extended high frequencies (EHF) and all of OHC loss (Fig. 4b). - fig4c__simul_efr__nh_slp_thres_all_ihc__no_cs.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function for the NH threshold listeners (average) assuming sloping threshold at extended high frequencies (EHF) and all of IHC loss (Fig. 4c). - fig4d__simul_efr__hi_23ohc_13ihc__no_cs.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function for the HI listeners (average) assuming 2/3 of OHC loss and 1/3 of IHC loss (Fig. 4d). - fig4e__simul_efr__hi_all_ohc__no_cs.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function for the HI threshold listeners (average) assuming all of OHC loss (Fig. 4e). - fig4f__simul_efr__hi_all_ihc__no_cs.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function for the HI threshold listeners (average) assuming all of IHC loss (Fig. 4f). - fig4g__simul_efr__hi_slp_thres_23ohc_13ihc__no_cs.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function for the HI listeners (average) assuming sloping threshold at EHF and 2/3 of OHC loss and 1/3 of IHC loss (Fig. 4d). - fig4h__simul_efr__hi_slp_thres_all_ohc__no_cs.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function for the HI threshold listeners (average) assuming sloping threshold at EHF and all of OHC loss (Fig. 4e). - fig4i__simul_efr__hi_slp_thres_all_ihc__no_cs.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function for the HI threshold listeners (average) assuming sloping threshold at EHF and and all of IHC loss (Fig. 4f).
Fig. 5:
- fig5a__simul_efr__nh__cs_ms_ls_100p.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function for the NH threshold listeners (average) assuming cochlear synaptopathy (CS) of a 100% of loss of only medium- and low-spontaneous rate (SR) AN fibers (Fig. 5a). - fig5b__simul_efr__nh09_cs__approx.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function to approximate the data for the NH threshold listener NH09 including CS (Fig. 5b). - fig5c__simul_efr__hi04_cs__approx.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function to approximate the data for the HI listener HI04 including CS (Fig. 5c).
Fig. 6:
Files with the simulation results for the NH threshold listener in different frequency bands and SR fiber types
- 08_simul__efr_healthy__mod-12.mat: Simulated EFR level-growth function for the healthy system using a SAM tone with m = 12%.
- 09_simul__efr_healthy__mod-25.mat: Simulated EFR level-growth function for the healthy system using a SAM tone with m = 25%.
- 10_simul__efr_healthy__mod-50.mat: Simulated EFR level-growth function for the healthy system using a SAM tone with m = 50%.
- 11_simul__efr_healthy__mod-85.mat: Simulated EFR level-growth function for the healthy system using a SAM tone with m = 85%.
- 12_simul__efr_healthy__mod-100.mat: Simulated EFR level-growth function for the healthy system using a SAM tone with m = 100%.
Fig. 7:
- fig7a__simul_efr__bw_analys__32oct_[20, 40, 60, 80, 100]p.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function for the NH threshold listeners assuming CS of a bandwidth (BW) of 3/2-octave for a loss of AN fibers ranging from 20% to 100% (Fig. 7a). - fig7b__simul_efr__bw_analys__1oct_[20, 40, 60, 80, 100]p.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function for the NH threshold listeners assuming CS of a bandwidth (BW) of 1-octave for a loss of AN fibers ranging from 20% to 100% (Fig. 7b). - fig7c__simul_efr__bw_analys__13oct_[20, 40, 60, 80, 100]p.csv:
Simulated EFR magnitude-level function for the NH threshold listeners assuming CS of a bandwidth (BW) of 1/3-octave for a loss of AN fibers ranging from 20% to 100% (Fig. 7c).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The structure of the .csv files that contain the EFR simulations is:
- lvl: Stimulation level
- mgn_mxxx: Simulated EFR magnitude (a.u. in dB) for each modulation depth (100%, 85%, 50%, 25% and 12%)
- bkg_mxxx: Estimate of the background noise floor (a.u. in dB) for each modulation depth.
- ftest_mxxx: Result of the F-test statistical test (0 or 1) for each modulation depth.
The structure of the .mat files that contain the EFR simulations is:
- exper_type: Name of the simulated experiment
- species: Species used in the AN model (in this study is always 2: human)
- species_age: (Not used in this work). Age of the animal when species is 4: mouse
- modulation: Modulation depth of the SAM tone used in the simulation (100%, 85%, 50%, 25% or 12%)
- f_on: Center frequency of the on-frequency band (2000 Hz)
- f_off_hf: Center frequency of the first off-frequency band (3000 Hz)
- f_off_vhf: Center frequency of the second off-frequency band (7000 Hz)
- f_off_uvhf: Center frequency of the third off-frequency band (12000 Hz)
- lvl_vect: Stimulus level vector (from 5 to 100 dB SPL, in steps of 5 dB)
- simul_efr Structure with the simulated data
- The data structure contains many fields which are matricies of size 3x20. The columns are the 20 stimulus levels defined in lvl_vect, and the first row is the simulated EFR, the second row is the estimates background noise floor in the simulation, and the third row is the output of the F-test statistics.
- The structure fields can be divided in 4 groups:
- ihc_ Responses from the IHC (not shown in the paper)
- an_hs_ Responses from the High-SR fibers in the AN
- an_ms_ Responses from the Medium-SR fibers in the AN
- an_ls_ Responses from the Low-SR fibers in the AN
- Each group has 5 responses corresponding to the on-frequency band (_on) and the three off-frequency bands (_off_hf, _off_vhf, _off_uvhf); and the sum across frequencies (_across_f)
Notes
Files
01_data__efr.csv
Files
(192.2 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:7bdbe0957cd0e16ad8cca53f348ba06e
|
13.1 kB | Preview Download |
md5:6388473aa16ffb928c4223f84a4d434f
|
4.0 kB | Preview Download |
md5:ccb4a3c849605c351e08d1d85f1210bf
|
4.0 kB | Preview Download |
md5:16a728086f3381fecf2ac9ef80ab01f6
|
4.0 kB | Preview Download |
md5:e2e9fe78f936a170e466ec83706defd6
|
4.0 kB | Preview Download |
md5:25caaeb0de9435cda46c13162b297bc8
|
4.0 kB | Preview Download |
md5:af6496be683c0c124e0aea7242ddfe1b
|
4.0 kB | Preview Download |
md5:bfd154b9898ccefd0d60d6452fb3e9f1
|
4.0 kB | Preview Download |
md5:80fb5c3bdd69c6c561c83613a724333b
|
30.2 kB | Download |
md5:db79d3d41925d81e4f17911b9d92bc9b
|
30.2 kB | Download |
md5:fbb43d9786dac1fa1ab6bdc31078148a
|
30.2 kB | Download |
md5:c22bc37b251a378bce6ebe0c4bbced31
|
30.2 kB | Download |
md5:7e7fe6c8af2749cda4f405f2f9ec1ce2
|
30.2 kB | Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is supplement to
- 10.1007/s10162-019-00721-7 (DOI)