Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2005, 149(2):309-313 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2005.048

PHARMACOKINETIC CONVERSION STUDY OF A NEW CYCLOSPORINE FORMULATION IN STABLE ADULT RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS

František Perlíka, Marwan A. Masrib, M. Rostc, Vojtěch Kamarádd
a Institute of Pharmacology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
b Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
c Univerity of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
d Clinical Department R&D, IVAX-CR, a.s., Opava, Czech Republic

Cyclosporine A (CyA) is a standard component of immunosuppressive regimens. It is a critical-dose drug for which a minor change in absorption can have important clinical consequences. The aim of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of the new generic CyA formulation, Equoral® capsules, after a switch from original formulation, Neoral® capsules, in seventy stable adult renal transplant recipients. The extent and rate of pharmacokinetic parameters for bioequivalence were compared in a non-randomized, steady-state clinical study with fixed non-replicate study design. Pharmacokinetic analysis of CyA have shown that both the rate and extent of absorption of Equoral® does not differ significantly from that of Neoral®. At identical dosing, the new formulation was found to have geometric means of Cmax 717 ng/ml and AUCτ 3108 ng/ml.h, while corresponding results of comparator were 725 ng/ml and AUCτ 3039 ng/ml.h, respectively. The 90 % confidence intervals of Cmax and AUCτ were within 80- 125 % interval of the mean values. The results suggest that Equoral® capsules can be used as an alternative treatment to Neoral® capsules in CyA regimen.

Keywords: Cyclosporine A, Comparative study Equoral vs. Neoral, Bioequivalence

Received: October 6, 2005; Accepted: November 30, 2005; Published: December 1, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Perlík, F., Masri, M.A., Rost, M., & Kamarád, V. (2005). PHARMACOKINETIC CONVERSION STUDY OF A NEW CYCLOSPORINE FORMULATION IN STABLE ADULT RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS. Biomedical papers149(2), 309-313. doi: 10.5507/bp.2005.048
Download citation

References

  1. Jorga A, Holt DW, Johnston A. (2004) Therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine. Transplant Proc, 36, 396-403. Go to original source...
  2. Levy G, Burra P, Cavallari A, Duvoux C, Lake J., Mayer AD, Mies S, Pollard SG, Varo E, Villamil F, Johnston A. (2002) Improved clinical outcomes for liver tranplant recipients using cyclosporine monitoring based on 2-hr post-dose levels (C2). Transplantation, 73, 953-959. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. McMillan, MA. (1989) Clinical pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine. Pharmacol Ther, 42, 135-156. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Pollard S, Nashan B, Johnston A, Hoyer P, Belicky P, Keown P, Helderman H. (2003) A Pharmacokinetic and clinical review of the potential clinical impact of using different formulations of cyclosporine A. Clin Ther, 25, 1654-1669. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Committee for Guidance on the Investigation of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence, CPMP, 2001.
  6. Masri MA, Andrysek T, Matha V. (2003) The role of generics in transplantation. Transplant Proc, 35, 2745-2747. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Proost JH, Meijer DKF. (1992) MW/Pharm, an integrated software package for drug dosage regimen calculation and therapeutic drug monitoring. Comput Biol Med, 27, 155-163. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Benet LZ (1999). Understanding bioequivalence testing. Transplant Proc, 31, 7-9. Go to original source...
  9. Cole E, Maham N, Cardella C, Cattran D, Fenton S, Hamel J, O,Grady C, Smith R. (2003) Clinical benefits of Neoral C2 monitoring in the long-term management of renal transplant recipients, Transplantation, 75, 2086-2090 DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000068868.01424.61 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Mahalati K, Belitsky P, Sketris I, West K, Panek R. (1999) Neoral monitoring by simplified sparse sampling area under the concentration- time curve: Its relationship to acute rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity early after kidney transplantation., Transplantation, 68, 55-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. International Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group. (2002) Cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) absorption profiling and sparse-sample predictors during the first 3 months after renal transplantation. Am J Transplant, 2, 148. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Grant D, Kneteman N, Tchervenkov J, Roy A, Murphy G, Tan A, Hendricks L, Guilbault N, Levy G. (1999) Peak cyclosporine levels (Cmax) correlate with freedom from liver graft rejection: Results of a prospective, randomized comparison of Neoral and Sandimmune for liver transplantation (NOF-8). Transplantation, 67, 1133-1137. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Cantarovich M, Besner JG, Barkun JS, Elstein E, Loertscher R. (1998) Two-hour cyclosporine level determination is the appropriate tool to monitor Neoral therapy. Clin Transplant, 12, 243-249.
  14. Einecke G, Mai I, Diekmann F, Fritsche L, Neumayer HH, Budde K. (2002) Cyclosporine absorption profiling and therapeutic drug monitoring using C2 blood levels in stable renal allograft recipients, Transplant Proc, 34, 1738-1739. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...