Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2006, 150(2):321-326 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2006.049

WEAR MEASUREMENT OF RETRIEVED POLYETHYLENE ABG 1 CUPS BY UNIVERSAL-TYPE MEASURING MICROSCOPE AND X-RAY METHODS

Jiri Galloa, Vitezslav Havranekb, Ivana Cechovaa, Jana Zapletalovac
a Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry and Teaching Hospital, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
b Joint Laboratory of Optics, Palacky University Faculty of Science & Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Olomouc
c Department of Biophysics, Palacky University Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Olomouc

Background: Polyethylene wear is considered a most important part of periprosthetic osteolysis development. Thus, its measurement is central to contemporary orthopaedics.

Aims: The aim of this paper was to compare the accuracy of three radiographic techniques for wear measurement. Secondly, the influence of the abduction angle of the cup on measurement accuracy was investigated.

Methods: Wear was measured manually in 80 patients by a single observer according to the Livermore, Charnley, and Dorr description. A multi-component statistical analysis was used to test the hypothesis that the Livermore technique was superior. In vitro data obtained from a Universal-type measuring microscope served as a gold standard.

Results: In vitro measurements showed an average linear wear of 0.363 mm per year (0.000-0.939, SD 0.241) with a corresponding volumetric wear rate of 161 mm3 per year (0-467, SD 118.2). The Livermore technique showed the least deviation from the optical reference standard and a superior position from the viewpoint of error analysis but the correlation coefficient was slightly less (r = 0.761) than for the Dorr and Charnley techniques (r = 0.795 and r = 0.778, respectively). In addition, the mean error of the Dorr method differed significantly from zero (p = 0.036). Overall, the Livermore technique was the most accurate method for polyethylene wear measurement regardless of the abduction angle of the cup.

Conclusions: The Livermore technique performed manually was more accurate than the Charnley and Dorr methods. Nevertheless, we consider the Dorr technique an adequate tool for day-to-day wear measurements, mainly due to its simplicity.

Keywords: Total hip arthroplasty, Polyethylene wear measurement, Microscope, Radiographic techniques, Cementless ABG 1

Received: September 10, 2006; Accepted: November 11, 2006; Published: December 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gallo, J., Havranek, V., Cechova, I., & Zapletalova, J. (2006). WEAR MEASUREMENT OF RETRIEVED POLYETHYLENE ABG 1 CUPS BY UNIVERSAL-TYPE MEASURING MICROSCOPE AND X-RAY METHODS. Biomedical papers150(2), 321-326. doi: 10.5507/bp.2006.049
Download citation

References

  1. Sosna A, Radonsky T, Pokorny D, Veigl D, Horak Z, Jahoda D. Polyethylene disease. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2003; 70:616.
  2. Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA. A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17:64961. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. McCalden RW, Naudie DD, Yuan X, Bourne RB. Radiographic methods for the assessment of polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2005; 87-A:232334. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Jasty M, Goetz DD, Bragdon CR, Lee KR, Hanson AE, Elder JR, et al. Wear of polyethylene acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. An analysis of one hundred and twenty-eight components retrieved at autopsy or revision operations. J Bone Joint Surg 1997; 79-A:34958. Go to original source...
  5. Raimondi MT, Sassi R, Pietrabissa R. A method for the evaluation of the change in volume of retrieved acetabular cups... Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2000; 214:57787. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Blacha J. High osteolysis and revision rate with the hydroxyapatitecoated ABG hip prostheses: 65 hips in 56 young patients followed for 59 years. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75:27682. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Duffy P, Sher JL, Partington PF. Premature wear and osteolysis in an HA-coated, uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2004; 86-B:348. Go to original source...
  8. Rogers A, Kulkarni R, Downes EM. The ABG hydroxyapatitecoated hip prosthesis: one hundred consecutive operations with average 6-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18:61925. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Badhe S, Livesley P. Early polyethylene wear and osteolysis with ABG acetabular cups (7- to 12-year follow-up). Int Orthop 2006; 30:314. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Kim WY, Muddu BN. Eleven-year results of the ABG I hip replacement. Int Orthop 2006; 30:1824. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Gallo J, Kaminek P, Pach M, Ditmar R. Early results of cementless hip arthroplasty: ABG and Balgrist-Zweymuller with 3 to 4 years of followup. Annual Meeting of the Czech and Slovac Society for Orthopaedics and Traumatology;1998 1921 November; Prague, Czech Republic. Abstract Book, p. 20.
  12. Gallo J, Kaminek P, Zapletalova J, Novotny R, Cechova I, Ditmar R. Early failure of the polyethylene liner in the ABG I total hip prosthesis. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2003; 70:3439.
  13. Oosterbos CJ, Rahmy AI, Tonino AJ, Witpeerd W. High survival rate of hydroxyapatite-coated hip prostheses: 100 consecutive hips followed for 10 years. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75:12733. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Tonino AJ, Rahmy AI. The hydroxyapatite-ABG hip system: 5- to 7-year results from an international multicentre study. The International ABG Study Group. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15:274 82. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. McKellop HA, Campbell P, Park SH, Schmalzried TP, Grigoris P, Amstutz HC, et al. The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1995; 311:320.
  16. Charnley J, Halley DK. Rate of wear in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1975; 112:1709. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B. Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 72-A:51828. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Dorr LD, Wan Z. Ten years of experience with porous acetabular components for revision surgery. Clin Orthop 1995; 319:191 200. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Havranek V. Measurement by universal microscope. Fine Mechanics and Optics 2002; 47:202.
  20. Gallo J, Havranek V, Hrabovsky M. Measurement of retrieved polyethylene cup by universal microscope. Fine Mechanics and Optics 2003; 48:3338.
  21. Giannikas KA, Din R, Sadiq S, Dunningham TH. Mediumterm results of the ABG total hip arthroplasty in young patients. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17:1848. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen J, Paavolainen P. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2006; 77:57 70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Pollock D, Sychterz CJ, Engh CA. A clinically practical method of manually assessing polyethylene liner thickness. J Bone Joint Surg 2001; 83-A:18039. Go to original source...
  24. Ebramzadeh E, Sangiorgio SN, Lattuada F, Kang JS, Chiesa R, McKellop HA, et al. Accuracy of measurement of polyethylene wear with use of radiographs of total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 2003; 85-A:237884. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Kang JS, Park SR, Ebramzadeh E, Dorr LD. Measurement of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty-accuracy versus ease of use. Yonsei Med J 2003; 44:4738. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Barrack RL, Lavernia C, Szuszczewicz ES, Sawhney J. Radiographic wear measurements in a cementless metal-backed modular cobalt-chromium acetabular component. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16:8208. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Ohlin A, Selvik G. Socket wear assessment. A comparison of three different radiographic methods. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8:42731. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...