Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2006, 150(2):327-332 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2006.050

USE OF THE PAVLIK NAIL FOR FEMORAL SHORTENING

Miroslav Pach, Miroslav Uvizl, Radomir Holibka
Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic

Background: Selecting the correct type of osteosynthesis has a crucial impact on the final outcome of shortening operations for leg length discrepancy (LLD). One approach, introduced at the beginning of the 1950's, was fixation of femoral shortening osteotomy using the Pavlik intramedullary nail.

Aim: The aim of this paper is to draw attention to the outstanding contribution of this great representative of Czech orthopaedics, to compare his method with other approaches to osteosynthesis, and, in the original patient set, to evaluate the long-term results of femoral shortening based on available medical records.

Material and methods: Of 34 operated patients, a subset of 11 underwent femoral shortening and fixation by the Pavlik nail and were evaluated according to the Merle d'Aubigne and Postel score. Preoperative, postoperative and current radiographs are described.

Results: The results were: excellent (6), good (3), and fair (2). There was no infection, thrombembolism, or osteosynthesis failure. Heterotopic ossification was recorded. The general validity of Pavlik's technical orthopaedic thinking is confirmed by stable osteosynthesis, and prevalence of excellent and good results.

Conclusion: This study has confirmed the general validity of Pavlik's technical and orthopaedic thinking. His intramedullary nail was a suitable instrument for achieving stable osteosynthesis after a shortening femoral osteotomy. There was neither nail migration nor bone fragment dislocation. No additional plaster immobilization was used and this promoted early, progressive and rapid rehabilitation oriented towards active exercises. The low complication rate was evidence of correct methodology. Despite the undoubted value of the Pavlik femoral intramedullary nail, this method has never become widespread.

Keywords: Keywords: Leg length discrepancy (LLD), Femoral shortening, Osteosynthesis, Pavlik nail, Long-term results, Merle d’Aubigne

Received: October 10, 2006; Accepted: November 29, 2006; Published: December 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pach, M., Uvizl, M., & Holibka, R. (2006). USE OF THE PAVLIK NAIL FOR FEMORAL SHORTENING. Biomedical papers150(2), 327-332. doi: 10.5507/bp.2006.050
Download citation

References

  1. Codivilla A. On the means of lengthening in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. Am J Orthop Surg 1905; 2:353369.
  2. Shapiro F. Developmental patterns of lower extremity discrepancies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64:639651. Go to original source...
  3. Torode I P. The behavior of limb inequality in specific disorders. In: Menelaus MB, ed. The management of limb inequality. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1991. p. 3738.
  4. Stricker SJ, Hunt T. Evaluation of leg length discrepancy in children. Int Pediatr 2004; 19:134142.
  5. Pavlík A. A femoral intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1957; 39:10591075. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Merle dAubigne R. Cotation chiffrée de la function de la hanche. Rev Orthop 1970; 56:481486.
  7. Merle dAubigne R, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1954; 34A: 451475.
  8. Tachdjian M O. Pediatric Orthopedics. Philadelphia, USA: W.B. Saunders Company, 1990.
  9. Siffert RS. Current concepts review: lower limb-length discrepancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69:11001106. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Wagner H. Surgical lengthening or shortening of femur and tibia. Technique and indications. Progress in Orthop Surg 1977; 1:71 94. Go to original source...
  11. Phemister DB. Operative arrest of longitudinal growth of bones in treatment of deformities. J Bone Joint Surg 1933; 15:115.
  12. Stamp WG and Lansche WE. Treatment of discrepancy in leg length. South Med J 1960; 53:764774. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Blair VP 3rd, Schoenecker PL, Sheridan JJ, Capelli AM. Closed shortening of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71:1440 1447. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Chapman ME, Duwelius PJ, Bray TJ and Gordon JE. Closed intramedullary femoral osteotomy, shortening and derotation procedures. Clin Orthop 1993; 287:245251. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Lambotte A. Lintervention opératoire dans les fractures récentes et anciennes envisagée particulierement au point de vue de losteo synthése avec la description de plusieurs techniques nouvelles. Paris: A. Kaloune, 1907.
  16. Küntscher G. Die Marknagelung. Berlin: Verlag Dr. Werner Saenger, 1950.
  17. Thompson TC, Straub LR and Campbell RD. An evaluation of femoral shortening with intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1954; 36:4356. Go to original source...
  18. Zahradníček J. Chirurgické léčení nestejně dlouhých dolních končetin. Čas lék čes 1943; 48:1407.
  19. Kempf I, Grosse A, Abalo C. Locked intramedullary nailing: its application to femoral and tibial axial, rotational, lengthening and shorthening osteotomies. Clin Orthop 1986; 212:165173. Go to original source...
  20. Kenwright J. Shortening by bone resection. Seminars in Orthopaedics 1992, 7(3):194200.
  21. Čech O, Stryhal F, Sosna A, Beznoska S. Stabilní osteosyntéza v traumatologii a ortopedii. Praha: Avicenum, 1982.
  22. Kenwright J, Albinana J. Problems encountered in leg shortening. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73:671675. Go to original source...
  23. Bianco AJ. Femoral shortening. Clin Orthop 1978; 136:4953. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...