Descending Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy – Results and Consequences

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy is the ther­apy of choice in selected prostate cancer patients. In an internal quality control including a questionnaire, our nerve-sparing radical prostatectomies have been analysed for oncological and functional results as well as patient satisfaction. 171 consecutive nerve sparing radical prostatectomies have been analysed, 123 bilateral, 48 unilateral. The median follow-up was 26 (2–56) months. The operations were performed by 5 surgeons. In 27 % the T-category and in 12 % the Gleason score had been understaged preoperatively, 9 % had positive margins and in 4 % lymph nodes were positive. 99 % of the patients stated that they would again prefer the operation as treatment of first choice. 95 % were satisfied with their postoperative situation. 53 % of the patients had erections sufficient for sexual intercourse following the bilateral, 25 % following the unilateral nerve-sparing procedure. The time until recurrence of erections was 1 month in 42 %, 6 months in 90 % and 12 months in 100 % of the potent men. 90 % of all patients within the observation period are fully continent, 10 % of the patients need more than 1 pad. The intersurgeon varia­bility is 77–98 % for continence and 25–60 % for potency. Patient satisfaction, oncological and functional results are good. The understaging rate suggests the necessity for better patient ­selection including re-biopsy and reference histology. 27 % would have been undertreated by brachytherapy as alternative treatment. Intensive surgeon teaching is mandatory.

References

• 1 Bannowsky A, Schulze H, van der Horst C et al. Nocturnal tumescence: a parameter for postoperative erectile integrity after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.  J Urol. 2006;  175 2214-2217
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Bianco Jr F J, Scardino P T, Eastham J A. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (“trifecta”).  Urology. 2005;  66 83-94
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Bill-Axelson A, Homberg L, Ruutu M Scandinavian prostate cancer group study No. 4 et al.,. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.  NEJM. 2005;  352 1977-1984
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Burkhard F C, Kessler T M, Fleischmann A et al. Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy-does it have an impact on urinary continence?.  J Urol. 2006;  176 189-195
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Burnett A L. Erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy.  JAMA. 2005;  293 2648-2653
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Catalona W J, Carvalhal G F, Mager D E et al. Potency, continence an complication rates in 1870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.  J Urol. 1999;  162 433
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Catalona W J, Ramos C G, Carvalhal G F. Contemporary results of anatomic radical prostatectomy.  CA Cancer J Clin. 1999;  49 282
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Han M, Partin A W, Chan D Y et al. An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in al large retropubic prostatectomy series.  J Urol. 2004;  171 23
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Han M, Partin A W, Pound C R et al. Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience.  Urol Clin North Am. 2001;  28 555-565
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Heidenreich A, Aus G, Abbou C C et al. Guidelines on Prostate Cancer.  Eur Association of Urol. 2005;  48 546-551
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Hull G W, Rabbani F, Abbas F et al. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1000 consecutive patients.  J Urol. 2002;  167 (2 Pt 1) 528-534
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Jacobsen N EB, Moore K, Estey E et al. Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of postoperative urinary incontinence rates.  J Urol. 2007;  177 615-619
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Michl U HG, Friedrich M G, Graefen M et al. Prediction of postoperative sexual function after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.  J Urol. 2006;  176 227-231
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Noldus J, Michl U, Graefen M et al. Patient-reported sexual function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.  Eur Urol. 2002;  42 118
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Ponholzer A, Brössner C, Struhal G et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms, urinary incontinence, sexual function and quality of life after radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy: real life experience in Austria.  World J Urol. 2006;  24 325-330
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 van Poppel H, Goethuys H, Callewaert P et al. Radical prostatectomy can provide cure for well selected clinical stage T3 prostate cancer.  Eur Urol. 2000;  38 372-379
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Rosen R C, Cappelleri J C, Smith M D et al. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction.  Int J Impot Res. 1999;  11 319
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Swindle P, Eastham J A, Ohori M et al. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.  J Urol. 2005;  174 903-907
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Ward J F, Slezak J M, Blute M L et al. Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome.  BJU Int. 2005;  95 751-756
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Wieder J A, Soloway M S. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.  J Urol. 1998;  160 299
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Wirth M P, Hakenberg O W, Fröhner M. Therapie des lokalen fort­ge­schrittenen Prostatakarzinoms.  Urologe. 2005;  44 1295-1302
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Prof. Dr. T. Kälble

Klinikum Fulda gAG · Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie

Pacelliallee 4

36043 Fulda

Germany

Email: t.kaelble.urologie@klinikum-fulda.de