Cap-assisted retrograde single-balloon enteroscopy results in high terminal ileal intubation rate

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims: Retrograde single-balloon enteroscopy (RSBE) facilitates evaluation of the distal small bowel and provision of appropriate therapy when necessary. Intubation of the terminal ileum (TI) is a major rate-limiting step, with failure rates as high as 30 %. Cap-assisted endoscopy has proven beneficial in other aspects of endoscopy. We have noticed that it similarly aids in TI intubation during RSBE by facilitating opening of the ileocecal valve (ICV). The primary aim of this study was to measure the TI intubation rate using cap-assisted RSBE. Other procedural details and outcomes were also measured.

Patients and methods: A total of 36 consecutive RSBEs performed between July 2011 and May 2014 at the Medical University of South Carolina were retrospectively reviewed. All procedures were performed or supervised by our center’s small bowel endoscopist (ASB). Outcomes measured included TI intubation rate, procedure time, depth of maximal insertion (DMI), diagnostic yield (DY), therapeutic yield (TY), and complications.

Results: The TI intubation rate was 97 % (35 /36). The one failure was due to stool completely obscuring the cecum. Median procedure time was 54 minutes, with a mean DMI of 68 cm beyond the ICV. The technical success rate was 86 %, whereas DY and TY were 61 % and 25 %, respectively. There were no complications. The study was limited in that it involved a single endoscopist at a single center.

Conclusions: Cap-assisted RSBE results in a high TI intubation rate, without compromise to safety or procedural yield.

• References

• 1 Mehdizadeh S, Ross A, Gerson L et al. What is the learning curve associated with double balloon enteroscopy? Technical details and early experience in 6 US tertiary care centers. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 740-750
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Dik VK, Moons LM, Siersema PD. Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 7: 2200-2211
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Frieling T, Neuhaus F, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R et al. Prospective and randomized study to evaluate the clinical impact of cap assisted colonoscopy (CAC). Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51: 1383-1388
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Choi YR, Han JH, Cho YS et al. Efficacy of cap-assisted endoscopy for routine examining the ampulla of Vater. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 2037-2043
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Upchurch BR, Sanaka MR, Lopez AR et al. The clinical utility of single-balloon enteroscopy: a single-center experience of 172 procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1218-1223
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Efthymiou M, Desmond P, Brown G et al. SINGLE-01: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and depth of insertion of single- and double-balloon enteroscopy by using a novel method to determine insertion depth. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 972-980
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Tsujikawa T, Saitoh Y, Andoh A et al. Novel single-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of the small intestine: preliminary experiences. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 11-15
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Frantz DJ, Dellon ES, Grimm IS et al. Single-balloon enteroscopy: results from an initial experience at a U.S. tertiary-care center. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 422-426
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar