Assessing Success after Cerebral Revascularization for Ischemia

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Cerebral revascularization continues to evolve as an option in the setting of ischemia. The potential to favorably influence stroke risk and the natural history of cerebrovascular occlusive disease is being evaluated by the ongoing Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study and the Japanese Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Trial. For those patients who undergo bypass in the setting of ischemia, four key areas of follow-up include functional neurological status, neurocognitive status, bypass patency, and status of cerebral blood flow and perfusion. Several stroke scales that can be used to assess functional status include the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Bathel Index, Modified Rankin Scale, and Stroke Specific Quality of Life. Neurocognition can be checked using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status, among other tests. Bypass patency is checked intraoperatively using various flow probes and postoperatively using magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or computed tomographic angiography (CTA). Cerebral blood flow and perfusion can be assessed using a host of modalities that include positron emission tomography (PET), xenon CT, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), transcranial Doppler (TCD), CT, and MR. Paired blood flow studies after a cerebral vasodilatory stimulus using one of these modalities can determine the state of autoregulatory vasodilation (Stage 1 hemodynamic compromise). However, only PET with oxygen extraction fraction measurements can reliably assess for Stage 2 compromise (misery perfusion). This article discusses the various clinical, neuropsychological, and radiographic techniques available to assess a patient's clinical state and cerebral blood flow before and after cerebral revascularization.

REFERENCES

• 1 [No authors listed.] Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial. The EC/IC Bypass Study Group.  N Engl J Med. 1985;  313 1191-1200
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Grubb Jr R L, Powers W J, Derdeyn C P, Adams H P, Clarke W R. The carotid occlusion surgery study.  Neurosurg Focus. 2003;  14 e9
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Mizumura S, Nakagawara J, Takahashi M et al.. Three-dimensional display in staging hemodynamic brain ischemia for JET study: objective evaluation using SEE analysis and 3D-SSP display.  Ann Nucl Med. 2004;  18 13-21
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Eastwood J D, Alexander M J, Petrella J R, Provenzale J M. Dynamic CT perfusion imaging with acetazolamide challenge for the preprocedural evaluation of a patient with symptomatic middle cerebral artery occlusive disease.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;  23 285-287
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Kim J K, Ahn J Y, Lee B H et al.. Elective stenting for symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis presenting as transient ischaemic deficits or stroke attacks: short-term arteriographical and clinical outcome.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;  75 847-851
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Ogasawara K, Ogawa A, Yoshimoto T. Cerebrovascular reactivity to acetazolamide and outcome in patients with symptomatic internal carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusion: a xenon 133 single-photon emission computed tomography study.  Stroke. 2002;  33 1857-1862
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Liu A Y, Do H M, Albers G W, Lopez J R, Steinberg G K, Marks M P. Hyperperfusion syndrome with hemorrhage after angioplasty for middle cerebral artery stenosis.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;  22 1597-1601
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Klopfenstein J D, Ponce F A, Kim L J, Albuquerque F A, Nakaji P, Spetzler R F. Middle cerebral artery stenosis: endovascular and surgical options.  Skull Base. 2005;  , In press
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 SSYLVIA Study Investigators . Stenting of Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Vertebral or Intracranial Arteries (SSYLVIA); study results.  Stroke. 2004;  35 1388-1392
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Adams Jr H P, Davis P H, Leira E C et al.. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke. A report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST).  Neurology. 1999;  53 126-131
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke.  Stroke. 1988;  19 1497-1500
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Mahoney F I, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index.  Md State Med J. 1965;  14 61-65
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Williams L S, Weinberger M, Harris L E, Clark D O, Biller J. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life QOL scale.  Stroke. 1999;  30 1362-1369
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Peerless S J, Chater N L, Ferguson G F. Multiple-vessel occlusions in cerebrovascular disease-a further follow-up of the effects of microvascular bypass on the quality of life and the incidence of stroke. In: Schmiedek P Microsurgery for Stroke New York, NY; Springer-Verlag 1977: 251-259
  Google Scholar
• 15 Dull R A, Brown G G, Adams K M, Shatz M W, Diaz F G, Ausman J I. Preoperative neurobehavioral impairment in cerebral revascularization candidates.  J Clin Neuropsychol. 1982;  4 151-165
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Binder L M, Tanabe C T, Waller F T, Wooster N E. Behavioral effects of superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass surgery: preliminary report.  Neurology. 1982;  32 422-424
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Baird A D, Boulos R, Mehta B et al.. Cerebral angiography and neuropsychological measurement: the twain may meet.  Surg Neurol. 1985;  23 641-650
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Brown G C, Ewing J R, Weiss S M, Robertson W M, Welch K MA. Neuropsychological correlates of regional cerebral blood flow in candidates for extracranial to intracranial bypass.  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1983;  3(suppl 1) S594-S595
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Payk T R, Wassmann H, Schumacher W, Bollbach R. Psychometric studies of cerebral performance before and following extra-intracranial bypass operations.  Nervenarzt. 1986;  57 244-248
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Nielsen H, Hojer-Pedersen E, Gulliksen G, Haase J, Enevoldsen E. Reversible ischemic neurological deficit and minor strokes before and after EC/IC bypass surgery. A neuropsychological study.  Acta Neurol Scand. 1986;  73 615-618
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Baird A D, Brown G G, Adams K M et al.. Neuropsychological deficits and real-world dysfunction in cerebral revascularization candidates.  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1987;  9 407-422
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Knipp S C, Matatko N, Wilhelm H et al.. Evaluation of brain injury after coronary artery bypass grafting. A prospective study using neuropsychological assessment and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;  25 791-800
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Nollert G, Mohnle P, Tassani-Prell P et al.. Postoperative neuropsychological dysfunction and cerebral oxygenation during cardiac surgery.  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;  43 260-264
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Shaw P J, Bates D, Cartlidge N E et al.. Early intellectual dysfunction following coronary bypass surgery.  Q J Med. 1986;  58 59-68
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Wiebers D O, Whisnant J P, Huston 3rd J International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators et al.. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment.  Lancet. 2003;  362 103-110
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Folstein M F, Folstein S E, McHugh P R. “Mini Mental State”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.  J Psychiatr Res. 1975;  12 189-198
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Gontkovsky S T, Hillary F G, Scott J G. Cross-validation and test sensitivity of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).  J Cogn Rehab. 2002;  winter 26-31
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Randolph C, Tierney M C, Mohr E, Chase T N. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity.  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998;  20 310-319
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Mattis S. Dementia Rating Scale: Professional Manual. Odessa, FL; Psychological Assessment Resources 1988
  Google Scholar
• 30 Randolph C. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). San Antonio, TX; Psychological Corp 1998
  Google Scholar
• 31 Gold J M, Queern C, Iannone V N, Buchanan R W. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status as a screening test in schizophrenia, I: sensitivity, reliability, and validity.  Am J Psychiatry. 1999;  156 1944-1950
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Hobart M P, Goldberg R, Bartko J J, Gold J M. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status as a screening test in schizophrenia, II: convergent/discriminant validity and diagnostic group comparisons.  Am J Psychiatry. 1999;  156 1951-1957
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Wilk C M, Gold J M, Bartko J J et al.. Test-retest stability of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status in schizophrenia.  Am J Psychiatry. 2002;  159 838-844
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Derdeyn C P, Moran C J, Cross D T, Grubb Jr R L, Dacey Jr R G. Intraoperative digital subtraction angiography: a review of 112 consecutive examinations.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;  16 307-318
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Chiang V L, Gailloud P, Murphy K J, Rigamonti D, Tamargo R J. Routine intraoperative angiography during aneurysm surgery.  J Neurosurg. 2002;  96 988-992
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Klopfenstein J D, Spetzler R F, Kim L J et al.. Comparison of routine and selective use of intraoperative angiography during aneurysm surgery: a prospective assessment.  J Neurosurg. 2004;  100 230-235
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Tang G, Cawley C M, Dion J E, Barrow D L. Intraoperative angiography during aneurysm surgery: a prospective evaluation of efficacy.  J Neurosurg. 2002;  96 993-999
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Raabe A, Beck J, Gerlach R, Zimmerman M, Seifert V. Near-infrared indocyanine green video angiography: a new method for intraoperative visualization of vascular flow.  J Neurosurg. 2003;  98 A246
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Raabe A, Nakaji P, Hsu F et al.. Prospective evaluation of surgical microscope-based indocyanine green video angiography in aneurysm surgery.  J Neurosurg. 2004;  100 A786
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Badie B, Lee Jr F T, Pozniak M A, Strother C M. Intraoperative sonographic assessment of graft patency during extracranial-intracranial bypass.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;  21 1457-1459
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Amin-Hanjani S, Du X, Mlinarevich N, Meglio G, Zhao M, Charbel F T. The cut flow index: an intraoperative predictor of the success of extracranial-intracranial bypass for occlusive cerebrovascular disease.  Neurosurgery. 2005;  56 75-85 discussion 75-85
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Charbel F T, Hoffman W E, Misra M, Ostergren L. Ultrasonic perivascular flow probe: technique and application in neurosurgery.  Neurol Res. 1998;  20 439-442
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Nakayama N, Kuroda S, Houkin K, Takikawa S, Abe H. Intraoperative measurement of arterial blood flow using a transit time flowmeter: monitoring of hemodynamic changes during cerebrovascular surgery.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;  143 17-24
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Lewis B D, Kwan E, Enzmann D R. DSA evaluation of the STA-MCA bypass.  Neuroradiology. 1984;  26 209-212
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Gratzl O, Schmiedek P, Spetzler R, Steinhoff H, Marguth F. Clinical experience with extra-intracranial arterial anastomosis in 65 cases.  J Neurosurg. 1976;  44 313-324
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Yasargil M G, Yonekawa Y. Results of microsurgical extra-intracranial arterial bypass in the treatment of cerebral ischemia.  Neurosurgery. 1977;  1 22-24
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Schmiedek P, Piepgras A, Leinsinger G, Kirsch C M, Einhupl K. Improvement of cerebrovascular reserve capacity by EC-IC arterial bypass surgery in patients with ICA occlusion and hemodynamic cerebral ischemia.  J Neurosurg. 1994;  81 236-244
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Sundt Jr T M, Whisnant J P, Fode N C, Piepgras D G, Houser O W. Results, complications, and follow-up of 415 bypass operations for occlusive disease of the carotid system.  Mayo Clin Proc. 1985;  60 230-240
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Mabuchi S, Nakayama N, Isu T, Harata T, Nanbu T. Evaluation of the patency of an extracranial-intracranial bypass using magnetic resonance angiography with selective presaturation of bypass vessels.  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1994;  34 365-370
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Praharaj S S, Coulthard A, Gholkar A, English P, Mendelow A D. Magnetic resonance angiographic assessment after extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;  60 439-441
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Kodoma T, Suzuki Y, Yano T, Watanabe K, Ueda T, Asada K. Phase-contrast MRA in the evaluation of EC-IC bypass patency.  Clin Radiol. 1995;  50 459-465
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Teksam M, McKinney A, Truwit C L. Multi-slice CT angiography in evaluation of extracranial-intracranial bypass.  Eur J Radiol. 2004;  52 217-220
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Tsuchiya K, Aoki C, Katase S, Hachiya J, Shiokawa Y. Visualization of extracranial-intracranial bypass using multidetector-row helical computed tomography angiography.  J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;  27 231-234
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Neff K W, Horn P, Dinter D, Vajkoczy P, Schmiedek P, Duber C. Extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass surgery improves total brain blood supply in selected symptomatic patients with unilateral internal carotid artery occlusion and insufficient collateralization.  Neuroradiology. 2004;  46 730-737
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 van Everdingen K J, Klijn C J, Kappelle L J, Mali W P, van der Grond J. MRA flow quantification in patients with a symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion. The Dutch EC-IC Bypass Study Group.  Stroke. 1997;  28 1595-1600
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Charbel F T, Zhao M, Amin-Hanjani S, Hoffman W, Du X, Clark M E. A patient-specific computer model to predict outcomes of the balloon occlusion test.  J Neurosurg. 2004;  101 977-988
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Guppy K H, Charbel F T, Corsten L A, Zhao M, Debrun G. Hemodynamic evaluation of basilar and vertebral artery angioplasty.  Neurosurgery. 2002;  51 327-333 discussion 333-334
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Zhao M, Charbel F T, Alperin N, Loth F, Clark M E. Improved phase-contrast flow quantification by three-dimensional vessel localization.  Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;  18 697-706
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Amin-Hanjani S, Shin J, Du X, Zhao M, Charbel F. Evaluation of EC-IC bypass grafts using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography.  J Neurosurg. 2005;  102 A791
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Schick U, Zimmermann M, Stolke D. Long-term evaluation of EC-IC bypass patency.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;  138 938-942 discussion 942-943
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Derdeyn C P, Grubb Jr R L, Powers W J. Cerebral hemodynamic impairment: methods of measurement and association with stroke risk.  Neurology. 1999;  53 251-259
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Grubb Jr R L, Derdeyn C P, Fritsch S M et al.. Importance of hemodynamic factors in the prognosis of symptomatic carotid occlusion.  JAMA. 1998;  280 1055-1060
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Muraishi K, Kameyama M, Sato K et al.. Cerebral circulatory and metabolic changes following EC/IC bypass surgery in cerebral occlusive diseases.  Neurol Res. 1993;  15 97-103
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Nagata S, Fujii K, Matsushima T et al.. Evaluation of EC-IC bypass for patients with atherosclerotic occlusive cerebrovascular disease: clinical and positron emission tomographic studies.  Neurol Res. 1991;  13 209-216
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Webster M W, Makaroun M S, Steed D L, Smith H A, Johnson D W, Yonas H. Compromised cerebral blood flow reactivity is a predictor of stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusive disease.  J Vasc Surg. 1995;  21 338-344 discussion 344-345
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Kleiser B, Widder B. Course of carotid artery occlusions with impaired cerebrovascular reactivity.  Stroke. 1992;  23 171-174
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Kuroda S, Houkin K, Kamiyama H, Mitsumori K, Iwasaki Y, Abe H. Long-term prognosis of medically treated patients with internal carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusion: can acetazolamide test predict it?.  Stroke. 2001;  32 2110-2116
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Ogasawara K, Ogawa A, Yoshimoto T. Cerebrovascular reactivity to acetazolamide and outcome in patients with symptomatic internal carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusion: a xenon-133 single-photon emission computed tomography study.  Stroke. 2002;  33 1857-1862
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Vernieri F, Pasqualetti P, Passarelli F, Rossini P M, Silvestrini M. Outcome of carotid artery occlusion is predicted by cerebrovascular reactivity.  Stroke. 1999;  30 593-598
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Gur D, Yonas H, Jackson D L et al.. Simultaneous measurements of cerebral blood flow by the xenon/CT method and the microsphere method. A comparison.  Invest Radiol. 1985;  20 672-677
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Nabavi D G, Cenic A, Henderson S, Gelb A W, Lee T Y. Perfusion mapping using computed tomography allows accurate prediction of cerebral infarction in experimental brain ischemia.  Stroke. 2001;  32 175-183
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Wintermark M, Thiran J P, Maeder P, Schnyder P, Meuli R. Simultaneous measurement of regional cerebral blood flow by perfusion CT and stable xenon CT: a validation study.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;  22 905-914
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 73 Carusone L M, Srinivasan J, Gitelman D R, Mesulam M M, Parrish T B. Hemodynamic response changes in cerebrovascular disease: implications for functional MR imaging.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;  23 1222-1228
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 74 Hedera P, Lai S, Lewin J S et al.. Assessment of cerebral blood flow reserve using functional magnetic resonance imaging.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;  6 718-725
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Kuwabara Y, Ichiya Y, Sasaki M et al.. PET evaluation of cerebral hemodynamics in occlusive cerebrovascular disease pre- and postsurgery.  J Nucl Med. 1998;  39 760-765
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 Klijn C J, Kappelle L J, van der Zwan A, van Gijn J, Tulleken C A. Excimer laser-assisted high-flow extracranial/intracranial bypass in patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusion at high risk of recurrent cerebral ischemia: safety and long-term outcome.  Stroke. 2002;  33 2451-2458
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 77 Charbel F, Du X, Guppy K, Zhao M, Maksoud Y, Ausman J. Improvement of cerebrovascular reserve capacity in patients with symptomatic internal carotid occlusion after EC-IC bypass surgery.  Neurosurgery. 2000;  47 A533
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 78 Karnik R, Valentin A, Ammerer H P, Donath P, Slany J. Evaluation of vasomotor reactivity by transcranial Doppler and acetazolamide test before and after extracranial-intracranial bypass in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion.  Stroke. 1992;  23 812-817
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 79 Yamashita T, Kashiwagi S, Nakano S et al.. The effect of EC-IC bypass surgery on resting cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reserve capacity studied with stable XE-CT and acetazolamide test.  Neuroradiology. 1991;  33 217-222
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 80 Ishikawa T, Houkin K, Abe H, Isobe M, Kamiyama H. Cerebral haemodynamics and long-term prognosis after extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;  59 625-628
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 81 Vorstrup S, Brun B, Lassen N A. Evaluation of the cerebral vasodilatory capacity by the acetazolamide test before EC-IC bypass surgery in patients with occlusion of the internal carotid artery.  Stroke. 1986;  17 1291-1298
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 82 Nussbaum E S, Erickson D L. Extracranial-intracranial bypass for ischemic cerebrovascular disease refractory to maximal medical therapy.  Neurosurgery. 2000;  46 37-42 discussion 42-43
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 83 Di Piero V, Lenzi G L, Collice M et al.. Long-term noninvasive single photon emission computed tomography monitoring of perfusional changes after EC-IC bypass surgery.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;  50 988-996
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 84 Yonekura M, Austin G, Hayward W. Long-term evaluation of cerebral blood flow, transient ischemic attacks, and stroke after STA-MCA anastomosis.  Surg Neurol. 1982;  18 123-130
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 85 Tanahashi N, Meyer J S, Rogers R L et al.. Long-term assessment of cerebral perfusion following STA-MCA by-pass in patients.  Stroke. 1985;  16 85-91
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 86 Derdeyn C P, Videen T O, Fritsch S M, Carpenter D A, Grubb Jr R L, Powers W J. Compensatory mechanisms for chronic cerebral hypoperfusion in patients with carotid occlusion.  Stroke. 1999;  30 1019-1024
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 87 Widder B, Kleiser B, Krapf H. Course of cerebrovascular reactivity in patients with carotid artery occlusions.  Stroke. 1994;  25 1963-1967
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 88 Haase J, Magnussen I B, Ogilvy C S et al.. Evaluating patients with vertebrobasilar transient ischemic attacks.  Surg Neurol. 1999;  52 386-392
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 89 Amin-Hanjani S, Du X, Zhao M, Walsh K, Malisch T, Charbel F. Use of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography to stratify stroke risk in symptomatic vertebrobasilar disease.  Stroke. 2005;  36 1140-1145
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

John E WaneboM.D. 

Department of Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Naval Medical Center San Diego

34730 Bob Wilson Dr., Ste. 201

San Diego, CA 92134-3201

Email: JEWanebo@nmcsd.med.navy.mil