Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Outcome Assessment of Non-Arthroplasty Hip Disease

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Hip Arthroscopy and Hip Joint Preservation Surgery

  • 3000 Accesses

Abstract

In order to assess the outcome of the treatment of non-arthroplasty hip disease, it is necessary to use validated patient-generated and patient-reported outcome tools. These measures should reflect the patient population with hip disorders who are typically younger and more active. The chapter addresses the who, why, when, where, and what of outcome assessment. It includes descriptions of the most up-to-date validated tools. This includes the NAHS, the iHOT-33 and iHOT-12, HAGOS, and Vail-10 questionnaires. Suggestions for the surgeon contemplating outcome assessment in their patients with hip disorders are made. Future research should provide direct comparison of the outcome measures to provide evidence-based recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Codman E. The product of a hospital. Surg Gyn Obst. 1914;18:491–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mallon W. E. Amory Codman, surgeon of the 1990s. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7(5):529–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergner M, Rothman M. Health status measures: an overview and guide for selection. Annu Rev Public Health. 1987;8:191–210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ware J. The status of health assessment 1994. Annu Rev Public Health. 1995;16:327–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW. A preliminary evaluation of the dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Clin Rheumatol. 1986;5(2):231–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellamy N, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(12):1833–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(4):737–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Byrd JW. Hip arthroscopy: patient assessment and indications. Instr Course Lect. 2003;52:711–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Christensen CP, et al. The nonarthritic hip score: reliable and validated. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;406:75–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Griffin DR, et al. A short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for use in routine clinical practice. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(5):611–6; quiz 616–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohtadi NG, et al. The Development and validation of a self-administered quality-of-life outcome measure for young, active patients with symptomatic hip disease: the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). Arthroscopy. 2012;28(5):595–605; quiz 606–10 e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thorborg K, et al. The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(6):478–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Patrick DL, et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health. 2007;10 Suppl 2:S125–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Doward LC, McKenna SP. Defining patient-reported outcomes. Value Health. 2004;7 Suppl 1:S4–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin RL, et al. Differences in physician and patient ratings of items used to assess hip disorders. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(8):1508–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Patrick DL. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs): an organizing tool for concepts, measures and applications. Qual Life Newslett. 2003;31:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(1):27–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(8):622–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guyatt GH, Bombardier C, Tugwell PX. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ. 1986;134(8):889–95.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lodhia P, et al. Patient-reported outcome instruments for femoroacetabular impingement and hip labral pathology: a systematic review of the clinimetric evidence. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(2):279–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thorborg K, et al. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported outcome questionnaires when assessing hip and groin disability: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(16):1186–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin RL, Kelly BT, Philippon MJ. Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(12):1304–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin RL, Philippon MJ. Evidence of reliability and responsiveness for the hip outcome score. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(6):676–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nilsdotter AK, et al. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)–validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:10.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tijssen M, et al. Patient-reported outcome questionnaires for hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of the psychometric evidence. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:117.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mokkink LB, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–49.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hetaimish BM, et al. Consistency of reported outcomes after arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(4):780–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Merle D’Aubigne R. Numerical evaluation of hip function. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1970;56(5):481–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Merle D’Aubigne R, Cauchoix J, Ramadier J. Evaluation chiffree de la fonction de la hanch. Application a l’etude des resultats des. Rev Chir Orthop. 1949;35:5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Larson CB. Rating scale for hip disabilities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1963;31:85–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim KC, et al. Influence of femoroacetabular impingement on results of hip arthroscopy in patients with early osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;456:128–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Briggs KK, Philippon MJ. A new validated score to document outcomes following hip arthroscopy. In: International society for hip arthroscopy. Cancun; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sport Medicine Centre and Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, T2N 1N4, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Nicholas G. H. Mohtadi

Authors
  1. Nicholas G. H. Mohtadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas G. H. Mohtadi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Shane J. Nho

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland

    Michael Leunig

  3. Minnesota Orthopedic Sports Medicine Institute, Twin Cities Orthopedics - Edina, Edina, Minnesota, USA

    Christopher M. Larson

  4. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

    Asheesh Bedi

  5. Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service and Center for Hip Preservation Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA

    Bryan T. Kelly

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mohtadi, N.G.H. (2015). Outcome Assessment of Non-Arthroplasty Hip Disease. In: Nho, S., Leunig, M., Larson, C., Bedi, A., Kelly, B. (eds) Hip Arthroscopy and Hip Joint Preservation Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6965-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6965-0_14

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6964-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6965-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation