Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Medical Research 1/2023

Open Access 01.12.2023 | Research

Association between body mass index and myopia in the United States population in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1999 to 2008: a cross-sectional study

verfasst von: Yaohui Qu, Huamin Huang, Hongxing Zhang

Erschienen in: European Journal of Medical Research | Ausgabe 1/2023

Abstract

Background

This study investigated the association between body mass index (BMI) and myopia in the United States.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 8,000 participants from the 1999 to 2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). BMI was classified into four groups: < 18.5, 18.5 – 24.9, 25–29.9, and > 29.9. Three diagnostic thresholds were used for myopia A\B\C: spherical equivalent ≤ −0.5\−0.75\−1 diopters in the right eye. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and smooth curve fitting were performed to evaluate the association between BMI and myopia.

Results

The incidence of myopia was 39.4%. BMI was correlated with myopia, with each 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI associated with a 1% increase in the risk of myopia (OR, 1.01; 95% CI 1.01 1.02; p < 0.05). In myopia B, after adjusting for confounding factors, compared with the reference group (BMI 18.5–24.9), participants with a BMI of 25–29.9 and greater than 29.9 had a 14% and 25% increased risk of myopia, respectively (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.01 1.29; p = 0.037, OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.08 1.44; p = 0.003), which was similar to the results for myopic A (OR, 1.15; 95% CI 1.02 1.3; p = 0.027, OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.03 1.37; p = 0.018) and myopia C (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.01 1.31; p = 0.035, OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.01 1.37; p = 0.032). Moreover, there was a linear relationship between myopia and BMI (p for nonlinearity = 0.767).

Conclusions

Myopia using all three diagnostic thresholds was positively associated with higher BMI. This suggests a potential association between myopia and higher BMI in the American population, warranting further investigations.
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s40001-023-01542-4.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
D
Diopters
MET
Metabolic equivalent
ALT
Alanine aminotransferase
AST
Aspartate aminotransferase
HDL-C
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol
CRP
C-reaction protein
BMI
Body mass index
SD
Standard deviation
Q1
First quartile
Q3
Third quartile
OR
Odds ratio
CI
Confidence interval
NHANES
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Background

Myopia is described as light rays entering the eye parallel to the optic axis and coming into focus in front of the retina when the ocular accommodation is relaxed [1]. The prevalence of myopia in the United States increased from 25% in 1971–1972 to 41.6% in 1999–2004 [2]. Two reports from China show that the prevalence of myopia among adolescents is 63.1% and 84.8%, and the incidence of high myopia reaches 9.4% and 19.3%, respectively [3, 4]. According to the forecast, the prevalence of myopia will reach 49.8% in 2050, and the prevalence of high myopia will reach 9.8% [5]. Not only do myopic patients suffer from decreased vision, but they are also at significant risk of developing complications, such as myopic macular degeneration, retinal detachment, open-angle glaucoma, and cataracts, which can severely reduce the quality of life [6, 7]. Globally, myopia has become a major public health concern.
Both genetic and environmental factors have an impact on the development of myopia [810]. Years of education [11] and hours of outdoor activity [1214] have been shown to have a strong causal association with myopia and inflammation [15, 16] also correlates with myopia. Then, late sleep [17] and high glycaemic load carbohydrate diets [18] may be potentially associated with myopia. According to the carbohydrate–insulin model of obesity, a high glycaemic load carbohydrate diet leads to an increase in adipose tissue and a greater tendency to become obese [1921]. Obese individuals tend to have a higher body mass index (BMI) compared to non-obese individuals. However, the results of existing studies on the association between BMI and myopia are inconsistent and mostly focused on Asian populations. Some studies have associated high BMI with myopia [22, 23], but others have linked it to low BMI [24] or have not found an association between both [25, 26].
Therefore, participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 1999 to 2008 were selected to explore the association between BMI and myopia in the United States population.

Methods

Study design and participants

The NHANES is a research program designed to assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States. This survey is conducted annually with a nationally representative sample of approximately 5,000 people. These individuals are located in counties across the country, 15 of which are visited annually. This study was managed by the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The study protocol met the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional review board of the National Center for Health Statistics. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. A more detailed description of the study protocol is provided elsewhere [27].
This study was a cross-sectional study using data from the NHANES database from 1999 to 2008. To calculate metabolic equivalents, participants who responded "don't know" for daily activity time (n = 12) and those with daily non-physical activity time less than 5 h (n = 44, because the veracity of the responses was questionable) were excluded. Then, all participants in the survey years 1999–2008 were included (n = 56,505). Duplicate data (n = 6,262) and missing data (n = 29,049) for any variables, and individuals with a history of refractive surgery or do not know (n = 315), cataract surgery or do not know (n = 740), hyperopia (defined as spherical equivalent ≥ 0.5 diopters (D), n = 4,198), unaware of their diabetic status (n = 11), above the age of 25 (n = 7,930) were excluded. Eventually, 8,000 participants were found suitable for inclusion in our study. The inclusion and exclusion processes are illustrated in Fig. 1.

Variables and measurement

We included only the right eye as the evaluation eye, because refractive errors in the right and left eyes have been shown to be highly correlated [13]. Technicians who initially received 8 weeks of training and then underwent updates and remedial training as needed performed the visual examination. The objective refraction (sphere and cylinder) results were obtained by taking the average of three measurements using a Nidek Auto Refractor Model ARK-760 instrument. The spherical equivalent was calculated as the sphere plus half the cylinder. Because the NHANES database does not account for cycloplegia in refractive measurements, to ensure reliable results, myopia was diagnosed using three thresholds: myopia A was defined as spherical equivalent ≤ -0.5 D, myopia B was defined as spherical equivalent ≤ −0.75 D and myopia C was defined as spherical equivalent  ≤ -1 D [1, 8, 28, 29].
The professional examiners at the mobile examination center measured the body of each examinee. Information on standing height and weight was collected electronically from the measuring devices to reduce the possibility of data input errors. The US Government Printing Office (https://​wwwn.​cdc.​gov/​nchs/​nhanes/​nhanes3/​anthropometricvi​deos.​aspx) offers a specific video technique. BMI was calculated as weight divided by the square of height (BMI = kg/m2) and classified into four groups: < 18.5, 18.5–24.9, 25–29.9, and > 29.9 kg/m2.
Age, sex (male, female), race (Mexican American, other Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and other races), and diabetes data were obtained through personal interviews, and the borderline group for diabetes data was considered to have no diabetes. Physical activity was obtained through the NHANES PAQ questionnaire, and metabolic equivalents were calculated with reference to previous papers [30]. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was measured using Hitachi 717 and Hitachi 912 (Roche Diagnostics, 9115 Hague Road, Indianapolis, IN 46250) from 1999 to 2006 and a Roche Modular P chemistry analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, 9115 Hague Road, Indianapolis, IN 46250) from 2007 to 2008. Triglycerides, total cholesterol, glucose, iron, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were measured using Beckman Synchron LX20 and Beckman UniCel® DxC800 Synchron. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were quantified using latex-enhanced nephelometry.
Missing values were handled by simple deletion, where the proportions of missing values were more than 35% for the following variables: physical activity (44.2%), AST (35.7%), ALT (35.7%), Iron (35.5%), Triglycerides (35.5%), Total cholesterol (35.5%), Glucose (35.5%), cylinder (35.5%). More detailed frequencies and proportions of missing values are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Statistical methods

For the baseline data of the subjects, the measurement data in accordance with the normal distribution were described by the mean ± standard deviation (SD), the measurement data that did not comply with the normal distribution were described by median (first quartile, third quartile), and the count data were described by n (%). A mediation analysis was performed for physical activity and adjusted for age, sex, race, ALT, AST, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C, glucose, iron, CRP, and diabetes mellitus. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between BMI and myopia. Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, physical activity, race, and diabetes mellitus. Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, physical activity, race, ALT, AST, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL-C. Model 3 was adjusted for age, sex, physical activity, race, ALT, AST, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C, glucose, iron, CRP, and diabetes mellitus. The smooth curve fitting graph was established and adjusted according to the covariables contained in Model 3. Considering the effect of extreme values, only the middle 95% of BMI data are shown. All analyses were performed using the statistical software package R (http://​www.​R-project.​org, The R Foundation) and Free Statistics software version 1.7 (http://​www.​clinicalscientis​ts.​cn/​freestatistics/​).

Results

Among 8000 participants with a mean age of 16.9 years, 3149 (39.4%) were diagnosed with myopia B (spherical equivalent ≤ −0.75 D). The baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. The p values for the mediating effect of physical activity on myopia A/B/C were 0.2189/0.184/0.1856, respectively. The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis of BMI and myopia are presented in Table 2. The trend was the same for all three myopia diagnostic criteria. BMI was correlated with myopia, with each 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI associated with a 1% increase in the risk of myopia (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.01 1.02; p < 0.05). In myopia B (spherical equivalent ≤ −0.75 D), compared with the reference group (BMI 18.5–24.9), participants with a BMI of 25–29.9 and greater than 29.9 had a 14% and 25% increased risk of myopia, respectively (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.01 1.29; p = 0.037, OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.08 1.44; p = 0.003), which was similar to the results for myopic A (spherical equivalent ≤ −0.5 D, OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.02 1.3; p = 0.027, OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.03 1.37; p = 0.018) and myopia C (spherical equivalent ≤ -1 D, OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.01 1.31; p = 0.035, OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.01 1.37; p = 0.032) in model 3.Smooth curve fitting showed a linear relationship between BMI and myopia B (p for nonlinearity = 0.767, Fig. 2).
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of the participants
Variables
Total (n = 8000)
BMI (kg/m2)
p value
 < 18.5 (n = 965)
18.5 − 24.9 (n = 4203)
25 − 29.9 (n = 1558)
 > 29.9 (n = 1274)
Sex, n (%)
     
 < 0.001
 Male
4156 (51.9)
573 (59.4)
2181 (51.9)
829 (53.2)
573 (45)
 
 Female
3844 (48.0)
392 (40.6)
2022 (48.1)
729 (46.8)
701 (55)
 
Age (years)
16.9 (3.3)
14.7 (2.5)
16.8 (3.1)
17.6 (3.4)
18.0 (3.4)
 < 0.001
Race, n (%)
     
 < 0.001
 Mexican American
2559 (32.0)
296 (30.7)
1307 (31.1)
548 (35.2)
408 (32)
 
 Other Hispanic
464 (5.8)
49 (5.1)
235 (5.6)
99 (6.4)
81 (6.4)
 
 Non-Hispanic White
2397 (30.0)
307 (31.8)
1307 (31.1)
456 (29.3)
327 (25.7)
 
 Non-Hispanic Black
2225 (27.8)
251 (26)
1167 (27.8)
399 (25.6)
408 (32)
 
 Other race
355 (4.4)
62 (6.4)
187 (4.4)
56 (3.6)
50 (3.9)
 
Physical activity (METs)
1800.0 (661.5, 4305.0)
1811.2 (721.0, 3840.0)
1939.0 (735.0, 4594.3)
1717.5 (611.6, 4154.5)
1440.0 (481.3, 3840.0)
 
Weight (kg)
67.7 (20.0)
44.8 (7.3)
61.0 (9.0)
76.6 (9.8)
99.5 (19.3)
 < 0.001
Standing height (cm)
166.1 (10.3)
160.9 (10.7)
166.4 (10.1)
167.5 (9.9)
167.5 (9.9)
 < 0.001
ALT (U/L)
17.0 (14.0, 22.0)
15.0 (13.0, 18.0)
16.0 (13.0, 20.0)
19.0 (15.0, 26.0)
22.0 (17.0, 31.0)
 < 0.001
AST (U/L)
22.0 (19.0, 26.0)
24.0 (21.0, 28.0)
22.0 (19.0, 26.0)
22.0 (19.0, 27.0)
22.0 (19.0, 27.0)
 < 0.001
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)
4.2 (0.9)
4.1 (0.7)
4.1 (0.8)
4.4 (0.9)
4.5 (1.0)
 < 0.001
Triglycerides (mmol/L)
0.9 (0.6, 1.2)
0.7 (0.5, 1.0)
0.8 (0.6, 1.1)
1.0 (0.7, 1.4)
1.2(0.8, 1.7)
 < 0.001
HDL-C (mmol/L)
1.3 (0.3)
1.5 (0.3)
1.4 (0.3)
1.3 (0.3)
1.2 (0.3)
 < 0.001
Glucose (mmol/L)
4.8 (0.9)
4.8 (0.8)
4.8 (1.0)
4.8 (0.8)
5.0 (1.0)
 < 0.001
Iron (μmol/L)
14.9 (10.8, 19.7)
15.4 (11.5, 20.1)
15.8 (11.5, 20.6)
14.5 (10.6, 19.2)
12.2(8.6, 16.1)
 < 0.001
C-reactive protein (mg/dL)
0.1 (0.0, 0.2)
0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
0.0 (0.0, 0.1)
0.1 (0.0, 0.2)
0.3 (0.1, 0.6)
 < 0.001
Diabetes, n (%)
     
 < 0.001
 Yes
35 (0.4)
3 (0.3)
18 (0.4)
7 (0.4)
7 (0.5)
 
 No
7965 (99.6)
962 (99.7)
4185 (99.6)
1551 (99.6)
1267 (99.5)
 
Myopia A, n (%)
     
 < 0.001
 Yes
3911 (48.9)
451 (46.7)
1984 (47.2)
796 (51.1)
680 (53.4)
 
 No
4089 (51.1)
514 (53.3)
2219 (52.8)
762 (48.9)
594 (46.6)
 
Myopia B, n (%)
     
 < 0.001
 Yes
3149 (39.4)
347 (36)
1590 (37.8)
643 (41.3)
569 (44.7)
 
 No
4851 (60.6)
618 (64)
2613 (62.2)
915 (58.7)
705 (55.3)
 
Myopia C, n (%)
     
 < 0.001
 Yes
2580 (32.2)
287 (29.7)
1299 (30.9)
533 (34.2)
461 (36.2)
 
 No
5420 (67.8)
678 (70.3)
2904 (69.1)
1025 (65.8)
813 (63.8)
 
Categorical variables are reported as No. (%) and continuous variables are reported as mean (SD) or median (Q1, Q3)
Myopia A was defined as spherical equivalent ≤ -0.5 D, myopia B was defined as spherical equivalent ≤ -0.75 D, and myopia C was defined as spherical equivalent ≤ -1 D
ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, BMI body mass index, MET metabolic equivalent, D diopters, SD standard deviation, Q1 first quartile, Q3 third quartile
Table 2
Association between BMI and myopia in multivariate logistic regression
Variables
Myopia
Crude Model
Adjusted Model 1
Adjusted Model 2
Adjusted Model 3
OR (95% CI)
p value
OR (95% CI)
p value
OR (95% CI)
p value
OR (95% CI)
p value
BMI (kg/m2)
A
1.02 (1.01 ~ 1.02)
 < 0.001
1.01 (1.01 ~ 1.02)
 < 0.001
1.01 (1.00 ~ 1.02)
0.003
1.01 (1.00 ~ 1.02)
0.012
 
B
1.02 (1.01 ~ 1.03)
 < 0.001
1.02 (1.01 ~ 1.02)
 < 0.001
1.02 (1.01 ~ 1.02)
 < 0.001
1.01 (1.01 ~ 1.02)
0.001
 
C
1.02 (1.01 ~ 1.02)
 < 0.001
1.01 (1.00 ~ 1.02)
0.002
1.01 (1.00 ~ 1.02)
0.009
1.01 (1.00 ~ 1.02)
0.034
 < 18.5
A
0.98 (0.85 ~ 1.13)
0.793
1.02 (0.88 ~ 1.17)
0.838
1.02 (0.88 ~ 1.18)
0.771
1.02 (0.88 ~ 1.18)
0.78
 
B
0.92 (0.80 ~ 1.07)
0.279
0.96 (0.83 ~ 1.11)
0.594
0.97 (0.83 ~ 1.12)
0.655
0.97 (0.83 ~ 1.12)
0.656
 
C
0.95 (0.81 ~ 1.10)
0.479
0.99 (0.85 ~ 1.16)
0.903
0.99 (0.85 ~ 1.16)
0.913
0.99 (0.84 ~ 1.16)
0.902
18.5–24.9
A
        
 
B
Reference
 
Reference
 
Reference
 
Reference
 
 
C
        
25–29.9
A
1.17 (1.04 ~ 1.31)
0.009
1.16 (1.03 ~ 1.30)
0.014
1.16 (1.02 ~ 1.31)
0.018
1.15 (1.02 ~ 1.30)
0.027
 
B
1.15 (1.03 ~ 1.30)
0.017
1.14 (1.02 ~ 1.29)
0.027
1.15 (1.01 ~ 1.30)
0.03
1.14 (1.01 ~ 1.29)
0.037
 
C
1.16 (1.03 ~ 1.32)
0.017
1.15 (1.02 ~ 1.30)
0.027
1.16 (1.02 ~ 1.32)
0.024
1.15 (1.01 ~ 1.31)
0.035
 > 29.9
A
1.28 (1.13 ~ 1.45)
 < 0.001
1.24 (1.09 ~ 1.41)
0.001
1.22 (1.06 ~ 1.40)
0.005
1.19 (1.03 ~ 1.37)
0.018
 
B
1.33 (1.17 ~ 1.51)
 < 0.001
1.28 (1.13 ~ 1.46)
 < 0.001
1.27 (1.10 ~ 1.46)
0.001
1.25 (1.08 ~ 1.44)
0.003
 
C
1.27 (1.11 ~ 1.45)
 < 0.001
1.22 (1.07 ~ 1.40)
0.004
1.21 (1.05 ~ 1.40)
0.01
1.18 (1.01 ~ 1.37)
0.032
Myopia A was defined as spherical equivalent ≤ -0.5 D, myopia B was defined as spherical equivalent ≤ -0.75 D and myopia C was defined as spherical equivalent ≤ -1 D
Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, physical activity, race, and diabetes mellitus
Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, physical activity, race, ALT, AST, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL-C
Model 3 was adjusted for age, sex, physical activity, race, ALT, AST, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C, glucose, iron, CRP, and diabetes mellitus
ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, CRP C-reaction protein, BMI body mass index, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, D diopters

Discussion

In our cross-sectional study that included 8,000 individuals, there was a linear relationship between BMI and myopia (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.01 1.02; p < 0.05). In a multifactorial analysis, participants with a BMI of 25–29.9 and greater than 29.9 had a 14% and 25% increased risk of myopia (spherical equivalent ≤ 0.75 D), respectively (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.01 1.29; p = 0.037, OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.08 1.44; p = 0.003), and the trend remained unchanged when the diagnostic threshold was changed to −0.5D (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.02 1.3; p = 0.027, OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.03 1.37; p = 0.018)or −1 D(OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.01 1.31; p = 0 0.035, OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.01 1.37; p = 0.032).The current focus of myopia and BMI research is on Asian children and adolescents. A cross-sectional study that included 1,359,153 Israeli adolescents aged 16–19 years who underwent medical examinations before mandatory military service showed that the BMI was a j-shaped pattern presented in the form of a bar chart for adolescent myopia and both higher and lower BMI were associated with a higher risk of myopia [22]. The results of our study are linear and presented in the form of smooth curve fitting. In the U.S. population, lower BMI did not appear to be associated with myopia, whereas higher BMI similarly had a higher OR. Similarly, a Korean cross-sectional study that investigated 24,269 participants aged 5–18 years in the KNHANES VII database from 2016 to 2018 found an association between obesity and high myopia in childhood and adolescence and an association between overweight and high myopia in girls [23]. According to the results provided in Table 2, there is not enough evidence to show that BMI and myopia are related, which is inconsistent with our results, and the different populations selected may be the source of the difference. A study using the 2003–2008 NHANES database of 6,855 participants aged 12–25 years showed that BMI was not associated with myopia (R2 = 0, P = 0.79) [26]. Three possible differences that may have contributed to the different results are as follows: first, the association between BMI and myopia was evaluated using multivariate analysis and adjustment was made with physical activity considered as one of the confounding factors; second, in addition to being analyzed as a continuous variable, BMI was also analyzed in groups. The OR of different groups reached different conclusions. Thirdly, the population from 1999 through 2008 was included, and differences in sample size (8,000) may have contributed to this difference. In a study of 19-year-old male consignors in Seoul, Korea, no association was found between myopia and BMI according to quartiles and by logistic regression [31]. In our study, a higher BMI appeared to favor a risk factor over a protective factor. Differences in population selection may account for the differences in results.
The association between BMI and myopia is affected by underlying lifestyle factors. One review found an association between decreased time spent outdoors and worsening myopia by studying children during COVID-19-induced lockdown [32]. Children who spend more time outdoors may have a lower BMI than their peers [33]. This may be a reasonable explanation for our linear results. After mediating role analysis, it was found that physical activity did not mediate the association between BMI and myopia. It may be one of the confounding factors affecting the results, so we included it in the multivariate analysis to adjust for it.
There are some limitations to this study. First, since the study design was cross-sectional, it was not possible to determine a causal relationship between BMI and myopia. In addition, measurement of refractive error in the absence of cycloplegia increases the prevalence of myopia. Therefore, three mainstream myopia diagnostic criteria were adopted to ensure the reliability of the results. Third, this study did not take into account the impact of air pollution and regional differences as confounding factors and further research is needed to explore this aspect. Fourth, due to the fact that BMI does not consider muscle mass, bone density, overall body composition, or racial and sex differences in lifespan, and also because children’s standards for obesity differ from those for adults, this study can only conclude an association between BMI and myopia, rather than a relationship between obesity and myopia. Fifth, NHANES only provided refractive data from 1999 to 2008, which may be outdated (> 15 years), and newer surveys are still needed to reflect current refractive errors, diet, exercise, or lifestyle.

Conclusions

In our study, myopia using all three diagnostic thresholds was positively associated with higher BMI. This suggests a potential association between myopia and higher BMI in the American population, warranting further investigations.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Jie Liu from the Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, for his contribution to statistical support, study design consultations, and comments regarding the manuscript. The authors thank Kai Zhang of Bethune Second Hospital of Jilin University for consultation and editing the manuscript.

Declarations

In 2003, the NHANES Institutional Review Board (IRB) changed its name to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Research Ethics Review Board (ERB). In 2018, the name changed from NCHS Research Ethics Review Board to NCHS Ethics Review Board. This study was approved by the NHANES Health and NCHS ERB. The protocol number and description are as follows: NHANES 2007–2008: Continuation of Protocol #2005–06; NHANES 2005–2006: Protocol #2005–06; NHANES 1999–2004: Protocol #98–12.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Flitcroft DI, He M, Jonas JB, Jong M, Naidoo K, Ohno-Matsui K, et al. IMI—defining and classifying myopia: a proposed set of standards for clinical and epidemiologic studies. Investig Opthalmology Vis Sci. 2019;60(3):M20.CrossRef Flitcroft DI, He M, Jonas JB, Jong M, Naidoo K, Ohno-Matsui K, et al. IMI—defining and classifying myopia: a proposed set of standards for clinical and epidemiologic studies. Investig Opthalmology Vis Sci. 2019;60(3):M20.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris FL. Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971–1972 and 1999–2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(12):1632–9.CrossRefPubMed Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris FL. Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971–1972 and 1999–2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(12):1632–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong L, Kang YK, Li Y, Wei WB, Jonas JB. Prevalence and time trends of myopia in children and adolescents in China: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Retina Phila Pa. 2020;40(3):399–411.CrossRef Dong L, Kang YK, Li Y, Wei WB, Jonas JB. Prevalence and time trends of myopia in children and adolescents in China: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Retina Phila Pa. 2020;40(3):399–411.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Ying GS, Fu X, Zhang R, Meng J, Gu F, et al. Prevalence of myopia and vision impairment in school students in Eastern China. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang J, Ying GS, Fu X, Zhang R, Meng J, Gu F, et al. Prevalence of myopia and vision impairment in school students in Eastern China. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–42.CrossRefPubMed Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–42.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sankaridurg P, Tahhan N, Kandel H, Naduvilath T, Zou H, Frick KD, et al. IMI Impact of Myopia. Investig Opthalmology Vis Sci. 2021;62(5):2.CrossRef Sankaridurg P, Tahhan N, Kandel H, Naduvilath T, Zou H, Frick KD, et al. IMI Impact of Myopia. Investig Opthalmology Vis Sci. 2021;62(5):2.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Haarman AEG, Enthoven CA, Tideman JWL, Tedja MS, Verhoeven VJM, Klaver CCW. The complications of myopia: a review and meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(4):49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Haarman AEG, Enthoven CA, Tideman JWL, Tedja MS, Verhoeven VJM, Klaver CCW. The complications of myopia: a review and meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(4):49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Karthikeyan SK, Ashwini DL, Priyanka M, Nayak A, Biswas S. Physical activity, time spent outdoors, and near work in relation to myopia prevalence, incidence, and progression: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(3):728–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Karthikeyan SK, Ashwini DL, Priyanka M, Nayak A, Biswas S. Physical activity, time spent outdoors, and near work in relation to myopia prevalence, incidence, and progression: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(3):728–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobi FK, Zrenner E, Broghammer M, Pusch CM. A genetic perspective on myopia. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS. 2005;62(7–8):800–8.CrossRefPubMed Jacobi FK, Zrenner E, Broghammer M, Pusch CM. A genetic perspective on myopia. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS. 2005;62(7–8):800–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rose KA, French AN, Morgan IG. Environmental factors and myopia: paradoxes and prospects for prevention. Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol Phila Pa. 2016;5(6):403–10.CrossRef Rose KA, French AN, Morgan IG. Environmental factors and myopia: paradoxes and prospects for prevention. Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol Phila Pa. 2016;5(6):403–10.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mountjoy E, Davies NM, Plotnikov D, Smith GD, Rodriguez S, Williams CE, et al. Education and myopia: assessing the direction of causality by Mendelian randomisation. BMJ. 2018;6(361):k2022.CrossRef Mountjoy E, Davies NM, Plotnikov D, Smith GD, Rodriguez S, Williams CE, et al. Education and myopia: assessing the direction of causality by Mendelian randomisation. BMJ. 2018;6(361):k2022.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin JX, Hua WJ, Jiang X, Wu XY, Yang JW, Gao GP, et al. Effect of outdoor activity on myopia onset and progression in school-aged children in northeast China: the Sujiatun Eye Care Study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;9(15):73.CrossRef Jin JX, Hua WJ, Jiang X, Wu XY, Yang JW, Gao GP, et al. Effect of outdoor activity on myopia onset and progression in school-aged children in northeast China: the Sujiatun Eye Care Study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;9(15):73.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu PC, Tsai CL, Wu HL, Yang YH, Kuo HK. Outdoor activity during class recess reduces myopia onset and progression in school children. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(5):1080–5.CrossRefPubMed Wu PC, Tsai CL, Wu HL, Yang YH, Kuo HK. Outdoor activity during class recess reduces myopia onset and progression in school children. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(5):1080–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat He M, Xiang F, Zeng Y, Mai J, Chen Q, Zhang J, et al. Effect of time spent outdoors at school on the development of myopia among children in china: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(11):1142–8.CrossRefPubMed He M, Xiang F, Zeng Y, Mai J, Chen Q, Zhang J, et al. Effect of time spent outdoors at school on the development of myopia among children in china: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(11):1142–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin HJ, Wei CC, Chang CY, Chen TH, Hsu YA, Hsieh YC, et al. Role of chronic inflammation in myopia progression: clinical evidence and experimental validation. EBioMedicine. 2016;10:269–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lin HJ, Wei CC, Chang CY, Chen TH, Hsu YA, Hsieh YC, et al. Role of chronic inflammation in myopia progression: clinical evidence and experimental validation. EBioMedicine. 2016;10:269–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu XN, Naduvilath TJ, Wang J, Xiong S, He X, Xu X, et al. Sleeping late is a risk factor for myopia development amongst school-aged children in China. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):17194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu XN, Naduvilath TJ, Wang J, Xiong S, He X, Xu X, et al. Sleeping late is a risk factor for myopia development amongst school-aged children in China. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):17194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cordain L, Eaton SB, Brand Miller J, Lindeberg S, Jensen C. An evolutionary analysis of the aetiology and pathogenesis of juvenile-onset myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80(2):125–35.CrossRefPubMed Cordain L, Eaton SB, Brand Miller J, Lindeberg S, Jensen C. An evolutionary analysis of the aetiology and pathogenesis of juvenile-onset myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80(2):125–35.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ludwig DS, Ebbeling CB. The carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity: beyond “calories in, calories out.” JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(8):1098–103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ludwig DS, Ebbeling CB. The carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity: beyond “calories in, calories out.” JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(8):1098–103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Klein GL, Wong JMW, Bielak L, Steltz SK, et al. Effects of a low carbohydrate diet on energy expenditure during weight loss maintenance: randomized trial. BMJ. 2018;14(363):k4583.CrossRef Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Klein GL, Wong JMW, Bielak L, Steltz SK, et al. Effects of a low carbohydrate diet on energy expenditure during weight loss maintenance: randomized trial. BMJ. 2018;14(363):k4583.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lennerz B, Lennerz JK. Food addiction, high-glycemic-index carbohydrates, and obesity. Clin Chem. 2018;64(1):64–71.CrossRefPubMed Lennerz B, Lennerz JK. Food addiction, high-glycemic-index carbohydrates, and obesity. Clin Chem. 2018;64(1):64–71.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Peled A, Nitzan I, Megreli J, Derazne E, Tzur D, Pinhas-Hamiel O, et al. Myopia and BMI: a nationwide study of 1.3 million adolescents. Obesity. 2022;30(8):1691–8.CrossRefPubMed Peled A, Nitzan I, Megreli J, Derazne E, Tzur D, Pinhas-Hamiel O, et al. Myopia and BMI: a nationwide study of 1.3 million adolescents. Obesity. 2022;30(8):1691–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee S, Lee HJ, Lee KG, Kim J. Obesity and high myopia in children and adolescents: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3):e0265317.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee S, Lee HJ, Lee KG, Kim J. Obesity and high myopia in children and adolescents: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3):e0265317.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahi JS, Cumberland PM, Peckham CS. Myopia over the lifecourse: prevalence and early life influences in the 1958 British birth cohort. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(5):797–804.CrossRefPubMed Rahi JS, Cumberland PM, Peckham CS. Myopia over the lifecourse: prevalence and early life influences in the 1958 British birth cohort. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(5):797–804.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mori K, Kurihara T, Uchino M, Torii H, Kawashima M, Sasaki M, et al. High myopia and its associated factors in JPHC-NEXT eye study: a cross-sectional observational study. J Clin Med. 2019;8(11):1788.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mori K, Kurihara T, Uchino M, Torii H, Kawashima M, Sasaki M, et al. High myopia and its associated factors in JPHC-NEXT eye study: a cross-sectional observational study. J Clin Med. 2019;8(11):1788.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Harb EN, Wildsoet CF. Nutritional factors and myopia: an analysis of national health and nutrition examination survey data. Optom Vis Sci Off Publ Am Acad Optom. 2021;98(5):458–68.CrossRef Harb EN, Wildsoet CF. Nutritional factors and myopia: an analysis of national health and nutrition examination survey data. Optom Vis Sci Off Publ Am Acad Optom. 2021;98(5):458–68.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke N, Butler JS, Flitcroft I, McCartney D, Loughman J. Association of total zinc intake with myopia in U.S. children and adolescents. Optom Vis Sci Off Publ Am Acad Optom. 2019;96(9):647–54.CrossRef Burke N, Butler JS, Flitcroft I, McCartney D, Loughman J. Association of total zinc intake with myopia in U.S. children and adolescents. Optom Vis Sci Off Publ Am Acad Optom. 2019;96(9):647–54.CrossRef
29.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Fowler JR, Tucker LA, Bailey BW, LeCheminant JD. Physical activity and insulin resistance in 6,500 NHANES adults: the role of abdominal obesity. J Obes. 2020;1(2020):e3848256. Fowler JR, Tucker LA, Bailey BW, LeCheminant JD. Physical activity and insulin resistance in 6,500 NHANES adults: the role of abdominal obesity. J Obes. 2020;1(2020):e3848256.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Jung SK, Lee JH, Kakizaki H, Jee D. Prevalence of myopia and its association with body stature and educational level in 19-year-old male conscripts in seoul. South Korea Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(9):5579–83.CrossRefPubMed Jung SK, Lee JH, Kakizaki H, Jee D. Prevalence of myopia and its association with body stature and educational level in 19-year-old male conscripts in seoul. South Korea Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(9):5579–83.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Limwattanayingyong J, Amornpetchsathaporn A, Chainakul M, Grzybowski A, Ruamviboonsuk P. The association between environmental and social factors and myopia: a review of evidence from COVID-19 pandemic. Front Public Health. 2022;10:918182.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Limwattanayingyong J, Amornpetchsathaporn A, Chainakul M, Grzybowski A, Ruamviboonsuk P. The association between environmental and social factors and myopia: a review of evidence from COVID-19 pandemic. Front Public Health. 2022;10:918182.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Cleland V, Crawford D, Baur LA, Hume C, Timperio A, Salmon J. A prospective examination of children’s time spent outdoors, objectively measured physical activity and overweight. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(11):1685–93.CrossRefPubMed Cleland V, Crawford D, Baur LA, Hume C, Timperio A, Salmon J. A prospective examination of children’s time spent outdoors, objectively measured physical activity and overweight. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(11):1685–93.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Association between body mass index and myopia in the United States population in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1999 to 2008: a cross-sectional study
verfasst von
Yaohui Qu
Huamin Huang
Hongxing Zhang
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2023
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
European Journal of Medical Research / Ausgabe 1/2023
Elektronische ISSN: 2047-783X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01542-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

European Journal of Medical Research 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe