Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2016

01.01.2016 | Original Article

Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts

Intrarater reliability and validity

verfasst von: Judith Czarnota, Jeremias Hey, Robert Fuhrmann

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this work was to determine the reliability and validity of measurements performed on digital models with a desktop scanner and analysis software in comparison with measurements performed manually on conventional plaster casts.

Materials and methods

A total of 20 pairs of plaster casts reflecting the intraoral conditions of 20 fully dentate individuals were digitized using a three-dimensional scanner (D700; 3Shape). A series of defined parameters were measured both on the resultant digital models with analysis software (Ortho Analyzer; 3Shape) and on the original plaster casts with a digital caliper (Digimatic CD-15DCX; Mitutoyo). Both measurement series were repeated twice and analyzed for intrarater reliability based on intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The results from the digital models were evaluated for their validity against the casts by calculating mean-value differences and associated 95 % limits of agreement (Bland–Altman method). Statistically significant differences were identified via a paired t test.

Results

Significant differences were obtained for 16 of 24 tooth-width measurements, for 2 of 5 sites of contact-point displacement in the mandibular anterior segment, for overbite, for maxillary intermolar distance, for Little’s irregularity index, and for the summation indices of maxillary and mandibular incisor width. Overall, however, both the mean differences between the results obtained on the digital models versus on the plaster casts and the dispersion ranges associated with these differences suggest that the deviations incurred by the digital measuring technique are not clinically significant.

Conclusion

Digital models are adequately reproducible and valid to be employed for routine measurements in orthodontic practice.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abizadeh N, Moles DR, O’Neill J et al (2012) Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they? J Orthod 39(3):151–159CrossRefPubMed Abizadeh N, Moles DR, O’Neill J et al (2012) Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they? J Orthod 39(3):151–159CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 346:1085–1087CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 346:1085–1087CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C et al (2010) Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 32:589–595CrossRefPubMed Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C et al (2010) Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 32:589–595CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dowling AH, Burns A, Macauley D et al (2013) Can the intra-examiner variability of Little’s Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts? J Dent 41(12):1271–1280CrossRefPubMed Dowling AH, Burns A, Macauley D et al (2013) Can the intra-examiner variability of Little’s Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts? J Dent 41(12):1271–1280CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A (2011) Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 14(1):1–16CrossRefPubMed Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A (2011) Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 14(1):1–16CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Grouven U, Bender R, Ziegler A et al (2007) Vergleich von Messmethoden—Artikel Nr. 24 der Statistik-Serie in der DMW. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 132:e69–e73CrossRefPubMed Grouven U, Bender R, Ziegler A et al (2007) Vergleich von Messmethoden—Artikel Nr. 24 der Statistik-Serie in der DMW. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 132:e69–e73CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunter WS, Priest WR (1960) Errors and discrepancies in measurement of tooth size. J Dent Res 39:405–414CrossRefPubMed Hunter WS, Priest WR (1960) Errors and discrepancies in measurement of tooth size. J Dent Res 39:405–414CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasparova M, Grafova L, Dvorak P et al (2013) Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models. Biomed Eng Online 12:49PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kasparova M, Grafova L, Dvorak P et al (2013) Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models. Biomed Eng Online 12:49PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R et al (2008) A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod 35(3):191–201CrossRefPubMed Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R et al (2008) A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod 35(3):191–201CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Luu NS, Nikolcheva LG, Retrouvey JM et al (2012) Linear measurements using virtual study models. Angle Orthod 82:1098–1106CrossRefPubMed Luu NS, Nikolcheva LG, Retrouvey JM et al (2012) Linear measurements using virtual study models. Angle Orthod 82:1098–1106CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayers M, Firestone AR, Rashid R et al (2005) Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128:431–434CrossRefPubMed Mayers M, Firestone AR, Rashid R et al (2005) Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128:431–434CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P et al (2007) Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod 29:517–522CrossRef Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P et al (2007) Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod 29:517–522CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts CT, Richmond S (1997) The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit indices in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 24:139–147CrossRefPubMed Roberts CT, Richmond S (1997) The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit indices in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 24:139–147CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Santoro M, Ayoub ME, Pardi V et al (2000) Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of the permanent dentition of Dominican American. Angle Orthod 70:303–307PubMed Santoro M, Ayoub ME, Pardi V et al (2000) Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of the permanent dentition of Dominican American. Angle Orthod 70:303–307PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M et al (2003) Comparison of measurments made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:101–105CrossRefPubMed Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M et al (2003) Comparison of measurments made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:101–105CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428CrossRefPubMed Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sjögren APG, Lindgren JE, Huggare JAV (2010) Orthodontic study cast analysis—reproducibility of recordings and agreement between conventional and 3D virtual measurements. J Digit Imaging 23:482–492PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sjögren APG, Lindgren JE, Huggare JAV (2010) Orthodontic study cast analysis—reproducibility of recordings and agreement between conventional and 3D virtual measurements. J Digit Imaging 23:482–492PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sousa MVS, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G et al (2012) Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 142(2):269–273CrossRefPubMed Sousa MVS, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G et al (2012) Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 142(2):269–273CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B et al (2006) Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129(6):794–803CrossRefPubMed Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B et al (2006) Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129(6):794–803CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Torassian G, Kau CH, Englisch JD et al (2010) Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials. Angle Orthod 80:474–481CrossRefPubMed Torassian G, Kau CH, Englisch JD et al (2010) Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials. Angle Orthod 80:474–481CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA (2003) Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 73:301–306PubMed Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA (2003) Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 73:301–306PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts
Intrarater reliability and validity
verfasst von
Judith Czarnota
Jeremias Hey
Robert Fuhrmann
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-015-0004-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

19.04.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Werden Personen mit Vorhofflimmern in der Blanking-Periode nach einer Katheterablation gegen eine bestehende Parodontitis behandelt, verbessert dies die Erfolgsaussichten. Dafür sprechen die Resultate einer prospektiven Untersuchung.

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

11.04.2024 Endokarditis Nachrichten

Bei welchen Personen eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe zur Prävention einer infektiösen Endokarditis nach invasiven zahnärztlichen Eingriffen sinnvoll ist, wird diskutiert. Neue Daten stehen im Einklang mit den europäischen Leitlinienempfehlungen.

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

08.04.2024 Zahnmedizin Nachrichten

Der Aufbau von Geweben und Organen während der Embryonalentwicklung wird von den Zellen bemerkenswert choreografiert. Für diesen Prozess braucht es spezielle sogenannte „Organisatoren“. In einer aktuellen Veröffentlichung im Fachjournal Nature Cell Biology berichten Forschende durch welchen Vorgang diese Organisatoren im Gewebe entstehen und wie sie dann die Bildung von Zähnen orchestrieren.

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

11.03.2024 Kinderzahnmedizin Nachrichten

Infolge der Umbenennung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnheilkunde in Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnmedizin (DGKiZ) wird deren Mitgliederzeitschrift Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde in Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnmedizin umbenannt. Aus diesem Grunde trägt die erste Ausgabe in 2024 erstmalig den neuen Titel.

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.