Sir,
We were interested to read the article in the journal by Javaudin et al. [1] looking at the re-warming of infants born out-of-hospital. Whilst the authors are to be congratulated for a careful comparison of several different techniques, their conclusions should be interpreted with caution.
Anzeige
The authors’ hypothesis that hypothermia is an independent risk factor for neonatal mortality in term infants cannot be substantiated. Of the four articles cited in the text, one concerned premature births, two looked at low birth weight infants and the fourth looked at a group of mixed gestational ages (with prematurity being an associated with increased mortality).
Therapeutic controlled cooling is routinely practiced on neonates with core temperatures of 33–34 °C during cooling for birth related anoxo-ischaemia [2] and 26–28 °C attained during surgical correction of congenital heart disease.
Rewarming after therapeutic cooling in clinical trials for hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) takes place at 0.25–0.5 °C/h over 6–12 h with seizures reported during too rapid re-warming [2].
Javaudin et al.’s incubator group had a 0.8 °C median increase in body temperature for a median transfer time of 38 min (IQR-31-49 min); equating to 1.3 °C/h. In contrast, the group plastic bag+skin-to-skin+cap had a median temperature rise of 0.2 °C (median transport time 43 min [IQR-33-61 min]); equating to 0.28 °C/h which is closer to therapeutic controlled methods.
Anzeige
Re-bound hyperthermia was limited in all groups studied but was present in 2.0% of the plastic bag+skin-to-skin+cap group and 3.1% in the incubator group, although the sample size is insufficient to permit a valid statistical comparison for these data.
Short periods of mild to moderate hypothermia have not been proven to increase mortality in term infants. However, hyperthermia has injurious effects on neurological and cognitive function [3]. As such, the principal objectives of rewarming infants born out-of-hospital should be the avoidance of both excessive cooling and rapid or excessive re-warming [4, 5]. Additionally, it should be born in mind that a proportion of these infants will have suffered from unquantified HIE during birth and it is not in their interest to arrive at hospital with higher core temperatures.
An alternative interpretation of the article’s results leads to the different conclusion that plastic bag+skin-to-skin+cap rather than an incubator is the preferable method of re-warming due to the more progressive re-warming and lower frequency of hyperthermia. Nevertheless, the authors are to be congratulated for their valid contribution in having marginalised the practice of rewarming by plastic bag+cap and skin-to-skin+cap.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgements are necessary.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The letter does not include data from patients and as such does not require ethical approval. Because no patients were involved in the study no patient consent can be obtained.
Consent for publication
The authors all give their consent for publication of the manuscript.
Competing interests
There are no competing interests for any of the authors.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.