There is broad agreement that a well-functioning trauma and emergency system, with a seamless treatment chain from scene to completed treatment, is essential for optimal patient outcome. However, there is a lack of studies investigating which elements contribute to increased quality and patient safety and why this treatment chain usually works well. A systematic review of studies evaluating the effects, reliability, validity and feasibility of interventions improving patient safety in emergency care identified a lack of evidence on effective safety governance strategies, particularly in the field of prehospital emergency care [
9]. Simulation-based training and incident reporting systems with a focus on reducing the fear of reporting, reporting burden, and structural and systematic feedback, are promising interventions to improve the governance of patient safety in emergency care [
9]. Articles discussing resilient health care in Eds recognized that to operate effectively and create value, EDs must be flexible, having the ability to rapidly adapt to the highly variable needs of patient [
10]. Safety II and the resilience research is interested in examining the overwhelming majority of healthcare processes with successful outcomes to determine how high quality patient care is generated in everyday clinical practice [
11]. Resilience in healthcare is conceptualized as a proactive ability to adjust to potentially harmful influences and challenges rather than to resist them, resulting in higher quality of care [
12]. It’s a term that can be understood in a variety of ways, both at the individual, team and system level. Our understanding of the resilience term as a multi-level phenomenon, considers adaptive capacity to changes as a foundation for high quality care [
12]. In this conceptualization resilience is defined as: the capacity to adapt to challenges and changes at different system levels, to maintain high quality care, involving flexibility, adjustments, improvisation, adaptation, and variability [
12]. Current research on patient safety and resilience lacks theoretical integration of the multiple levels of the healthcare systems, from individuals and teams (micro), to organisations (meso), to regulatory bodies and policy level actors (macro) [
8]. Working with severely ill or injured patients in the emergency chain demands both clinical skills and leadership at a micro level, coordination, adaptability and preparedness across tactical, operational and strategic levels at a meso level [
13,
14], and development and compliance to a set of functional procedures and regulation from the regulatory bodies at the macro level [
15].