Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2013

01.05.2013

Single-Port Cholecystectomy Versus Multi-Port Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study with 222 Patients

verfasst von: Markus J. Wagner, Hans Kern, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Jan Mehler, Michael H. Schoenberg

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to compare single-port access cholecystectomy (SPA) with the standard laparoscopic technique (LC) regarding the duration of the operation, complications, learning curve, late postoperative quality of life (QoL) and the incidence of incisional hernias.

Methods

Between June 2009 and December 2011, a total of 122 SPA cholecystectomies were performed in our hospital. Simultaneously, 310 patients were operated on with the LC technique. In the LC group, 100 patients met the same criteria defined for SPA surgery. The two groups (SPA and LC) were compared by multivariable regression analysis. Endpoints of this study were quality of life (QoL) after 6 months by the EQ-5D questionnaire 5L and the incidence of incisional hernia 1 year after surgery. Operating time, hospital stay, and perioperative complications were also measured and compared. The median follow-up was 9.2 months (3–25 months).

Results

The patients in the SPA group were younger and more often female. The mean operating time for group SPA was 73 min (35–136 min)—significantly longer than that for group LC with 60 min (33–190 min) (p < 0.001). Additional trocars were used in 8 of 122 (6.5 %) SPA patients. A conversion to open cholecystectomy was not necessary in SPA patients. The conversion rate in the LC group to open cholecystectomy was 2 % (2/100). The perioperative and postoperative complications and incisional hernia (5.5 %) were the same in both groups. QoL was significantly better in the SPA group in terms of mobility (p = 0,002), usual activity (p = 0.036), and overall anxiety (p = 0.026).

Conclusions

SPA cholecystectomy is safe, although the operation is significantly longer. No differences in terms of major complications or the incidence of incisional hernia were seen after 1 year. QoL was significantly better in patients operated on with the SPA technique.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mühe E (1986) Die erste Cholecystektomie durch das Laparoskop. Langebecks Arch 369:804CrossRef Mühe E (1986) Die erste Cholecystektomie durch das Laparoskop. Langebecks Arch 369:804CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mühe E (1992) Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 24:754–758PubMedCrossRef Mühe E (1992) Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 24:754–758PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mouret P (1991) From the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the frontiers of laparoscopic surgery: the future prospectives. Dig Surg 8:124–125CrossRef Mouret P (1991) From the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the frontiers of laparoscopic surgery: the future prospectives. Dig Surg 8:124–125CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuschieri A (1990) Minimal access surgery: the birth of a new era. J R Coll Surg Edinb 35:345–347PubMed Cuschieri A (1990) Minimal access surgery: the birth of a new era. J R Coll Surg Edinb 35:345–347PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bittner R (2004) The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:157–163PubMedCrossRef Bittner R (2004) The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:157–163PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S et al (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695PubMedCrossRef Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S et al (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfluke JM, Parker M, Stauffer JA et al (2011) Laparoscopic surgery performed through a single incision: a systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg 212:113–118PubMedCrossRef Pfluke JM, Parker M, Stauffer JA et al (2011) Laparoscopic surgery performed through a single incision: a systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg 212:113–118PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 25:367–377PubMedCrossRef Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 25:367–377PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollard JS, Fung AK, Ahmed I (2012) Are natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision surgery viable techniques for cholecystectomy? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22(1):1–14PubMedCrossRef Pollard JS, Fung AK, Ahmed I (2012) Are natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision surgery viable techniques for cholecystectomy? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22(1):1–14PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodgett SE, Hernandez JM, Morton CA et al (2008) Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:188–192PubMedCrossRef Hodgett SE, Hernandez JM, Morton CA et al (2008) Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:188–192PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ, Poblete H et al (2009) Single Port Access (SPA™) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:219–222PubMedCrossRef Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ, Poblete H et al (2009) Single Port Access (SPA™) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:219–222PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chow A, Purkayastha S, Aziz O (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique. Surg Endosc 24:709–714PubMedCrossRef Chow A, Purkayastha S, Aziz O (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique. Surg Endosc 24:709–714PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Romanelli JR, Roshek TB, Lynn DC et al (2009) Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 24:1374–1379PubMedCrossRef Romanelli JR, Roshek TB, Lynn DC et al (2009) Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 24:1374–1379PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards C, Bradshaw A, Ahearne P et al (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible: initial experience with 80 cases. Surg Endosc 24:2241–2247PubMedCrossRef Edwards C, Bradshaw A, Ahearne P et al (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible: initial experience with 80 cases. Surg Endosc 24:2241–2247PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Duron VP, Nicastri GR, Gill PS (2010) Novel technique for a single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) approach to cholecystectomy: single-institution case series. Surg Endosc 25:1666–1671PubMedCrossRef Duron VP, Nicastri GR, Gill PS (2010) Novel technique for a single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) approach to cholecystectomy: single-institution case series. Surg Endosc 25:1666–1671PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Curcillo PG, Wu AS, Podolsky ER et al (2010) Single-port-access (SPATM) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc 24:1854–1860PubMedCrossRef Curcillo PG, Wu AS, Podolsky ER et al (2010) Single-port-access (SPATM) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc 24:1854–1860PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rivas H, Varela E, Scott D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc 24:1403–1412PubMedCrossRef Rivas H, Varela E, Scott D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc 24:1403–1412PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Erbella J, Bunch GM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 100 outpatients. Surg Endosc 24:1958–1961PubMedCrossRef Erbella J, Bunch GM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 100 outpatients. Surg Endosc 24:1958–1961PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G et al (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 24:1842–1848PubMedCrossRef Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G et al (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 24:1842–1848PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 97:1007–1012PubMedCrossRef Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 97:1007–1012PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K et al (2011) Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 201:369–373PubMedCrossRef Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K et al (2011) Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 201:369–373PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Aprea G, Bottazzi EC, Guida F et al (2011) Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study. J Surg Res 166:109–112CrossRef Aprea G, Bottazzi EC, Guida F et al (2011) Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study. J Surg Res 166:109–112CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO et al (2011) Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 254:22–27PubMedCrossRef Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO et al (2011) Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 254:22–27PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC et al (2011) Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1695–1702PubMedCrossRef Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC et al (2011) Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1695–1702PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinan H, Demirbas S, Ozer MT et al (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:12–16PubMedCrossRef Sinan H, Demirbas S, Ozer MT et al (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:12–16PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G et al (1990) Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg 211:60–62PubMedCrossRef Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G et al (1990) Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg 211:60–62PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg S, Eagon C (2000) The “hidden cystic duct” syndrome and the infundibular technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the danger of the false infundibulum. J Am Coll Surg 191:661–667PubMedCrossRef Strasberg S, Eagon C (2000) The “hidden cystic duct” syndrome and the infundibular technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the danger of the false infundibulum. J Am Coll Surg 191:661–667PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Podolsky ER, Curcillo PG (2010) Reduced-port surgery: preservation of the critical view in single-port-access cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24:3038–3043PubMedCrossRef Podolsky ER, Curcillo PG (2010) Reduced-port surgery: preservation of the critical view in single-port-access cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24:3038–3043PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat EuroQual (2009) EQ 5D User Guide, p 1–24 EuroQual (2009) EQ 5D User Guide, p 1–24
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Brazier J, Roberts J, Tsuchiya A et al (2004) A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ 13:873–884PubMedCrossRef Brazier J, Roberts J, Tsuchiya A et al (2004) A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ 13:873–884PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Greiner CCW (2008) Der EQ-5D der EuroQol-Gruppe, p 1–12 Greiner CCW (2008) Der EQ-5D der EuroQol-Gruppe, p 1–12
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M et al (2009) Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg Endosc 24:762–768PubMedCrossRef Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M et al (2009) Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg Endosc 24:762–768PubMedCrossRef
37.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Garg P, Thakur JD, Garg M et al (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1618–1628PubMedCrossRef Garg P, Thakur JD, Garg M et al (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1618–1628PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Archer SB, Hunter JG (2001) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey. Ann Surg 234:549–558; discussion 558–559PubMedCrossRef Archer SB, Hunter JG (2001) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey. Ann Surg 234:549–558; discussion 558–559PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Savassi-Rocha P, Almeida S, Sanches M (2003) Iatrogenic bile duct injuries: a multicenter study of 91, 232 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 17:1356–1361PubMedCrossRef Savassi-Rocha P, Almeida S, Sanches M (2003) Iatrogenic bile duct injuries: a multicenter study of 91, 232 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 17:1356–1361PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Connor S, Garden OJ (2006) Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 93:158–168PubMedCrossRef Connor S, Garden OJ (2006) Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 93:158–168PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Gangl O, Hofer W, Tomaselli F et al (2011) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC): a matched pair analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:819–824PubMedCrossRef Gangl O, Hofer W, Tomaselli F et al (2011) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC): a matched pair analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:819–824PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Eypasch E, Troidl H (1993) Immediate improval in quality of life after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2:139–146CrossRef Eypasch E, Troidl H (1993) Immediate improval in quality of life after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2:139–146CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Barkun J, Barkun A, Meakins J (1993) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience. Am J Surg 165:455–458PubMedCrossRef Barkun J, Barkun A, Meakins J (1993) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience. Am J Surg 165:455–458PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Topçu O, Karakayali F, Kuzu MA et al (2003) Comparison of long-term quality of life after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:291–295PubMedCrossRef Topçu O, Karakayali F, Kuzu MA et al (2003) Comparison of long-term quality of life after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:291–295PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Plaisier PW, van der Hul RL, Nijs HGT et al (1995) Quality of life and the course of biliary and gastrointestinal symptoms after laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy. Dig Surg 12:87–91CrossRef Plaisier PW, van der Hul RL, Nijs HGT et al (1995) Quality of life and the course of biliary and gastrointestinal symptoms after laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy. Dig Surg 12:87–91CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Ainslie WG, Catton JA, Davides D et al (2003) Micropuncture cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:766–772PubMedCrossRef Ainslie WG, Catton JA, Davides D et al (2003) Micropuncture cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:766–772PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Nassar A, Ashkar K (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the umbilicus. Br J Surg 84:630–633PubMedCrossRef Nassar A, Ashkar K (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the umbilicus. Br J Surg 84:630–633PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Bunting DM (2010) Port-site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 14:482–489CrossRef Bunting DM (2010) Port-site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 14:482–489CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Krajinovic K, Ickrath P, Germer CT et al (2011) Trocar-site hernia after single-port cholecystectomy: not an exceptional complication? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:919–921PubMedCrossRef Krajinovic K, Ickrath P, Germer CT et al (2011) Trocar-site hernia after single-port cholecystectomy: not an exceptional complication? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:919–921PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucher P, Pugin F, Ostermann S et al (2010) Population perception of surgical safety and body image trauma: a plea for scarless surgery? Surg Endosc 25:408–415PubMedCrossRef Bucher P, Pugin F, Ostermann S et al (2010) Population perception of surgical safety and body image trauma: a plea for scarless surgery? Surg Endosc 25:408–415PubMedCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao A, Kynaston J, MacDonald ER et al (2010) Patient preferences for surgical techniques: should we invest in new approaches? Surg Endosc 24:3016–3025PubMedCrossRef Rao A, Kynaston J, MacDonald ER et al (2010) Patient preferences for surgical techniques: should we invest in new approaches? Surg Endosc 24:3016–3025PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamadé W, Friedrich C, Ulmer C et al (2010) Impact of body image on patients’ attitude towards conventional, minimal invasive, and natural orifice surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:331–336PubMedCrossRef Lamadé W, Friedrich C, Ulmer C et al (2010) Impact of body image on patients’ attitude towards conventional, minimal invasive, and natural orifice surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:331–336PubMedCrossRef
56.
Metadaten
Titel
Single-Port Cholecystectomy Versus Multi-Port Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study with 222 Patients
verfasst von
Markus J. Wagner
Hans Kern
Alexander Hapfelmeier
Jan Mehler
Michael H. Schoenberg
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1946-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2013

World Journal of Surgery 5/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Traumatologische Notfälle Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.