Background
In the past two decades, with the change of people's concept of fertility and the improvement of fetal monitoring, the cesarean section rate has been on the rise globally [
1]. Previous surveys [
2,
3] have found that the cesarean section rate in China is as high as 46. 5%. Cesarean section surgery is a double-edged sword with some risk of adverse outcomes, and postoperative infection is one of the most common complications after cesarean section surgery. Although antibiotics have been widely used to prevent postpartum infection of cesarean section, the risk of abdominal incision infection, uterine incision infection, endometritis and urinary tract infection after surgery is still increasing [
4]. In severe cases, sepsis, postpartum hemorrhage, shock and even life-threatening of patients may occur [
5]. Therefore, how to prevent infection after cesarean section has become a common concern of all obstetricians.
Recent studies have shown that the rate of maternal death caused by postpartum sepsis in developing countries accounts for about 10.7%, only second to postpartum hemorrhage [
6]. Sepsis is a clinical syndrome that results from the dysregulated inflammatory response to infection that leads to organ dysfunction [
7]. Cesarean section increases the risk of postoperative infection, which can then develop into sepsis. The results of many previous studies [
8‐
10] have shown that the occurrence of postoperative sepsis can significantly increase the risk of death in patients. The early prevention and treatment of postoperative sepsis is of great significance to improve the prognosis of patients. Although the risk factors for sepsis after cesarean delivery already well-known, there can be some risk factors that have not been fully elucidated. Besides, the incidence of sepsis after cesarean delivery is not very high in clinical setting, the risk factors for sepsis should be investigated from different population in different areas. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the risk factors of sepsis after caesarean section, to provide references for clinical prevention and treatment of postoperative sepsis.
Methods
Ethical consideration
In this study, all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. This present study was a retrospective study design, the study protocol had been discussed and approved by the ethical committee of our hospital (approval number:170068). And written informed consents had been obtained from all the included patients.
Calculation of sample size
The sample size for analysis was calculated by the comparison formula of two groups [
11]:
\(n=\frac{\lambda }{{2\left(arcsin\sqrt{{P}_{max}}-arcsin\sqrt{{P}_{min}}\right)}^{2}}\), we presumed that α = 0.05, β = 0.2, ν = 3 − 1 = 2, then the λ = 8.84, set Pmax, Pmin, respectively, as the reported maximum and minimum incidence of sepsis after cesarean Sect. (0.48% and 1.12%) [
12,
13], then it come to the results that n≈26. Therefore, at least 26 sepsis cases should be included.
Patients
This study selected patients who underwent cesarean section surgery from January 1, 2017 to April 30, 2021 in the obstetrics department of our hospital as the research population. The inclusion criteria of patients were: adult patients aged ≥ 18 years old; patient underwent cesarean section treatment in our hospital; clinical data of the patient were complete; patient was well-informed and agreed to participate in this study. Patients with unknown or unavailable clinical data, disagreed to participant in this study were excluded.
Diagnosis of sepsis
The diagnosis of sepsis referred to the Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of sepsis [
14,
15]. The diagnosis of sepsis must meet at least the following 2 items or more: (1) The patient has symptoms of infection, including white blood cell count > 12*10
9, body temperature > 38 ℃, respiratory rate > 20 beats/min, heart rate > 90 beats/min. (2) Infection or systemic inflammatory response syndrome appeared. (3) Signs of organ failure or tissue hypoperfusion. (4) hypotension (despite adequate fluid resuscitation) and abnormal perfusion.
Data collection
The two authors collected patient-related clinical data, including age, body mass index (BMI), gestational age, history of miscarriage, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, vaginal delivery attempt, premature rupture of membranes, preoperative white blood cells, preoperative red blood cells value, preoperative hemoglobin, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss during surgery, postoperative urinary tube implacement.
Statistical methods
We used SPSS 22.0 statistical software for data analysis. Count data were expressed as percentage (%), and the chi-square test was used for comparison between groups. Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and comparison between groups was performed by t test. We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). In this study, the difference was statistically significant with p < 0.05.
Discussion
Previous studies [
16,
17] have shown that there are many high-risk factors that affect infection after cesarean section. Pregnant women may have basic diseases such as severe anemia, hypoproteinemia, malnutrition, diabetes, obesity, etc. [
18]. Premature rupture of the membrane, especially for patients undergoing cesarean section after labor, has prolonged labor, multiple vaginal examinations and anal examinations, and amniotic fluid contamination, etc., which reduce the patient's body resistance and easily lead to postoperative infection [
19‐
22]. Previous studies have reported that the incidence of sepsis after cesarean section varies from 0.48% to 1.12% [
12,
13]. The results of this study have showed that the incidence of sepsis in patients undergoing cesarean section is 0.84%, age ≥ 35y, gestational diabetes, vaginal delivery attempt, premature rupture of membranes, preoperative hemoglobin ≤ 105 g/L, estimated blood loss during surgery ≥ 400 ml, postoperative urinary tube implacement are the risk factors of sepsis in patients undergoing cesarean section. Besides, Escherichia Coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the most commonly-seen bacteria in sepsis patients. Clinical preventions and nursing cares are warranted for those patients.
Previous studies [
23,
24] have shown that the risk of infection after cesarean section in pregnant women with diabetes is four times that of non-diabetic women. Due to the long-term significant reduction of body defense function of diabetic women, all stages of the bacterial response are inhibited, including the phagocytosis of neutralizing toxins, intracellular bactericidal effect and cellular immunity, etc., which makes the patient prone to infection [
25‐
27]. Moreover, sugar and fat metabolism disorders in patients with gestational diabetes, resulting in reduced postoperative tissue repair ability, slow healing of incisions, and increased probability of bacteria entering the bloodstream [
28]. Besides, hyperglycemia provides support for the reproduction and spread of bacteria [
29,
30]. Therefore, clinically, hidden cases should be detected as early as possible through diabetes screening, and the blood sugar level of diabetic women and the indications of cesarean section should be strictly controlled to reduce the risk of infection [
31,
32].
Due to prolonged labor, stagnant active period of the parturient, vaginal delivery attempts was transferred to cesarean section [
33]. This study has found that vaginal delivery attempts is an important influencing factor of sepsis. This may be related to the fact that the vagina is connected to the outside world, and the resident bacteria are many and they are all conditional pathogens [
34]. The vaginal delivery attempts make the fetal head stagnant in the vagina, and the lower part of the uterus is compressed by the fetal head for a long time, resulting in poor tissue blood supply and higher probability of infection [
35,
36]. In addition, the process of vaginal trial of parturient is often mixed with excrement, and pathogenic bacteria are also easy to go up through the enlarged birth canal or into the blood through the incision of cesarean section [
37]. Therefore, attention should be paid to the evaluation of prenatal delivery factors, and painless delivery techniques (such as epidurals) should be developed to minimize repeated vaginal labor attempts.
Previous studies [
38,
39] have shown that the longer the catheter is indwelled, the higher the infection rate. We did not use catheters for all patients in this present study, only the patients have difficulty in urination for more than four hours got postoperative urinary tubes. Postoperative puerpera's vulva lochia and blood oozing from traumatic tissues increase the probability of contamination of the long-term indwelling catheter, which may enter the blood through urethral mucosal damage [
40,
41]. Therefore, the indwelling catheter must be strictly followed and evaluated for removal. Paraffin oil or progesterone can be used as a lubricant to reduce urethral damage and remove the catheter as soon as possible. Previous studies [
42,
43] have reported that the use of antibacterial drugs is an independent risk factor for patients with sepsis. Clinically, preventive medication has been given for repeated bleeding or premature rupture of membranes due to abnormal position of the placenta [
44]. For patients with repeated bleeding or premature rupture of membranes, the use of antibacterial drugs will be more challenging with regards to the flora disorder and poor specificity of bacteria in those conditions [
45]. Future research should further analyze the relationship between the use of antibiotics and the occurrence of sepsis.
A total of 39 strains of bacteria have been isolated in this study, mainly Gram-negative cocci, which is consistent with previous related literature reports. Streptococcus, a type of mucosal tissue symbiotic bacteria, mostly exists in the skin, mucous membranes, and female genitourinary tract. For example, Streptococcus pharyngitis is a normal genitourinary tract flora. Those with surgical trauma, diabetes, and immunocompromised are susceptible to infection and invasion [
46,
47]. Therefore, cephalosporins or quinolones can be empirically selected in clinical treatment, and the use of extended-spectrum antimicrobials should be avoided. If empirical treatment is ineffective for 72 h, pathogenic evidence should be actively sought, based on the results of pathogen isolation and identification and drug susceptibility testing, and adjust the antibacterial drug treatment plan timely [
48]. In view of the particularity of cesarean section, there are still some controversies about the application principles of preventive use of antibiotics in the perioperative period, such as the long-term effect of antibiotics on newborns, and for pregnant women with high-risk infection factors. The selection of narrow-spectrum or broad-spectrum antibiotics still need further research.
This study is a retrospective investigation and has some limitations. First of all, all data in this study are taken from archived medical records. Medical history data such as pregnancy and childbirth history, blood transfusion history, hospitalization history and other medical history data are provided by the parturient and cannot be fully checked for accuracy, and the investigator may have insufficiently comprehensive indicators included. Secondly, the sepsis cases in this present study are relatively small, even rough we have calculated the sample size that 32 cases are statistical power enough to detect the group differences, the results from more case number or from multi centers will be much more convincing with stronger evidences. Thirdly, the laboratory test data in this study have not involved the body's immune response, such as inflammatory factors, oxygen free radicals and other biochemical indicators, which play an important role in clarifying the mechanism of sepsis after caesarean section. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct more multi-center, multi-sample and more scientifically designed prospective studies in the future, to explore the influencing factors and related nursing strategies of sepsis after caesarean section.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.