skip to main content
10.1145/1180875.1180886acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Formalizing work: reallocating redundancy

Published:04 November 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reports from an introduction of the electronic patient record for nurses in a Norwegian hospital. In addition to establish electronic written accounts of nurses' reports, a major aim was to formalize nurses' work, related to handover conferences. Despite the projects proclaimed success, like reduced overtime, improved quality of the written documentation and eliminated redundancy, our analysis demonstrates an opposite effect. Formalizing the nursing handover and thus reduce redundancy, in fact resulted in a reintroduction of redundancy, although at another time and place. We found that work (and redundancy) in fact had moved, to another time (i), into different artifacts (ii), or old artifacts that now were used/annotated differently (iii).

References

  1. Allen, D. Re-reading nursing and re-writing practice: towards an empirically-based reformulation of the nursing mandate, Nursing Inquiry, Special Centenary Issue. 11(4):271--83. 2004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, P. Medical talk and medical work. Sage Publications Ltd. 1995Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, L., McGinnis, C. A computer generated shift report. Nursing Management. September 1994Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg, M. Accumulating and coordinating: occasions for information technologies in medical work. Computer Supported Cooperative work 8: 373--401. 1999 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Berg, M. and Timmermans, S. Orders and their others: on the constitution of universalities in medical work. Configurations 8, 31--61. 2000Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Berg, M., and Winthereik, B. Waiting for Godot: Episodes from the History of Patient Records. In Health Information Management: Integrating Information and Communication Technology in Health Care Work, edited by M. Berg. London: Routledge, 2004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bomba, D.T and Prakash, R. A description of handover processes in an Australian public hospital. Australian Health Review. February 2005. Vol 29. No1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bossen, C. The Parameters of Common Information Spaces: the Heterogeneity of Cooperative Work at a Hospital Ward. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 176--185. 2002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bowker, G. C. and Star, S. L. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT Press. 1999 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Cabitza, F., Sarini, M., Simone, C., Telaro, M. When once is not enough: the role of redundancy in a hospital ward setting. GROUP 2005: 158--167 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Chaiklin, S. Understanding the social scientific practice of Understanding practice. In Chaiklin, S., Lave, J. (Eds.) Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1996Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellingsen, G. and Monteiro, E. A patchwork planet: Integration and Cooperation in hospitals. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 12(1), 71--95. 2003 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Getty, M., Ryan, A.A. and Ekins, M.L.C. A comparative study of the attitudes of users and non-users towards computerized care planning, Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 8, 431--439. 1999Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Grimson, J., Grimson, W., Hasselbring, W. The SI Challenge in Health Care. Communications of the ACM. June 2000; Vol. 43, No.6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Grudin, J. Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers. Communications of the ACM 37(1): 93--105. 1994 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hanseth, O.and Monteiro, E. Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies. 7(4):183--211, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Hardey, M., Payne, S. and Coleman P.G. `Scraps': hidden nursing information and its influence on the delivery of care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000, 32, 208--214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Hartswood, M., Procter, R., Rouncefield, M., Slack, R., 2003. Making a Case in Medical Work: Implications for the Electronic Medical Record. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 12(3), 241--266. 2003 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Heath, C., and P. Luff. Collaboration and Control: Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1: 69--94. 1992Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Heath, C. and Luff, P. Documents and Professional Practice: 'Bad' Organizational Reasons for 'Good' Clinical Records. In: Olson, Gary M., Olson, Judith S., Ackerman, Mark (ed.): Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. November 16-20, 1996, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. p.354--363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hellesø, R. and Ruland, C.M. Developing a module for nursing documentation integrated in the electronic patient record, Journal of Clinical Nursing 2001; 10: 799--805.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hong, L.K., Duff, R.W. Modulated Participant-Observation: Managing the Dilemma of Distance in Field Research. Field Methods 14(2,):190--196. Sage Publications 2002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Hutchins, E. Cognition in the wild. MIT Press. 1994Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kassean, H. K., Jagoo, Z. B. Managing change in the nursing handover from traditional to bedside handover - a case study from Mauritius. BMC Nursing, Volume 4 (2005-02-11)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kerr, M.P. A qualitative study of shift handover practice and function from a socio-technical perspective, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(2), 125--135. 2002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Klein, H.K. and Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems, 1999. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kling, R. Cooperation, Coordination and Control in Computer Supported Work, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 83--88. 1991 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Lachmund, J. Making Sense of Sound: Auscultation and Lung Sound Codification in Nineteenth-Century French and German Medicine. Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol 24, No 4, pp. 419--450. 1999Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Law, J. Ladbroke Grove, or How to Think About Failing Systems. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, December, 2003 (Accessed online August 2006 at http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/law-ladbroke-grove-failing-systems.pdf)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, T.T. Nurses' concerns about using information systems: analysis of comments on a computerized nursing care plan system in Taiwan, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14, 344--353. 2005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Manias, E. and Street, A. The nursing handover: uncovering the hidden practices of nurses. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 16, 373--383. 2000Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Munkvold, G., Ellingsen, G. and Monteiro, E. From plans to planning: the case of nurse care plans. Proc. Continuity of care, HelsIT 2005, Trondheim Sept. 2005,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Olson, G.M., and J.S. Olson. The Effectiveness of Simple Shared Electronic Workspaces. In Groupware and Authoring, edited by R. Rada, 105--126. Academic press. 1996Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Olson, J.S., and S. Teasley, L. Covi, and G. Olson. The (Currently) Unique Advantage of Collocated Work. In Distributed Work, edited by P.J. Hinds and S. Kiesler, 113--135, The MIT 2002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Orlikowski, W.J., and C.S. Iacono. Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research -- A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact. Information Systems Research 12(2): 121--134. 2001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Orr, J. Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job, Cornell, CA: Cornell Univ. Press. 1996Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Sexton, A., Chan, C., Elliot, M., Stuart, J., Jayasuriya, R. and Crookes, P. Nursing handovers: do we really need them? Journal of Nursing Management, 2004, 12, 37--42. 2004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Suchman, L. Plans and Situated Action: The Problem of Human-Machine Communications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1987 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Tjora, A. Maintaining Redundancy in the Coordination of Medical Emergencies. CSCW'04, November 6-10, 2004, Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp. 132--141. 2004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Vikkelsø, S. Subtle Redistribution of Work, Attention and Risks: Electronic Patient Records and Organisational Consequences. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 2005, 17(1):3--30Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Walsham, G. Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method, 1995. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Winthereik, B. R. and Vikkelsø, S. ICT and Integrated Care: Some Dilemmas of Standardising Inter-Organisational Communication. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2005 vol. 14, pp. 43--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Formalizing work: reallocating redundancy

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CSCW '06: Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work
          November 2006
          548 pages
          ISBN:1595932496
          DOI:10.1145/1180875

          Copyright © 2006 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 November 2006

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CSCW '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader