Hao-Chuan Wang
Susan F. Fussell
Leslie D. Setlock
ABSTRACT
Supporting creativity via collaborative group brainstorming is a prevalent practice in organizations. Today's technology makes it easy for international and intercultural group members to brainstorm together remotely, but surprisingly little is known about how culture and medium shape the underlying brainstorming process. In a laboratory study, we examined the influences of individual cultural background (American versus Chinese), group cultural composition (same- versus mixed-culture groups), and communication medium (text-only versus video-enabled chatrooms) on group brainstorming conversations. Cultural differences and adaptation in conversational talkativeness and responsiveness were identified. The text-only medium reduced cultural differences in talkativeness. Working in a mixed-culture group led to cultural adaptation in the communication style of Chinese but not American participants. We discuss implications for international group brainstorming.
- Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357--376.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Blot, K. J., Zarate, M. A., Paulus, P. B. (2003). Code-switching across brainstorming sessions: implications for the revised hierarchical model of bilingual language processing. Experimental Psychology, 50(3), 171--183.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bond, M. H. (2003). Cross-cultural social psychology and the real world of culturally diverse teams and dyads. In D. Tjosvold,&K. Leung (Eds.). Cross-cultural management: Foundations and future. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Carletta, J., Isard, A., Isard, S., Kowtko, J. C., Doherty-Sneddon, G., Anderson, A. H. (1997). The reliability of a dialogue structure coding scheme. Computational Linguistics, 23, 13--31. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clark, H. H.,&Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine,&S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127--149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Cheng, C-Y., Lee, F.,&Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Assimilation and contrast effects in cultural frame switching: Bicultural identity integration and valence of cultural values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 742--760.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E.,&Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 12629-- 12633.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Connolly, T., Jessup, L. M., Valacich, J. S. (1988). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 689--703. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Connolly, T. (1993). Behavioral decision theory and group support systems. (pp.270--280). In L. Jessup&J. Valacich (Eds.). Group support systems. NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Daft, R. L.,&Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirement, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32. 554--571. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dennis, A. R.,&Valacich, J. S. (1999). Rethinking media richness: Toward a theory of media synchronicity. Proceedings of HICSS 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Diamant, E. I., Fussell, S. R.&Lo, F-L. (in press). "Where did we turn wrong?" Unpacking the effects of culture and technology on attributions of team performance. Proceedings of CSCW 2008. NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Diehl, M.,&Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497--509.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diehl, M.,&Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392--403.Google ScholarCross Ref
- DiMicco, J. M., Pandolfo, A.,&Bender, W. (2004). Influencing group participation with a shared display. Proceedings of CSCW'04. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dugosh, K. L.,&Paulus, P. B. (2005). Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 313--320.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gallupe, R. B., Dennis, A. R., Cooper, W. H., Valacich, J. S., Bastianutti, L. M.m&Nunamaker, J F. (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 350--369.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Geen, R. G. (1991). Social motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 377--399.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Giles, H., Coupland, J.,&Coupland, N. (1991). Contexts of Accommodation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gudykunst, W. B., Matusmoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K.,&Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self-construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 510--543.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hall, E. (1976). Beyond Culture. New York, NY: Doubleday/Anchor Books.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (1983). Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In J. Deregowski, S. Dzuirawiec&R. Annis (Eds.), Explications in Cross-Cultural Psychology.Google Scholar
- Hong, Y., Morris, M., Chiu, C.,&Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologists, 55, 709--720.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jackson, M. H.,&Poole, M. S. (2003). Idea generation in naturally occurring contexts: complex appropriation of a simple group procedure. Human Communication Research, 29, 560--591.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A.,&Livi, S. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 126--137.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kerr, D. S.,&Murthy, U. S. (2004). Divergent and convergent idea generation in teams: A comparison of computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 381--399.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leshed, G., Hancock, J.T., Cosley, D., McLeod, P.L.,&Gay, G. (2007). Feedback for Guiding Reflection on Teamwork Practices. Proceedings of Group'07. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Levine, J. M.,&Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585--634.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Li, H. Z., (1999). Grounding and information communication in intercultural and intracultural dyadic discourse. Discourse Processes, 28, 195--215.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Littell, R., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W.,&Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
- Masuda, T.,&Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922--934.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Masuda, T., Ellsworth, P. C., Mesquita, B., Leu, J., Tanida, S.,&van de Veerdonk, E. (2008). Placing the face in context: Cultural differences in the perception of facial emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 365--381.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nemeth, C. J., Personnaz, B., Personnaz, M.,&Goncalo, J. (2004). The liberating role of conflict in group creativity: A study in two countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 365--374.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nijstad, B. A.,&Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: a cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186--213.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291--310.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
- Paulus, P.B. Larey, T.S., Putman, V.L., Legget, K. L.,&Roland, E. J. (1996). Social influence processes in computer brainstorming, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 3--14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Setlock, L. D., Fussell, S. R.,&Neuwirth. C. (2004). Taking it out of context: collaborating within and across cultures in face-to-face settings and via instant messaging. Proceedings of CSCW 2004 (pp. 604--613), NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Setlock, L. D., Fussell, S. R.,&Shih, Y. Y. (2006). Effects of culture, language and communication medium on conversational grounding. Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
- Setlock, L. D., Quinones, P. A.,&Fussell, S. R. (2007). Does culture interact with media richness? The effects of audio vs. video conferencing on Chinese and American dyads. Proceedings of HICSS 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Short, J. A., Williams, E.,&Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Spears, R., Lea, M.&Postmes, T. (2001) Social psychological theories of computer-mediated communication: Social pain or social gain. In W. P. Robinson and H. Giles (Eds.) The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology (pp. 601--623). Chichester: John Wiley&Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
- Sproull, L.,&Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic main in organizational communications. Management Science, 32, 1492--1512. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
- Veinott, E., Olson, J., Olson, G.,&Fu, X. (1999). Video helps remote work: Speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other. In Proceedings of CHI 1999 (pp. 302--309). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Cultural difference and adaptation of communication styles in computer-mediated group brainstorming
Recommendations
Groups in groups: conversational similarity in online multicultural multiparty brainstorming
CSCW '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative workOnline collaboration, in comparison to face-to-face collaboration, is advantageous in making multiparty teamwork possible at a very low cost. As multicultural multiparty collaboration becomes ubiquitous, it is crucial to understand how communication ...
From diversity to creativity: stimulating group brainstorming with cultural differences and conversationally-retrieved pictures
CSCW '11: Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative workGroup brainstorming, or collaboratively generating ideas through idea sharing, demands diverse contributions to spark more ideas and improve creativity. One approach to supporting group brainstorming is to introduce conceptual diversity. In this study, ...
Cultural adaptation of conversational style in intercultural computer-mediated group brainstorming
IWIC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 international workshop on Intercultural collaborationThe ubiquity of international and intercultural collaboration over computer-mediated communication (CMC) raises questions about how culture, group cultural composition and medium influence communication. We conducted a laboratory study investigating the ...
Comments