skip to main content
10.1145/1718918.1718925acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social language network analysis

Published:06 February 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this note we introduce a new methodology that combines tools from social language processing and network analysis to identify socially situated relationships between individuals, even when these relationships are latent or unrecognized. We call this approach social language network analysis (SLNA). We describe the philosophical antecedents of SLNA, the mechanics of preprocessing, processing, and post-processing stages, and the results of applying this approach to a 15-month corporate discussion archive. These example results include an explicit mapping of both the perceived expertise hierarchy and the social support / friendship network within this group.

References

  1. Baldwin, T.T., Bedell, M.D., and Johnson, J.L., The Social Fabric of a Team-Based M.B.A. Program, Acad. of Management Journal, 40, 6 (1997), pp. 1369--1397.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Borgatti, S.P. and Cross, R., A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks, Management Science, 49, 4 (2003), pp. 432--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chung, C.K. and Pennebaker, J.W., The psychological function of function words. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication: Frontiers of social psychology, Psychology Press (2007), pp. 343--359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hansen, M.T., Knowledge Networks, Organization Science, 13, 3 (2002), pp. 232--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hossain, L., Wu, A., and Chung, K.K.S, Actor Centrality Correlates to Project Based Coordination, Proc. CSCW'06, ACM Press (2006), pp. 363--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ibarra, H. and Andrews, S. B., Power, Social Influence, and Sense Making, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (1993), pp. 277--303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Issacs, E., Walendowski, A., Whittaker, S., Schiano, D.J., and Kamm, C., The Character, Functions, and Styles of Instant Messaging in the Workplace, Proc. CSCW'02, ACM Press (2002), pp. 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Julsrud, T.E, Core/periphery Structures and Trust in Distributed Work Groups, Structure and Dynamics, 2, 2 (2007) pp. 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kacewicz, E., Pennebaker, J.W., Davis, M., Jeon, M., and Graesser, A.C. (under review). The language of status hierarchies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lave, J. and Wagner, E., Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge Press (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Milroy, L. and Milroy, J., Social network and social class: towards an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society, 21, 1 (1992), pp. 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mutton, P., Inferring and Visualizing Social Networks on Internet Relay Chat, IV 2004, (2004), pp. 35--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Newman, M.L., Pennebaker, J.W., Berry, D.S., and Richards, J.M., Lying words, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (2003), pp. 665--675.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Paollilo, J.C., Language variation on Internet Relay Chat: A social network approach, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5, 2 (2001), pp.180--213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Pennebaker, J.W., Mehl, M.R., and Niederhoffer, K., Psychological aspects of natural language use, Annual Review of Psychology, 54 (2003), pp. 547--577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Pentland, A. Honest Signals, MIT Press (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sexton, J.B. and Helmreich, R.L., Analyzing cockpit communications, Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 5, 1 (2000), pp. 63--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Slatcher, R.B. and Pennebaker, J.W., How do I love thee? Psychological Science, 17 (2006), pp. 660--664.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Sparrowe, R.T., Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., and Kraimer, M.L., Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 2 (2001), pp. 316--325.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tichy, N.M., Tushman, M.L., Fombrun, C., Social Network Analysis for Organizations, The Academy of Management Review, 4, 4 (1979), pp. 507--519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Tyler, J., Wilkinson, D., and Huberman, B., Email as Spectroscopy, (2003), http://www.hpl.hp.com/shl/papers/email/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Weick, K.E., Sensemaking in organizations, Sage Publications (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. White, S. and Smyth, P., Algorithms For Estimating Relative Importance In Networks, KDD '03, ACM Press (2003), pp. 266--275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Social language network analysis

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
      February 2010
      468 pages
      ISBN:9781605587950
      DOI:10.1145/1718918

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 February 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader