skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753453acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The influence of implicit and explicit biofeedback in first-person shooter games

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

To understand how implicit and explicit biofeedback work in games, we developed a first-person shooter (FPS) game to experiment with different biofeedback techniques. While this area has seen plenty of discussion, there is little rigorous experimentation addressing how biofeedback can enhance human-computer interaction. In our two-part study, (N=36) subjects first played eight different game stages with two implicit biofeedback conditions, with two simulation-based comparison and repetition rounds, then repeated the two biofeedback stages when given explicit information on the biofeedback. The biofeedback conditions were respiration and skin-conductance (EDA) adaptations. Adaptation targets were four balanced player avatar attributes. We collected data with psycho¬physiological measures (electromyography, respiration, and EDA), a game experience questionnaire, and game-play measures.

According to our experiment, implicit biofeedback does not produce significant effects in player experience in an FPS game. In the explicit biofeedback conditions, players were more immersed and positively affected, and they were able to manipulate the game play with the biosignal interface. We recommend exploring the possibilities of using explicit biofeedback interaction in commercial games.

References

  1. Bersak, D., McDarby, G., Augenblick, N., McDarby, P., McDonnell, D., McDonald, B., and Karkun, R. (2001). Intelligent Biofeedback Using an Immersive Competitive Environment. Designing Ubiquitous Computing Games Workshop at UbiComp 2001, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Björk, S. and Holopainen, J. (2004). Patterns in Game Design. Hingham, Mass., USA: Charles River Media. 423 p. ISBN: 9781584503545.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dekker, A. and Champion, E. (2007). Please Biofeed the Zombies: Enhancing the Gameplay and Display of a Horror Game Using Biofeedback. In: Proceedings of DiGRA 2007: Situated Play, September 24-28, 2007, Tokyo, Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Fairclough, S.H. (2007). Psychophysiological Inference and Physiological Computer Games. Brainplay '07: Brain-Computer Interfaces and Games. Advances in Computer Entertainment, Salzburg, Austria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Freeman, D. (2004). Creating Emotion in Games: The Craft and Art of Emotioneering. USA: New Riders. 539 p. ISBN: 1-5927-3007-8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gilleade, K.M., Dix, A., and Allanson, J. (2005). Affective Videogames and Modes of Affective Gaming: Assist Me, Challenge Me, Emote Me. Proceedings of DiGRA 2005: Changing Views -- Worlds in Play, June 16-20, 2005, Vancouver, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Grodal, T. (2000). Video Games and the Pleasures of Control. In: D. Zillmann and P. Vorderer (eds.), Media Entertainment: The Psychology of Its Appeal (pp. 197--212). Mahwah, New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hefner, D., Klimmt, C., and Vorderer, P. (2007). Identification with the Player Character As Determinant of Video Game Enjoyment. In: L. Ma, R. Nakatsu, & M. Rauterberg (eds.), International Conference on Entertainment Computing 2007 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4740, pp. 39--48). Berlin: Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kim, J. and André, E. (2008). Four-Channel Biosignal Analysis and Feature Extraction for Automatic Emotion Recognition. In: Proceedings of BIOSTEC 2008, A. Fred, J. Filipe, & H. Gamboa (eds.). CCIS 25, pp. 265--277, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lang, P.J. (1995). The Emotion Probe. Studies of Motivation and Attention. American Psychologist, 50, 372--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lindley, C. and Sennersten, C. (2008). Game Play Schemas: From Player Analysis to Adaptive Game Mechanics. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, 2008, Article ID 216784. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Picard, R.W., Vyzas, E., and Healey, J. (2001). Toward Machine Emotional Intelligence: Analysis of Affective Physiological State. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23, 10, 1175--1191. ISSN: 0162-8828. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Laarni, J., Kallinen, K., Salminen, M., Holopainen, J., and Järvinen, A. (2005). The Psychophysiology of Video Gaming: Phasic Emotional Responses to Game Events. In: Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views -- Worlds in Play, Vancouver, Canada. June 16-20, 2005, pp. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Scherer, K.R. (1993). Neuroscience Projections to Current Debates in Emotion Psychology. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 1--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Tijs, T.J., Brokken, D., and Ijsselsteijn, W.A. (2008). Dynamic Game Balancing by Recognizing Affect. Fun and Games 2008 Conference. Eindhoven, Netherlands. October 20--21, 2008, pp. 88--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Vorderer, P., Hartmann, T., and Klimmt, C. (2003). Explaining the Enjoyment of Playing Video Games: The Role of Competition. In: D. Marinelli (ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Entertainment Computing (ICEC 2003) (pp. 1--8). Pittsburgh, Penn., & New York, New York, USA: ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The influence of implicit and explicit biofeedback in first-person shooter games

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2010
        2690 pages
        ISBN:9781605589299
        DOI:10.1145/1753326

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 April 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader