Tim Merritt
Kevin McGee
ABSTRACT
Although there has been research suggesting that people will treat computers socially and even consider computers as team-mates, there does not seem to have been any research looking specifically at how the perception of team-mate identity affects game enjoyment and team-mate preference in real-time cooperative games. In order to study this question, a quantitative study was conducted in which 40 participants played a real-time, goal-oriented, cooperative game. During the study, all participants played the game twice: once with an AI team-mate and once with a "presumed" human team-mate (i.e., an AI team-mate that they believed was a human team-mate). Thus, the team-mate performance and behaviors were essentially the same for both conditions. Participants in the study showed a much higher preference for the "presumed" human team-mate, indicating significantly higher levels of enjoyment and cooperation during the game sessions with that team-mate. The results suggests that perceived identity is a strong moderator of game enjoyment.
- A. T. Abraham and K. McGee. AI for dynamic team-mate adaptation in games. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, pages 419--426, Aug. 2010.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- B. Bostan. Player motivations: A psychological perspective. Comput. Entertain., 7, June 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. S. Carter, I. I. Lederhendler, and B. Kirkpatrick. Integrative Neurobiology of Affiliation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 1997.Google Scholar
- M. Chen. Communication, Coordination, and Camaraderie in World of Warcraft. Games and Culture, 4(1):47--73, January 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. M. Doherty. Human-centered design in synthetic teammates for aviation: The challenge for artificial intelligence. In I. Russell and S. M. Haller, editors, Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, May 12--14, 2003, St. Augustine, Florida, USA, pages 54--56. AAAI Press, 2003.Google Scholar
- S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, and G. Lindzey. Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th Edition, Volume One. Wiley, 5 edition, February 2010.Google Scholar
- F. Försterling. Attribution: An Introduction to Theories, Research and Applications. Psychology Press, 1 edition, Aug. 2001.Google Scholar
- B. Gajadhar, Y. de Kort, and W. IJsselsteijn. Influence of social setting on player experience of digital games. In CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, CHI EA '08, pages 3099--3104, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Hartmann and P. Vorderer. It's Okay to Shoot a Character: Moral Disengagement in Violent Video Games. Journal of Communication, 60(1):94--119, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Hayes, A. Ulinski, and L. Hodges. That Avatar Is Looking at Me! Social Inhibition in Virtual Worlds. In J. Allbeck, N. Badler, T. Bickmore, C. Pelachaud, and A. Safonova, editors, Intelligent Virtual Agents, volume 6356 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, chapter 49, pages 454--467. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Johnson and J. Gardner. The media equation and team formation: Further evidence for experience as a moderator. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(2):111--124, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Li, R. Halterman, M. Cason, G. Knight, and J. Maner. The stress-affiliation paradigm revisited: Do people prefer the kindness of strangers or their attractiveness? Personality and Individual Differences, 44(2):382--391, January 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Lim and B. Reeves. Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(1--2):57--68, January 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. L. Mandryk, K. M. Inkpen, and T. W. Calvert. Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2):141--158, April 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. McGee and A. T. Abraham. Real-time team-mate AI in games: a definition, survey, & critique. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, FDG '10, pages 124--131, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. R. Merritt, K. B. Tan, C. Ong, A. Thomas, T. L. Chuah, and K. McGee. Are artificial team-mates scapegoats in computer games. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, CSCW '11, pages 685--688, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Nass, B. Fogg, and Y. Moon. How Powerful Is Social Identity? Affiliation Effects in Human-Computer Interaction. Stanford University Communications Department, Stanford April, 23:1995, 1995.Google Scholar
- C. Nass, B. J. Fogg, and Y. Moon. Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(6):669--678, December 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Ravaja, T. Saari, M. Turpeinen, J. Laarni, M. Salminen, and M. Kivikangas. Spatial Presence and Emotions during Video Game Playing: Does It Matter with Whom You Play? Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ., 15:381--392, August 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Reeves and C. Nass. The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. L. Sherry, K. Lucas, B. S. Greenberg, and K. Lachlan. Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preferences. In P. Vorderer and J. Bryant, editors, Playing video games Motives responses and consequences, pages 213--224. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006.Google Scholar
- S. S. Sundar. Loyalty to Computer Terminals: Is it Anthropomorphism or Consistency? Behaviour and Information Technology, 23(2):107--118, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Van Diggelen, T. Muller, and K. Van Den Bosch. Using artificial team members for team training in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent virtual agents, IVA'10, pages 28--34, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Weibel, B. Wissmath, S. Habegger, Y. Steiner, and R. Groner. Playing online games against computer- vs. human-controlled opponents: Effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5):2274--2291, September 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Weiner. Human Motivation: Metaphors, Theories, and Research. Sage Publications, Inc, 2nd revised edition edition, Mar. 1992.Google Scholar
- R. S. Weiss. A Taxonomy of Relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(5):671--683, October 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Williams. Aggression, competition and computer games: computer and human opponents. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5):495--506, Sept. 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Choosing human team-mates: perceived identity as a moderator of player preference and enjoyment
Recommendations
Protecting artificial team-mates: more seems like less
CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsPrevious research on conversational, competitive, and cooperative systems suggests that people respond differently to humans and AI agents in terms of perception and evaluation of observed team-mate behavior. However, there has not been research ...
Are artificial team-mates scapegoats in computer games
CSCW '11: Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative workIn cooperative games that involve team-mates that are controlled by either a computer or another human player, is there a difference in how humans assign credit or blame? There has been some related work on computers as team-mates and credit/blame ...
Did you notice? artificial team-mates take risks for players
IVA'11: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent virtual agentsArtificial agents are increasingly included in digital games, often taking on a role as a team-mate with human players. An interesting area of focus is the differences in player responses to teammates that are either controlled by another human or a ...
Comments